[press] Phoronix compares 7 versions of Wine

2007-12-09 Thread Jonathan Ernst
Hello,

What do you think about their tests and results ?

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=11539

The performance in the fourteen 3DMark 2001 SE and 3DMark 2003 tests
were fairly consistent in the releases between WINE 0.9.44 and WINE
0.9.50 -- generally only swaying a few frames in either direction --
though the performance overall has slightly declined and we were
surprised by a few of the results.




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



Re: [press] Phoronix compares 7 versions of Wine

2007-12-09 Thread Jonathan Ernst
On dim, 2007-12-09 at 14:07 +0100, Jonathan Ernst wrote:
 Hello,
 
 What do you think about their tests and results ?
 
 http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=11539

I guess it's linked with http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10631







Re: [press] Phoronix compares 7 versions of Wine

2007-12-09 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Sonntag, 9. Dezember 2007 14:10:33 schrieb Jonathan Ernst:
 On dim, 2007-12-09 at 14:07 +0100, Jonathan Ernst wrote:
  Hello,
 
  What do you think about their tests and results ?
 
  http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=11539

 I guess it's linked with http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10631
No, it doesn't look like they are hit by the 3dmark2k1 bug, which is strange. 
They are hit by the stencil test slowness in 3dmark2k3 though, which we 
resolved as a driver bug on geforce 8 cards, since we couldn't reproduce it 
elsewhere.

I didn't find any info what card they used, so it is a bit hard to say what 
might be wrong.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.



Re: [press] Phoronix compares 7 versions of Wine

2007-12-09 Thread Bryan Haskins
Phoronix often uses the 8 series cards when not testing things like driver
versions, we can probably assume they did use an 8 series.

On Dec 9, 2007 10:54 AM, Stefan Dösinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Am Sonntag, 9. Dezember 2007 14:10:33 schrieb Jonathan Ernst:
  On dim, 2007-12-09 at 14:07 +0100, Jonathan Ernst wrote:
   Hello,
  
   What do you think about their tests and results ?
  
   http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=11539
 
  I guess it's linked with http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10631
 No, it doesn't look like they are hit by the 3dmark2k1 bug, which is
 strange.
 They are hit by the stencil test slowness in 3dmark2k3 though, which we
 resolved as a driver bug on geforce 8 cards, since we couldn't reproduce
 it
 elsewhere.

 I didn't find any info what card they used, so it is a bit hard to say
 what
 might be wrong.






-- 
Cheers,
Bryan



Re: [press] Phoronix compares 7 versions of Wine

2007-12-09 Thread Matthew Clark
I want to say it said somewhere that it was a 8600 that they used... 
pretty sure

Bryan Haskins wrote:
 Phoronix often uses the 8 series cards when not testing things like 
 driver versions, we can probably assume they did use an 8 series.

 On Dec 9, 2007 10:54 AM, Stefan Dösinger  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Am Sonntag, 9. Dezember 2007 14:10:33 schrieb Jonathan Ernst:
  On dim, 2007-12-09 at 14:07 +0100, Jonathan Ernst wrote:
   Hello,
  
   What do you think about their tests and results ?
  
   http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=11539
 
  I guess it's linked with
 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10631
 No, it doesn't look like they are hit by the 3dmark2k1 bug, which
 is strange.
 They are hit by the stencil test slowness in 3dmark2k3 though,
 which we
 resolved as a driver bug on geforce 8 cards, since we couldn't
 reproduce it
 elsewhere.

 I didn't find any info what card they used, so it is a bit hard to
 say what
 might be wrong.






 -- 
 Cheers,
 Bryan