Re: [3/5] urlmon: Implemented canonicalization for ports in URIs

2010-07-28 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Thomas Mullaly thomas.mull...@gmail.com writes:

 ---
  dlls/urlmon/uri.c |   88
 +++-
  1 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

It doesn't work here:

../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M urlmon.dll -T ../../.. -p 
urlmon_test.exe.so uri.c  touch uri.ok
uri.c:2788: Test failed: Error: Expected a length of 0 but got -2 on 
uri_tests[13].str_props[6].
make: *** [uri.ok] Error 1

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org




Re: [3/5] urlmon: Implemented canonicalization for ports in URIs

2010-07-28 Thread Thomas Mullaly
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.orgwrote:

 Thomas Mullaly thomas.mull...@gmail.com writes:

  ---
   dlls/urlmon/uri.c |   88
  +++-
   1 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

 It doesn't work here:

 ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M urlmon.dll -T ../../.. -p
 urlmon_test.exe.so uri.c  touch uri.ok
 uri.c:2788: Test failed: Error: Expected a length of 0 but got -2 on
 uri_tests[13].str_props[6].
 make: *** [uri.ok] Error 1


Hmm... that's weird. The patch didn't change any of the test cases nor did
it even change any of the implementations that it's now failing on.

I would like to ask if you could ignore the whole patch set until I figure
out what's going on, since the bug might have been introduced earlier in the
set. Thanks.

-- 
Thomas Mullaly
thomas.mull...@gmail.com