Re: [WISPA] star os config help

2008-06-11 Thread ralph
Hi Marlon-

I learned the hard way-  Upgrade your firmware immediately!

I bought 5 2000's plus one of the ones with the panel antenna built on the
front because I had kept hearing about how good StarOS was and I wanted to
do a couple of things with them:

1. Try out the OLSR meshing because, as you know, I do a lot of mesh and I
am looking for a lower end solution than Tropos or Cisco for the small
projects.
2. Use them as transparent bridges to feed docks at a marina.

The Lucaya product was attractive to me: reasonably priced, it seemed that a
lot of people used it, they were FCC type accepted systems (a big thing for
me, as I have several licenses at stake personally), and they were
supposedly good at making a dual-radio mesh.

The striking thing about these is the almost near total lack of
documentation. There is a decent piece on StarOS itself, but nothing is
available about the product we bought- hardware wise.
There is not a tech support number, and no way I can see to communicate with
Valemount other than the forum, which Lonnie does seen to monitor often. 

I made the mistake of asking what you did: How do you make a bridge?  I
finally got an answer, but prior to that was lectured endlessly about how I
should be using routing instead of bridging and why would I possibly want to
use a bridge- EVER. Remember- all I wanted to do was make them act like a
simple pair of Canopys, Tranzeos, Trangos, or Ligos, all of which have a
simple bridge function and are used in many systems by some of the biggest
players as such.

I made the bridge, but made the mistake of using the same subnet on all
interfaces (normal practice with Ligo, Canopy, Tranzeo, etc.)  Well DON'T DO
THIS ON STAROS!   You end up with an internal bridge loop.
Simple, I thought,  I'll just factory default it and not do that again.
WRONG.  After many more forum messages back and forth and no really straight
answers, I finally learned that the button does nothing but reboot the
radio.
Turns out that the button only works as a defaulter in the latest firmware.
I get to send them all back to be reflashed.  Sure you can do it with the
serial port, IF you have the proper header plug and IF you happen to have a
TTL to Serial converter laying around.  I am going to make an adapter cable
so I can use my Motorola RIB (a box used for programming Motorola 2 way
radios) to talk to these, but in the meantime I had to deinstall all of the
Lucayas and replace them with something else (Ligowave 1a23 bridges) because
I had screaming customers and this marina is a 3 hour round trip for me.

Now don't get the idea that I am totally dissing this product.  I really
like the way it programs and that settings can be applied without a time
consuming reboot.  I only wish the SSH terminal allowed other terminal
options. All of these are behind MT routers that we use as captive hotspot
portals, and we normally make pass-through's in the routers to allow us to
remotely administer.  Doesn't work. I have also been unsuccessful in talking
to the Lucayas through the SSH terminal on the MT router itself. It seems to
be a terminal emulation incompatibility issue.  The only command you can get
to work is F2.  I can't find how to change the emulation on either the MT or
the Lucaya.  Since there's no GUI, I can't use a browser either. I want to
continue using them and playing with the mesh, once the units work again!

The packaging is also intriguing.  The shielding looks excellent!  Also- in
mesh design, we sometimes have to mount on strand, and this package looks
similar to a cable TV amp and may blend nicely in this application, if I can
find a professional way to clamp it on. The supplied bracket is kind of
goofy. I am going to have to be creative to figure out how to mount this on
a power pole or street light arm and not create a hazard that will make us
lose our bond. I did note that after only three weeks outside (fresh water
marina) the cases looked like they were 2 years old and the brand label on
the outside was so sun-faded that it could hardly be read. 


So- to sum up-
1. Upgrade immediately- even if the units were just received new and just
produced.  Otherwise its back to Mama for defaulting.
2. Don't ask dumb questions like how do I make a transparent bridge g





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:46 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help

Where is that?  I'm not seeing it at all.
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: Mark Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help


 It's on the Interface, under IP addresses.  Change the bridge group number
 from 0 to something else.  All interfaces with the same number (other than
 Zero) will be bridged.

 Mark Nash
 UnwiredWest
 78 Centennial Loop
 Suite E
 Eugene, OR 97401
 

Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message

2008-06-11 Thread ralph
I just re-read it and need to clarify.
I put addresses from the same subnet on all interfaces because it seemed
that an address was required per the blanks to fill in.  It was never
documented to only put an address on one interface.
With other products, you don't really program the other interfaces, so you
aren't inclined to make that mistake.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message

2008-06-11 Thread Tim Kerns
I don't think that StarOS will let you put addresses from the same subnet on 
all interfaces. If you try this AND not notice, it will add the address but 
disable it (this is shown by the easy to miss * by it). This will result in 
the same thing though and that is not able to get into the unit. It is best 
when configuring these units to apply changes but do not save until you 
are sure of the change. This way to restore all you need to do is power 
cycle it.

- Original Message - 
From: ralph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 5:28 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message


I just re-read it and need to clarify.
 I put addresses from the same subnet on all interfaces because it seemed
 that an address was required per the blanks to fill in.  It was never
 documented to only put an address on one interface.
 With other products, you don't really program the other interfaces, so you
 aren't inclined to make that mistake.



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message

2008-06-11 Thread George Rogato
Not really trying to defend star. The documentation issue has been 
around since Adam met Eve.

The learning curve appears to be steep, but in fact, there is pretty 
good documentation.
If you search the forums, you will pretty much find anything you need to 
know. Trick is first searching the forums.
Then there is Tog's WiKi that is pretty good.
Tog has put a lot of time into the WiKi and helping others with their 
star stuff.

One thing I might add, one reason it's hard to document star, it's 
always changing, and how do you document l7 filtering or isc dhcp easily?

Fortunately Tog and a few other smart guys hang out there and try to 
offer their help when they can.

Good luck Ralph.

George

ralph wrote:
 I just re-read it and need to clarify.
 I put addresses from the same subnet on all interfaces because it seemed
 that an address was required per the blanks to fill in.  It was never
 documented to only put an address on one interface.
 With other products, you don't really program the other interfaces, so you
 aren't inclined to make that mistake.
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] easy voip

2008-06-11 Thread Victoria Proffer
I live in Missouri and I have one. I have been using it for about two months
and the calls work great, but it occasional crashes my computer.  I also got
one for my sister that lives in California and it is constantly dropping
calls.  So their network might be a little hinky yet.

When I first got mine the ads did not show up, now they are showing up with
more frequency.  Even being ad driven I still don't understand how these
folks are going to make it.

Just my .02

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 http://www.localcallingguide.com/lca_telco.php?ocn_name=YMAXnpa=ocn=

 That's where they have numbers available.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message -
 From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:25 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] easy voip


 I dunno, we are rural and they have numbers out here...
  - Original Message -
  From: Frank Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 4:20 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] easy voip
 
 
  Yes they do, and we all know how well that has worked for the industry.
  Secondly, they have limited coverage applying mostly
  to the metro areas. A sister company I work with offers the service, but
  has greater sales with ATA based providers offering
  expanded coverage.
 
 
 
 
  Frank Muto
  President
  FSM Marketing Group, Inc.
  www.SecureEmailPlus.com
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Wes James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:25 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] easy voip
 
 
  If you look at the TOS, it is ad-supported.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
  Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:15 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] easy voip
 
  They seem to work fine.  Not sure what the business plan is or how they
  can
  do this, but they are working.
  - Original Message -
  From: Patrick Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:32 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] easy voip
 
 
  There are at least two VoIP providers here that are WISPA vendor
  members. I am using one for my customers and would be happy to relate
  my
  experiences offlist. I'd encourage you to stay away from any software
  or
  PC based VoIP solutions and stick with ATAs.
 
  Patrick Shoemaker
  President, Vector Data Systems LLC
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  office: (301) 358-1690 x36
  mobile: (410) 991-5791
  http://www.vectordatasystems.com
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




-- 
Victoria Proffer
CEO
St. Louis Broadband
Visit us @
www.StLBroadband.com
314-974-5600



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message

2008-06-11 Thread ralph
Yes-
I did look all through the forums first, and Tog's Wiki is really helpful
too.
We need the experts to continue populating some of the sparse areas and I
will try to help as I become more familiar- 'specially if I get these
working as mesh radios. I have considerable Tropos and Cisco outdoor mesh
experience and am really hoping to find a poor man's mesh.  I want to try
some of the Ligo mesh too, but can't afford to buy it right now. 

Ralph

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:56 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message

Not really trying to defend star. The documentation issue has been 
around since Adam met Eve.

The learning curve appears to be steep, but in fact, there is pretty 
good documentation.
If you search the forums, you will pretty much find anything you need to 
know. Trick is first searching the forums.
Then there is Tog's WiKi that is pretty good.
Tog has put a lot of time into the WiKi and helping others with their 
star stuff.

One thing I might add, one reason it's hard to document star, it's 
always changing, and how do you document l7 filtering or isc dhcp easily?

Fortunately Tog and a few other smart guys hang out there and try to 
offer their help when they can.

Good luck Ralph.

George

ralph wrote:
 I just re-read it and need to clarify.
 I put addresses from the same subnet on all interfaces because it seemed
 that an address was required per the blanks to fill in.  It was never
 documented to only put an address on one interface.
 With other products, you don't really program the other interfaces, so you
 aren't inclined to make that mistake.
 
 
 



 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] mesh throughput?

2008-06-11 Thread Jason Hensley
Good info.  Also good to know about the web interface.  That's really been my 
only negative on the Ligo gear. 


 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hardy
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:54 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mesh throughput?

Here are some tests we have run with Full/Half/Quarter channel sizes with 
Atheros super features (WMM/Fast Frames/ Packet Bursting) on and
off:

Full:
Super Off: 24Mbps
Super On: 33Mbps
Super On / Turbo: 53Mbps

Half:
Super Off: 11Mbps
Super On: 15Mbps

Quarter:
Super Off: 6Mbps
Super On: 7Mbps

* Note that these are with LigoWave 802.11 standard products, and not with 
LigoPTP :)

One note is that compression is not on in these tests, and we have found it 
will improve throughput a bit. However, you have to be careful because you can 
get somewhat inflated results when using compression because some throughput 
test utilities use pretty compressible data. The throughput test tool built 
into LigoWave (nepim - network pipemeter) can be set to use random data 
patterns by using the -P random switch in shell.

I agree with you Tom; we usually recommend a hard set modulation rate for 
stable links. You're also correct that half size channels max datarate is 27 
(54/2). 

One more thing to add regarding Tom's post... we are designing a new 
architecture for the web interface so that it will be much, much faster.
More to come later! :)

-Matt

On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 20:21 -0500, Tom DeReggi wrote:

 I guess the answer is in what the definition is of Real World :-)
 
 For the record my conservative comment was not meant to be against 
 Ligowave, but specific to Atheros Mini PCi Cards in general, 
 regardless of the software platform.
 I agree if you can get a peak modulation consistently w/ compression, 
 sure you can get the speed. The Ligo MB hardware has the processing 
 power to do the speed, with multiple cards.
 However, in my real world, we are lucky to get 18 mbps modulations, 
 allthough when doing 20Mhz channels we always try for 36mbps mod  if we can.
 I'm not possitive, but I think the 10Mhz channel may max out at 27mbps 
 modulation as an option, with Atheros. (Although That should be 
 verified with Ligo, as I may be mistaken). The problem with commercial 
 grade services is that they generally don't respond well to frequent 
 modulation changes. If a modulation is bouncing back and forth from 36 
 to 18 to 24  to 36, etc, it will have very undesirable effects on the End 
 Users' TCP session throughput.
 We have found it much more advantageous to hard set the Max modulation 
 to a lower number that would result in the least frequent amount of 
 automatic modulation changes. It doesn't matter how fast the radio can 
 test in peak situations, it matters how fast the end user can push 
 their data consistently. Usually the best we can count on consistently 
 is usually closer to 15mbps, in our environment.  We bit ourselves in 
 the Back-side to often quoting 10mbps Full Duplex, and only getting 5 
 mb on way and 10 mbps the other, and having our customers Claim we 
 didn't deliver our SLA, and having to requote/redefine the job.  I'm 
 not saying that people can't get 20mbps, some people here, have just 
 clearly stated that it was possible for them. I just suggest planning 
 for the worst, and being conservative in expectation.
 
 With that said my comment  is not a complaint. I can get qty 4- 15 
 mbps links out of that one 533 Ligo Box, with 10mhz channels, which is 
 pretty darn amazing.
 
 What I liked about Ligo though is their support. They try hard to please.
 There software is also very easy to navigate and intuitive.
 Its a bit slow to navigate (compared to StarOS or MikroTik), due to 
 web interface redraw time between screens, but that's not really a big deal.
 My units have shown to pretty much be install and leave it units, with 
 very little trouble.
 
 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Jason Hensley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:42 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] mesh throughput?
 
 
  For the record as well, this is with Fast Frames, Packet Bursting, 
  and Compression all turned on.  We bounce anywhere from 18-20 meg.  
  Very excited about it and EXTREMELY pleased with the results we've 
  had from the Ligowave gear.
 
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Jason Hensley
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:52 AM
  To: 'WISPA General List'
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] mesh throughput?
 
  Nope, actually getting 20meg off a 10mhz channel in real world high 
  noise environment.
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:44 AM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] mesh 

Re: [WISPA] easy voip

2008-06-11 Thread Mike Hammett
Are you serious?  They're going to take off just like metro wifi...  they'll 
be everywhere and everyone will love them.

oh, wait...  Metro wifi is dead?  heh, I guess they will end up the same.


--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: Victoria Proffer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] easy voip


I live in Missouri and I have one. I have been using it for about two 
months
 and the calls work great, but it occasional crashes my computer.  I also 
 got
 one for my sister that lives in California and it is constantly dropping
 calls.  So their network might be a little hinky yet.

 When I first got mine the ads did not show up, now they are showing up 
 with
 more frequency.  Even being ad driven I still don't understand how these
 folks are going to make it.

 Just my .02

 On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

 http://www.localcallingguide.com/lca_telco.php?ocn_name=YMAXnpa=ocn=

 That's where they have numbers available.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message -
 From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:25 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] easy voip


 I dunno, we are rural and they have numbers out here...
  - Original Message -
  From: Frank Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 4:20 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] easy voip
 
 
  Yes they do, and we all know how well that has worked for the 
  industry.
  Secondly, they have limited coverage applying mostly
  to the metro areas. A sister company I work with offers the service, 
  but
  has greater sales with ATA based providers offering
  expanded coverage.
 
 
 
 
  Frank Muto
  President
  FSM Marketing Group, Inc.
  www.SecureEmailPlus.com
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Wes James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:25 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] easy voip
 
 
  If you look at the TOS, it is ad-supported.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
  Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:15 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] easy voip
 
  They seem to work fine.  Not sure what the business plan is or how 
  they
  can
  do this, but they are working.
  - Original Message -
  From: Patrick Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:32 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] easy voip
 
 
  There are at least two VoIP providers here that are WISPA vendor
  members. I am using one for my customers and would be happy to 
  relate
  my
  experiences offlist. I'd encourage you to stay away from any 
  software
  or
  PC based VoIP solutions and stick with ATAs.
 
  Patrick Shoemaker
  President, Vector Data Systems LLC
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  office: (301) 358-1690 x36
  mobile: (410) 991-5791
  http://www.vectordatasystems.com
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 -- 
 Victoria Proffer
 CEO
 St. Louis Broadband
 Visit us @
 www.StLBroadband.com
 314-974-5600


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message

2008-06-11 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
I have more and more trouble justifying the cost of any product with a 
steep learning curve.  There's just no reason for gear to not have a 
simple and advanced mode these days.

And there's no reason for documentation that doesn't cover simple questions.

There's no reason to NOT have a quick start guide.

There's no reason to have a box that doesn't do something right out of the 
box (this one shipped with all wireless ports disabled!).

There's no reason to not have the option of picking up the phone and getting 
some help to get started.  Now I'm DAYS into a project that should have 
taken just a few minutes.  There was no documentation in the box.  Not even 
the web site address, had to Google for it.  There is no tech support number 
on the web site.

I guess if a company wants to stay small, have a small user base etc. this 
is all good.  You only get really tech savvy customers.  Something that I'm 
not when it comes to routing and command line.  I've got a very lean fast 
growing company.  I have over a dozen brands of hardware deployed.  They all 
do things differently.  I have long ago given up on trying to memorize all 
of this crap.  If it's not completely self explanatory (like 802.1d bridging 
actually turning on bridging) I don't have time to play with the gear. 
It doesn't really matter how good it is.

For the record I've got the same bitch with MT.  I can do a little bit more 
with them because they at least have a decent gui.  But most of what I do 
with them is due to Butch's help.  He's great but having to hire him all of 
the time raises the cost of the gear by a lot.  All because I don't have the 
option of a Linksys simple setup option  Dumb.  Very dumb.

Alvarion has work to do too.  They use strange names for functions.  Don't 
give typical levels as examples right in the software.  I mean really, how 
am I supposed to know if 10, 1000 or -50 is a good number to try for 
interference mitigation?  And which settings would I tweak for which things? 
Who the heck has time to read yet another 150+++ page manual?  Put the 
basics right in the software!

sigh
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:56 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message


 Not really trying to defend star. The documentation issue has been
 around since Adam met Eve.

 The learning curve appears to be steep, but in fact, there is pretty
 good documentation.
 If you search the forums, you will pretty much find anything you need to
 know. Trick is first searching the forums.
 Then there is Tog's WiKi that is pretty good.
 Tog has put a lot of time into the WiKi and helping others with their
 star stuff.

 One thing I might add, one reason it's hard to document star, it's
 always changing, and how do you document l7 filtering or isc dhcp easily?

 Fortunately Tog and a few other smart guys hang out there and try to
 offer their help when they can.

 Good luck Ralph.

 George

 ralph wrote:
 I just re-read it and need to clarify.
 I put addresses from the same subnet on all interfaces because it seemed
 that an address was required per the blanks to fill in.  It was never
 documented to only put an address on one interface.
 With other products, you don't really program the other interfaces, so 
 you
 aren't inclined to make that mistake.



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message

2008-06-11 Thread Mark Nash
I agree with you, Marlon on the documentation/ease-of-use.  I gave up using
Tranzeos for StarOS because of its flexibility and powerful boards and the
atheros driver available creating an environment with extremely low latency.

Tranzeos were/are super-easy.  With StarOS, I've gotten over alot of the
learning curve, but there is still more to learn.  It's for geeks...but once
you're there, you're in pretty good shape.

My biggest issue as of late is that I have a problem remembering which power
supply goes to which board, and remembering which of two ethernet ports is
the PoE port on each different type of board.

Documentation for StarOS and the equipment it supports is lacking.  Just
last week I told our engineer that we MUST put PRINTED information in the
hands of our installers on the equipment that we use (what power supply to
use, which is the PoE ports, which boards can handle the high-powered cards
and how many, etc).

The equipment and software is very very good, but you have to be at least a
semi-geek to understand it.

Mark Nash
UnwiredWest
78 Centennial Loop
Suite E
Eugene, OR 97401
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
http://www.unwiredwest.com
- Original Message - 
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message


 I have more and more trouble justifying the cost of any product with a
 steep learning curve.  There's just no reason for gear to not have a
 simple and advanced mode these days.

 And there's no reason for documentation that doesn't cover simple
questions.

 There's no reason to NOT have a quick start guide.

 There's no reason to have a box that doesn't do something right out of the
 box (this one shipped with all wireless ports disabled!).

 There's no reason to not have the option of picking up the phone and
getting
 some help to get started.  Now I'm DAYS into a project that should have
 taken just a few minutes.  There was no documentation in the box.  Not
even
 the web site address, had to Google for it.  There is no tech support
number
 on the web site.

 I guess if a company wants to stay small, have a small user base etc. this
 is all good.  You only get really tech savvy customers.  Something that
I'm
 not when it comes to routing and command line.  I've got a very lean fast
 growing company.  I have over a dozen brands of hardware deployed.  They
all
 do things differently.  I have long ago given up on trying to memorize all
 of this crap.  If it's not completely self explanatory (like 802.1d
bridging
 actually turning on bridging) I don't have time to play with the gear.
 It doesn't really matter how good it is.

 For the record I've got the same bitch with MT.  I can do a little bit
more
 with them because they at least have a decent gui.  But most of what I do
 with them is due to Butch's help.  He's great but having to hire him all
of
 the time raises the cost of the gear by a lot.  All because I don't have
the
 option of a Linksys simple setup option  Dumb.  Very dumb.

 Alvarion has work to do too.  They use strange names for functions.  Don't
 give typical levels as examples right in the software.  I mean really,
how
 am I supposed to know if 10, 1000 or -50 is a good number to try for
 interference mitigation?  And which settings would I tweak for which
things?
 Who the heck has time to read yet another 150+++ page manual?  Put the
 basics right in the software!

 sigh
 marlon

 - Original Message - 
 From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:56 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message


  Not really trying to defend star. The documentation issue has been
  around since Adam met Eve.
 
  The learning curve appears to be steep, but in fact, there is pretty
  good documentation.
  If you search the forums, you will pretty much find anything you need to
  know. Trick is first searching the forums.
  Then there is Tog's WiKi that is pretty good.
  Tog has put a lot of time into the WiKi and helping others with their
  star stuff.
 
  One thing I might add, one reason it's hard to document star, it's
  always changing, and how do you document l7 filtering or isc dhcp
easily?
 
  Fortunately Tog and a few other smart guys hang out there and try to
  offer their help when they can.
 
  Good luck Ralph.
 
  George
 
  ralph wrote:
  I just re-read it and need to clarify.
  I put addresses from the same subnet on all interfaces because it
seemed
  that an address was required per the blanks to fill in.  It was never
  documented to only put an address on one interface.
  With other products, you don't really program the other interfaces, so
  you
  aren't inclined to make that mistake.
 
 
 

 -
---
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  

Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message

2008-06-11 Thread Faisal Imtiaz

Just a thought.

There is some concerted effort from the folks who work with StarOS to
create/compile documentation.

Here is a very decent effort from Travis TOG
http://staros.tog.net/wiki/Main_Page

Maybe if more of the folks working with Staros, contribute to the wiki,
there will be complete documention set ver quickly.

 

Faisal Imtiaz
SnappyDSL.net

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Nash
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:43 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message

I agree with you, Marlon on the documentation/ease-of-use.  I gave up using
Tranzeos for StarOS because of its flexibility and powerful boards and the
atheros driver available creating an environment with extremely low latency.

Tranzeos were/are super-easy.  With StarOS, I've gotten over alot of the
learning curve, but there is still more to learn.  It's for geeks...but once
you're there, you're in pretty good shape.

My biggest issue as of late is that I have a problem remembering which power
supply goes to which board, and remembering which of two ethernet ports is
the PoE port on each different type of board.

Documentation for StarOS and the equipment it supports is lacking.  Just
last week I told our engineer that we MUST put PRINTED information in the
hands of our installers on the equipment that we use (what power supply to
use, which is the PoE ports, which boards can handle the high-powered cards
and how many, etc).

The equipment and software is very very good, but you have to be at least a
semi-geek to understand it.

Mark Nash
UnwiredWest
78 Centennial Loop
Suite E
Eugene, OR 97401
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
http://www.unwiredwest.com
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message


 I have more and more trouble justifying the cost of any product with a
 steep learning curve.  There's just no reason for gear to not have a
 simple and advanced mode these days.

 And there's no reason for documentation that doesn't cover simple
questions.

 There's no reason to NOT have a quick start guide.

 There's no reason to have a box that doesn't do something right out of the
 box (this one shipped with all wireless ports disabled!).

 There's no reason to not have the option of picking up the phone and
getting
 some help to get started.  Now I'm DAYS into a project that should have
 taken just a few minutes.  There was no documentation in the box.  Not
even
 the web site address, had to Google for it.  There is no tech support
number
 on the web site.

 I guess if a company wants to stay small, have a small user base etc. this
 is all good.  You only get really tech savvy customers.  Something that
I'm
 not when it comes to routing and command line.  I've got a very lean fast
 growing company.  I have over a dozen brands of hardware deployed.  They
all
 do things differently.  I have long ago given up on trying to memorize all
 of this crap.  If it's not completely self explanatory (like 802.1d
bridging
 actually turning on bridging) I don't have time to play with the gear.
 It doesn't really matter how good it is.

 For the record I've got the same bitch with MT.  I can do a little bit
more
 with them because they at least have a decent gui.  But most of what I do
 with them is due to Butch's help.  He's great but having to hire him all
of
 the time raises the cost of the gear by a lot.  All because I don't have
the
 option of a Linksys simple setup option  Dumb.  Very dumb.

 Alvarion has work to do too.  They use strange names for functions.  Don't
 give typical levels as examples right in the software.  I mean really,
how
 am I supposed to know if 10, 1000 or -50 is a good number to try for
 interference mitigation?  And which settings would I tweak for which
things?
 Who the heck has time to read yet another 150+++ page manual?  Put the
 basics right in the software!

 sigh
 marlon

 - Original Message - 
 From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:56 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message


  Not really trying to defend star. The documentation issue has been
  around since Adam met Eve.
 
  The learning curve appears to be steep, but in fact, there is pretty
  good documentation.
  If you search the forums, you will pretty much find anything you need to
  know. Trick is first searching the forums.
  Then there is Tog's WiKi that is pretty good.
  Tog has put a lot of time into the WiKi and helping others with their
  star stuff.
 
  One thing I might add, one reason it's hard to document star, it's
  always changing, and how do you document l7 filtering or isc dhcp
easily?
 
  Fortunately Tog and a few other smart guys hang out there and 

Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message

2008-06-11 Thread Mark Nash
Yes, but Marlon's point should not be passed by... It shouldn't be so
difficult.  It's been around long enough.

This hardware and software has made life more difficult for our installers
to deal with.

I do believe in fairness where appropriate, though... Once installed, it's
highly-capable and manageable.  I actually don't like the ssh interface vs.
the Mikrotik Winbox.  However...I do appreciate the ability to run the ssh
interface from any computer anywhere and once I get through our firewall, I
have access to our entire infrastructure and clients.  And since it's not
web-based management, it's very responsive and fast.

Mark Nash
UnwiredWest
78 Centennial Loop
Suite E
Eugene, OR 97401
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
http://www.unwiredwest.com
- Original Message - 
From: Faisal Imtiaz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message



 Just a thought.

 There is some concerted effort from the folks who work with StarOS to
 create/compile documentation.

 Here is a very decent effort from Travis TOG
 http://staros.tog.net/wiki/Main_Page

 Maybe if more of the folks working with Staros, contribute to the wiki,
 there will be complete documention set ver quickly.



 Faisal Imtiaz
 SnappyDSL.net

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Mark Nash
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:43 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message

 I agree with you, Marlon on the documentation/ease-of-use.  I gave up
using
 Tranzeos for StarOS because of its flexibility and powerful boards and the
 atheros driver available creating an environment with extremely low
latency.

 Tranzeos were/are super-easy.  With StarOS, I've gotten over alot of the
 learning curve, but there is still more to learn.  It's for geeks...but
once
 you're there, you're in pretty good shape.

 My biggest issue as of late is that I have a problem remembering which
power
 supply goes to which board, and remembering which of two ethernet ports is
 the PoE port on each different type of board.

 Documentation for StarOS and the equipment it supports is lacking.  Just
 last week I told our engineer that we MUST put PRINTED information in the
 hands of our installers on the equipment that we use (what power supply to
 use, which is the PoE ports, which boards can handle the high-powered
cards
 and how many, etc).

 The equipment and software is very very good, but you have to be at least
a
 semi-geek to understand it.

 Mark Nash
 UnwiredWest
 78 Centennial Loop
 Suite E
 Eugene, OR 97401
 541-998-
 541-998-5599 fax
 http://www.unwiredwest.com
 - Original Message -
 From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:31 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message


  I have more and more trouble justifying the cost of any product with a
  steep learning curve.  There's just no reason for gear to not have a
  simple and advanced mode these days.
 
  And there's no reason for documentation that doesn't cover simple
 questions.
 
  There's no reason to NOT have a quick start guide.
 
  There's no reason to have a box that doesn't do something right out of
the
  box (this one shipped with all wireless ports disabled!).
 
  There's no reason to not have the option of picking up the phone and
 getting
  some help to get started.  Now I'm DAYS into a project that should have
  taken just a few minutes.  There was no documentation in the box.  Not
 even
  the web site address, had to Google for it.  There is no tech support
 number
  on the web site.
 
  I guess if a company wants to stay small, have a small user base etc.
this
  is all good.  You only get really tech savvy customers.  Something that
 I'm
  not when it comes to routing and command line.  I've got a very lean
fast
  growing company.  I have over a dozen brands of hardware deployed.  They
 all
  do things differently.  I have long ago given up on trying to memorize
all
  of this crap.  If it's not completely self explanatory (like 802.1d
 bridging
  actually turning on bridging) I don't have time to play with the
gear.
  It doesn't really matter how good it is.
 
  For the record I've got the same bitch with MT.  I can do a little bit
 more
  with them because they at least have a decent gui.  But most of what I
do
  with them is due to Butch's help.  He's great but having to hire him all
 of
  the time raises the cost of the gear by a lot.  All because I don't have
 the
  option of a Linksys simple setup option  Dumb.  Very dumb.
 
  Alvarion has work to do too.  They use strange names for functions.
Don't
  give typical levels as examples right in the software.  I mean really,
 how
  am I supposed to know if 10, 1000 or -50 is a good number to try for
  interference 

Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message

2008-06-11 Thread George Rogato
You'll forget that you weren't familiar with it after you get used to 
them. It's just like getting a cisco router for your first time and then 
trying to figure out where to start. Sort of like walking in a dark room 
blindfolded for the first time, where am I?

One thing about having to learn the system is when you are forced to 
look through all the various settings you start getting real familiar 
real fast of all the variations of settings. Usually thats enough to 
challenge a thinker type and they soon expose themselves as very 
versatile products and easy to mess with. And it touches on lots of 
things nothing to do with star. OLSR DHCP L7 are not anything special 
that star has done, they are the same as you would find in any linux 
router. They are just inluded as an additional features.

Star is really about the wireless driver. Rest of the stuff is common place.

As for the cards coming disabled, you now know, you can log into the 
unit to turn off a port. Nice feature to have. And to get there to the 
place where you disable or enable the device, you have to go there 
anyways to configure that port.

What seasoned star guys probably do, at least I do this, is when I first 
turn a board on, I upload the newest firware that I intend on using. 
Then I upload a default configuration for that particular board in that 
particular situation. If it's a 2 port, a 4 port a 1 port etc, I have 
default configs.
Actually those default configs are just a config off another board thats 
already configured. We download and back up the configs off every board 
on our network.
Then we go through and make those changes that are unique to that 
deploymment, essid 1p addy, etc.
It's then fast and easy.

Utilistar, star util, and now Star gaze will help you.
You can download the configs and save them and if a board dies on you, 
you just upload the current config to the new board and it works, no 
config changes needed. Just save and activate changes and reboot. Presto.

The best thing about Stars forums style support, there is a lot of 
people that are very smart that are willing to help. And a lot of those 
guys also use MT, Alvarion, Moto, Trango and anything else, so it's not 
as much of a closed minded group to get help or opinions from.








Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
 I have more and more trouble justifying the cost of any product with a 
 steep learning curve.  There's just no reason for gear to not have a 
 simple and advanced mode these days.
 
 And there's no reason for documentation that doesn't cover simple questions.
 
 There's no reason to NOT have a quick start guide.
 
 There's no reason to have a box that doesn't do something right out of the 
 box (this one shipped with all wireless ports disabled!).
 
 There's no reason to not have the option of picking up the phone and getting 
 some help to get started.  Now I'm DAYS into a project that should have 
 taken just a few minutes.  There was no documentation in the box.  Not even 
 the web site address, had to Google for it.  There is no tech support number 
 on the web site.
 
 I guess if a company wants to stay small, have a small user base etc. this 
 is all good.  You only get really tech savvy customers.  Something that I'm 
 not when it comes to routing and command line.  I've got a very lean fast 
 growing company.  I have over a dozen brands of hardware deployed.  They all 
 do things differently.  I have long ago given up on trying to memorize all 
 of this crap.  If it's not completely self explanatory (like 802.1d bridging 
 actually turning on bridging) I don't have time to play with the gear. 
 It doesn't really matter how good it is.
 
 For the record I've got the same bitch with MT.  I can do a little bit more 
 with them because they at least have a decent gui.  But most of what I do 
 with them is due to Butch's help.  He's great but having to hire him all of 
 the time raises the cost of the gear by a lot.  All because I don't have the 
 option of a Linksys simple setup option  Dumb.  Very dumb.
 
 Alvarion has work to do too.  They use strange names for functions.  Don't 
 give typical levels as examples right in the software.  I mean really, how 
 am I supposed to know if 10, 1000 or -50 is a good number to try for 
 interference mitigation?  And which settings would I tweak for which things? 
 Who the heck has time to read yet another 150+++ page manual?  Put the 
 basics right in the software!
 
 sigh
 marlon
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:56 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message
 
 
 Not really trying to defend star. The documentation issue has been
 around since Adam met Eve.

 The learning curve appears to be steep, but in fact, there is pretty
 good documentation.
 If you search the forums, you will pretty much find anything you need to
 know. Trick is first searching 

Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message

2008-06-11 Thread George Rogato
We started using OLSR a few months ago. Not for the redundant mesh back 
hauls, but rather the dynamic routing aspect of it.
Friday I had to move a sub from one end of our network to an entirely 
different ap and segmant.
All I had to do to make sure his ethernet port handed out the same 
public IP to him, was change the ip address and essid on his wan port 
and he was done. No having to add routes through to him. No removing old 
routes.
Just worked when I turned on his radio.

Eventually I will start playing connect the ap's for wireless redundancy.


ralph wrote:
 Yes-
 I did look all through the forums first, and Tog's Wiki is really helpful
 too.
 We need the experts to continue populating some of the sparse areas and I
 will try to help as I become more familiar- 'specially if I get these
 working as mesh radios. I have considerable Tropos and Cisco outdoor mesh
 experience and am really hoping to find a poor man's mesh.  I want to try
 some of the Ligo mesh too, but can't afford to buy it right now. 
 
 Ralph
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of George Rogato
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:56 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message
 
 Not really trying to defend star. The documentation issue has been 
 around since Adam met Eve.
 
 The learning curve appears to be steep, but in fact, there is pretty 
 good documentation.
 If you search the forums, you will pretty much find anything you need to 
 know. Trick is first searching the forums.
 Then there is Tog's WiKi that is pretty good.
 Tog has put a lot of time into the WiKi and helping others with their 
 star stuff.
 
 One thing I might add, one reason it's hard to document star, it's 
 always changing, and how do you document l7 filtering or isc dhcp easily?
 
 Fortunately Tog and a few other smart guys hang out there and try to 
 offer their help when they can.
 
 Good luck Ralph.
 
 George
 
 ralph wrote:
 I just re-read it and need to clarify.
 I put addresses from the same subnet on all interfaces because it seemed
 that an address was required per the blanks to fill in.  It was never
 documented to only put an address on one interface.
 With other products, you don't really program the other interfaces, so you
 aren't inclined to make that mistake.




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message

2008-06-11 Thread George Rogato
It would be nice if they came more configured, so all we had to do is 
give a radio an ip addy and set the essid.

Mark Nash wrote:
 Yes, but Marlon's point should not be passed by... It shouldn't be so
 difficult.  It's been around long enough.
 
 This hardware and software has made life more difficult for our installers
 to deal with.
 
 I do believe in fairness where appropriate, though... Once installed, it's
 highly-capable and manageable.  I actually don't like the ssh interface vs.
 the Mikrotik Winbox.  However...I do appreciate the ability to run the ssh
 interface from any computer anywhere and once I get through our firewall, I
 have access to our entire infrastructure and clients.  And since it's not
 web-based management, it's very responsive and fast.
 
 Mark Nash
 UnwiredWest
 78 Centennial Loop
 Suite E
 Eugene, OR 97401
 541-998-
 541-998-5599 fax
 http://www.unwiredwest.com
 - Original Message - 
 From: Faisal Imtiaz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:52 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message
 
 
 Just a thought.

 There is some concerted effort from the folks who work with StarOS to
 create/compile documentation.

 Here is a very decent effort from Travis TOG
 http://staros.tog.net/wiki/Main_Page

 Maybe if more of the folks working with Staros, contribute to the wiki,
 there will be complete documention set ver quickly.



 Faisal Imtiaz
 SnappyDSL.net

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Mark Nash
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:43 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message

 I agree with you, Marlon on the documentation/ease-of-use.  I gave up
 using
 Tranzeos for StarOS because of its flexibility and powerful boards and the
 atheros driver available creating an environment with extremely low
 latency.
 Tranzeos were/are super-easy.  With StarOS, I've gotten over alot of the
 learning curve, but there is still more to learn.  It's for geeks...but
 once
 you're there, you're in pretty good shape.

 My biggest issue as of late is that I have a problem remembering which
 power
 supply goes to which board, and remembering which of two ethernet ports is
 the PoE port on each different type of board.

 Documentation for StarOS and the equipment it supports is lacking.  Just
 last week I told our engineer that we MUST put PRINTED information in the
 hands of our installers on the equipment that we use (what power supply to
 use, which is the PoE ports, which boards can handle the high-powered
 cards
 and how many, etc).

 The equipment and software is very very good, but you have to be at least
 a
 semi-geek to understand it.

 Mark Nash
 UnwiredWest
 78 Centennial Loop
 Suite E
 Eugene, OR 97401
 541-998-
 541-998-5599 fax
 http://www.unwiredwest.com
 - Original Message -
 From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:31 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message


 I have more and more trouble justifying the cost of any product with a
 steep learning curve.  There's just no reason for gear to not have a
 simple and advanced mode these days.

 And there's no reason for documentation that doesn't cover simple
 questions.
 There's no reason to NOT have a quick start guide.

 There's no reason to have a box that doesn't do something right out of
 the
 box (this one shipped with all wireless ports disabled!).

 There's no reason to not have the option of picking up the phone and
 getting
 some help to get started.  Now I'm DAYS into a project that should have
 taken just a few minutes.  There was no documentation in the box.  Not
 even
 the web site address, had to Google for it.  There is no tech support
 number
 on the web site.

 I guess if a company wants to stay small, have a small user base etc.
 this
 is all good.  You only get really tech savvy customers.  Something that
 I'm
 not when it comes to routing and command line.  I've got a very lean
 fast
 growing company.  I have over a dozen brands of hardware deployed.  They
 all
 do things differently.  I have long ago given up on trying to memorize
 all
 of this crap.  If it's not completely self explanatory (like 802.1d
 bridging
 actually turning on bridging) I don't have time to play with the
 gear.
 It doesn't really matter how good it is.

 For the record I've got the same bitch with MT.  I can do a little bit
 more
 with them because they at least have a decent gui.  But most of what I
 do
 with them is due to Butch's help.  He's great but having to hire him all
 of
 the time raises the cost of the gear by a lot.  All because I don't have
 the
 option of a Linksys simple setup option  Dumb.  Very dumb.

 Alvarion has work to do too.  They use strange names for functions.
 Don't
 give typical levels as 

Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message

2008-06-11 Thread reader
Marlon, I have been using Star-OS since the beginning here.   Means four 
years of using it.

It is the fastest, easiest, and best performing of anything I've tried.

They're so right about not bridging, but if you need any assistance, give me 
a shout.  It's not even that far if you want a hands on demo on how to set 
things up, and I don't mind making the trip.

Mark






insert witty tagline here

- Original Message - 
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message


I have more and more trouble justifying the cost of any product with a
 steep learning curve.  There's just no reason for gear to not have a
 simple and advanced mode these days.

 And there's no reason for documentation that doesn't cover simple 
 questions.

 There's no reason to NOT have a quick start guide.

 There's no reason to have a box that doesn't do something right out of the
 box (this one shipped with all wireless ports disabled!).

 There's no reason to not have the option of picking up the phone and 
 getting
 some help to get started.  Now I'm DAYS into a project that should have
 taken just a few minutes.  There was no documentation in the box.  Not 
 even
 the web site address, had to Google for it.  There is no tech support 
 number
 on the web site.

 I guess if a company wants to stay small, have a small user base etc. this
 is all good.  You only get really tech savvy customers.  Something that 
 I'm
 not when it comes to routing and command line.  I've got a very lean fast
 growing company.  I have over a dozen brands of hardware deployed.  They 
 all
 do things differently.  I have long ago given up on trying to memorize all
 of this crap.  If it's not completely self explanatory (like 802.1d 
 bridging
 actually turning on bridging) I don't have time to play with the gear.
 It doesn't really matter how good it is.

 For the record I've got the same bitch with MT.  I can do a little bit 
 more
 with them because they at least have a decent gui.  But most of what I do
 with them is due to Butch's help.  He's great but having to hire him all 
 of
 the time raises the cost of the gear by a lot.  All because I don't have 
 the
 option of a Linksys simple setup option  Dumb.  Very dumb.

 Alvarion has work to do too.  They use strange names for functions.  Don't
 give typical levels as examples right in the software.  I mean really, 
 how
 am I supposed to know if 10, 1000 or -50 is a good number to try for
 interference mitigation?  And which settings would I tweak for which 
 things?
 Who the heck has time to read yet another 150+++ page manual?  Put the
 basics right in the software!

 sigh
 marlon

 - Original Message - 
 From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:56 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message


 Not really trying to defend star. The documentation issue has been
 around since Adam met Eve.

 The learning curve appears to be steep, but in fact, there is pretty
 good documentation.
 If you search the forums, you will pretty much find anything you need to
 know. Trick is first searching the forums.
 Then there is Tog's WiKi that is pretty good.
 Tog has put a lot of time into the WiKi and helping others with their
 star stuff.

 One thing I might add, one reason it's hard to document star, it's
 always changing, and how do you document l7 filtering or isc dhcp easily?

 Fortunately Tog and a few other smart guys hang out there and try to
 offer their help when they can.

 Good luck Ralph.

 George

 ralph wrote:
 I just re-read it and need to clarify.
 I put addresses from the same subnet on all interfaces because it seemed
 that an address was required per the blanks to fill in.  It was never
 documented to only put an address on one interface.
 With other products, you don't really program the other interfaces, so
 you
 aren't inclined to make that mistake.



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 

[WISPA] Voip over Wireless

2008-06-11 Thread Steve Barnes
We are a small wisp and have been asked about VOIP and I am just starting to
research it.  Vonage has not worked on our network.  What service is
recommended by all of you that does not eat your networks alive with large
packets and Keep alive.  

FYI, I am looking for a service not to build my own.

Steve Barnes
Executive Manager
PCS-WIN
RCWiFi Wireless Internet Service
(765)584-2288





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message

2008-06-11 Thread Mark Nash
Yes, but only the clients I think.  The APs/backhauls/distros should need to
be configured.

I'd say that
99.99% of the
WAR1's are configured as a NAT router.  Then there are those who use them as
bridges... ;)

Mark Nash
UnwiredWest
78 Centennial Loop
Suite E
Eugene, OR 97401
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
http://www.unwiredwest.com
- Original Message - 
From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message


 It would be nice if they came more configured, so all we had to do is
 give a radio an ip addy and set the essid.

 Mark Nash wrote:
  Yes, but Marlon's point should not be passed by... It shouldn't be so
  difficult.  It's been around long enough.
 
  This hardware and software has made life more difficult for our
installers
  to deal with.
 
  I do believe in fairness where appropriate, though... Once installed,
it's
  highly-capable and manageable.  I actually don't like the ssh interface
vs.
  the Mikrotik Winbox.  However...I do appreciate the ability to run the
ssh
  interface from any computer anywhere and once I get through our
firewall, I
  have access to our entire infrastructure and clients.  And since it's
not
  web-based management, it's very responsive and fast.
 
  Mark Nash
  UnwiredWest
  78 Centennial Loop
  Suite E
  Eugene, OR 97401
  541-998-
  541-998-5599 fax
  http://www.unwiredwest.com
  - Original Message - 
  From: Faisal Imtiaz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:52 AM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message
 
 
  Just a thought.
 
  There is some concerted effort from the folks who work with StarOS to
  create/compile documentation.
 
  Here is a very decent effort from Travis TOG
  http://staros.tog.net/wiki/Main_Page
 
  Maybe if more of the folks working with Staros, contribute to the wiki,
  there will be complete documention set ver quickly.
 
 
 
  Faisal Imtiaz
  SnappyDSL.net
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Mark Nash
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:43 AM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message
 
  I agree with you, Marlon on the documentation/ease-of-use.  I gave up
  using
  Tranzeos for StarOS because of its flexibility and powerful boards and
the
  atheros driver available creating an environment with extremely low
  latency.
  Tranzeos were/are super-easy.  With StarOS, I've gotten over alot of
the
  learning curve, but there is still more to learn.  It's for geeks...but
  once
  you're there, you're in pretty good shape.
 
  My biggest issue as of late is that I have a problem remembering which
  power
  supply goes to which board, and remembering which of two ethernet ports
is
  the PoE port on each different type of board.
 
  Documentation for StarOS and the equipment it supports is lacking.
Just
  last week I told our engineer that we MUST put PRINTED information in
the
  hands of our installers on the equipment that we use (what power supply
to
  use, which is the PoE ports, which boards can handle the high-powered
  cards
  and how many, etc).
 
  The equipment and software is very very good, but you have to be at
least
  a
  semi-geek to understand it.
 
  Mark Nash
  UnwiredWest
  78 Centennial Loop
  Suite E
  Eugene, OR 97401
  541-998-
  541-998-5599 fax
  http://www.unwiredwest.com
  - Original Message -
  From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:31 AM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os config help- clarifying my message
 
 
  I have more and more trouble justifying the cost of any product with a
  steep learning curve.  There's just no reason for gear to not have a
  simple and advanced mode these days.
 
  And there's no reason for documentation that doesn't cover simple
  questions.
  There's no reason to NOT have a quick start guide.
 
  There's no reason to have a box that doesn't do something right out of
  the
  box (this one shipped with all wireless ports disabled!).
 
  There's no reason to not have the option of picking up the phone and
  getting
  some help to get started.  Now I'm DAYS into a project that should
have
  taken just a few minutes.  There was no documentation in the box.  Not
  even
  the web site address, had to Google for it.  There is no tech support
  number
  on the web site.
 
  I guess if a company wants to stay small, have a small user base etc.
  this
  is all good.  You only get really tech savvy customers.  Something
that
  I'm
  not when it comes to routing and command line.  I've got a very lean
  fast
  growing company.  I have over a dozen brands of hardware deployed.
They
  all
  do things differently.  I 

Re: [WISPA] Voip over Wireless

2008-06-11 Thread Jeff Broadwick
Hi Steve,

VoIP generally uses very small packets...and those are the ones that tax a
network.  What you most likely need is QoS set up further out in your
network.

Regards,

Jeff
ImageStream 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:49 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Voip over Wireless

We are a small wisp and have been asked about VOIP and I am just starting to
research it.  Vonage has not worked on our network.  What service is
recommended by all of you that does not eat your networks alive with large
packets and Keep alive.  

FYI, I am looking for a service not to build my own.

Steve Barnes
Executive Manager
PCS-WIN
RCWiFi Wireless Internet Service
(765)584-2288






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Voip over Wireless

2008-06-11 Thread Mike Hammett
Large packets are your friend, the small ones are not.  All VoIP is small 
packets.


--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: Steve Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:48 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Voip over Wireless


 We are a small wisp and have been asked about VOIP and I am just starting 
 to
 research it.  Vonage has not worked on our network.  What service is
 recommended by all of you that does not eat your networks alive with large
 packets and Keep alive.

 FYI, I am looking for a service not to build my own.

 Steve Barnes
 Executive Manager
 PCS-WIN
 RCWiFi Wireless Internet Service
 (765)584-2288




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Voip over Wireless

2008-06-11 Thread Matt Hardy
If you're looking at implementing VoIP with a system that's standards
based, I'd try to find something that utilizes the Atheros Super G
capabilities (WMM, Packet Bursting, Compression, Fast Frames).

These can really help with VoiP in two main ways:

WMM - A subset of 802.11e (QoS). Prioritizes data traffic based on 4
categories (Voice, Video, Best Effort, and Background)... VoIP
automatically gets prioritized.
and
Fast Frames - Packet aggregation which helps with the small packets
issue  :)

For reference:
http://www.atheros.com/pt/whitepapers/atheros_superg_whitepaper.pdf

-Matt

On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:40 -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:

 Large packets are your friend, the small ones are not.  All VoIP is small 
 packets.
 
 
 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Steve Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:48 AM
 Subject: [WISPA] Voip over Wireless
 
 
  We are a small wisp and have been asked about VOIP and I am just starting 
  to
  research it.  Vonage has not worked on our network.  What service is
  recommended by all of you that does not eat your networks alive with large
  packets and Keep alive.
 
  FYI, I am looking for a service not to build my own.
 
  Steve Barnes
  Executive Manager
  PCS-WIN
  RCWiFi Wireless Internet Service
  (765)584-2288
 
 
 
 
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] Rapid Link Improves Working Capital Position by Over $1, 000, 000

2008-06-11 Thread Mike Prachar
- Long-Standing Texas State Tax Liability Settled -

OMAHA, NE - June 11, 2008 - Rapid Link, Incorporated (OTCBB: RPID), a
leading provider of WiMax and Communication Services, announced today
the final settlement, and release from any ongoing liability, of a
long-standing sales tax dispute in the State of Texas. A result of the
settlement was the elimination of a $1,062,000 current liability. 

The original liability was due to an assessment by the State of Texas
for past due sales tax. This assessment stemmed from an alleged
underpayment of sales taxes by a now dissolved subsidiary of Rapid Link
Incorporated. At no time was there a judgment against Rapid Link
Incorporated; however the potential for a future judgment necessitated
the accrual of this potential liability. 

John Jenkins, Chief Executive Officer of Rapid Link states, Though it
was a long time coming, we are very pleased to settle this issue once
and for all, and again show our shareholders that we are serious about
our goal to attain a net positive working capital position. This is just
one of many steps we are taking to do just that. 

Chris Canfield, Chief Financial Officer of Rapid Link states,
Extinguishing this liability has improved our balance sheet
significantly. In the past year Rapid Link has seen its Chief Executive
convert $900,000 of debt into equity at above market prices, announced
the extensions of virtually all short-term notes into long-term notes
due in 2011, and raised significant capital, all of which has
dramatically improved our working capital position. We are confident we
can now aggressively grow our business without the need to seek
additional capital. 

About Rapid Link, Incorporated. 

Rapid Link, Incorporated is a Diversified Communication Services
company, supplying bundled internet and voice services to Business and
Residential customers. Rapid Link offers broadband access via its own
facilities to ensure fast and reliable delivery of its content. As a
leading licensed WiMAX carrier, Rapid Link is on the cutting edge of
this exciting new technology. We are one of the only carriers that can
offer an end-to-end solution for our customers without a dependency on
any other company's resources. 

For more information about Rapid Link, visit www.rapidlink.com. 

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995: With the exception of historical information, the
statements set forth above include forward-looking statements that
involve risk and uncertainties. The Company wishes to caution readers
that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ
materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Those factors
include, but are not limited to, risks and uncertainties such as the
failure to satisfy contractually agreed upon closing conditions that may
delay or prevent the closings of subsequent debt financings contemplated
by the applicable agreements; the risk factors noted in the Company's
filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, such
as the trading price of the Company's common stock reaching levels that
would cause funding to occur; the rapidly changing nature of technology,
evolving industry standards and frequent introductions of new products,
services and enhancements by competitors; the competitive nature of the
markets for the Company's products and services; the Company's ability
to gain market acceptance for its products and services; the Company's
ability to fund its operational growth; the Company's ability to attract
and retain skilled personnel; the Company's ability to diversify its
revenue streams and customer concentrations; and the Company's reliance
on third-party suppliers.

For more information:
Rapid Link, Incorporated
Investor Relations
402-392-7561 

Or: 
DME Capital
Investor Relations
David Elias
516-967-0205



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Voip over Wireless

2008-06-11 Thread George Rogato
Steve
What doesn't work with Vonage?
Is it the quality of the call or the service itself?
Maybe I can help abit.

George

Steve Barnes wrote:
 We are a small wisp and have been asked about VOIP and I am just starting to
 research it.  Vonage has not worked on our network.  What service is
 recommended by all of you that does not eat your networks alive with large
 packets and Keep alive.  
 
 FYI, I am looking for a service not to build my own.
 
 Steve Barnes
 Executive Manager
 PCS-WIN
 RCWiFi Wireless Internet Service
 (765)584-2288
 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/