[WISPA] rooftop leasing?

2005-10-06 Thread Dan Metcalf
Aftering spending almost 8 weeks trying to get a lease with a rooftop provider,
they come back at us with a request for a business plan and financial statement
before going forward ---

Thoughts? Has anybody had a request like this before? We haven't

Thanks

Dan


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
 Of Tony Weasler
 Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 3:43 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cogent - Level3
 
 On 10/6/2005 1:03 PM, Tom DeReggi created:
  To set the record straight, no peering agreements were violated
  between L3 and Cogent.
 
  I heard otherwise, however I can't prove that.
 
 Cogent on their own web site said that agreements were not violated:
 
 Level 3 terminated its peering with Cogent without cause (as
 permitted under its peering agreement with Cogent) even though both
 Cogent and Level 3 remained in full compliance with the previously
 existing interconnection agreement.
 http://status.cogentco.com/
 
  There is also no confirmed evidence that L3 is
  blocking Cogent traffic through Cogent's Verio transit (which Cogent
  pays $$ for.)
 
  There was evidence. I wish I saved my traceroutes yesterday.
  To make more clear, Cogent is our backbone.
  When going to www.logmein.com, the last successfull hop was a peer
  labelled similar to verio.cogentco.com, meaning we crossed over to
  Verio's side. (the actual name was more meaningful). Now today, the
  traffic destined for that site stops cold at the first hop from our
  network, meaning it does not get routes from Level3 on where to send the
  data, once we enter Cogent's network.  Unless you are referring that
  Cogent is blocking any advertised route info from Level3, which is
  highly unlikely.  If Level3 was allowing our IPs to go through Verio's
  link, we would receive routes to route our packets in that direction
  across Cogent's network, and packets would travel further into Cogent's
  network (such as to the Verio link). If Cogent blocked traffic to Verio,
  it would most likely block it at the peer, not at the entry to Cogent's
  network from us as their client.
 
 This isn't evidence of blocking on L3's side.  It could be because
 Cogent only purchases transit to certain prefixes and L3 isn't one of
 them (and Verio is filtering the announcements.)  It could be because
 Cogent internally uses traffic engineering to prevent L3 traffic from
 reaching them over their Verio transit circuits.  One of the two
 scenarios is likely given their peering arrangement with L3.  I didn't
 see any table entries on the L3 San Diego looking glass for AS174.  I
 saw only one route on their Denver looking glass through AS7018.  Does
 that mean that L3 is filtering or that Cogent's announcements aren't
 reaching L3 for other reasons?  The former is probably correct, but
 that's not something that can be easily demonstrated.  I couldn't find
 a looking glass in AS174 which would allow me to see Cogent's tables
 from the inside.  Cogent does appear to be announcing their Verio link
 to other peers, however.  I see direct announcements for AS174 and an
 announcement for Sprint-Verio-Cogent, but not an ATT-Cogent path.
 
 I think that both carriers are at fault.  Both companies should have
 resolved this before it came to reducing connectivity for their
 customers. They both should be held accountable by their customers.  I
 replied to your original post, Tom, because Cogent made a public
 statement which directly contradicted yours and I thought that people
 on the list should have a more complete story [1].  You could be
 entirely correct about there having been a contract violation.  I am
 confident that a considerable amount of money will be wasted trying to
 determine that.
 
 I fear that because of the the popularity of this issue it will reach
 the ears of the less clueful xEOs at carrier organizations and that
 the current SFI structure could be at risk of being 're-evaluated' in
 favor of paid interconnection.  Most of the scenarios that I can think
 of involving compensation for interconnection lead to higher wholesale
 prices of bandwidth and additional overall system complexity.
 
 
  It appears that Cogent is unwilling to use this route
  because it would force them to pay (Verio) per Mb/s for the
  information sent to/from L3's network.  The de-peering was consistent
  with the peering agreement between L3 and Cogent according to
  http://status.cogentco.com/
 
  It stated that, but it is not in actuallity.
 
 So why would Cogent lie about something that makes them look bad on
 their own public web site?  Many SFI contracts allow for termination
 without cause given enough notice and it is reasonable to assume that
 this one included that type of language.  According to conjecture on
 NANOG, Cogent was given notice 40 days before the disconnect.  In the
 absence of more reliable information I don't have any reason to assume
 otherwise.
 
  Current NANOG consensus 

RE: [WISPA] porno stopper

2005-09-16 Thread Dan Metcalf
I would highly suggest dans guardian, along w/ squidguard - I have been using
this solution for some time, and dans guardian blocks via content and squidguard
blocks via a blacklist

Using both provides very good filtering, you can't even search google for
anything dirty as dan sguardian blocks it

Dan


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
 Of Ron Wallace
 Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 8:14 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] porno stopper
 
 Tom,
 Have you tried these devices.  What is your evaluation of the
 Belkin Pre-N Router?
 
 Ron Wallace
 
  Original message 
 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:26:53 -0400
 From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] porno stopper
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 
 The near Belkin pre-N Routers have content control
 subscription options
 built-in.
 
 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
 - Original Message -
 From: Eric Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 9:34 AM
 Subject: RE: [WISPA] porno stopper
 
 
 Why not bring this to the WISP forum for members instead of
 being private, I
 am sure others would be interested.
 
 Eric
 
 
 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Weddell
 Sent: Mon 9/12/2005 12:14 AM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: RE: [WISPA] porno stopper
 
 
 
 We have a solution for preventing questionable content onto
 your network. It
 is both a plug in or a server solution. Contact me offlist
 and I can hook
 you up with the details.
 
 Regards,
 
 David Weddell
 
 Director of Sales
 
 
 
 260 273 2662 Cell
 
 260 827 2551 Office
 
 800 363 4881 Ext 2551 Toll Free
 
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 www.onlyinternet.net
 
 www.oibw.net
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wireless-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
 Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 10:27 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] porno stopper
 
 I just got this message from a sub.
 
 
 Do you also have any software that I can install the
 prevents my children
 (and me for that matter) from accessing questionable
 content?
 
 
 
 
 Who recommends what and where can I get it?
 
 Brian
 --
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 --
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 ---
 
 
  --
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 -
 ---
 
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.21/96 - Release
 Date: 9/10/2005
 
 --
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 Ron Wallace
 Hahnron, Inc.
 220 S. Jackson St.
 Addison, MI 49220
 
 Phone:  (517) 547-8410
 Mobile:  (517) 605-4542
 e-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 --
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.0/103 - Release Date: 09/15/2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.1/104 - Release Date: 09/16/2005
 

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] need WISPA to step up

2005-09-02 Thread Dan Metcalf
I will add a link on my website as well and post it on the local forums

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
 Of George
 Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 10:48 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] need WISPA to step up
 
 Mac Dearman wrote:
  Johnny,
 
   You are mistaken - - it is not 1 man and its not one shelter. It is 3
  Parishes full of evacuees and 11 shelters. (estimated 1100 evacuees)
 
 
 Mac do you have an address for people to send money to?
 Like the name of the church, address phone number etc.
 
 I would put a message on my web site for people to donate directly to.
 
 I suppose anyone can just give to the Red Cross, etc. But I'm sure cash
 sent directly to your church would be the most efficient way to donate.
 
 George
 
 --
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.18/88 - Release Date: 09/01/2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.18/88 - Release Date: 09/01/2005
 

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] In the News.

2005-08-29 Thread Dan Metcalf
Its tough to be a karlnet operator these days, the borg has stopped production
on existing hardware and forcing operators to use different hardware (which is a
lot more expensive and frankly not worth it) ie: kn-250 board - mini-pci
replacement for the kn-205 pcmcia, old price $160 - new boards are $300 and the
software for the mini-pci is $700

Dan


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
 Of John Scrivner
 Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 5:36 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] In the News.
 
 Rick doesn't like Torinokarlproxibeamasaurus right now. I am guessing he
 is not alone.
 :-)
 Scriv
 
 
 Dan Metcalf wrote:
 
 Rick,
 
 No comment?
 
 Dan
 
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf
 Of Rick Harnish
 Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 5:20 PM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: RE: [WISPA] In the News.
 
 NO COMMENT! :P  It is not worth my time.
 
 Rick Harnish
 OnlyInternet Broadband  Wireless
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Dawn
 Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 3:34 PM
 To: WISPA General List; isp-wireless@isp-wireless.com
 Subject: [WISPA] In the News.
 
 All,
 
 I thought this was pretty interesting when I read it.
 
 http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_vie
 wnewsId=20050829005365newsLang=en
 
 Thanks,
 Dawn
 --
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 --
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.16/83 - Release Date: 08/26/2005
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.16/83 - Release Date: 08/26/2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.16/83 - Release Date: 08/26/2005
 

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] more grounding related questions

2005-08-04 Thread Dan Metcalf
I am installing some new rb532's w/ shielded cat5, I have a couple of options,
using shielded connectors all the way to the rb532 connector itself, this would
connect the rb532 ground to the cat5 sheild and tower ground but I'm wondering
if I should only ground it at the antenna itself on the tower and not on the
ground in fear of a ground loop?

Any thoughts, how folks ground/connecting the shielded cat5?

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.0/63 - Release Date: 08/03/2005
 

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Grounding questions/help

2005-08-02 Thread Dan Metcalf
I have several towers, all of which except for 1 never have any issues, however,
this 1 tower (we are the only tenant) seems to have a problem each year during
lightning season...

Last night it took a hit, although it appears it came through the electrical and
not the tower, but I’m not sure, the UPS was off, I reset it and it came back
online --- but the POE injector did NOT, it was completely shot.

Replaced the POE unit and the wireless gear came online, but started rebooting
after about 15minutes (although it didn't this before, I just changed the POE
from a 12v to 15v) tried a 24v POE, and the radio was still rebooting... Called
the tower climber..

Anyways I looked over the ground and the tower appears to 3 ground rod off each
tower leg and then the building has a separate ground rod - (unless its
connected underground)

Any thoughts?

Thanks

Dan

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.7/60 - Release Date: 07/28/2005
 

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Grounding questions/help

2005-08-02 Thread Dan Metcalf
Yeah that’s what I'm thinking, basically my cat5 wire and POE system is the bond
between the 2 separate grounds :-(... Is there an easy/cheap way to test of the
grounds are connected underground?

 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JohnnyO
 Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 5:06 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Grounding questions/help
 
 Unless all of your grounds are bonded together - You stand 
 the risk of causing your own nightmares due to the difference 
 in potential across the 2 different grounding systems. Make 
 sure everything is bonded together as 1 single grounding system.
 
 JohnnyO
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Dan Metcalf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 3:24 PM
 Subject: [WISPA] Grounding questions/help
 
 
 I have several towers, all of which except for 1 never have 
 any issues, 
 however,
 this 1 tower (we are the only tenant) seems to have a problem 
 each year 
 during
 lightning season...
 
 Last night it took a hit, although it appears it came through 
 the electrical 
 and
 not the tower, but I’m not sure, the UPS was off, I reset it 
 and it came 
 back
 online --- but the POE injector did NOT, it was completely shot.
 
 Replaced the POE unit and the wireless gear came online, but started 
 rebooting
 after about 15minutes (although it didn't this before, I just 
 changed the 
 POE
 from a 12v to 15v) tried a 24v POE, and the radio was still 
 rebooting... 
 Called
 the tower climber..
 
 Anyways I looked over the ground and the tower appears to 3 
 ground rod off 
 each
 tower leg and then the building has a separate ground rod - 
 (unless its
 connected underground)
 
 Any thoughts?
 
 Thanks
 
 Dan
 
 -- 
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.7/60 - Release Date: 
 07/28/2005
 
 
 -- 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 -- 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 -- 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.7/60 - Release Date: 
 07/28/2005
  
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.7/60 - Release Date: 07/28/2005
 

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/