Re: make install problem
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > My guess is that ldconfig has messed with the symlinks. Maybe because I have the old libwine*.so.1.0 in there... I'll get rid of them, sorry for the false alarm. -- Dimi.
Re: make install problem
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, I did a standard build: > > configure --with-nptl --silent && make -s depend && make -s > > than installed it (as root): > > make -s install My guess is that ldconfig has messed with the symlinks. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: make install problem
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Yes, and it seems to work fine here. Could you show us the exact > commands you ran and the relevant make output? Well, I did a standard build: configure --with-nptl --silent && make -s depend && make -s than installed it (as root): make -s install to fix the problem, I had to do: cd libs/; make -s install-dev -- Dimi.
Re: make install problem
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That is to say, both libwine.so and libwine_unicode.so are fubared. > They point to old libs. Shouldn't they just point to the .1 versions? Yes, and it seems to work fine here. Could you show us the exact commands you ran and the relevant make output? -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
make install problem
Hi folks, We have a problem with 'make install' in the libs dir. More explicitly, after a 'make & make install', I have this in /usr/local/lib: [EMAIL PROTECTED] unicode]$ ls -l /usr/local/lib/libwine* -rw-r--r--1 root root 319332 Oct 27 12:01 /usr/local/lib/libwine_port.a lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 14 Oct 28 14:38 /usr/local/lib/libwine.so -> libwine.so.1.0 -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 249859 Oct 28 14:37 /usr/local/lib/libwine.so.1 -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 238529 Feb 20 2003 /usr/local/lib/libwine.so.1.0 lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 22 Oct 28 14:38 /usr/local/lib/libwine_unicode.so -> libwine_unicode.so.1.0 -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1289718 Oct 28 14:37 /usr/local/lib/libwine_unicode.so.1 -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1187040 Feb 20 2003 /usr/local/lib/libwine_unicode.so.1.0 -rw-r--r--1 root root 1867136 Oct 28 14:37 /usr/local/lib/libwine_uuid.a That is to say, both libwine.so and libwine_unicode.so are fubared. They point to old libs. Shouldn't they just point to the .1 versions? It's true, I didn't do a 'make install-dev', but this is counter intuitive because 'make install' does install the headers, and libwine_uuid.a, and libwine_port.a, and winegcc, and so on. -- Dimi.
