Re: [AppDB] - user class cleanup and implement user class unit test

2006-06-26 Thread Chris Morgan
On Monday 26 June 2006 6:06 pm, Jonathan Ernst wrote:
> Le lundi 26 juin 2006 à 15:33 -0400, Chris Morgan a écrit :
> [...]
>
> > Comments?  Questions?
>
> Index: index.php
> ===
> RCS file: /opt/cvs-commit/appdb/index.php,v
> retrieving revision 1.33
> diff -u -r1.33 index.php
> --- index.php   21 Jun 2006 01:04:12 -  1.33
> +++ index.php   26 Jun 2006 19:26:39 -
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>   * application environment
>   */
>  include("path.php");
> -require(BASE."include/incl.php");
> +require_once(BASE."include/incl.php");
>
> Why use require_once ? It is slower and is bad unless you intend to
> include index.php in another file where incl.php is also included...
>

I can't recall why anymore.  I've reverted this change and everything still 
seems to work.


>
> Index: include/image.php
> ===
> RCS file: /opt/cvs-commit/appdb/include/image.php,v
> retrieving revision 1.5
> diff -u -r1.5 image.php
> --- include/image.php   21 Sep 2005 14:16:40 -  1.5
> +++ include/image.php   26 Jun 2006 19:26:40 -
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
>  /* image and image_resource classes  */
>  /*/
>
> +include_once(BASE."include/incl.php");
> +
>
> This time you use include once, we should use require everywhere if
> incl.php is required (and including a file in another include is not so
> pretty IMHO).
>

Reverted this change too since I can't recall why I made this change either.



>
>
> +/* NOTE: we can't update the users password like we can update
> other */
> +/* fields such as their email or username because the password is
> hashed */
> +/* in the database so we can't keep the users password in a class
> member variable */
> +/* and use update() because we can't check if the password changed
> without hashing */
> +/* the newly supplied one */
> +function update_password($sPassword)
>
>
> Should updatePassword according to our coding standards (method names).

Updated.

Chris




Re: [AppDB] - user class cleanup and implement user class unit test

2006-06-26 Thread Jonathan Ernst
Le lundi 26 juin 2006 à 15:33 -0400, Chris Morgan a écrit :
[...]
> Comments?  Questions?
> 


Index: index.php
===
RCS file: /opt/cvs-commit/appdb/index.php,v
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -r1.33 index.php
--- index.php   21 Jun 2006 01:04:12 -  1.33
+++ index.php   26 Jun 2006 19:26:39 -
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
  * application environment
  */ 
 include("path.php");
-require(BASE."include/incl.php");
+require_once(BASE."include/incl.php");

Why use require_once ? It is slower and is bad unless you intend to
include index.php in another file where incl.php is also included...


Index: include/image.php
===
RCS file: /opt/cvs-commit/appdb/include/image.php,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5 image.php
--- include/image.php   21 Sep 2005 14:16:40 -  1.5
+++ include/image.php   26 Jun 2006 19:26:40 -
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
 /* image and image_resource classes  */
 /*/
 
+include_once(BASE."include/incl.php");
+

This time you use include once, we should use require everywhere if
incl.php is required (and including a file in another include is not so
pretty IMHO).



+/* NOTE: we can't update the users password like we can update
other */
+/* fields such as their email or username because the password is
hashed */
+/* in the database so we can't keep the users password in a class
member variable */
+/* and use update() because we can't check if the password changed
without hashing */
+/* the newly supplied one */
+function update_password($sPassword)


Should updatePassword according to our coding standards (method names).




signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée