Re: user32/tests: Add more intensive tests for SetCursor.

2009-06-26 Thread Daniel Santos

lol! I guess it's time for me to remove myself from the mailing lists I don't 
read anymore, I'm starting to miss replies!  Anyway, I'm off for the weekend, 
but will rebase and re-send (with attachment) Monday or so.  Thanks for the 
response Austin!

Daniel

--- On Tue, 6/9/09, Austin English  wrote:

> From: Austin English 
> Subject: Re: user32/tests: Add more intensive tests for SetCursor.
> To: "Daniel Santos" 
> Cc: "Wine Devel" 
> Date: Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 5:15 PM
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:13 PM,
> Daniel Santos
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello!  This is a prelude to other cursor patches to
> follow (both Griswold's & my work).  As requested, I
> have replaced the __FILE_SPOT with the standard
> ok_(file,line) mechanism (looks much better to me).  I've
> removed the windows version checking from tests and last
> error checking on success, although I have reservations
> about it (mostly the later).
> 
> Forgot patch.
> 
> 
> -- 
> -Austin
> 


  





Re: user32/tests: Add more intensive tests for SetCursor.

2009-06-09 Thread Austin English
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Daniel Santos wrote:
>
> Hello!  This is a prelude to other cursor patches to follow (both Griswold's 
> & my work).  As requested, I have replaced the __FILE_SPOT with the standard 
> ok_(file,line) mechanism (looks much better to me).  I've removed the windows 
> version checking from tests and last error checking on success, although I 
> have reservations about it (mostly the later).

Forgot patch.


-- 
-Austin