RE: [WISPA] Re: verizon fios - Advertising Battle

2006-01-03 Thread dustin jurman
Charles, 

What kind of work did they do in the forbearance issues?  

It's good to have some guns on our side into battles, In many trips to the
FCC I've heard the same thing,  We  -ISP's Wisp's etc,,, Don't show up
enough as the LEC's roam the halls of the FCC. Squeaky wheel gets the oil. 


Dustin 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 1:50 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Re: verizon fios - Advertising Battle

snip
You guys haven't been going to enough conferences and listening to very
bright people like Kris Twomey try and explain such things to the (W)ISP
industry. Shame on that Michael Anderson for putting Kris up in front of an
audience to try to keep the WISP industry informed.
/snip

Thought I'd chime in and add my 2 cents

One thing that this WISP / ISP / Operator community lacks is a cohesive and
constant voice for wireless in DC (WISPA has done a great job, but guys like
Marlon, Rich, Jon and co still have day jobs and families to feed, and we
can't rely solely on their volunteer efforts)

I would like to take this opportunity to intrtoduce everyone to Michael
Hazzard, of Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge  Rice (WCSR).  WCSR has been quite
active in the CLEC / UNE-P / Forebearance battles, and although the outcome
of those battles may be a foregone conclusion by now, they are interested in
helping on the final front for independents (e.g., broadband wireless).
That said, we plan on collaborating together the next several months amongst
all affected communities (in this case, WISPs/ISPs are one organization we
are interested in working with, but we also plan on working with other types
of network operators, including CLECs, Rural Independents, Electrical Coops,
Munis, etc) to put together a unified cohesive position on wireless
broadband

We are currently working on some survey questions, and will probably be
contacting everyone shortly to ask some of these questions (so please don't
blacklist me =)

-Charles

---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com 


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/











-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Re: verizon fios - Advertising Battle

2005-12-30 Thread Charles Wu
snip
You guys haven't been going to enough conferences and listening to very 
bright people like Kris Twomey try and explain such things to the 
(W)ISP industry. Shame on that Michael Anderson for putting Kris up in 
front of an audience to try to keep the WISP industry informed.
/snip

Thought I'd chime in and add my 2 cents

One thing that this WISP / ISP / Operator community lacks is a cohesive and
constant voice for wireless in DC (WISPA has done a great job, but guys like
Marlon, Rich, Jon and co still have day jobs and families to feed, and we
can't rely solely on their volunteer efforts)

I would like to take this opportunity to intrtoduce everyone to Michael
Hazzard, of Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge  Rice (WCSR).  WCSR has been quite
active in the CLEC / UNE-P / Forebearance battles, and although the outcome
of those battles may be a foregone conclusion by now, they are interested in
helping on the final front for independents (e.g., broadband wireless).
That said, we plan on collaborating together the next several months amongst
all affected communities (in this case, WISPs/ISPs are one organization we
are interested in working with, but we also plan on working with other types
of network operators, including CLECs, Rural Independents, Electrical Coops,
Munis, etc) to put together a unified cohesive position on wireless
broadband

We are currently working on some survey questions, and will probably be
contacting everyone shortly to ask some of these questions (so please don't
blacklist me =)

-Charles

---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com 


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Re: verizon fios - Advertising Battle

2005-12-29 Thread Steve Stroh


John:

In years previous, the telcos had whittled away at UNE to the point 
that if they deployed advanced services in the last mile - read 
fiber, even an inch of it in the neighborhood cable vault (and the rest 
remained copper), then the telcos didn't have to share. But if there 
was a copper loop from the home/business to the CO, UNE applied. That 
was then.


But with a recent Federal appeals court ruling, UNE is no more. There 
is NO legal requirement for telcos to share their copper at ALL.


Telcos have PRIVATE agreements to share the copper loop - Verizon just 
reached one with Covad, but now it's ENTIRELY at the OPTION of the 
telcos.


For you that are working with telcos, usually smaller ones, that don't 
seem inclined to take advantage of this leverage, count your blessings 
- they may well be fleeting.


The FCC wrangled something of a concession that the telcos wouldn't 
make major changes in existing UNE arrangements until June 2006.


But after June, the gloves are completely off. A lot of ISP business 
models will be completely wrecked.


You guys haven't been going to enough conferences and listening to very 
bright people like Kris Twomey try and explain such things to the 
(W)ISP industry. Shame on that Michael Anderson for putting Kris up in 
front of an audience to try to keep the WISP industry informed.



Thanks,

Steve


On Dec 28, 2005, at 06:54, John Scrivner wrote:

Can you explain this statement for me? Excuse my lack of knowledge 
here. What are you referring to as a MSA? Also let us hear a little 
more detail about this statement please.


I thought if the service drop was used to deliver phone service that 
the telco had to allow UNE access to the line. This has changed? I 
knew it had gone away in terms of access to  advanced broadband 
facilities like DSLAMs and such but I thought the RBOCs still had to 
give up access to subscriber lines regardless of the media? Please 
elaborate.

Thank you,
Scriv


---

Steve Stroh
425-939-0076 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.stevestroh.com

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/