RE: Alternatives to PI for Cisco WLAN

2016-03-31 Thread Osborne, Bruce W (Network Services)
Actually, the HP Enterprise networking group is basically run by Aruba.

We had an issue with our Airwave server missing data. The culprit, at least in 
our case turned out to be a Cisco ASA firewall that was dropping some UDP 
traffic it was supposed to allow. We moved the server outside that firewall to 
resolve the issue. A server can also drop data if it is not powerful enough for 
the load. We had that issue before upgrading to our current hardware.

We have found Aruba support as very good and they will work on adding needed 
features when requested. One thing we like about Airwave is that, at least with 
Aruba APS, it detects AP reboots that occur between controller scans. Airwave 
alerts when the number of reboots is not what it expected, which helps with 
troubleshooting.

​

Bruce Osborne
Wireless Engineer
IT Network Services - Wireless

(434) 592-4229

LIBERTY UNIVERSITY
Training Champions for Christ since 1971

From: Oliver Elliott [mailto:oliver.elli...@bristol.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 3:49 AM
Subject: Re: Alternatives to PI for Cisco WLAN

We trialed Airwave for a bit a year ago. The software itself blows PI out of 
the water but the Cisco support wasn't quite good enough. There is lag for 
support of newer APs (which PI also has to be fair), but more importantly there 
were lots of gaps in the data for several of our APs. Shortly after Aruba got 
bought out by HP so I don't imagine 3rd party support is going to be a high 
priority sadly.

Oli

On 25 March 2016 at 12:46, Lee H Badman 
mailto:lhbad...@syr.edu>> wrote:
For those of you that moved away from Cisco's PI, what have you gone to? And 
how has it worked?



Lee Badman (mobile)
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



--
Oliver Elliott
Senior Network Specialist
IT Services, University of Bristol
t: 0117 39 (41131)
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Alternatives to PI for Cisco WLAN

2016-03-30 Thread Oliver Elliott
We trialed Airwave for a bit a year ago. The software itself blows PI out
of the water but the Cisco support wasn't quite good enough. There is lag
for support of newer APs (which PI also has to be fair), but more
importantly there were lots of gaps in the data for several of our APs.
Shortly after Aruba got bought out by HP so I don't imagine 3rd party
support is going to be a high priority sadly.

Oli

On 25 March 2016 at 12:46, Lee H Badman  wrote:

> For those of you that moved away from Cisco's PI, what have you gone to?
> And how has it worked?
>
>
>
> Lee Badman (mobile)
> **
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
> Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>



-- 
Oliver Elliott
Senior Network Specialist
IT Services, University of Bristol
t: 0117 39 (41131)

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



Alternatives to PI for Cisco WLAN

2016-03-25 Thread Lee H Badman
For those of you that moved away from Cisco's PI, what have you gone to? And 
how has it worked?



Lee Badman (mobile)
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.