Re: December 2004 - more patches than you can shake a stick at

2005-01-03 Thread Rein Klazes
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 23:35:17 +0100, you wrote:

> Rein Klazes wrote:
> > On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 14:57:27 +, you wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>Being the patch fetishist that I am, I couldn't help noticing that in
> >>December 2004 we cleared 8mb of patches: that's by far the largest since
> >>the current archives began in October 2000.
> > 
> > 
> > For those that like such statistics:
> > 
> > http://home.wanadoo.nl/wijn/wine/cvssize.png
> > 
> > Rein.
> > 
> > 
> 
> Am I the only one who thinks that trend line isn't up to date? :p
> 

It is the trend of the first three years of wine cvs development. The
graphs where created after a discussion (Dec. 2004) whether wine's
progress is accelerating or even accelerating exponentially.

Rein.



Re: December 2004 - more patches than you can shake a stick at

2005-01-02 Thread Joris Huizer
Rein Klazes wrote:
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 14:57:27 +, you wrote:

Being the patch fetishist that I am, I couldn't help noticing that in
December 2004 we cleared 8mb of patches: that's by far the largest since
the current archives began in October 2000.

For those that like such statistics:
http://home.wanadoo.nl/wijn/wine/cvssize.png
Rein.

Am I the only one who thinks that trend line isn't up to date? :p



Re: December 2004 - more patches than you can shake a stick at

2005-01-02 Thread Rein Klazes
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 14:57:27 +, you wrote:

> Being the patch fetishist that I am, I couldn't help noticing that in
> December 2004 we cleared 8mb of patches: that's by far the largest since
> the current archives began in October 2000.

For those that like such statistics:

http://home.wanadoo.nl/wijn/wine/cvssize.png

Rein.



Re: December 2004 - more patches than you can shake a stick at

2005-01-02 Thread Mike Hearn
On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 17:07 +0100, Maxime Bellengà wrote:
> Happy new year everybody !
> 
> In your list, you forgot your big work on systray. Do you see in your
> crystal ball if/when it will be merged ?

We'll see ;) Every so often I do a sprint on that patch, and each time
it gets a bit closer to what Alexandre wants.

The main problem is that I don't actually know what his vision for this
code is, he never spells it out. So each time I improve it a few times
but it's still not good enough, and I get bored/frustrated and move onto
something else.

I'll probably return to it in a few months. If somebody else wants to
run with it of course they are welcome to do so.

thanks -mike





Re: December 2004 - more patches than you can shake a stick at

2005-01-02 Thread Maxime Bellengé
Happy new year everybody !

In your list, you forgot your big work on systray. Do you see in your
crystal ball if/when it will be merged ?

thanks

Max

On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 14:57 +, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Happy new year everybody!
> 
> Being the patch fetishist that I am, I couldn't help noticing that in
> December 2004 we cleared 8mb of patches: that's by far the largest since
> the current archives began in October 2000.
> 
> The extra traffic came from a lot of places:
> 
> -  Huge improvements to the Application Database.
> 
> -  The number was also pushed higher by an MSI merge from CodeWeavers.
> 
> -  Some big janitorial patches went in from Michael Stefaniuc
> 
> -  Finally Rob and I were cranking out DCOM patches, and there are of
>course lots more in the pipeline.
> 
> Now time for some crystal ball gazing. Here are some interesting patches
> we might be seeing in 2005:
> 
> -  Completion of the WM rewrite work. Alexandre seems to be making great
>progress on this, which will let us fix many of the odd visual
>corruption problems we've been plagued with for so long. It'll also 
>let us remerge Alexs winedesktop patch, giving us a real desktop window
>that is used for all apps, at last. 
> 
>It should have many other benefits too: fixing the flickering in 
>the Half Life menus and allowing us to support the NETWM fullscreen
>protocol. This should let us resolve many instances of the "my game
>starts but I can't type" problem.
> 
> -  Lots more DCOM code. Huw Davies is hacking on getting widl to produce
>a stdole32.tlb file, once that's in we can start really nailing 
>InstallShield to the wall. We will hopefully get this and the
>thread-affinity patches in the next few months, which should mean 
>for the first time we can run InstallShield 6 installers perfectly, out
>of the box.
> 
>Support for newer InstallShields will come as time permits of course.
> 
> -  More MSI improvements! CodeWeavers are continuing to work on
>this so it should develop nicely even though the iTunes installer 
>work has been completed. Office 2003 will also motivate this. It's
>being used by at least one commercial app porting project as well.
> 
> -  Support for running Winelib apps directly, so we can get rid of the
>.exe.so extensions/shell wrapper scripts, and produce "raw" ELF
>binaries. They'll still need the wine loader app to be present of
>course, but it should all be invisible and behind the scenes. Vincent
>Beron and I have been working on this in the last week or so, and we
>just need to finish it off and convince Alexandre the extra assembly
>is worth it! :)
> 
> Who knows what the new year will bring? More apps working out of the box,
> that's for sure! Have fun!
> 
> thanks -mike
> 
> 
>