Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> writes: > I noticed that we are not using the error code coming from service_start, > and indeed there was a FIXME there already. Would it make sense to handle > this (at least) somehow like the patch below? > > If preferred, I could also yank the err variable, but I figured you'd > prefer the error handling. (Or is there a mistake I made when adding > that handling?)
Printing an ERR is not error handling. -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
