Re: Coverity coverage of Wine
On Mi, 2006-09-27 at 14:43 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote: Got an email from a Coverity guy. Apparently they have some backlog but Wine is by no means not covered anymore. Things should settle down soon and we can look forward to some nice reports again. Great news. Examining and fixing all Smatch and Coverity-Hits before Wine 1.0 would be great, but I think, that might be to much for the short Time. -- By by ... Detlef
Re: Coverity coverage of Wine
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 12:00 +0200, Detlef Riekenberg wrote: On Mi, 2006-09-27 at 14:43 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote: Got an email from a Coverity guy. Apparently they have some backlog but Wine is by no means not covered anymore. Things should settle down soon and we can look forward to some nice reports again. Great news. Examining and fixing all Smatch and Coverity-Hits before Wine 1.0 would be great, but I think, that might be to much for the short Time. I've seen a lot of Coverity 'bugs' to already be marked as BUG back in April when this thing started. Would be good if we could already squash those. Cheers, Paul.
Re: Coverity coverage of Wine
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 11:25 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote: On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 11:15 +0200, Detlef Riekenberg wrote: On Di, 2006-09-12 at 08:51 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote: the latest run (with report) on the Coverity site seems to be from July 21st. Does anybody know more about the why? What comes in my mind, that they offered there Service to Wine to use it as an Advertisement like: Coverity detected 800 Errors in Wine and all where fixed in less than 2 Month We started to fix them, but the fixing-Rate went down near to Zero very fast. To remember, the Announcement from Ben Chelf was on 07. April 2006: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2006-April/046354.html The first Day, we fixed 31 Defects ( http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2006-April/046433.html ), but the total Results are not so good: We marked 74 Defects as RESOLVED, 78 Entries are Verified and 344 are still Uninspected or Pending. (Overview at http://scan.coverity.com ) You must also think, that every Run is visible with annotated source. This cost them a lot of GB HD-Space, that is always online for us. I've tried to contact Coverity for the last month and my last email (where I've requested a read-receipt, shame on me) was deleted without being read. IMHO, they did not see enough benefit for there investigation in Wine. Simple: We do not pay, they stopped But wouldn't it be nice if they would tell us? The page http://scan.coverity.com/; shows lots of projects and I cannot believe they are all paying 'customers'. If they want to stop covering Wine they can do it of course, but it would be nice to throw us of the main page then. Otherwise all that will be seen is 'look at how many issues Wine still has, it must be (very) bad'. Cheers, Paul. Got an email from a Coverity guy. They've hired someone to work on the Scan project full time. Apparently they have some backlog but Wine is by no means not covered anymore. Things should settle down soon and we can look forward to some nice reports again. Paul.
Coverity coverage of Wine
Hi, the latest run (with report) on the Coverity site seems to be from July 21st. It appears that the main page is updated though (not for the lines of code but for the errors fixed). Does anybody know more about the why? I've tried to contact Coverity for the last month and my last email (where I've requested a read-receipt, shame on me) was deleted without being read. Cheers, Paul.
Re: Coverity coverage of Wine
On Di, 2006-09-12 at 08:51 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote: the latest run (with report) on the Coverity site seems to be from July 21st. Does anybody know more about the why? What comes in my mind, that they offered there Service to Wine to use it as an Advertisement like: Coverity detected 800 Errors in Wine and all where fixed in less than 2 Month We started to fix them, but the fixing-Rate went down near to Zero very fast. To remember, the Announcement from Ben Chelf was on 07. April 2006: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2006-April/046354.html The first Day, we fixed 31 Defects ( http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2006-April/046433.html ), but the total Results are not so good: We marked 74 Defects as RESOLVED, 78 Entries are Verified and 344 are still Uninspected or Pending. (Overview at http://scan.coverity.com ) You must also think, that every Run is visible with annotated source. This cost them a lot of GB HD-Space, that is always online for us. I've tried to contact Coverity for the last month and my last email (where I've requested a read-receipt, shame on me) was deleted without being read. IMHO, they did not see enough benefit for there investigation in Wine. Simple: We do not pay, they stopped BUG-Hunting is not a fun thing, but Alexandre can open bug-hunting Weeks, similar to the feature-freeze before wine-0.9. This can target the Bugs found by Coverity and Smatch with Priority. Seems to be a nice theme for Wineconf (Sorry, I'm not there). -- By by ... Detlef
Re: Coverity coverage of Wine
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 11:15 +0200, Detlef Riekenberg wrote: On Di, 2006-09-12 at 08:51 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote: the latest run (with report) on the Coverity site seems to be from July 21st. Does anybody know more about the why? What comes in my mind, that they offered there Service to Wine to use it as an Advertisement like: Coverity detected 800 Errors in Wine and all where fixed in less than 2 Month We started to fix them, but the fixing-Rate went down near to Zero very fast. To remember, the Announcement from Ben Chelf was on 07. April 2006: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2006-April/046354.html The first Day, we fixed 31 Defects ( http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2006-April/046433.html ), but the total Results are not so good: We marked 74 Defects as RESOLVED, 78 Entries are Verified and 344 are still Uninspected or Pending. (Overview at http://scan.coverity.com ) You must also think, that every Run is visible with annotated source. This cost them a lot of GB HD-Space, that is always online for us. I've tried to contact Coverity for the last month and my last email (where I've requested a read-receipt, shame on me) was deleted without being read. IMHO, they did not see enough benefit for there investigation in Wine. Simple: We do not pay, they stopped But wouldn't it be nice if they would tell us? The page http://scan.coverity.com/; shows lots of projects and I cannot believe they are all paying 'customers'. If they want to stop covering Wine they can do it of course, but it would be nice to throw us of the main page then. Otherwise all that will be seen is 'look at how many issues Wine still has, it must be (very) bad'. Cheers, Paul.
