Re: Recent problems with shdocvw
Dan Kegel wrote: On 7/26/06, Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have looked at bugzilla. There is one regression (bug 5630) that needs more widl improvements to work. I have done some work on widl that will help it some time ago, but I've never had time to finish it. Dan Hipschman is focused on widl improvements, perhaps he can work on it. Do you have any notes to send him? I've just looked at the code in my tree and most of my work on widl is a mess ATM, but there are a few simple patches ready to send. It's possible to compile shdocvw typelib, although it's quite not correct. The main problem is that widl creates too many typeinfos for typedefs of structures and unions. That's because there should be only one typeinfo, not one for struct or union and one for typedef. There are also many other issues. It's easy to find them writing tests and comparing result of midl and widl. Anyways currently comiled typelib is enough for WebBrowser implementation so I'll send patches that will add it. Jacek
Re: Recent problems with shdocvw
On 7/26/06, Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have looked at bugzilla. There is one regression (bug 5630) that needs more widl improvements to work. I have done some work on widl that will help it some time ago, but I've never had time to finish it. Dan Hipschman is focused on widl improvements, perhaps he can work on it. Do you have any notes to send him? - Dan
Re: Recent problems with shdocvw
Vitaliy Margolen wrote: Ever since replacement of Mozilla Active X control with new gecko. And shift of attention to mshtml we have lots of programs that still need shdocvw break. Is this a temporary or intentional? Could author look at related bugs on bugzilla? I have looked at bugzilla. There is one regression (bug 5630) that needs more widl improvements to work. I have done some work on widl that will help it some time ago, but I've never had time to finish it. A few other reports are quite old and probably they are fixed now. Also although it's true that my attention is on mshtml ATM, but, to fix some bugs, we really need to fix MSHTML, not shdocvw. Eg. bug 5726 needs improvements in MSHTML. It works a bit better in my tree as it needs the area I'm working on. If I've messed something, feel free to assign bugs to me. Thanks, Jacek
Recent problems with shdocvw
Ever since replacement of Mozilla Active X control with new gecko. And shift of attention to mshtml we have lots of programs that still need shdocvw break. Is this a temporary or intentional? Could author look at related bugs on bugzilla? -- Best regards, Vitaliy
