Re: Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]
Am Sonntag, den 29.01.2006, 14:08 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Ernst: Jonathan, what software do you use, if you don't mind revealing? :-) It's Evolution 2.4.2.1, pretty good e-mail client if you ask me. Evolution 2.2.1.1 here and i had a similar problem with my Patches: I used UTF-8 in as the prefered Encoding in the Editor. The attachment is encoded as 7-Bit, but Evolution is unable to drop the charset UTF-8 in the Header down to 7-Bit ASCII. = The mail arrived to some People as binary. I switched back to ISO8859-15. -- By By ... ... Detlef
Re: Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]
Jonathan Ernst wrote: Le samedi 28 janvier 2006 à 21:07 +, Molle Bestefich a écrit : Jonathan, what software do you use, if you don't mind revealing? :-) It's Evolution 2.4.2.1, pretty good e-mail client if you ask me. I'll agree that the GUI is pretty good. The MIME assembly lacks somewhat :-). And for some odd reason Gmail's aggregation feature doesn't like your mails either - the same email always shows up twice for me. I wonder.
Re: Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]
Le samedi 28 janvier 2006 à 21:07 +, Molle Bestefich a écrit : Tony Lambregts wrote: [...] Is it Jonathan's mailer or gmane that does this??? I assume it's Jonathan's mailer, since I can't find any good reasons why gmane would do this. Jonathan, what software do you use, if you don't mind revealing? :-) It's Evolution 2.4.2.1, pretty good e-mail client if you ask me. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Re: Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]
Tony Lambregts wrote: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-January/023490.html Looks odd with all the MIME in there. So... I went looking at the alternative and thought of GMANE and it turns out that this patch is not archived there at all. GMANE snips stuff with X-No-Archive set - just offering pointers. [snip body of email from Jonathan Ernst] Would you mind posting the entire email, including headers etc., as an attachment? I'd like to take a look at it too but I'm not subscribed to wine-patches =).
Re: Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]
Molle Bestefich wrote: Tony Lambregts wrote: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-January/023490.html Looks odd with all the MIME in there. So... I went looking at the alternative and thought of GMANE and it turns out that this patch is not archived there at all. GMANE snips stuff with X-No-Archive set - just offering pointers. [snip body of email from Jonathan Ernst] Would you mind posting the entire email, including headers etc., as an attachment? I'd like to take a look at it too but I'm not subscribed to wine-patches =). attached is the message source that I got throught gmane news server. (I do not get emails from wine patches even though I am subscribed...) Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jonathan Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patches Subject: Re: Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED] Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:05:21 +0100 Lines: 146 Approved: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: wine-devel@winehq.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary0121623449== X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137420449 22397 80.91.229.2 (16 Jan 2006 14:07:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:07:29 + (UTC) Original-X-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 16 15:07:24 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original-Received: from wine.codeweavers.com ([209.32.141.3]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EyV0w-0005FB-AD for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:07:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain) by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EyUzk-00022z-RS; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:06:04 -0600 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EyUzi-00022n-DL for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:06:02 -0600 Original-Received: from wine.codeweavers.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wine [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01730-10 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:06:02 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sun3.netoxygen.ch ([193.73.122.103]) by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EyUzX-000206-5u for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:06:02 -0600 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.13] (adsl-62-167-24-207.adslplus.ch [62.167.24.207]) (authenticated bits=0) by sun3.netoxygen.ch (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0GE5SjV011432; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:05:29 +0100 Original-To: Filip Navara [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 X-Auth_User: ernstfamily.ch1 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 193.73.122.103 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on wine X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at codeweavers.com X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Wine Patch Submissions wine-patches.winehq.org List-Unsubscribe: http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-patches, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Archive: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-patches, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Original-Mime-version: 1.0 Original-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on wine.codeweavers.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patches:21235 Archived-At: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patches/21235 --===0121623449== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==-Vvuh16CRO4mt6LCzAjUl --=-Vvuh16CRO4mt6LCzAjUl Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==-hIMNUJu5LS0S9amw3+Fv --=-hIMNUJu5LS0S9amw3+Fv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le dimanche 15 janvier 2006 =C3=A0 07:40 -0800, Dan Kegel a =C3=A9crit : On 1/15/06, Ge van Geldorp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Mozilla ActiveX control download feature is cool and all, but until we repackage the sucker to include MSVCP60.DLL to fix http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D4064 ... I could have sworn I saw somebody post a note saying they had done said repackaging, but I can't find it now... http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2005-December/022795.html
Re: Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]
Tony Lambregts wrote: attached is the message source that I got throught gmane news server. Thanks. gmail seems to like to ruin line endings as much as Outlook does, so I've attached my reply to preserve the fine ASCII art :-). Please take a look... (I do not get emails from wine patches even though I am subscribed...) Oh, ok. Mime-Version: 1.0 Looks odd, usually it's MIME-Version. Not that it should matter. And it could be gmane that's altering it. Archived-At: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patches/21235 Which means that it's also available at: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patches/21235 So it's not really missing from gmane, or? Anyway, the MIME structure of the email is: body: multipart/mixed | +-- multipart/signed | | | +-- multipart/mixed | | | | | +-- text/plain (Jonathan's mail) | | | | | +-- text/x-patch [attachment](Jonathan's patch) | | | +-- section: application/pgp-signature (Jonathan's pgp sig) | +-- text/plain (blank text/plain?!) So looking at the inner multipart/mixed, it contains a text/plain which is Jonathan's bread text, and a text/x-patch with an attachment flag, which is obviously his attachment. But if you take a look at the outer multipart/mixed, there's a multipart/signed and then there's a completely blank text/plain section: --===0121623449== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --===0121623449==-- Which makes no sense to me at all. If I were writing a mail parser, I'd have serious trouble choosing what to do with this kind of c... too :-). I think I'd choose to merge all the text/plain sections (without attachment flags) into a single entity and consider that the bread text. Pipermail seems to choose to pick the first text/plain section, the outer one (which happens to be empty) and just use that. And then scrub that other multipart/signed part, who needs that anyway. Right?
Re: Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]
Molle Bestefich wrote: Tony Lambregts wrote: attached is the message source that I got throught gmane news server. Thanks. gmail seems to like to ruin line endings as much as Outlook does, so I've attached my reply to preserve the fine ASCII art :-). Please take a look... (I do not get emails from wine patches even though I am subscribed...) Oh, ok. Mime-Version: 1.0 Looks odd, usually it's MIME-Version. Not that it should matter. And it could be gmane that's altering it. Archived-At: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patches/21235 Which means that it's also available at: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patches/21235 I missed that, cool.. it archived it with a .bin extention even though I could open it in gedit fine. Now the question remains (now that we know it is archived) how do would one actually find it http://search.gmane.org/ As a matter of fact I could not find any reference to your post or mine in this thread http://search.gmane.org/?query=email=tony.lambregts%40gmail.comgroup=gmane.comp.emulators.wine.develsort=dateDEFAULTOP=andxFILTERS=Gcomp.emulators.wine.devel-Amolle.bestefich%40gmail.com---A Something to talk to Gmane about? So it's not really missing from gmane, or? Anyway, the MIME structure of the email is: body: multipart/mixed | +-- multipart/signed | | | +-- multipart/mixed | | | | | +-- text/plain (Jonathan's mail) | | | | | +-- text/x-patch [attachment](Jonathan's patch) | | | +-- section: application/pgp-signature (Jonathan's pgp sig) | +-- text/plain (blank text/plain?!) So looking at the inner multipart/mixed, it contains a text/plain which is Jonathan's bread text, and a text/x-patch with an attachment flag, which is obviously his attachment. But if you take a look at the outer multipart/mixed, there's a multipart/signed and then there's a completely blank text/plain section: --===0121623449== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --===0121623449==-- Which makes no sense to me at all. If I were writing a mail parser, I'd have serious trouble choosing what to do with this kind of c... too :-). I think I'd choose to merge all the text/plain sections (without attachment flags) into a single entity and consider that the bread text. Pipermail seems to choose to pick the first text/plain section, the outer one (which happens to be empty) and just use that. And then scrub that other multipart/signed part, who needs that anyway. Right? Is it Jonathan's mailer or gmane that does this??? At this point I am happy that it is archived somewhere at least. -- Tony Lambregts
Re: Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]
Tony Lambregts wrote: Now the question remains (now that we know it is archived) how do would one actually find it http://search.gmane.org/ I'm leaving now, but I'll check this out later. If I remember :-). If I were writing a mail parser, I'd have serious trouble choosing what to do with this kind of c... too :-). I think I'd choose to merge all the text/plain sections (without attachment flags) into a single entity and consider that the bread text. Pipermail seems to choose to pick the first text/plain section, the outer one (which happens to be empty) and just use that. And then scrub that other multipart/signed part, who needs that anyway. Is it Jonathan's mailer or gmane that does this??? I assume it's Jonathan's mailer, since I can't find any good reasons why gmane would do this. Jonathan, what software do you use, if you don't mind revealing? :-)
Re: Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]
I dont normally top post ;^) but this time it makes sense to. This (replied to) email is not archived in the Piper Mail archive correctly although it looks fine here. In the pipermail archive there is only a pgp signature. This is not the first time I have seen this, it seems that Piper Mail grabs the pgp signature and does not archive the patch which makes the archive less usefull. If you ask me this is what I would call a bug in pipermail. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-January/023490.html Between this bug and the lack of dates in the archive I really getting to despise pipermail. So... I went looking at the alternative and thought of GMANE and it turns out that this patch is not archived there at all. In fact the last patch by Jonathan Ernst that was archived by GMANE is 2005-12-19 16:28:02 GMT and I know that there are more after that date. http://search.gmane.org/?query=email=Jonathan+Ernstgroup=gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patchessort=dateDEFAULTOP=andxFILTERS=Gcomp.emulators.wine.patches-Ajonathan+ernst---A So now I'm really starting to get upset because we have no reliable archive and that just sucks. Has anyone got any ideas on how to fix this. -- Tony Lambregts Jonathan Ernst wrote: Le dimanche 15 janvier 2006 à 07:40 -0800, Dan Kegel a écrit : On 1/15/06, Ge van Geldorp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Mozilla ActiveX control download feature is cool and all, but until we repackage the sucker to include MSVCP60.DLL to fix http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4064 ... I could have sworn I saw somebody post a note saying they had done said repackaging, but I can't find it now... http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2005-December/022795.html Instructions on how to repackage can be found at svn://svn.reactos.org/trunk/tools/MozillaControl/ Thanks! I've updated bug 4064. Now can somebody update winehq.org's copy of the control so we can close that bug? - Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv Le lundi 16 janvier 2006 à 14:30 +0100, Filip Navara a écrit : Jonathan Ernst wrote: // Exact size of the file: $iFileSize = 4771240; Shouldn't you change the file size too? - Filip Sure, thanks for spotting it ;-) Changelog: - use repackaged Mozilla ActiveX control from ReactOS Index: mozactivex.php === RCS file: /home/wine/tools/mozactivex.php,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -p -r1.1 mozactivex.php --- mozactivex.php 19 Oct 2005 16:17:09 - 1.1 +++ mozactivex.php 16 Jan 2006 14:02:33 - @@ -14,31 +14,27 @@ // Name of the file -$sFileName = MozillaControl1712.exe; +$sFileName = MozillaControl1712-ReactOS.exe; // Exact size of the file: -$iFileSize = 4771240; +$iFileSize = 4735160; // List of locations -$aList = array(http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/;, - http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/;, - http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/;, - http://easynews.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/;, - http://mesh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/;, - http://puzzle.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/;, - http://citkit.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/;, - http://umn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/;, - http://cogent.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/;, - http://jaist.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/;, - http://surfnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/;, - http://peterhost.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/;, - http://ufpr.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/;, - http://optusnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/;, - http://keihanna.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/;, - http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/;, - http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/;, - http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/;, - http://ovh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/; +$aList = array(http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/;, + http://surfnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/;, + http://citkit.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/;, + http://keihanna.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/;, + http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/;, + http://easynews.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/;, + http://ovh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/;, + http://jaist.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/;, + http://puzzle.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/;, + http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/;, + http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/;,
Re: Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]
Tony Lambregts wrote: ... Between this bug and the lack of dates in the archive I really getting to despise pipermail. So... I went looking at the alternative and thought of GMANE and it turns out that this patch is not archived there at all. In fact the last patch by Jonathan Ernst that was archived by GMANE is 2005-12-19 16:28:02 GMT and I know that there are more after that date. http://search.gmane.org/?query==Jonathan+Ernst=gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patches=date=and=Gcomp.emulators.wine.patches-Ajonathan+ernst---A So now I'm really starting to get upset because we have no reliable archive and that just sucks. Has anyone got any ideas on how to fix this. ... Tony, Please try the Nabble archive of the Wine lists: http://www.nabble.com/Wine-f924.html - The is the parent Wine archive that combines all the Devel, Users, Patches, Bugs into a single place. With regard to the latest patch post by Jonathan Ernst, Nabble shows it should be Jan 16, 2006. http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Repackaging-Mozilla-ActiveX-control-to-include-MSVCP60.DLL--t927107.html#a2402419 You can simply click the user name link in the thread. That will show you all the posts by a user. To narrow it down, you can click the dropdown box (located at the top) from All Dates to Past Month, then search again. Also, you can narrow it down by forums (located to the right) to narrow down to the Wine - Patches archive. Nabble is a new project trying to improve online discussions. It archives all the post up to the minute. Hope this helps. Will L Nabble.com View this message in context: Re: Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED] Sent from the Wine - Devel forum at Nabble.com.
Re: Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]
Will L (sent by Nabble.com) wrote: Tony Lambregts wrote: ... Between this bug and the lack of dates in the archive I really getting to despise pipermail. So... I went looking at the alternative and thought of GMANE and it turns out that this patch is not archived there at all. In fact the last patch by Jonathan Ernst that was archived by GMANE is 2005-12-19 16:28:02 GMT and I know that there are more after that date. http://search.gmane.org/?query=email=Jonathan+Ernstgroup=gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patchessort=dateDEFAULTOP=andxFILTERS=Gcomp.emulators.wine.patches-Ajonathan+ernst---A http://search.gmane.org/?query=email=Jonathan+Ernstgroup=gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patchessort=dateDEFAULTOP=andxFILTERS=Gcomp.emulators.wine.patches-Ajonathan+ernst---A So now I'm really starting to get upset because we have no reliable archive and that just sucks. Has anyone got any ideas on how to fix this. ... Tony, Please try the Nabble archive of the Wine lists: http://www.nabble.com/Wine-f924.html - The is the parent Wine archive that combines all the Devel, Users, Patches, Bugs into a single place. With regard to the latest patch post by Jonathan Ernst, Nabble shows it should be Jan 16, 2006. http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Repackaging-Mozilla-ActiveX-control-to-include-MSVCP60.DLL--t927107.html#a2402419 You can simply click the user name link in the thread. That will show you all the posts by a user. To narrow it down, you can click the dropdown box (located at the top) from All Dates to Past Month, then search again. Also, you can narrow it down by forums (located to the right) to narrow down to the Wine - Patches archive. Nabble is a new project trying to improve online discussions. It archives all the post up to the minute. Hope this helps. Thank you for trying but unfortunately it does not help, it does not have the patch either. ;^( From the link... --8--- Changelog: - use repackaged Mozilla ActiveX control from ReactOS [attachment removed][attachment removed] --8--- So any one else have ideas.. -- Tony Lambregts
