Re: [WISPA] Fwd: FCC expected to officially proposeDSLderegulationonThursday
Charles Wu wrote: If anyone recalls the argument I had with Charles Wu...about how I would NEVER surrender ownership of every part of my own network, from customer to carrier hotel if there was any way of keeping it... So here's the caveat... If you refuse to be regulated, then you shouldn't complain when the FCC rewrites the rules and stops regulating phone/cable incumbents You can't have "double standards" - and they can always put up a super-mesh network and trash your spectrum (in Chicago, SBC DSL modems now come w/ WiFi access points turned on broadcasting away...sure, it's a convenience to the consumers, but I cannot but wonder if this is an "insidious method" of trashing 2.4 muni-wifi / wisp networks) Especially when those wireless routers put out 400 mW. John -Charles --- WISPNOG Park City, UT http://www.wispnog.com August 15-17, 2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Fwd: FCC expected to officially proposeDSLderegulationonThursday
I feel that we are kind of self regulated, where as the "big boys", when left unregulated, go crazy. Charles Wu wrote: If anyone recalls the argument I had with Charles Wu...about how I would NEVER surrender ownership of every part of my own network, from customer to carrier hotel if there was any way of keeping it... So here's the caveat... If you refuse to be regulated, then you shouldn't complain when the FCC rewrites the rules and stops regulating phone/cable incumbents You can't have "double standards" - and they can always put up a super-mesh network and trash your spectrum (in Chicago, SBC DSL modems now come w/ WiFi access points turned on broadcasting away...sure, it's a convenience to the consumers, but I cannot but wonder if this is an "insidious method" of trashing 2.4 muni-wifi / wisp networks) -Charles --- WISPNOG Park City, UT http://www.wispnog.com August 15-17, 2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Fwd: FCC expected to officially proposeDSLderegulationonThursday
This is why we need our own spectrum boy and girls I have seen a 40% increase in noise in my area. They all come from Linksys, D-link and others on my downtown tower. Bo Barry at Mutual Data wrote: Hello Charles, (in Chicago, SBC DSL modems now come w/ WiFi CW> access points turned on broadcasting away...sure, it's a convenience to the CW> consumers, but I cannot but wonder if this is an "insidious method" of CW> trashing 2.4 muni-wifi / wisp networks) We have a village of about 400 homes that has veriscum dsl with wireless AP's all over it now. You can pretty much stay connected anywhere in that town and stay on the verizon "hotspot". No one needs a 200mw AP in their house IMO. Barry -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re[2]: [WISPA] Fwd: FCC expected to officially proposeDSLderegulationonThursday
Hello Charles, (in Chicago, SBC DSL modems now come w/ WiFi CW> access points turned on broadcasting away...sure, it's a convenience to the CW> consumers, but I cannot but wonder if this is an "insidious method" of CW> trashing 2.4 muni-wifi / wisp networks) We have a village of about 400 homes that has veriscum dsl with wireless AP's all over it now. You can pretty much stay connected anywhere in that town and stay on the verizon "hotspot". No one needs a 200mw AP in their house IMO. Barry -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Fwd: FCC expected to officially proposeDSLderegulationonThursday
If anyone recalls the argument I had with Charles Wu...about how I would NEVER surrender ownership of every part of my own network, from customer to carrier hotel if there was any way of keeping it... So here's the caveat... If you refuse to be regulated, then you shouldn't complain when the FCC rewrites the rules and stops regulating phone/cable incumbents You can't have "double standards" - and they can always put up a super-mesh network and trash your spectrum (in Chicago, SBC DSL modems now come w/ WiFi access points turned on broadcasting away...sure, it's a convenience to the consumers, but I cannot but wonder if this is an "insidious method" of trashing 2.4 muni-wifi / wisp networks) -Charles --- WISPNOG Park City, UT http://www.wispnog.com August 15-17, 2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
