Re: Re: make CryptSetProviderEx update the provider Name and TypeName to registry

2004-08-21 Thread James Hawkins
I just ran a test programming in windows to see how the registry is
changed by called CryptSetProviderEx with the CRYPT_DELETE_DEFAULT
flag.  When the CRYPT_DELETE_DEFAULT flag is used, the Name value of
the Type XXX key is removed, but not the TypeName, which solves the
problem of not being able to get to the TypeName.  I will rewrite this
patch with the new behavior and send it shortly.

On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:11:12 -0700, James Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm working on a test app that I hope wil shine some light on how
 windows gets the Name and TypeName values back in the registry after
 they've been deleted.  The problem is that the only instance of the
 Name and TypeName data is in the DllRegisterServer function of the
 provider dll.  I couldn't think of any other way to get to that data
 to get it in the registry, but I will be testing this in windows.
 What im thinking is that windows might not even delete the key at all.
  If you have any suggestions it would help a lot.
 
 
 
 On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:48:07 -0700, Alexandre Julliard
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  James Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
   Changelog
  * Call provider.dll's DllRegisterServer from CryptSetProviderEx to
   update the Name and TypeName values in the registry properly when
   setting the default provider
 
  It doesn't seem right to call DllRegisterServer from there, IMO it
  should only be called when the dll is installed. Do you have evidence
  that Windows does it this way?
 
  --
  Alexandre Julliard
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 --
 James Hawkins
 


-- 
James Hawkins



Re: Re: make CryptSetProviderEx update the provider Name and TypeName to registry

2004-08-20 Thread James Hawkins
I'm working on a test app that I hope wil shine some light on how
windows gets the Name and TypeName values back in the registry after
they've been deleted.  The problem is that the only instance of the
Name and TypeName data is in the DllRegisterServer function of the
provider dll.  I couldn't think of any other way to get to that data
to get it in the registry, but I will be testing this in windows. 
What im thinking is that windows might not even delete the key at all.
 If you have any suggestions it would help a lot.

On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:48:07 -0700, Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 James Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Changelog
 * Call provider.dll's DllRegisterServer from CryptSetProviderEx to
  update the Name and TypeName values in the registry properly when
  setting the default provider
 
 It doesn't seem right to call DllRegisterServer from there, IMO it
 should only be called when the dll is installed. Do you have evidence
 that Windows does it this way?
 
 --
 Alexandre Julliard
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-- 
James Hawkins