Re: [WISPA] EarthLink Says No More Money for Existing Muni Networks
Can you imagine trying to partner with 500 WISP's around the country? What a nightmare. Different equipment, different troubleshooting, different everything. It would never work. Travis Microserv Tom DeReggi wrote: Like we didn't see it comming :-) The key statement I saw was... "no more investment, unless a change in model", or something like that. What Earthlinks should be doing is staying focused on help desk support, content, and value add, partnering with existing providers that have models that work. Meaning partner with successful WISPs, not try and become one. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 6:01 PM Subject: [WISPA] EarthLink Says No More Money for Existing Muni Networks http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008052.html -- Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc. FCC License # PG-12-25133 Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993 Author of the WISP Handbook - "Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs" True Vendor-Neutral Wireless Consulting-Training-Troubleshooting FCC Part 15 Certification for Manufacturers and Service Providers Phone (VoIP Over Broadband Wireless) 818-227-4220 www.ask-wi.com WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.5/1085 - Release Date: 10/22/2007 10:35 AM WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] PacWireless Sector
Sorry, I forgot when I was looking I needed a 120 degree h-pol sector. And I don't really like their antenna config (bottom stand-off style mounting) for a sector. It works great for an omni, but sectors should mount in the middle directly behind the antenna if possible. Travis Microserv Mike Hammett wrote: http://www.pacwireless.com/products/sector.shtml - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Travis Johnson To: WISPA General List Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 5:46 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] PacWireless Sector No, PacWireless doesn't sell a h-pol 2.4ghz sector. I checked before I bought the Tranzeo. Travis Microserv Ryan Langseth wrote: I think Tranzeo H. Sectors are Pac Wireless Antennas? We have also had good luck with Tranzeo Sectors, although the towers where we have them deployed are 100% Tranzeo (AP radio, antenna, and CPE). Ryan On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 16:34 -0700, Travis Johnson wrote: Hi, We have used a LOT of PacWireless 2.4ghz horizontal omni's and they work great. I have never used any PacWireless 2.4ghz sectors, but we do have some Tranzeo 2.4ghz sectors (horizontal) that work good and are affordable. Travis Microserv Mike Hammett wrote: I'm looking (again) at putting up another tower. The tower I have now is 5 GHz with two sectors of PacWireless and MTI. The MTI ones are outperforming the PacWireless ones, but I have never really looked into it. It could be because I bought a 5.4 GHz band antenna so I could do 5.3 or 5.7 with little loss. Anyway Looking at 2.4 GHz sectors for the new tower. The PacWireless ones are less than a third of the MTI. That's a big difference. Should I really expect that kind of performance difference? I would love to use all high-end equipment, but I'm still on a shoe-string budget. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] EarthLink Says No More Money for Existing Muni Networks
They never did get the problems sorted out with the new orleans network. Maybe they just got tired of people complaining about the free service not working. Most of the complaints here seemed to be low penetration of houses/buildings and dhcp issues. Now, If they would just unplug everything I could play around with some new 2.4 stuff. It kind of makes me feel good because all my wifi A/P's always have made excellent money. Imagine that. All you have to do is design it to work without problems and charge someone a fee it. If it works as designed then people will gladly pay for it. I still do not see profit in trying to build the whole city out street by street. Not in a cable/bell area anyway. Joe WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] PacWireless Sector
http://www.pacwireless.com/products/sector.shtml - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Travis Johnson To: WISPA General List Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 5:46 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] PacWireless Sector No, PacWireless doesn't sell a h-pol 2.4ghz sector. I checked before I bought the Tranzeo. Travis Microserv Ryan Langseth wrote: I think Tranzeo H. Sectors are Pac Wireless Antennas? We have also had good luck with Tranzeo Sectors, although the towers where we have them deployed are 100% Tranzeo (AP radio, antenna, and CPE). Ryan On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 16:34 -0700, Travis Johnson wrote: Hi, We have used a LOT of PacWireless 2.4ghz horizontal omni's and they work great. I have never used any PacWireless 2.4ghz sectors, but we do have some Tranzeo 2.4ghz sectors (horizontal) that work good and are affordable. Travis Microserv Mike Hammett wrote: I'm looking (again) at putting up another tower. The tower I have now is 5 GHz with two sectors of PacWireless and MTI. The MTI ones are outperforming the PacWireless ones, but I have never really looked into it. It could be because I bought a 5.4 GHz band antenna so I could do 5.3 or 5.7 with little loss. Anyway Looking at 2.4 GHz sectors for the new tower. The PacWireless ones are less than a third of the MTI. That's a big difference. Should I really expect that kind of performance difference? I would love to use all high-end equipment, but I'm still on a shoe-string budget. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] EarthLink Says No More Money for Existing Muni Networks
Like we didn't see it comming :-) The key statement I saw was... "no more investment, unless a change in model", or something like that. What Earthlinks should be doing is staying focused on help desk support, content, and value add, partnering with existing providers that have models that work. Meaning partner with successful WISPs, not try and become one. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 6:01 PM Subject: [WISPA] EarthLink Says No More Money for Existing Muni Networks http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008052.html -- Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc. FCC License # PG-12-25133 Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993 Author of the WISP Handbook - "Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs" True Vendor-Neutral Wireless Consulting-Training-Troubleshooting FCC Part 15 Certification for Manufacturers and Service Providers Phone (VoIP Over Broadband Wireless) 818-227-4220 www.ask-wi.com WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.5/1085 - Release Date: 10/22/2007 10:35 AM WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] PacWireless Sector
No, PacWireless doesn't sell a h-pol 2.4ghz sector. I checked before I bought the Tranzeo. Travis Microserv Ryan Langseth wrote: I think Tranzeo H. Sectors are Pac Wireless Antennas? We have also had good luck with Tranzeo Sectors, although the towers where we have them deployed are 100% Tranzeo (AP radio, antenna, and CPE). Ryan On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 16:34 -0700, Travis Johnson wrote: Hi, We have used a LOT of PacWireless 2.4ghz horizontal omni's and they work great. I have never used any PacWireless 2.4ghz sectors, but we do have some Tranzeo 2.4ghz sectors (horizontal) that work good and are affordable. Travis Microserv Mike Hammett wrote: I'm looking (again) at putting up another tower. The tower I have now is 5 GHz with two sectors of PacWireless and MTI. The MTI ones are outperforming the PacWireless ones, but I have never really looked into it. It could be because I bought a 5.4 GHz band antenna so I could do 5.3 or 5.7 with little loss. Anyway Looking at 2.4 GHz sectors for the new tower. The PacWireless ones are less than a third of the MTI. That's a big difference. Should I really expect that kind of performance difference? I would love to use all high-end equipment, but I'm still on a shoe-string budget. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] PacWireless Sector
I think Tranzeo H. Sectors are Pac Wireless Antennas? We have also had good luck with Tranzeo Sectors, although the towers where we have them deployed are 100% Tranzeo (AP radio, antenna, and CPE). Ryan On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 16:34 -0700, Travis Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > We have used a LOT of PacWireless 2.4ghz horizontal omni's and they work > great. I have never used any PacWireless 2.4ghz sectors, but we do have > some Tranzeo 2.4ghz sectors (horizontal) that work good and are affordable. > > Travis > Microserv > > Mike Hammett wrote: > > I'm looking (again) at putting up another tower. The tower I have now is 5 > > GHz with two sectors of PacWireless and MTI. The MTI ones are > > outperforming the PacWireless ones, but I have never really looked into it. > > It could be because I bought a 5.4 GHz band antenna so I could do 5.3 or > > 5.7 with little loss. > > > > Anyway > > > > Looking at 2.4 GHz sectors for the new tower. The PacWireless ones are > > less than a third of the MTI. That's a big difference. Should I really > > expect that kind of performance difference? I would love to use all > > high-end equipment, but I'm still on a shoe-string budget. > > > > > > - > > Mike Hammett > > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > > > > > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > > > > > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] PacWireless Sector
Hi, We have used a LOT of PacWireless 2.4ghz horizontal omni's and they work great. I have never used any PacWireless 2.4ghz sectors, but we do have some Tranzeo 2.4ghz sectors (horizontal) that work good and are affordable. Travis Microserv Mike Hammett wrote: I'm looking (again) at putting up another tower. The tower I have now is 5 GHz with two sectors of PacWireless and MTI. The MTI ones are outperforming the PacWireless ones, but I have never really looked into it. It could be because I bought a 5.4 GHz band antenna so I could do 5.3 or 5.7 with little loss. Anyway Looking at 2.4 GHz sectors for the new tower. The PacWireless ones are less than a third of the MTI. That's a big difference. Should I really expect that kind of performance difference? I would love to use all high-end equipment, but I'm still on a shoe-string budget. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] PacWireless Sector
I'm looking (again) at putting up another tower. The tower I have now is 5 GHz with two sectors of PacWireless and MTI. The MTI ones are outperforming the PacWireless ones, but I have never really looked into it. It could be because I bought a 5.4 GHz band antenna so I could do 5.3 or 5.7 with little loss. Anyway Looking at 2.4 GHz sectors for the new tower. The PacWireless ones are less than a third of the MTI. That's a big difference. Should I really expect that kind of performance difference? I would love to use all high-end equipment, but I'm still on a shoe-string budget. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] EarthLink Says No More Money for Existing Muni Networks
http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008052.html -- Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc. FCC License # PG-12-25133 Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993 Author of the WISP Handbook - "Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs" True Vendor-Neutral Wireless Consulting-Training-Troubleshooting FCC Part 15 Certification for Manufacturers and Service Providers Phone (VoIP Over Broadband Wireless) 818-227-4220 www.ask-wi.com WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] PowerStation2 Problem
Replace the unit. I've seen 2 like that. Sam Tetherow wrote: If it is the ethernet side I would check the ethernet cabling to make sure you didn't kink it when stringing the wire or got a bad end on it. Also depending on what you are plugging the ethernet into you may want to turn off auto negotiate or set the rate manually if you have the capability on one end or the other. I have had RB532 ethernet connections that are crappy unless autonegotiate is off. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote: I have a Ubiquiti PowerStaion2 that is having some weird issues. It has a -68 signal and good LOS to the AP however there is packet loss on the link but only from the Ethernet side of it. From the radio side (pinging from the gateway) I see no such loss. The Ethernet drops from 10-30 seconds and then continues on like normal, when this happens I can still ping from the gateway to the radio IP. This is running as a bridge and has ver. 2.9 firmware on it, I upgraded from 2.8 to try to fix the problem in a last ditch effort. Any ideas as to what is going on? The AP is custom linux box and no other problems like this exist on any of the other clients. Thanks, _ /-\ ndrew WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] PowerStation2 Problem
Hello Our experience with LS2 with Advanced->Rate Algorithm which is default with "Optimistic", used to cause packet loss by pinging from PC1 to PC2, while with rest as default setting for indoor environment. once such "Opt" is changed to other option then we did not feel packet loss. PC1 ---RJ45---LS2 ---wireless-any AP--RJ45--PC2 Kevin > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 12:33 AM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] PowerStation2 Problem > > Bad radio or multipath. > > Move it up or down by as little as 2', but you may have to > move as far as > 10' futher up or further down. > > Look for ground, trees, power lines, buildings etc. NEAR the path. > > laters, > marlon > > - Original Message - > From: "Andrew Niemantsverdriet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 4:22 PM > Subject: [WISPA] PowerStation2 Problem > > > >I have a Ubiquiti PowerStaion2 that is having some weird issues. It > > has a -68 signal and good LOS to the AP however there is packet loss > > on the link but only from the Ethernet side of it. From the > radio side > > (pinging from the gateway) I see no such loss. The Ethernet > drops from > > 10-30 seconds and then continues on like normal, when this happens I > > can still ping from the gateway to the radio IP. This is > running as a > > bridge and has ver. 2.9 firmware on it, I upgraded from 2.8 > to try to > > fix the problem in a last ditch effort. Any ideas as to > what is going > > on? The AP is custom linux box and no other problems like this exist > > on any of the other clients. > > > > Thanks, > > _ > > /-\ ndrew > > > > > > > -- > -- > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > -- > -- > > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > -- > -- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -- > -- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] PowerStation2 Problem
Bad radio or multipath. Move it up or down by as little as 2', but you may have to move as far as 10' futher up or further down. Look for ground, trees, power lines, buildings etc. NEAR the path. laters, marlon - Original Message - From: "Andrew Niemantsverdriet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 4:22 PM Subject: [WISPA] PowerStation2 Problem I have a Ubiquiti PowerStaion2 that is having some weird issues. It has a -68 signal and good LOS to the AP however there is packet loss on the link but only from the Ethernet side of it. From the radio side (pinging from the gateway) I see no such loss. The Ethernet drops from 10-30 seconds and then continues on like normal, when this happens I can still ping from the gateway to the radio IP. This is running as a bridge and has ver. 2.9 firmware on it, I upgraded from 2.8 to try to fix the problem in a last ditch effort. Any ideas as to what is going on? The AP is custom linux box and no other problems like this exist on any of the other clients. Thanks, _ /-\ ndrew WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] PowerStation2 Problem
Happens to frequently for it to be the watch dog, but the watchdog is off. On Nov 16, 2007 5:26 PM, Mark Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > watchdog rebooting the device? > > Mark Nash > UnwiredOnline.Net > 350 Holly Street > Junction City, OR 97448 > http://www.uwol.net > 541-998- > 541-998-5599 fax > > > - Original Message - > From: "Andrew Niemantsverdriet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 4:22 PM > Subject: [WISPA] PowerStation2 Problem > > > > I have a Ubiquiti PowerStaion2 that is having some weird issues. It > > has a -68 signal and good LOS to the AP however there is packet loss > > on the link but only from the Ethernet side of it. From the radio side > > (pinging from the gateway) I see no such loss. The Ethernet drops from > > 10-30 seconds and then continues on like normal, when this happens I > > can still ping from the gateway to the radio IP. This is running as a > > bridge and has ver. 2.9 firmware on it, I upgraded from 2.8 to try to > > fix the problem in a last ditch effort. Any ideas as to what is going > > on? The AP is custom linux box and no other problems like this exist > > on any of the other clients. > > > > Thanks, > > _ > > /-\ ndrew > > > > > > -- > -- > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > -- > -- > > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > > > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 499
Perhaps, I may have confused it with 477? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Sam Tetherow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 12:16 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 499 Isn't the 499 only for voice (traditional or VOIP)? Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Mike Hammett wrote: If you have equipment, you fill it out. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 10:38 AM Subject: [WISPA] FCC Form 499 Everyone, Can someone tell me who is required to fill out FCC form 499? The legal language is too convoluted and cross-referenced for me to follow here: http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form499-A/499a.pdf Jason WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 499
Perhaps, I may have confused it with 477? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Sam Tetherow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 12:16 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 499 Isn't the 499 only for voice (traditional or VOIP)? Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Mike Hammett wrote: If you have equipment, you fill it out. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 10:38 AM Subject: [WISPA] FCC Form 499 Everyone, Can someone tell me who is required to fill out FCC form 499? The legal language is too convoluted and cross-referenced for me to follow here: http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form499-A/499a.pdf Jason WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 499
Sam Tetherow wrote: Isn't the 499 only for voice (traditional or VOIP)? No; it covers any telecommunication services that are regulated by the FCC. -Matt WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] PowerStation2 Problem
If it is the ethernet side I would check the ethernet cabling to make sure you didn't kink it when stringing the wire or got a bad end on it. Also depending on what you are plugging the ethernet into you may want to turn off auto negotiate or set the rate manually if you have the capability on one end or the other. I have had RB532 ethernet connections that are crappy unless autonegotiate is off. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote: I have a Ubiquiti PowerStaion2 that is having some weird issues. It has a -68 signal and good LOS to the AP however there is packet loss on the link but only from the Ethernet side of it. From the radio side (pinging from the gateway) I see no such loss. The Ethernet drops from 10-30 seconds and then continues on like normal, when this happens I can still ping from the gateway to the radio IP. This is running as a bridge and has ver. 2.9 firmware on it, I upgraded from 2.8 to try to fix the problem in a last ditch effort. Any ideas as to what is going on? The AP is custom linux box and no other problems like this exist on any of the other clients. Thanks, _ /-\ ndrew WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 499
Isn't the 499 only for voice (traditional or VOIP)? Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Mike Hammett wrote: If you have equipment, you fill it out. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 10:38 AM Subject: [WISPA] FCC Form 499 Everyone, Can someone tell me who is required to fill out FCC form 499? The legal language is too convoluted and cross-referenced for me to follow here: http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form499-A/499a.pdf Jason WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
