[WISPA] WaveRider LMS 3000
Does anyone use this equipment or have experience in using this equipment? With Canopy/UBNT/MikroTik we have pretty much set the standard for QoS reasons that the signal should not be worse than -75. I have seen another WISP using this older WaveRider gear, and most of his clients are at -80 to -95. Are signals using this equipment that usable at those rates? Can anyone shed some light on this really old gear? Any information is appreciated... Regards, Chuck WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] WaveRider LMS 3000
I had some links like that when we used waverider but it was on sectors with little interference. They will probably work if you have a low noise floor. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:54 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote: > Does anyone use this equipment or have experience in using this equipment? > > With Canopy/UBNT/MikroTik we have pretty much set the standard for QoS > reasons that the signal should not be worse than -75. I have seen another > WISP using this older WaveRider gear, and most of his clients are at -80 to > -95. Are signals using this equipment that usable at those rates? Can > anyone shed some light on this really old gear? Any information is > appreciated... > > Regards, > > Chuck > > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] WaveRider LMS 3000
I think a lot depends on what the signal strength is on the CCU (AU) side. I several links that from the EUM (SU) are worse than -85, but at the CCU they are better than -78. Mind you these links aren't supper fast though, especially on the upload. It's okay if they're a lower usage customer. Jon On 9/10/2010 6:54 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote: Does anyone use this equipment or have experience in using this equipment? With Canopy/UBNT/MikroTik we have pretty much set the standard for QoS reasons that the signal should not be worse than -75. I have seen another WISP using this older WaveRider gear, and most of his clients are at -80 to -95. Are signals using this equipment that usable at those rates? Can anyone shed some light on this really old gear? Any information is appreciated... Regards, Chuck WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] WaveRider LMS 3000
That is from the CCU side. In all of our testing we are seeing high ping spikes. Is there any other commands than "air" that you would recommend for trouble shooting and if there are do you mind explaining them? Regards, Chuck On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 2:35 PM, my_em...@webjogger.net < my_em...@webjogger.net> wrote: > I think a lot depends on what the signal strength is on the CCU (AU) side. > I several links that from the EUM (SU) are worse than -85, but at the CCU > they are better than -78. Mind you these links aren't supper fast though, > especially on the upload. It's okay if they're a lower usage customer. > > Jon > > > On 9/10/2010 6:54 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote: > > Does anyone use this equipment or have experience in using this equipment? > > With Canopy/UBNT/MikroTik we have pretty much set the standard for QoS > reasons that the signal should not be worse than -75. I have seen another > WISP using this older WaveRider gear, and most of his clients are at -80 to > -95. Are signals using this equipment that usable at those rates? Can > anyone shed some light on this really old gear? Any information is > appreciated... > > Regards, > > Chuck > > > > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > > > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] WaveRider LMS 3000
On September 11, 2010, Chuck Hogg wrote: > That is from the CCU side. In all of our testing we are seeing high ping > spikes. Is there any other commands than "air" that you would recommend > for trouble shooting and if there are do you mind explaining them? Try "ping -i.4" in *nix or the equivalent. You need to keep the ping iterations under 400 milliseconds to force the modem to be active continuously. -- Regards, Kevin R. Battersby WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] WaveRider LMS 3000
Mac OS X (bash) says: ping -i.4 192.168.7.1 ping: -i interval too short: Operation not permitted using sudo makes it work. It might be the same for Linux. Greg On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:04 PM, Kevin R. Battersby wrote: > On September 11, 2010, Chuck Hogg wrote: >> That is from the CCU side. In all of our testing we are seeing high ping >> spikes. Is there any other commands than "air" that you would recommend >> for trouble shooting and if there are do you mind explaining them? > > Try "ping -i.4" in *nix or the equivalent. You need to keep the ping > iterations > under 400 milliseconds to force the modem to be active continuously. > > -- > Regards, > Kevin R. Battersby > > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] WaveRider LMS 3000
What about using flood ping "-f". Does that work in Linux. I use that in Mac OS X. Greg On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:04 PM, Kevin R. Battersby wrote: > On September 11, 2010, Chuck Hogg wrote: >> That is from the CCU side. In all of our testing we are seeing high ping >> spikes. Is there any other commands than "air" that you would recommend >> for trouble shooting and if there are do you mind explaining them? > > Try "ping -i.4" in *nix or the equivalent. You need to keep the ping > iterations > under 400 milliseconds to force the modem to be active continuously. > > -- > Regards, > Kevin R. Battersby WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] WaveRider LMS 3000
Part of their mac polling will turn it off if their is not traffic for a while. If I remember correctly their is a high priority setting that will keep it up. I will check all that at the office Monday. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 11, 2010, at 8:34 PM, "Kevin R. Battersby" wrote: > On September 11, 2010, Chuck Hogg wrote: >> That is from the CCU side. In all of our testing we are seeing high ping >> spikes. Is there any other commands than "air" that you would recommend >> for trouble shooting and if there are do you mind explaining them? > > Try "ping -i.4" in *nix or the equivalent. You need to keep the ping > iterations > under 400 milliseconds to force the modem to be active continuously. > > -- > Regards, > Kevin R. Battersby > > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] WaveRider LMS 3000
An elevated noise floor will push your avg rssi levels up basically making your acceptable EUM signal levels higher than usual. A typical EUM under perfect conditions can have link up to -89, but with an elevated noise floor the acceptable signal level becomes higher and higher. You'll need to run a spectrum analysis at the CCU to see what noise floor you get. A good way to test is with the and commands either from the EUM or CCU. This performs a bandwidth test between radios. My experience is that with a unacceptable connection the upload will be really slow or non existent. By the way, I have an excess inventory of these radios that I'm looking to sell real cheap. Contact me off list if you're interested. Jon On 9/12/2010 12:53 AM, Chris Hudson wrote: In the eum (client) use 'ra li' and make sure you see at least 6 for signal strength and 3 for quality. Waveriders are polling protocol and high latency is normal unless you keep the data connection active. Chris Chuck Hogg wrote: That is from the CCU side. In all of our testing we are seeing high ping spikes. Is there any other commands than "air" that you would recommend for trouble shooting and if there are do you mind explaining them? Regards, Chuck On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 2:35 PM, my_em...@webjogger.net< my_em...@webjogger.net> wrote: I think a lot depends on what the signal strength is on the CCU (AU) side. I several links that from the EUM (SU) are worse than -85, but at the CCU they are better than -78. Mind you these links aren't supper fast though, especially on the upload. It's okay if they're a lower usage customer. Jon On 9/10/2010 6:54 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote: Does anyone use this equipment or have experience in using this equipment? With Canopy/UBNT/MikroTik we have pretty much set the standard for QoS reasons that the signal should not be worse than -75. I have seen another WISP using this older WaveRider gear, and most of his clients are at -80 to -95. Are signals using this equipment that usable at those rates? Can anyone shed some light on this really old gear? Any information is appreciated... Regards, Chuck WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
