Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-23 Thread Gino Villarini
Sure do, Cti would have to fly me there

Sent from my Motorola Startac...


On May 23, 2009, at 12:11 AM, Charles Wu c...@cticonnect.com wrote:

 Well Gino, it looks you're buying ski tickets next time =)

 -Charles

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]  
 On Behalf Of Gino Villarini
 Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 3:54 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital  
 Availability

 Option 3


 Gino A. Villarini
 g...@aeronetpr.com
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]  
 On
 Behalf Of Charles Wu
 Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 4:50 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital
 Availability

 Lease, lease, lease.

 Agreed that leasing is a great option, but in looking at my numbers
 these past few months, I've noticed that the amount of leasing that we
 do is a fraction of what we used to do 12 months ago (if it wasn't for
 the Motorola 3% program, I don't think we'd be doing any leasing) -  
 part
 of it is because many of our leasing vendors aren't leasing anymore
 (e.g., GE Capital), but given that infrastructure sales haven't  
 dropped
 off that much in this economy (in fact, our March numbers for 2009  
 were
 BETTER than our March 2008 numbers), I'm trying to understand why  
 people
 who may have leased in the past no longer seem to be leasing  
 (obviously,
 you're still leasing away so this question doesn't apply to you =)...

 So if you were leasing 12 months ago, but no longer are, Is it because


 1.   The economy sucks and you're not buying new equipment?

 2.   The economy is fine, you want to lease equipment but can't  
 get
 approved?

 3.   The economy is fine, but you're making so much money that you
 no longer need to lease equipment?

 Just curiosity on my side

 -Charles




 --- 
 -
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --- 
 -
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-23 Thread Scott Reed
So I will take option 4 from a previous post since Travis made the point.
Up to 60 months with $1 buyout is the same as a 5 year bank loan.
I want to run debt free as soon a possible.  That being the case I don't 
lease and have not leased to keep debt down.  I do have a start-up loan 
that is being paid on a little slower than I would like, but we have 
paid off 1/2 of it in  5 years and based on our payments, we are cash 
flow positive.
Granted, my WISP is a lot smaller than many that post here and our 
growth rate is small, but some of that is managing growth to stay 
cash-flow positive.
I have seen several companies die because they became cash rich, but 
still could not cover the debt.

Travis Johnson wrote:
 The banks can sell a car with little effort. They already have 
 relationships with dealers and auctions. And often, if the consumer's 
 credit is questionable, the dealer will guarantee to take the car back 
 if the loan defaults.

 Who is going to buy a $10,000 radio that has been repo'd? Even for 
 $5k, I wouldn't touch it. I'd buy a new radio with warranty, that I 
 know is good and hasn't been fried or broken.

 The banks will never loan on the equipment alone. There is no security 
 there... but again, why do you need a bank loan for equipment when you 
 can just lease it and get the same results? Up to 60 months with $1 
 buyout is the same as a 5 year bank loan. What's the difference?

 Travis
 Microserv

 Tom DeReggi wrote:
 Maybe when talking about CPE.

 But what about when one is talking about a $10,000 Part101 radio?

 Just like a car, all that the lender should need is to hold the title of 
 the radio until paid off, and get a down payment of $2000 to cover the cost 
 of tower climber/repo man, and a signed letter of authorization from lanlord 
 stating the location of the tower gear is installed on and they acknowledge 
 that the gear is not abandoned equipment. (So it does not automatically 
 become property of landlord in 4 months, and teh landlord knows the 
 equipment owner has first rights to the gear).

 Think about it... Wouldn't repo costs be reduced when the repo man knows 
 exactly where to find the radio? A car can easilly be relocated and 
 hard-to-find, when the owner skips town.
 Plus the home likely has an owner with a shot gun or a big dog, which the 
 tower/MTU likely does not.  The MTU building might even have a security 
 guard to escort teh lender safely to the roof :-)


 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


 - Original Message - 
 From: jp j...@saucer.midcoast.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 11:13 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability


   
 In a worse case scenario, a car is probably considerably easier to repo
 than the antenna on my roof and radio in my attic. And the car would be
 worth a magnitude more money. The installed infrastructure is worthless
 if it costs a huge amount to get to it.

 On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:27:09PM -0400, Tom DeReggi wrote:
 
 I've never found a lender willing to lend against using the in-place used
 equipment as colladeral.
 It is the biggest double standard.
 I find it highly ironic that they'll use a car for colladeral that looses
 50% of its value the day it leaves the lot, and has a rate of failure and
 risk of damage higher than just about any product on the market, and it 
 has
 a huge cash burn (gas :-). but yet lendors won't put equivellent value on
 wireless gear, that holds its value, Ebay boasting easilly 50% after 3-4
 years of use, even after fully depreciated.
 I'll never understand the lending market.

 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


 - Original Message - 
 From: rea...@muddyfrogwater.us
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 1:55 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital 
 Availability


   
 Answers in-line.


 
 insert witty tagline here

 - Original Message - 
 From: Charles Wu c...@cticonnect.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 8:49 AM
 Subject: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability


 
 With all the hype being generated by the stimulus bill, we have been
 approached by a multitude of third party financial organizations that
 have
 a renewed interest in potentially financing rural broadband...now,
 specifically, for WISPs, in the past, equipment leasing has been a 
 very
 popular option for financing, but in looking at our numbers over the 
 past
 year, I've noticed a marked decline in the amount of leasing that we 
 do -
 that said, I have the following questions for the listserv about
 financing

 Assuming that WISPs are still need to buy equipment...

 1. Are you able to just purchase equipment out of cash-flow 
 organically
 generated from 

Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-23 Thread Tom DeReggi
Travis, 

I'd agree, except, I'm finding a loan or Line of Credit  is as easy to get as a 
lease.  
When the leasor considers a radio, the opposite of a car, non-liquidatable, 
does the lender really benefit by leasing it instead of lending for it? 


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


  - Original Message - 
  From: Travis Johnson 
  To: WISPA General List 
  Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 6:04 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability


  The banks can sell a car with little effort. They already have relationships 
with dealers and auctions. And often, if the consumer's credit is questionable, 
the dealer will guarantee to take the car back if the loan defaults.

  Who is going to buy a $10,000 radio that has been repo'd? Even for $5k, I 
wouldn't touch it. I'd buy a new radio with warranty, that I know is good and 
hasn't been fried or broken.

  The banks will never loan on the equipment alone. There is no security 
there... but again, why do you need a bank loan for equipment when you can just 
lease it and get the same results? Up to 60 months with $1 buyout is the same 
as a 5 year bank loan. What's the difference?

  Travis
  Microserv

  Tom DeReggi wrote: 
Maybe when talking about CPE.

But what about when one is talking about a $10,000 Part101 radio?

Just like a car, all that the lender should need is to hold the title of 
the radio until paid off, and get a down payment of $2000 to cover the cost 
of tower climber/repo man, and a signed letter of authorization from lanlord 
stating the location of the tower gear is installed on and they acknowledge 
that the gear is not abandoned equipment. (So it does not automatically 
become property of landlord in 4 months, and teh landlord knows the 
equipment owner has first rights to the gear).

Think about it... Wouldn't repo costs be reduced when the repo man knows 
exactly where to find the radio? A car can easilly be relocated and 
hard-to-find, when the owner skips town.
Plus the home likely has an owner with a shot gun or a big dog, which the 
tower/MTU likely does not.  The MTU building might even have a security 
guard to escort teh lender safely to the roof :-)


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: jp j...@saucer.midcoast.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability


  In a worse case scenario, a car is probably considerably easier to repo
than the antenna on my roof and radio in my attic. And the car would be
worth a magnitude more money. The installed infrastructure is worthless
if it costs a huge amount to get to it.

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:27:09PM -0400, Tom DeReggi wrote:
I've never found a lender willing to lend against using the in-place used
equipment as colladeral.
It is the biggest double standard.
I find it highly ironic that they'll use a car for colladeral that looses
50% of its value the day it leaves the lot, and has a rate of failure and
risk of damage higher than just about any product on the market, and it 
has
a huge cash burn (gas :-). but yet lendors won't put equivellent value on
wireless gear, that holds its value, Ebay boasting easilly 50% after 3-4
years of use, even after fully depreciated.
I'll never understand the lending market.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: rea...@muddyfrogwater.us
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital 
Availability


  Answers in-line.



insert witty tagline here

- Original Message - 
From: Charles Wu c...@cticonnect.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 8:49 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability


With all the hype being generated by the stimulus bill, we have been
approached by a multitude of third party financial organizations that
have
a renewed interest in potentially financing rural broadband...now,
specifically, for WISPs, in the past, equipment leasing has been a 
very
popular option for financing, but in looking at our numbers over the 
past
year, I've noticed a marked decline in the amount of leasing that we 
do -
that said, I have the following questions for the listserv about
financing

Assuming that WISPs are still need to buy equipment...

1. Are you able to just purchase equipment out of cash-flow 
organically
generated from operations
  Other than originally starting with our own personal seed money, 
that's
what
we've done.

2. Have you gone to more traditional forms of money (e.g., bank / SBA 
/
RUS loans)?
  I could not qualify for any of them.

3. Are you doing more 

Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-23 Thread Travis Johnson
The biggest difference I have seen with a loan or line of credit, even 
for us (a corporation in business for 13 years and profitable since the 
first year) is that the banks want personal guarantees... and we haven't 
done a personal guarantee on leasing equipment for 5+ years.

When you have 20+ current leases totalling over $1,000,000 having that 
show up on your personal credit reports makes it very hard to re-finance 
your house, or buy a car, etc. Yes, it can be done (because I have done 
it), it just creates 10x the work... and there is no benefit (tax wise, 
equipment wise, company wise, etc.) so we take the easy way. ;)

We lease, it stays corporate (as it should), and everything is good. :)

Travis
Microserv

Tom DeReggi wrote:
 Travis, 

 I'd agree, except, I'm finding a loan or Line of Credit  is as easy to get as 
 a lease.  
 When the leasor considers a radio, the opposite of a car, non-liquidatable, 
 does the lender really benefit by leasing it instead of lending for it? 


 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


   - Original Message - 
   From: Travis Johnson 
   To: WISPA General List 
   Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 6:04 PM
   Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability


   The banks can sell a car with little effort. They already have 
 relationships with dealers and auctions. And often, if the consumer's credit 
 is questionable, the dealer will guarantee to take the car back if the loan 
 defaults.

   Who is going to buy a $10,000 radio that has been repo'd? Even for $5k, I 
 wouldn't touch it. I'd buy a new radio with warranty, that I know is good and 
 hasn't been fried or broken.

   The banks will never loan on the equipment alone. There is no security 
 there... but again, why do you need a bank loan for equipment when you can 
 just lease it and get the same results? Up to 60 months with $1 buyout is the 
 same as a 5 year bank loan. What's the difference?

   Travis
   Microserv

   Tom DeReggi wrote: 
 Maybe when talking about CPE.

 But what about when one is talking about a $10,000 Part101 radio?

 Just like a car, all that the lender should need is to hold the title of 
 the radio until paid off, and get a down payment of $2000 to cover the cost 
 of tower climber/repo man, and a signed letter of authorization from lanlord 
 stating the location of the tower gear is installed on and they acknowledge 
 that the gear is not abandoned equipment. (So it does not automatically 
 become property of landlord in 4 months, and teh landlord knows the 
 equipment owner has first rights to the gear).

 Think about it... Wouldn't repo costs be reduced when the repo man knows 
 exactly where to find the radio? A car can easilly be relocated and 
 hard-to-find, when the owner skips town.
 Plus the home likely has an owner with a shot gun or a big dog, which the 
 tower/MTU likely does not.  The MTU building might even have a security 
 guard to escort teh lender safely to the roof :-)


 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


 - Original Message - 
 From: jp j...@saucer.midcoast.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 11:13 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability


   In a worse case scenario, a car is probably considerably easier to repo
 than the antenna on my roof and radio in my attic. And the car would be
 worth a magnitude more money. The installed infrastructure is worthless
 if it costs a huge amount to get to it.

 On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:27:09PM -0400, Tom DeReggi wrote:
 I've never found a lender willing to lend against using the in-place used
 equipment as colladeral.
 It is the biggest double standard.
 I find it highly ironic that they'll use a car for colladeral that looses
 50% of its value the day it leaves the lot, and has a rate of failure and
 risk of damage higher than just about any product on the market, and it 
 has
 a huge cash burn (gas :-). but yet lendors won't put equivellent value on
 wireless gear, that holds its value, Ebay boasting easilly 50% after 3-4
 years of use, even after fully depreciated.
 I'll never understand the lending market.

 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


 - Original Message - 
 From: rea...@muddyfrogwater.us
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 1:55 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital 
 Availability


   Answers in-line.


 
 insert witty tagline here

 - Original Message - 
 From: Charles Wu c...@cticonnect.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 8:49 AM
 Subject: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability


 With all the hype being generated by the stimulus bill, we have been
 approached by a multitude of 

Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-23 Thread Charles Wu
Hi Scott,

Regarding debt...I've found that there's a scale inflection point in running 
a WISP (or any business for the matter) that needs to be reached -- the main 
purpose for taking on debt (because due to interest, you end up paying more in 
the longer term instead of buying cash), is to accelerate growth so one can 
progress beyond this point

e.g., if you can organically fund 30 new installs a month with cash, if you 
take on debt, you could leverage yourself and now do 100 installs / month

Now, from a business perspective -- in looking at the WISP

As a stand-alone sustainable business -- it costs a minimum of about $30k / 
month to operate a small WISP -- now, I'll argue that that $30k/month in 
operations remains relatively constant and whether it's supporting 300, 800 or 
1500 customers -- however, at 300 customers, the business is bleeding cash...at 
800 customers the business is just about at a break-even, and at 1500 
customers, the business is a cash machine

-Charles

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Scott Reed
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 4:20 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

So I will take option 4 from a previous post since Travis made the point.
Up to 60 months with $1 buyout is the same as a 5 year bank loan.
I want to run debt free as soon a possible.  That being the case I don't 
lease and have not leased to keep debt down.  I do have a start-up loan 
that is being paid on a little slower than I would like, but we have 
paid off 1/2 of it in  5 years and based on our payments, we are cash 
flow positive.
Granted, my WISP is a lot smaller than many that post here and our 
growth rate is small, but some of that is managing growth to stay 
cash-flow positive.
I have seen several companies die because they became cash rich, but 
still could not cover the debt.

Travis Johnson wrote:
 The banks can sell a car with little effort. They already have 
 relationships with dealers and auctions. And often, if the consumer's 
 credit is questionable, the dealer will guarantee to take the car back 
 if the loan defaults.

 Who is going to buy a $10,000 radio that has been repo'd? Even for 
 $5k, I wouldn't touch it. I'd buy a new radio with warranty, that I 
 know is good and hasn't been fried or broken.

 The banks will never loan on the equipment alone. There is no security 
 there... but again, why do you need a bank loan for equipment when you 
 can just lease it and get the same results? Up to 60 months with $1 
 buyout is the same as a 5 year bank loan. What's the difference?

 Travis
 Microserv

 Tom DeReggi wrote:
 Maybe when talking about CPE.

 But what about when one is talking about a $10,000 Part101 radio?

 Just like a car, all that the lender should need is to hold the title of 
 the radio until paid off, and get a down payment of $2000 to cover the cost 
 of tower climber/repo man, and a signed letter of authorization from lanlord 
 stating the location of the tower gear is installed on and they acknowledge 
 that the gear is not abandoned equipment. (So it does not automatically 
 become property of landlord in 4 months, and teh landlord knows the 
 equipment owner has first rights to the gear).

 Think about it... Wouldn't repo costs be reduced when the repo man knows 
 exactly where to find the radio? A car can easilly be relocated and 
 hard-to-find, when the owner skips town.
 Plus the home likely has an owner with a shot gun or a big dog, which the 
 tower/MTU likely does not.  The MTU building might even have a security 
 guard to escort teh lender safely to the roof :-)


 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


 - Original Message - 
 From: jp j...@saucer.midcoast.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 11:13 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability


   
 In a worse case scenario, a car is probably considerably easier to repo
 than the antenna on my roof and radio in my attic. And the car would be
 worth a magnitude more money. The installed infrastructure is worthless
 if it costs a huge amount to get to it.

 On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:27:09PM -0400, Tom DeReggi wrote:
 
 I've never found a lender willing to lend against using the in-place used
 equipment as colladeral.
 It is the biggest double standard.
 I find it highly ironic that they'll use a car for colladeral that looses
 50% of its value the day it leaves the lot, and has a rate of failure and
 risk of damage higher than just about any product on the market, and it 
 has
 a huge cash burn (gas :-). but yet lendors won't put equivellent value on
 wireless gear, that holds its value, Ebay boasting easilly 50% after 3-4
 years of use, even after fully depreciated.
 I'll never understand the lending market.

 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 

Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-23 Thread Travis Johnson




Charles,

I agree with you... but at what point does that happen? If your growth
is growing (meaning you are doing more installs every month then the
previous month), I don't think you can ever reach the point of paying
cash for CPE... without completely strapping the entire business.

I just don't see a reason that it makes sense to pay cash for the CPE.
Yes, we pay cash for all of our backhauls, AP's, antennas for CPE,
accessories (CAT5, mounts, etc.) but when it really costs so little in
the long run to finance the CPE and have extra cash flow for other
things, it seems the easy solution... especially during heavy growth
periods.

All I can say is if you are "holding back" on doing more installs
because you can't afford it, you need to find some financing and get
installing. Once that customer is installed with something else (DSL,
Cable, competitor), it's 10x harder to get them to switch to you. You
have to get the customers NOW.

Travis
Microserv

Charles Wu wrote:

  Hi Scott,

Regarding debt...I've found that there's a "scale inflection point" in running a WISP (or any business for the matter) that needs to be reached -- the main purpose for taking on debt (because due to interest, you end up paying more in the longer term instead of buying cash), is to accelerate growth so one can progress beyond this point

e.g., if you can organically fund 30 new installs a month with cash, if you take on debt, you could leverage yourself and now do 100 installs / month

Now, from a business perspective -- in looking at the WISP

As a stand-alone sustainable business -- it costs a minimum of about $30k / month to operate a small WISP -- now, I'll argue that that $30k/month in operations remains relatively constant and whether it's supporting 300, 800 or 1500 customers -- however, at 300 customers, the business is bleeding cash...at 800 customers the business is just about at a break-even, and at 1500 customers, the business is a cash machine

-Charles

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Scott Reed
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 4:20 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

So I will take option 4 from a previous post since Travis made the point.
"Up to 60 months with $1 buyout is the same as a 5 year bank loan."
I want to run debt free as soon a possible.  That being the case I don't 
lease and have not leased to keep debt down.  I do have a start-up loan 
that is being paid on a little slower than I would like, but we have 
paid off 1/2 of it in  5 years and based on our payments, we are cash 
flow positive.
Granted, my WISP is a lot smaller than many that post here and our 
growth rate is small, but some of that is managing growth to stay 
cash-flow positive.
I have seen several companies die because they became cash rich, but 
still could not cover the debt.

Travis Johnson wrote:
  
  
The banks can sell a car with little effort. They already have 
relationships with dealers and auctions. And often, if the consumer's 
credit is questionable, the dealer will guarantee to take the car back 
if the loan defaults.

Who is going to buy a $10,000 radio that has been repo'd? Even for 
$5k, I wouldn't touch it. I'd buy a new radio with warranty, that I 
know is good and hasn't been fried or broken.

The banks will never loan on the equipment alone. There is no security 
there... but again, why do you need a bank loan for equipment when you 
can just lease it and get the same results? Up to 60 months with $1 
buyout is the same as a 5 year bank loan. What's the difference?

Travis
Microserv

Tom DeReggi wrote:


  Maybe when talking about CPE.

But what about when one is talking about a $10,000 Part101 radio?

Just like a car, all that the lender should need is to "hold the title" of 
the radio until paid off, and get a down payment of $2000 to cover the cost 
of tower climber/repo man, and a signed letter of authorization from lanlord 
stating the location of the tower gear is installed on and they acknowledge 
that the gear is not abandoned equipment. (So it does not automatically 
become property of landlord in 4 months, and teh landlord knows the 
equipment owner has first rights to the gear).

Think about it... Wouldn't repo costs be reduced when the repo man knows 
exactly where to find the radio? A car can easilly be relocated and 
hard-to-find, when the owner skips town.
Plus the home likely has an owner with a shot gun or a big dog, which the 
tower/MTU likely does not.  The MTU building might even have a security 
guard to escort teh lender safely to the roof :-)


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: "jp" j...@saucer.midcoast.com
To: "WISPA General List" wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability