Re: patchwatcher status: online but no email
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 09:29 -0800, Dan Kegel wrote: > > Would you settle for static alternating colors? > I'm kind of anti hover highlight. IIRC there was a recent study claiming that alternating row colors are not all that useful in practice, the on-hover has the advantage of focusing your attention only on the row that you care about. But if you have a problem with that, static colors would be a step forward (and AFAIAC it would be fine). -- Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lattica, Inc.
Re: patchwatcher status: online but no email
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One suggestion that I have is changing the background color > of the row on hover so you can easily match the result on the > RHS to the Subject, right now that is a bit difficult to > do visually on a wide-screen monitor. Would you settle for static alternating colors? I'm kind of anti hover highlight.
Re: patchwatcher status: online but no email
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 08:32 -0800, Dan Kegel wrote: > You should see your patch appear at > http://kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results Very nice! One suggestion that I have is changing the background color of the row on hover so you can easily match the result on the RHS to the Subject, right now that is a bit difficult to do visually on a wide-screen monitor. -- Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lattica, Inc.
