Hi Dan,
2008/7/23 Dan Hipschman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This isn't the most efficient implementation, but it works, and it should
not be difficult to tweak. Hence, I'd rather get this version in and add
the optimizations one at a time, in little patches. Get it working first...
Yes, I think you're right. I don't think it will be too hard to change
the architecture of this to that of my suggestions.
However, I have one minor nit.
+static void WINAPI timer_queue_thread_proc(LPVOID p)
+{
+struct timer_queue *q = p;
+ULONG timeout_ms;
+BOOL done;
+
+timeout_ms = INFINITE;
+while (!q-quit)
+{
+LARGE_INTEGER timeout;
+DWORD ret = NtWaitForSingleObject(q-event, FALSE,
+ get_nt_timeout(timeout,
timeout_ms));
This should be NTSTATUS.
+
+if (ret == STATUS_TIMEOUT)
+queue_timer_expire_next(q);
+
+RtlEnterCriticalSection(q-cs);
+timeout_ms = timer_queue_update(q);
+RtlLeaveCriticalSection(q-cs);
+}
--
Rob Shearman
