Re: [AppDB] Entry for Everquest 2

2009-03-19 Thread John Beaulieu
Ricardo Filipe ricardojdfilipe at gmail.com writes:

 as i said before, it was an uninformed decision, and yes, not enough time was
left for feedback from the maintainers.we thought that appdb WOULD save all the
data when moving, not only tests. it serves as example for us for the future,
unfortunatly with problems to the EQ2 users. as i said before, sorry for that.
at least it serves to not repeat the mistake, we hope you understand.a super
maintainer would not be able to move the data to the new application, only 
appdb
admins have that power.votes cannot be restored automatically, people will have
to vote on the new page.bug links are manually recoverable, searching bugzilla
and linking should be easy, i can do that if you feel you don't have time to.


Mistakes happen, and I apologize for the irritated undertones of my messages. In
the end it was the right thing to do anyways. Any help anybody could provide on
tracking down and linking bugs is much appreciated. I'll try and do what I can
as time permits. Thanks again for the explanation and the help. :)







Re: [AppDB] Entry for Everquest 2

2009-03-19 Thread IneedAname
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:58:00 +
Ricardo Filipe ricardojdfil...@gmail.com wrote:

 bug links are manually recoverable, searching bugzilla and linking should be
 easy, i can do that if you feel you don't have time to.

You can find a copy of wine appdb here http://ftp.winehq.org/pub/wine/
So someone may have a old copy of the data base.




Re: [AppDB] Entry for Everquest 2

2009-03-18 Thread John Beaulieu
Ben Klein shacklein at gmail.com writes:

 
 I just noticed that the entry for Everquest II, the sequel to
 Everquest, is listed as version 2 under Everquest in AppDB. This
 is incorrect, as the sequel is not a new version of the original game,
 it is a new game. Can someone help me fix it? I'd delete the version
 but there's quite a bit of test data there.
 
 I've CC'd the version maintainers.
 
 


I understand why this was fixed, but the method and timing were bad. When
EverQuest II was removed as a version of EverQuest and moved to it's own appdb
entry in response to this message the only thing preserved was the test data.
The votes for the application, the comments (with much needed info), maintainer
notes (including howtos), and even the maintainers were removed. None of the
bugs reported for Everquest 2 that were linked to the app are linked anymore and
do not appear on the new appdb page. After being forced to re-apply to be a
maintainer once again and doing a lot of searching through cached google pages I
was able to restore some of the lost info. Is there a way to link the bugs to
the appdb entry or not? Can the votes for the application be restored? Why wasnt
this left to a super maintainer to correct instead? Why wasnt enough time
allowed for input before an arbitrary change was made?





Re: [AppDB] Entry for Everquest 2

2009-03-18 Thread Ricardo Filipe
as i said before, it was an uninformed decision, and yes, not enough time
was left for feedback from the maintainers.
we thought that appdb WOULD save all the data when moving, not only tests.
it serves as example for us for the future, unfortunatly with problems to
the EQ2 users. as i said before, sorry for that. at least it serves to not
repeat the mistake, we hope you understand.

a super maintainer would not be able to move the data to the new
application, only appdb admins have that power.

votes cannot be restored automatically, people will have to vote on the new
page.
bug links are manually recoverable, searching bugzilla and linking should be
easy, i can do that if you feel you don't have time to.

2009/3/18 John Beaulieu john.beaul...@comcast.net

 Ben Klein shacklein at gmail.com writes:

 
  I just noticed that the entry for Everquest II, the sequel to
  Everquest, is listed as version 2 under Everquest in AppDB. This
  is incorrect, as the sequel is not a new version of the original game,
  it is a new game. Can someone help me fix it? I'd delete the version
  but there's quite a bit of test data there.
 
  I've CC'd the version maintainers.
 
 


 I understand why this was fixed, but the method and timing were bad. When
 EverQuest II was removed as a version of EverQuest and moved to it's own
 appdb
 entry in response to this message the only thing preserved was the test
 data.
 The votes for the application, the comments (with much needed info),
 maintainer
 notes (including howtos), and even the maintainers were removed. None of
 the
 bugs reported for Everquest 2 that were linked to the app are linked
 anymore and
 do not appear on the new appdb page. After being forced to re-apply to be a
 maintainer once again and doing a lot of searching through cached google
 pages I
 was able to restore some of the lost info. Is there a way to link the bugs
 to
 the appdb entry or not? Can the votes for the application be restored? Why
 wasnt
 this left to a super maintainer to correct instead? Why wasnt enough time
 allowed for input before an arbitrary change was made?







Re: [AppDB] Entry for Everquest 2

2009-03-15 Thread John Beaulieu
This is really nitpicking isn't it? 

On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 12:02 +1100, Ben Klein wrote:
 I just noticed that the entry for Everquest II, the sequel to
 Everquest, is listed as version 2 under Everquest in AppDB. This
 is incorrect, as the sequel is not a new version of the original game,
 it is a new game. Can someone help me fix it? I'd delete the version
 but there's quite a bit of test data there.
 
 I've CC'd the version maintainers.





Re: [AppDB] Entry for Everquest 2

2009-03-15 Thread Ricardo Filipe
not really... it's a completly new game. i'll see if i can do something...

2009/3/15 John Beaulieu john.beaul...@comcast.net

 This is really nitpicking isn't it?

 On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 12:02 +1100, Ben Klein wrote:
  I just noticed that the entry for Everquest II, the sequel to
  Everquest, is listed as version 2 under Everquest in AppDB. This
  is incorrect, as the sequel is not a new version of the original game,
  it is a new game. Can someone help me fix it? I'd delete the version
  but there's quite a bit of test data there.
 
  I've CC'd the version maintainers.







Re: [AppDB] Entry for Everquest 2

2009-03-15 Thread Ricardo Filipe
done. i've created a new application and moved test data there. unfortunatly
appdb doesn't move comments so those are lost :(

i wait for the EQ maintainers to step up for EQ2 :P
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=applicationiId=9400

2009/3/15 Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com

 I just noticed that the entry for Everquest II, the sequel to
 Everquest, is listed as version 2 under Everquest in AppDB. This
 is incorrect, as the sequel is not a new version of the original game,
 it is a new game. Can someone help me fix it? I'd delete the version
 but there's quite a bit of test data there.

 I've CC'd the version maintainers.






Re: [AppDB] Entry for Everquest 2

2009-03-15 Thread Charity Abbott
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Ricardo Filipe
ricardojdfil...@gmail.com wrote:
 done. i've created a new application and moved test data there. unfortunatly
 appdb doesn't move comments so those are lost :(

 i wait for the EQ maintainers to step up for EQ2 :P
 http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=applicationiId=9400

 2009/3/15 Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com

 I just noticed that the entry for Everquest II, the sequel to
 Everquest, is listed as version 2 under Everquest in AppDB. This
 is incorrect, as the sequel is not a new version of the original game,
 it is a new game. Can someone help me fix it? I'd delete the version
 but there's quite a bit of test data there.

 I've CC'd the version maintainers.








I've always wondered about that. Thanks for fixing it. Someone already
changed the description to include the link you mentioned. Is that all
you wanted? I am a maintainer of the original EQ.




Re: [AppDB] Entry for Everquest 2

2009-03-15 Thread Ricardo Filipe
all that is changed it was me. i kept everything on context, although i
forgot to copy EQ2 description :S

what i meant is that you or other EQ maintainer ask to be EQ2 maintainer ;)

2009/3/15 Charity Abbott angeli...@gmail.com

 On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Ricardo Filipe
 ricardojdfil...@gmail.com wrote:
  done. i've created a new application and moved test data there.
 unfortunatly
  appdb doesn't move comments so those are lost :(
 
  i wait for the EQ maintainers to step up for EQ2 :P
  http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=applicationiId=9400
 
  2009/3/15 Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com
 
  I just noticed that the entry for Everquest II, the sequel to
  Everquest, is listed as version 2 under Everquest in AppDB. This
  is incorrect, as the sequel is not a new version of the original game,
  it is a new game. Can someone help me fix it? I'd delete the version
  but there's quite a bit of test data there.
 
  I've CC'd the version maintainers.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 I've always wondered about that. Thanks for fixing it. Someone already
 changed the description to include the link you mentioned. Is that all
 you wanted? I am a maintainer of the original EQ.






Re: [AppDB] Entry for Everquest 2

2009-03-15 Thread Ricardo Filipe
no test data was lost. it is all in the new link.

i already stated the comments got lost and i'm sorry for that, i thought
appdb would copy them too.
and that's why i asked for the EQ maintainers to step up to be EQ2
maintainers. i apologize for the missing comments, again.

2009/3/15 John Beaulieu john.beaul...@comcast.net

 Hey, you caused comments, data, and maintainers to be removed. Thats not
 cool.

 On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 11:18 +, Ricardo Filipe wrote:
  not really... it's a completly new game. i'll see if i can do
  something...





Re: [AppDB] Entry for Everquest 2

2009-03-15 Thread Ricardo Filipe
actually ben, how to's and warnings also went away.
i think beaulieu already found them elsewhere and updated the page with
them, thanks ;)

sorry about that again, i'll post a bug for moving data to also copy the
rest of the page...

2009/3/15 Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com

 2009/3/16 Ricardo Filipe ricardojdfil...@gmail.com:
  no test data was lost. it is all in the new link.
 
  i already stated the comments got lost and i'm sorry for that, i thought
  appdb would copy them too.
  and that's why i asked for the EQ maintainers to step up to be EQ2
  maintainers. i apologize for the missing comments, again.
 
  2009/3/15 John Beaulieu john.beaul...@comcast.net
 
  Hey, you caused comments, data, and maintainers to be removed. Thats not
  cool.
 
  On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 11:18 +, Ricardo Filipe wrote:
   not really... it's a completly new game. i'll see if i can do
   something...
 

 Thanks Ricardo. Pity about the comments, but Notes, HOWTOs and
 Warnings are more useful than comments anyway, and comments tend to
 get stale faster :)




Re: [AppDB] Entry for Everquest 2

2009-03-15 Thread Ben Klein
2009/3/16 Ricardo Filipe ricardojdfil...@gmail.com:
 actually ben, how to's and warnings also went away.
 i think beaulieu already found them elsewhere and updated the page with
 them, thanks ;)

 sorry about that again, i'll post a bug for moving data to also copy the
 rest of the page...

Oh well, I still appreciate your help in cleaning it up :D




Re: [AppDB] Entry for Everquest 2

2009-03-15 Thread Rosanne DiMesio
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:23:20 +
Ricardo Filipe ricardojdfil...@gmail.com wrote:

 no test data was lost. it is all in the new link.
 
 i already stated the comments got lost and i'm sorry for that, i thought
 appdb would copy them too.
 and that's why i asked for the EQ maintainers to step up to be EQ2
 maintainers. i apologize for the missing comments, again.
 

Screenshots are not copied either.

IMO, the move child objects link should be renamed move test data, as that 
seems to be all it actually moves. And perhaps deleting the entry moved from 
should not be automatic. It's just one extra step for an admin to go back and 
manually delete an entry after moving test data, and this would give us a 
chance to verify that everything that needed to be copied over has been before 
the change becomes irrevocable. 


-- 
Rosanne DiMesio dime...@earthlink.net




Re: [AppDB] Entry for Everquest 2

2009-03-15 Thread Ricardo Filipe
agreed. either that or do a new link that copies EVERYTHING.

i've CCed the appdb site manager to see what he thinks :)

2009/3/15 Rosanne DiMesio dime...@earthlink.net

 On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:23:20 +
 Ricardo Filipe ricardojdfil...@gmail.com wrote:

  no test data was lost. it is all in the new link.
 
  i already stated the comments got lost and i'm sorry for that, i thought
  appdb would copy them too.
  and that's why i asked for the EQ maintainers to step up to be EQ2
  maintainers. i apologize for the missing comments, again.
 

 Screenshots are not copied either.

 IMO, the move child objects link should be renamed move test data, as
 that seems to be all it actually moves. And perhaps deleting the entry moved
 from should not be automatic. It's just one extra step for an admin to go
 back and manually delete an entry after moving test data, and this would
 give us a chance to verify that everything that needed to be copied over has
 been before the change becomes irrevocable.


 --
 Rosanne DiMesio dime...@earthlink.net






[AppDB] Entry for Everquest 2

2009-03-14 Thread Ben Klein
I just noticed that the entry for Everquest II, the sequel to
Everquest, is listed as version 2 under Everquest in AppDB. This
is incorrect, as the sequel is not a new version of the original game,
it is a new game. Can someone help me fix it? I'd delete the version
but there's quite a bit of test data there.

I've CC'd the version maintainers.