Re: includes: Fix IsEqualPropertyKey definitions

2010-02-22 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Maarten Lankhorst m.b.lankho...@gmail.com writes:

 @@ -48,7 +48,11 @@
  #endif
  
  #ifndef IsEqualPropertyKey
 +#ifdef __cplusplus
  #define IsEqualPropertyKey(a,b) (((a).pid == (b).pid)  
 IsEqualIID((a).fmtid,(b).fmtid))
 +#else
 +#define IsEqualPropertyKey(a,b) (((a)-pid == (b)-pid)  
 IsEqualIID((a)-fmtid,(b)-fmtid))
 +#endif

This doesn't match the PSDK. Where does this come from?

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org




Re: includes: Fix IsEqualPropertyKey definitions

2010-02-22 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hi AJ,

2010/2/22 Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org:
 Maarten Lankhorst m.b.lankho...@gmail.com writes:

 @@ -48,7 +48,11 @@
  #endif

  #ifndef IsEqualPropertyKey
 +#ifdef __cplusplus
  #define IsEqualPropertyKey(a,b) (((a).pid == (b).pid)  
 IsEqualIID((a).fmtid,(b).fmtid))
 +#else
 +#define IsEqualPropertyKey(a,b) (((a)-pid == (b)-pid)  
 IsEqualIID((a)-fmtid,(b)-fmtid))
 +#endif

 This doesn't match the PSDK. Where does this come from?
In C, REFPROPERTYKEY becomes PROPERTYKEY*, in C++ it's PROPERTYKEY ,
so IsEqualPropertyKey will need a different macro. The psdk doesn't
define this properly for the C case, but since I need it in C code I
need it defined, unless you want me to do IsEqualPropertyKey(*key1,
*key2), but even that wouldn't work because of the IsEqualIID..

Cheers,
Maarten.




Re: includes: Fix IsEqualPropertyKey definitions

2010-02-22 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Maarten Lankhorst m.b.lankho...@gmail.com writes:

 This doesn't match the PSDK. Where does this come from?
 In C, REFPROPERTYKEY becomes PROPERTYKEY*, in C++ it's PROPERTYKEY ,
 so IsEqualPropertyKey will need a different macro. The psdk doesn't
 define this properly for the C case, but since I need it in C code I
 need it defined, unless you want me to do IsEqualPropertyKey(*key1,
 *key2), but even that wouldn't work because of the IsEqualIID..

That doesn't match the PSDK I have, and yes it has a C definition that
is different from the C++ one, but is also different from yours.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org




Re: includes: Fix IsEqualPropertyKey definitions

2010-02-22 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hi AJ,

2010/2/22 Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org:
 Maarten Lankhorst m.b.lankho...@gmail.com writes:

 This doesn't match the PSDK. Where does this come from?
 In C, REFPROPERTYKEY becomes PROPERTYKEY*, in C++ it's PROPERTYKEY ,
 so IsEqualPropertyKey will need a different macro. The psdk doesn't
 define this properly for the C case, but since I need it in C code I
 need it defined, unless you want me to do IsEqualPropertyKey(*key1,
 *key2), but even that wouldn't work because of the IsEqualIID..

 That doesn't match the PSDK I have, and yes it has a C definition that
 is different from the C++ one, but is also different from yours.
Mine doesn't seem to have a C definition at all, but from the
devpropdef one I assume the C version takes a PROPERTYKEY as parameter
and not a PROPERTYKEY*?

Cheers,
Maarten.




Re: includes: Fix IsEqualPropertyKey definitions

2010-02-22 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Maarten Lankhorst m.b.lankho...@gmail.com writes:

 That doesn't match the PSDK I have, and yes it has a C definition that
 is different from the C++ one, but is also different from yours.
 Mine doesn't seem to have a C definition at all, but from the
 devpropdef one I assume the C version takes a PROPERTYKEY as parameter
 and not a PROPERTYKEY*?

Yes.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org