Re: [PATCH 3/6] [UnInstall]: No longer use unix stdio functions, but the kernel32 equivalent
Eric Pouech writes: > do you consider it's the same for winepath and winetest (number 5& 6 > in patchset) ? or shall I resubmit the remaining two ? It's the same for winepath, yes. winetest is probably OK to change. -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
Re: [PATCH 3/6] [UnInstall]: No longer use unix stdio functions, but the kernel32 equivalent
Le 07/11/2011 14:12, Alexandre Julliard a écrit : Eric Pouech writes: #28185 A+ --- programs/uninstaller/main.c | 65 ++- 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) I'm not sure that's a good idea. The output of uninstaller is meant to be used by Unix apps, it's not something a user would want to display on the console. do you consider it's the same for winepath and winetest (number 5& 6 in patchset) ? or shall I resubmit the remaining two ? A+ -- Eric Pouech "The problem with designing something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of a complete idiot." (Douglas Adams)
Re: [PATCH 3/6] [UnInstall]: No longer use unix stdio functions, but the kernel32 equivalent
Eric Pouech writes: > #28185 > > A+ > --- > > programs/uninstaller/main.c | 65 > ++- > 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) I'm not sure that's a good idea. The output of uninstaller is meant to be used by Unix apps, it's not something a user would want to display on the console. -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
