user32: the patches - what's wrong?

[Kirill K. Smirnov]

Hi,

Traditional questions from rejected patch-sender:

1) What's wrong with the following patches?
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-January/034758.html
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-January/034790.html

2) What can be done to improve them?

Those patches let the window proc repaint NC area instead of calling NCPaint 
directly.
And changes processing of WM_SETICON to be similar with WM_SETTEXT.

-- Kirill

Re: user32: the patches - what's wrong?

[Alexandre Julliard]

Kirill K. Smirnov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Traditional questions from rejected patch-sender:

 1) What's wrong with the following patches?
 http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-January/034758.html
 http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-January/034790.html

 2) What can be done to improve them?

You should add tests in tests/msg.c to show that your changes yield
the same message sequence as on Windows.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]