Re: wine packages for Fedora Extras
That's great, thanks!
Re: wine packages for Fedora Extras
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 20:23:49 -0500 Neal Gompa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, does that mean that the wine debugger is now available in extras? Because it seems its not there, and I could find a such package that would contain it... Sure is: [03:53 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -ql wine-tools | grep winedbg /usr/bin/winedbg /usr/lib/wine/winedbg.exe.so and [03:53 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -q --whatrequires wine-tools wine-0.9.16-1.fc5 - Andreas --- Andreas Bierfert | http://awbsworld.de | GPG: C58CF1CB [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://lowlatency.de | signed/encrypted phone: +49 2402 102373 | cell: +49 173 5803043| mail preferred signature.asc Description: PGP signature
re: Wine packages for Fedora Extras
There is only one other thing that really needs to be in the source for this. There needs to be a SHORT description of exactly how this differs from the Wine CVS tree. The description should also include any interesting comments That would make tinkering much easier. I once had Wine blow up because I had a defective Fontforge and I didn't even know Wine used Fontforge because it wasn't in the documentation.
wine packages for Fedora Extras
Hi, some of you might have noticed that building 0.9.16 for Fedora Extras took me more time then the releases before. This was because of the discussions from a couple of weeks ago on this list. As a result I did spent some time on the mentioned issues and came across an easy solution: If you install wine form the Fedora Extras repository via 'yum install wine' nearly everything that would be in a monolithic package is going to be installed. The 'wine' package now is a meta-package containing requires for the various subpackages. So now 'normal' users who do a 'yum install wine' will get everything they need and experts who know what they are doing can go and install only the parts they want. I hope that this solution now leads to fewer 'false positives' on bug reports and for better user integration and satisfies some of the things you, the wine folks, brought up. Thanks for the input on this matter. I hope that this is only the first step towards a good relation ship between wine and the fedora packages for wine and that emails like the ones from a couple of weeks back won't happen again... So for the announcement: wine 0.9.16 for Fedora Extras 3,4,5,devel is build and should be pushed to the mirrors in a couple of hours. - Andreas -- Andreas Bierfert | http://awbsworld.de | GPG: C58CF1CB [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://lowlatency.de | signed/encrypted phone: +49 2402 102373 | cell: +49 173 5803043| mail preferred signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: wine packages for Fedora Extras
Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 12:06:00 PM, Andreas Bierfert wrote: Hi, some of you might have noticed that building 0.9.16 for Fedora Extras took me more time then the releases before. This was because of the discussions from a couple of weeks ago on this list. As a result I did spent some time on the mentioned issues and came across an easy solution: If you install wine form the Fedora Extras repository via 'yum install wine' nearly everything that would be in a monolithic package is going to be installed. The 'wine' package now is a meta-package containing requires for the various subpackages. So now 'normal' users who do a 'yum install wine' will get everything they need and experts who know what they are doing can go and install only the parts they want. I hope that this solution now leads to fewer 'false positives' on bug reports and for better user integration and satisfies some of the things you, the wine folks, brought up. Thanks for the input on this matter. I hope that this is only the first step towards a good relation ship between wine and the fedora packages for wine and that emails like the ones from a couple of weeks back won't happen again... So for the announcement: wine 0.9.16 for Fedora Extras 3,4,5,devel is build and should be pushed to the mirrors in a couple of hours. - Andreas Wonderful! Thank you very much! Vitaliy.
Re: wine packages for Fedora Extras
So, does that mean that the wine debugger is now available in extras? Because it seems its not there, and I could find a such package that would contain it...On 7/4/06, Vitaliy Margolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 12:06:00 PM, Andreas Bierfert wrote: Hi, some of you might have noticed that building 0.9.16 for Fedora Extras took me more time then the releases before. This was because of the discussions from a couple of weeks ago on this list. As a result I did spent some time on the mentioned issues and came across an easy solution: If you install wine form the Fedora Extras repository via 'yum install wine' nearly everything that would be in a monolithic package is going to be installed. The 'wine' package now is a meta-package containing requires for the various subpackages. So now 'normal' users who do a 'yum install wine' will get everything they need and experts who know what they are doing can go and install only the parts they want. I hope that this solution now leads to fewer 'false positives' on bug reports and for better user integration and satisfies some of the things you, the wine folks, brought up. Thanks for the input on this matter. I hope that this is only the first step towards a good relation ship between wine and the fedora packages for wine and that emails like the ones from a couple of weeks back won't happen again... So for the announcement: wine 0.9.16 for Fedora Extras 3,4,5,devel is build and should be pushed to the mirrors in a couple of hours. - AndreasWonderful! Thank you very much!Vitaliy.
