Re: [WISPA] Network/infrastructure design for WISP's

[Ian Fraser]

Not sure how static would be safer than DHCP for CPE mgmt?

Ian

 Original message 
From: Fred Goldstein  
Date:10-21-2016  6:31 PM  (GMT-05:00) 
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Cc:  
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Network/infrastructure design for WISP's 

On 10/21/2016 5:55 PM, Ian Fraser wrote:
>
>
> PPPOE for Res traffic. VLAN's for Biz. Public IP's are statically 
> assigned.  DHCP for CPE's MgMt IP assignment.  PPPOE session and CPE's 
> connection to the AP authenticated by Radius. Radius Accounting  is 
> used for traffic billing and session info.
>

Wouldn't it be safer to use static IPs for CPE management? I'd do that, 
private IPs of course on a management VLAN not visible to customers.

> Per site: 2 VLANs for MgMt (1 for Tower/AP/UPS etc and 1 for CPEs) and 
> 1 VLAN per AP for PPPOE or a dedicated VLAN per Biz. AP's are bridged 
> for CPE's PPPOE to NAS.  uPnP enabled CPEs. Cust Routers are not 
> allowed to initiate PPPOE.  PPPOE NAS's are mostly colocated tower 
> sites so that backhauls can see QOS markers on traffic and not just a 
> Tunnel.
>
> BGP Advertises IP range per Fibre POP and feeds 0.0.0.0/0 into OSPF 
> for redistributing routes inside the AS.  Infrastructure MgMt is on 
> RFC1918 and customers are Public IPs.  Firewall rules on 
> NAS/Router/CPE prevent Customer IP's from reaching MgMt IP's.
>
Nice if you have enough public IPs for customers. I'm not sure BGP and 
PPPOE are necessarily the easiest protocols for this purpose, but 
definitely do use the VLANs and keep the routing out of the radios.

> Mikrotik for all routing.  Netonix for most switching. Mikrotik for 
> most PtMP (probably uncommon) but LTE is Telrad in areas where it is 
> deployed, which skews the above architecture a bit :(  LTE is not for 
> newbies though mind you maybe Mikrotik isn't either lol...  but in 
> 13 years I've never been floored by a virus "infecting" my gear ;-)
>
You can't do 5 GHz with MikroTik in the US; they don't have valid FCC 
approval any more. Not that they admit it, but the US isn't a big market 
for them. The wireless design itself has to be based on the local 
terrain, clutter (trees, etc.), subscriber density, and other conditions.

You do want a nice SNMP monitoring system that allows you to pull 
whatever parameters you want out of the MIB, not one that charges per 
line item (like PRTG) or that only pulls a few selected details. I do 
enjoy the detail I can get out of InterMapper, for instance. Where are 
you (or your planned network) located, Jordan?

> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
>
>> On 10/21/2016 3:07 PM, Jordan de Geus wrote:
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> I'm very new to the WISP industry and I've been curious to know how 
>>> people are designing their WISP networks.
>>>
>>> Are you creating VLAN's for each connection point? So your backhauls 
>>> are all in one VLAN, while all AP to client connections are in 
>>> another VLAN?
>>>
>>> I had been thinking about how the above VLAN based design would be, 
>>> in terms of security, and I realized that if all CPE's were in one 
>>> VLAN together, wouldn't they be able to cross communicate? So an AP 
>>> with 30 clients operating in VLANX, would essentially be able to 
>>> communicate to each other, bring security as a major issue. I was 
>>> thinking that you'd be able to do VLAN's for each customer, but 
>>> doing a PTMP setup for residential purposes, I feel like the system 
>>> would be quite bogged down with that amount of vlans?
>>>
>>> How are you authenticating and issuing IP's to clients? Are you 
>>> doing PPPOE or DHCP? Is everything just in routed tables?
>>>
>>> What sort of hardware are you using for your network design and 
>>> management?
>>>
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> Jordan
>>>


-- 
  Fred R. Goldstein  k1iofred "at" interisle.net
  Interisle Consulting Group
  +1 617 795 2701


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Network/infrastructure design for WISP's

[Ian Fraser]

PPPOE for Res traffic. VLAN's for Biz. Public IP's are statically 
assigned.  DHCP for CPE's MgMt IP assignment.  PPPOE session and CPE's 
connection to the AP authenticated by Radius.  Radius Accounting  is 
used for traffic billing and session info.


Per site: 2 VLANs for MgMt (1 for Tower/AP/UPS etc and 1 for CPEs) and 1 
VLAN per AP for PPPOE or a dedicated VLAN per Biz. AP's are bridged for 
CPE's PPPOE to NAS.  uPnP enabled CPEs.  Cust Routers are not allowed to 
initiate PPPOE.  PPPOE NAS's are mostly colocated tower sites so that 
backhauls can see QOS markers on traffic and not just a Tunnel.


BGP Advertises IP range per Fibre POP and feeds 0.0.0.0/0 into OSPF for 
redistributing routes inside the AS.  Infrastructure MgMt is on RFC1918 
and customers are Public IPs.  Firewall rules on NAS/Router/CPE prevent 
Customer IP's from reaching MgMt IP's.


Mikrotik for all routing.  Netonix for most switching. Mikrotik for most 
PtMP (probably uncommon) but LTE is Telrad in areas where it is 
deployed, which skews the above architecture a bit :(  LTE is not for 
newbies though mind you maybe Mikrotik isn't either lol...  but in 
13 years I've never been floored by a virus "infecting" my gear ;-)



Cheers,

Ian



On 10/21/2016 3:07 PM, Jordan de Geus wrote:

Hey guys,

I'm very new to the WISP industry and I've been curious to know how 
people are designing their WISP networks.


Are you creating VLAN's for each connection point? So your backhauls 
are all in one VLAN, while all AP to client connections are in 
another VLAN?


I had been thinking about how the above VLAN based design would be, 
in terms of security, and I realized that if all CPE's were in one 
VLAN together, wouldn't they be able to cross communicate? So an AP 
with 30 clients operating in VLANX, would essentially be able to 
communicate to each other, bring security as a major issue. I was 
thinking that you'd be able to do VLAN's for each customer, but doing 
a PTMP setup for residential purposes, I feel like the system would 
be quite bogged down with that amount of vlans?


How are you authenticating and issuing IP's to clients? Are you doing 
PPPOE or DHCP? Is everything just in routed tables?


What sort of hardware are you using for your network design and 
management?


Kind Regards,
Jordan


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


--
Ethan Dee
Network Admin
Globalvision
864 704 3600
e...@globalvision.net

gv-supp...@globalvision.net
864 467 1333


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] WISPA Webpage is down

[Ian Fraser]

Warning you could waste a day here https://honestnetworker.wordpress.com/

Ian


On 27/09/2016 3:56 PM, Tim Way wrote:

Ahh classic. Um what EMAIL?

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Bryce Duchcherer > wrote:


Must watch!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8_Kfjo3VjU


Bryce D
NETAGO

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org

[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
] On Behalf Of Sam Morris
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 13:50
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WISPA Webpage is down

Running on Windows? :)

On 9/27/2016 12:23 PM, Jim Patient wrote:
> Ok, Trina, I'll be Patient.
>
> cid:image001.png@01D03C92.EFCBD870
>
> _jpati...@linktechs.net >_
>
> www.LinkTechs.net 
*| *www.TowerCoverage.com

> 
>
> usa_flag *Phone:* 314-735-0270  *FAX*:
636-660-1534 
>
> *canada_flagPhone:*647-725-7011 
>
> *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org

[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
]
> *On Behalf Of *Trina Coffey, Director of Operations
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 27, 2016 11:12 AM
> *To:* memb...@wispa.org ; 'WISPA
General List' mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>;
> wi...@wispa.org 
> *Subject:* [WISPA] WISPA Webpage is down
> *Importance:* High
>
> Hello all
>
> The server that houses our website is down.  This means until it is
> fixed you will be unable to login to your account or register for
> WISPAPALOOZA.  Please be patient, we have contacted our software
> company and they are aware of the problem.
>
> My staff and I will also be unable to access your profile,
account, or
> membership information during the outage.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Trina Coffey
>
> Director of Operations
>
> WISPA
>
> 260-622-5775  direct
>
> 866-317-2851 ext. 102  (US only)
>
> 530-227-6696  cell
>
> www.wispa.org  
>
> Come see us at WISPAPALOOZA
>!!
>
>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

>

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless





___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Hotspot service for MT

[Ian Fraser]

Radius Manager 3 or 4

At one time I had a few dozen hotspots on RM3

Ian


On 6/27/2016 9:58 AM, Scott Piehn wrote:
I am looking for recommendations from anyone using a radius server for 
MT hotspot authentication and billing for temporary service.  Ours 
needs to be replaced


thanks in advance

-
Scott M Piehn


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

[Ian Fraser]

But it's not saying that the Baicells did either because they didn't Set 
a provisioned speed for it.  So what /should /it have reached ?  Granted 
the numbers are higher, but what does that mean ?



Maybe it says that one EPC/UE was configured for QCI 6 and the other for 
3 ?  Maybe the UE was 5 feet off the ground for one and 35' for the 
other.  One tweaked or one just 'aimed'.



Maybe the competitor was doing the absolute best they could to make 
their stuff run as good as possible and Baicell's is just so much better 
that they tested from a J Arm on the seat of the car facing in the 
opposite direction.  Maybe not.  We have no idea so it's useless 
information.



Ian


On 6/25/2016 12:22 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
Generally I agree. But none of the competitor tests, save one, even 
approached the provisioned speed.



On Jun 25, 2016, at 09:30, Josh Luthman <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:



Adding foliage and faster speeds...I mean that speaks pretty loudly.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Jun 25, 2016 9:26 AM, "Ian Fraser" <mailto:ian_fra...@gozoom.ca>> wrote:



This info is like comparing apples and oranges.  One with foliage
and one without, one with 'Max 15/2' and the other no 'speed
limit set'.

What other differences not shown here ? EPC (probably), Internet
pipe (maybe), Laptop and/or software used (probably), time of day
(most likely), duration of sampling ? (impossible to tell), test
rig used ? (who knows), latency (?).

So all I can get from this is that both would not create a stable
connection at the same single location.

Please publish something comparative that we can chew on,
otherwise what's the point ?

Ian



On 6/24/2016 12:32 PM, Rick Harnish wrote:


Wave 2 trials are just beginning.  Here are some results of a
test in South Carolina on Tuesday.

Test results of Baicells Nova eNodeB w/GPS and Alpha sector in
Reeseville, SC. Note testing dates of competitor was before
foliage emerged and Baicells was after foliage emerged. ‪#‎Baicells

Posted on Facebook WISP Talk, WISP Pics and will soon be on the
Baicells Facebook page<https://www.facebook.com/BaiCells/>

Respectfully,

Rick Harnish

Director of WISP Markets

Baicells Technologies, N.A.

Mobile: +1.972.922.1443 

Email: rick.harn...@baicells.com <mailto:rick.harn...@baicells.com>

Follow us on Facebook for the latest news

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Mullen
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 3:18 PM
To: WISPA General List 
<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

+1.

At 05:05 PM 17-06-2016, you wrote:

>I believe the canary would say people have deployed but can not
speak

>yet :P  Watch lists and Facebook, I'm sure details will forth
come very

>soon.

>

>On 6/17/16 3:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

> > Does anyone besides the guys in Amarillo have this gear
deployed?

> > Care to comment on/off list?

> >

> > Josh Luthman

> > Office: 937-552-2340 

> > Direct: 937-552-2343 

> > 1100 Wayne St

> > Suite 1337

> > Troy, OH 45373

> >

> >

> > ___

> > Wireless mailing list

> > Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>

> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

> >

>___

>Wireless mailing list

>Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>

>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___

Wireless mailing list

Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
Virus-free. www.avast.com

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

__

Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

[Ian Fraser]

And the question to be answered is what is the reason for that? To 
answer that you must eliminate all the variables you can.  To just 
assume either gear is better or worse because of these numbers without 
knowing all the other variables is not the right way to go.


Ian


On 6/25/2016 12:22 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
Generally I agree. But none of the competitor tests, save one, even 
approached the provisioned speed.



On Jun 25, 2016, at 09:30, Josh Luthman <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:



Adding foliage and faster speeds...I mean that speaks pretty loudly.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Jun 25, 2016 9:26 AM, "Ian Fraser" <mailto:ian_fra...@gozoom.ca>> wrote:



This info is like comparing apples and oranges.  One with foliage
and one without, one with 'Max 15/2' and the other no 'speed
limit set'.

What other differences not shown here ? EPC (probably), Internet
pipe (maybe), Laptop and/or software used (probably), time of day
(most likely), duration of sampling ? (impossible to tell), test
rig used ? (who knows), latency (?).

So all I can get from this is that both would not create a stable
connection at the same single location.

Please publish something comparative that we can chew on,
otherwise what's the point ?

Ian



On 6/24/2016 12:32 PM, Rick Harnish wrote:


Wave 2 trials are just beginning.  Here are some results of a
test in South Carolina on Tuesday.

Test results of Baicells Nova eNodeB w/GPS and Alpha sector in
Reeseville, SC. Note testing dates of competitor was before
foliage emerged and Baicells was after foliage emerged. ‪#‎Baicells

Posted on Facebook WISP Talk, WISP Pics and will soon be on the
Baicells Facebook page<https://www.facebook.com/BaiCells/>

Respectfully,

Rick Harnish

Director of WISP Markets

Baicells Technologies, N.A.

Mobile: +1.972.922.1443 

Email: rick.harn...@baicells.com <mailto:rick.harn...@baicells.com>

Follow us on Facebook for the latest news

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Mullen
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 3:18 PM
To: WISPA General List 
<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

+1.

At 05:05 PM 17-06-2016, you wrote:

>I believe the canary would say people have deployed but can not
speak

>yet :P  Watch lists and Facebook, I'm sure details will forth
come very

>soon.

>

>On 6/17/16 3:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

> > Does anyone besides the guys in Amarillo have this gear
deployed?

> > Care to comment on/off list?

> >

> > Josh Luthman

> > Office: 937-552-2340 

> > Direct: 937-552-2343 

> > 1100 Wayne St

> > Suite 1337

> > Troy, OH 45373

> >

> >

> > ___

> > Wireless mailing list

> > Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>

> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

> >

>___

>Wireless mailing list

>Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>

>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___

Wireless mailing list

Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
Virus-free. www.avast.com

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

[Ian Fraser]

I disagree.

 I can publish info that shows my truck can go faster than yours, on 
the "same" road under different conditions with a number of variables 
not accounted for including speed limit, driver, traffic conditions, 
tires, engine size, snow/ice/rain/clear sunny day, day/night and a dozen 
other things.  What does that prove ?  Would you then decide that you 
should buy the same kind of truck ?


Without the other variables accounted for this info says nothing of real 
value.  I'm not siding with any vendor.  I just want real comparative 
data so that I can make informed decisions and this is not that in the 
slightest.


Ian


On 6/25/2016 9:30 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:


Adding foliage and faster speeds...I mean that speaks pretty loudly.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Jun 25, 2016 9:26 AM, "Ian Fraser" <mailto:ian_fra...@gozoom.ca>> wrote:



This info is like comparing apples and oranges.  One with foliage
and one without, one with 'Max 15/2' and the other no 'speed limit
set'.

What other differences not shown here ? EPC (probably), Internet
pipe (maybe), Laptop and/or software used (probably), time of day
(most likely), duration of sampling ? (impossible to tell), test
rig used ? (who knows), latency (?).

So all I can get from this is that both would not create a stable
connection at the same single location.

Please publish something comparative that we can chew on,
otherwise what's the point ?

Ian



On 6/24/2016 12:32 PM, Rick Harnish wrote:


Wave 2 trials are just beginning.  Here are some results of a
test in South Carolina on Tuesday.

Test results of Baicells Nova eNodeB w/GPS and Alpha sector in
Reeseville, SC. Note testing dates of competitor was before
foliage emerged and Baicells was after foliage emerged. ‪#‎Baicells

Posted on Facebook WISP Talk, WISP Pics and will soon be on the
Baicells Facebook page<https://www.facebook.com/BaiCells/>

Respectfully,

Rick Harnish

Director of WISP Markets

Baicells Technologies, N.A.

Mobile: +1.972.922.1443 

Email: rick.harn...@baicells.com <mailto:rick.harn...@baicells.com>

Follow us on Facebook for the latest news

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Mullen
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 3:18 PM
To: WISPA General List 
<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

+1.

At 05:05 PM 17-06-2016, you wrote:

>I believe the canary would say people have deployed but can not
speak

>yet :P  Watch lists and Facebook, I'm sure details will forth
come very

>soon.

>

>On 6/17/16 3:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

> > Does anyone besides the guys in Amarillo have this gear
deployed?

> > Care to comment on/off list?

> >

> > Josh Luthman

> > Office: 937-552-2340 

> > Direct: 937-552-2343 

> > 1100 Wayne St

> > Suite 1337

> > Troy, OH 45373

> >

> >

> > ___

> > Wireless mailing list

> > Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>

> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

> >

>___

>Wireless mailing list

>Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>

>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___

Wireless mailing list

Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
Virus-free. www.avast.com

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

[Ian Fraser]

This info is like comparing apples and oranges.  One with foliage and 
one without, one with 'Max 15/2' and the other no 'speed limit set'.


What other differences not shown here ? EPC (probably), Internet pipe 
(maybe), Laptop and/or software used (probably), time of day (most 
likely), duration of sampling ? (impossible to tell), test rig used ? 
(who knows), latency (?).


So all I can get from this is that both would not create a stable 
connection at the same single location.


Please publish something comparative that we can chew on, otherwise 
what's the point ?


Ian



On 6/24/2016 12:32 PM, Rick Harnish wrote:


Wave 2 trials are just beginning. Here are some results of a test in 
South Carolina on Tuesday.


Test results of Baicells Nova eNodeB w/GPS and Alpha sector in 
Reeseville, SC. Note testing dates of competitor was before foliage 
emerged and Baicells was after foliage emerged. ‪#‎Baicells


Posted on Facebook WISP Talk, WISP Pics and will soon be on the 
Baicells Facebook page


Respectfully,

Rick Harnish

Director of WISP Markets

Baicells Technologies, N.A.

Mobile: +1.972.922.1443

Email: rick.harn...@baicells.com

Follow us on Facebook for the latest news

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] 
On Behalf Of Daniel Mullen

Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 3:18 PM
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

+1.

At 05:05 PM 17-06-2016, you wrote:

>I believe the canary would say people have deployed but can not speak

>yet :P  Watch lists and Facebook, I'm sure details will forth come very

>soon.

>

>On 6/17/16 3:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

> > Does anyone besides the guys in Amarillo have this gear deployed?

> > Care to comment on/off list?

> >

> > Josh Luthman

> > Office: 937-552-2340

> > Direct: 937-552-2343

> > 1100 Wayne St

> > Suite 1337

> > Troy, OH 45373

> >

> >

> > ___

> > Wireless mailing list

> > Wireless@wispa.org 

> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

> >

>___

>Wireless mailing list

>Wireless@wispa.org 

>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___

Wireless mailing list

Wireless@wispa.org 

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

[Ian Fraser]

Please Clarify what "8 miles NLOS means".  You can't do 8 miles of solid 
foliage on 900M forget about 5Ghz there is simply no way that you 
have 8 solid miles of foliage and are getting a signal on 5Gig.



On 6/18/2016 2:11 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
I can do 8 mile NLOS in 5GHz with Uniquiti now. Around a -78. If 
assume Bai will do just as well but modulate much better.


On Jun 18, 2016, at 14:08, Gino Villarini > wrote:



There is also a big difference between the 2 in tx power

From: > on behalf of Adair Winter 
mailto:ada...@amarillowireless.net>>


*//*

*/Gino Villarini/*

President
Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968



Reply-To: WISPA General List >

Date: Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 11:25 AM
To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

I don't expect the Baicell BTS to have the tree penetration that the 
Telrad BTS has until the Baicell has 4x4.


On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Matt Hoppes 
> wrote:


But that tree penetration do!

On Jun 18, 2016, at 08:53, Josh Luthman
mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:


And more than 450, less than Telrad.  That's just common sense.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Jun 18, 2016 8:49 AM, "Matt Hoppes"
mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>> wrote:

More than Ubiquiti?

On Jun 18, 2016, at 08:29, Josh Luthman
mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:


Relative terms :P

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Jun 18, 2016 8:18 AM, "Matt Hoppes"
mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>> wrote:

As opposed to bad? :P.

On Jun 18, 2016, at 08:03, Josh Luthman
mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:


"Good"?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Jun 18, 2016 8:02 AM, "Matt Hoppes"
mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>> wrote:

True. It's good though. Real good.

On Jun 18, 2016, at 02:24, Chris Ruschmann
mailto:ch...@scsalaska.net>>
wrote:


We all had to sign an NDA. So I'll let the
baicells guys answer that one.

On Jun 17, 2016 9:05 PM, mailto:mike.l...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Whats the pricing like?

On Jun 17, 2016, at 19:12, Matt Hoppes
mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>>
wrote:



https://www.facebook.com/thewirelessninja/videos/1017353051688688/

On Jun 17, 2016, at 21:07, Christian Palecek
mailto:christ...@cybernet1.com>> wrote:


Ours*  brain fart.

We are deploying in one of our most
difficult nlos areas, and another in a
small town center so we'll have a variety
of testing.



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

 Original message 
From: Christian Palecek
mailto:christ...@cybernet1.com>>
Date: 6/17/16 7:02 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's
deployed it?

We'll have ares up pretty quick, don't have
a SU yet though.  Only getting one I guess.



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

 Original message 
From: Chris Ruschmann mailto:ch...@scsalaska.net>>
Date: 6/17/16 3:58 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's
deployed it?

I should have mine deployed next week as
well. Just received the gear today.

On Jun 17, 2016 1:11 PM, "Mike Francis"
mailto:mfran...@jmfsolutions.net>> wrote:

By: Douglas Adams
"Man [has] always assumed that he was
more intelligent than dolphins because
he had achieved so much-the wheel, New
York, wars and so on-while all the
dolphins had

Re: [WISPA] Anyone used the Tycon TPDIN-Monitor-WEB ?

[Ian Fraser]

works for me with OID using The Dude

Ian
On 11/01/2015 3:15 PM, Mike Lyon wrote:


I couldn't ever get snmp to work on it :(

On Jan 11, 2015 12:08 PM, "Ian Fraser" <mailto:ian_fra...@gozoom.ca>> wrote:



Yes.  It works as advertised. Monitoring inside and outside temp
as well as 2 voltages. Also controlling heating and cooling and
alerting on triggers. The DIN mounting is handy if you have DIN
rails... not so much if you need to make one.

Ian

On 11/01/2015 2:58 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:

Any feedback?

TPDIN-Monitor-WEB



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com <http://www.aeronetpr.com>
@aeronetpr




___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org  <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Anyone used the Tycon TPDIN-Monitor-WEB ?

[Ian Fraser]

Yes.  It works as advertised. Monitoring inside and outside temp as well 
as 2 voltages. Also controlling heating and cooling and alerting on 
triggers. The DIN mounting is handy if you have DIN rails... not so much 
if you need to make one.


Ian

On 11/01/2015 2:58 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:

Any feedback?

TPDIN-Monitor-WEB



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr




___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced

[Ian Fraser]

When it's Cold snow is dry  Rain, fog, drizzle or snow at or above 
0C is a different game.


On 17/12/2014 2:02 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote:

Josh
but is it snowing all the time? if so what kind of speeds are you 
getting out of them.


Tim


-Original Message-
From: "Josh Reynolds" 
To: "WISPA General List" 
Date: 12/17/14 02:00 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced

Working great at six miles here in Alaska.

On December 17, 2014 9:58:58 AM AKST, Tim Reichhart
 wrote:

Here is my issue the af24 wouldnt work for me since I live in
the Midwest and we get rain etc... it would only work about an
mile or so not 8 mile shots when can you guys get an working
24Ghz airfiber to work in these types of weather climates?

Tim



-Original Message-
From: "Ben Moore" 
To: "WISPA General List" 
Date: 12/17/14 01:56 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced

and 50% more range...

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Josh Reynolds
mailto:j...@spitwspots.com>> wrote:

500Mbps technically :)


On December 17, 2014 9:52:55 AM AKST, Gino Villarini
mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>> wrote:

Dang! 2x price for 250 mbps more, ouch!



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr



From: "ben.mo...@ubnt.com
" mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com>>
Reply-To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 at 2:48 PM
To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced

Hi Gino -

Initial shipments are in transit to distributors
so units will be received in early to mid January.

MSRP is $6k/link.

Thanks,
Ben

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Gino Villarini
mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>> wrote:

Just got a email from UBNT

AF24HD announced, similar to AF24, bigger Rx
dish (40db) 256 qam 1 Gbps Fdx

http://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber24/

No pricing or availability info, Ben?



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org  
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please
excuse my brevity.

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___