Re: [3/4] gdiplus: Add some tests for GdipGetPropertyItemSize and GdipGetPropertyItem.

2012-07-25 Thread Marvin
Hi,

While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://winetestbot.dolphin/JobDetails.pl?Key=100

Your paranoid android.


=== debiantesting (build) ===
Patch failed to apply




Re: [3/4] gdiplus: Add some tests for GdipGetPropertyItemSize and GdipGetPropertyItem. Take 2.

2012-07-25 Thread Marvin
Hi,

While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://winetestbot.dolphin/JobDetails.pl?Key=158

Your paranoid android.


=== debiantesting (build) ===
Patch failed to apply




Re: [3/4] gdiplus: Add some tests for GdipGetPropertyItemSize and GdipGetPropertyItem. Take 2.

2012-07-04 Thread Marvin
Hi,

While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19764

Your paranoid android.


=== WINEBUILD (build) ===
Patch failed to apply




Re: [3/4] gdiplus: Add some tests for GdipGetPropertyItemSize and GdipGetPropertyItem. Take 2.

2012-07-04 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
Marvin test...@testbot.winehq.org wrote:

 === WINEBUILD (build) ===
 Patch failed to apply

Either the testbot needs to reset its incoming queue once a day, or mail
delivery problems for patch batches in winehq should be fixed.

-- 
Dmitry.




Re: [3/4] gdiplus: Add some tests for GdipGetPropertyItemSize and GdipGetPropertyItem.

2012-06-27 Thread Marvin
Hi,

While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19594

Your paranoid android.


=== W7PROX64 (64 bit image) ===
image.c:2811: Test failed:  0: expected property size 17 or 36, got 44
image.c:2811: Test failed:  2: expected property size 144 or 0, got 152
image.c:2811: Test failed:  3: expected property size 20 or 0, got 28

=== TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit image) ===
image.c:2811: Test failed:  0: expected property size 17 or 36, got 44
image.c:2811: Test failed:  2: expected property size 144 or 0, got 152
image.c:2811: Test failed:  3: expected property size 20 or 0, got 28




Re: [3/4] gdiplus: Add some tests for GdipGetPropertyItemSize and GdipGetPropertyItem.

2012-06-27 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
Marvin test...@testbot.winehq.org wrote:

 === W7PROX64 (64 bit image) ===
 image.c:2811: Test failed:  0: expected property size 17 or 36, got 44
 image.c:2811: Test failed:  2: expected property size 144 or 0, got 152
 image.c:2811: Test failed:  3: expected property size 20 or 0, got 28
 
 === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit image) ===
 image.c:2811: Test failed:  0: expected property size 17 or 36, got 44
 image.c:2811: Test failed:  2: expected property size 144 or 0, got 152
 image.c:2811: Test failed:  3: expected property size 20 or 0, got 28

Looks like testbot picked up wrong e-mail sequence. It looks like an e-mail
delivery problem in the mailing list software, and it is getting pretty
annoying.

-- 
Dmitry.




Re: [3/4] gdiplus: Add some tests for GdipGetPropertyItemSize and GdipGetPropertyItem.

2012-06-27 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
Dmitry Timoshkov dmi...@baikal.ru wrote:

 Marvin test...@testbot.winehq.org wrote:
 
  === W7PROX64 (64 bit image) ===
  image.c:2811: Test failed:  0: expected property size 17 or 36, got 44
  image.c:2811: Test failed:  2: expected property size 144 or 0, got 152
  image.c:2811: Test failed:  3: expected property size 20 or 0, got 28
  
  === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit image) ===
  image.c:2811: Test failed:  0: expected property size 17 or 36, got 44
  image.c:2811: Test failed:  2: expected property size 144 or 0, got 152
  image.c:2811: Test failed:  3: expected property size 20 or 0, got 28
 
 Looks like testbot picked up wrong e-mail sequence. It looks like an e-mail
 delivery problem in the mailing list software, and it is getting pretty
 annoying.

Just in case sent precompiled version of the tests to testbot once again,
and they passed: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19596

-- 
Dmitry.




Re: [3/4] gdiplus: Add some tests for GdipGetPropertyItemSize and GdipGetPropertyItem.

2012-06-27 Thread Ben Peddell
On 27/06/2012 7:35 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
 Marvin test...@testbot.winehq.org wrote:
 
 === W7PROX64 (64 bit image) ===
 image.c:2811: Test failed:  0: expected property size 17 or 36, got 44
 image.c:2811: Test failed:  2: expected property size 144 or 0, got 152
 image.c:2811: Test failed:  3: expected property size 20 or 0, got 28

 === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit image) ===
 image.c:2811: Test failed:  0: expected property size 17 or 36, got 44
 image.c:2811: Test failed:  2: expected property size 144 or 0, got 152
 image.c:2811: Test failed:  3: expected property size 20 or 0, got 28
 
 Looks like testbot picked up wrong e-mail sequence. It looks like an e-mail
 delivery problem in the mailing list software, and it is getting pretty
 annoying.
 

The winehq.org mailserver only allows one SMTP connection per relaying
IP, so emails sent at the same time are likely to be received out of
order unless the relaying mailserver only transfers emails sequentially.

-- 
Ben Peddell
IT Support Bowen, Collinsville and Proserpine Catholic schools
http://klightspeed.killerwolves.net/





Re: [3/4] gdiplus: Add some tests for GdipGetPropertyItemSize and GdipGetPropertyItem.

2012-06-27 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
Ben Peddell klightsp...@netspace.net.au wrote:

  Looks like testbot picked up wrong e-mail sequence. It looks like an e-mail
  delivery problem in the mailing list software, and it is getting pretty
  annoying.
  
 
 The winehq.org mailserver only allows one SMTP connection per relaying
 IP, so emails sent at the same time are likely to be received out of
 order unless the relaying mailserver only transfers emails sequentially.

It doesn't explain the lost of some e-mails. For instance patch tracker
may see 2 of 5 patches while http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches
lists 3 of 5.

-- 
Dmitry.