RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 1140 Cisco APs

2009-11-09 Thread Legge, Jeffry
I am using 1142's. Most of them are mounted above dropped ceilings. I have wall 
mounted some units and they work fine. The antenna pattern is designed for 
horizontal mounting but I have found the vertical mounting to be acceptable. 

-Jeff Legge
Radford University

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Kristina Gasca Kelly
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 1:14 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 1140 Cisco APs

We are a Cisco shop and have begun discussing the deployment of 802.11n 
APs in our environment. We currently have 22 WiSMs and approx 1100 APs 
(1240s and 1230s).

Currently there are two Cisco flavors of APs the 1252 and 1140. We are 
shying away for the 1250 series because of the power draw limitation 
with our current PoE switches. We don't want to start using injectors 
again or buy all new 3560e switches! However the 1140s were designed to 
be hung from the ceiling and we only hang wall mounted APs.

Has anyone else installed 1140s on the wall, and if so, did you have to 
change your design methodology?

Thanks, Kristina

-- 
~~
Kristina Gasca Kelly
Network Operations Manager
North Carolina State University
Communication Technologies
919.515.0107 (office)
919.515.1641 (fax)
krist...@ncstate.net
~~ 

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 1140 Cisco APs

2009-11-09 Thread Linchuan Yang
Hi, Kristina

We did a test with Cisco 1142 AP. From the results (same location, 12 feet),
the coverage of vertical mounting (on the wall) and horizontal mounting
(under the ceiling) are almost the same. Please consult with Cisco about the
mounting position of 1140 AP; I think both of them are suitable for 1140.

Linchuan Yang

Wireless Networking Analyst
Network Assessment and Integration,
IITS-Concordia University
Tel: (514)848-2424 ext. 7664

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Kristina Gasca
Kelly
Sent: November 9, 2009 1:14 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 1140 Cisco APs

We are a Cisco shop and have begun discussing the deployment of 802.11n 
APs in our environment. We currently have 22 WiSMs and approx 1100 APs 
(1240s and 1230s).

Currently there are two Cisco flavors of APs the 1252 and 1140. We are 
shying away for the 1250 series because of the power draw limitation 
with our current PoE switches. We don't want to start using injectors 
again or buy all new 3560e switches! However the 1140s were designed to 
be hung from the ceiling and we only hang wall mounted APs.

Has anyone else installed 1140s on the wall, and if so, did you have to 
change your design methodology?

Thanks, Kristina

-- 
~~
Kristina Gasca Kelly
Network Operations Manager
North Carolina State University
Communication Technologies
919.515.0107 (office)
919.515.1641 (fax)
krist...@ncstate.net
~~ 

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 1140 Cisco APs

2009-11-09 Thread Procyk, Ian
Kristina,

Also be aware of the fact that to mount on a single gang electrical box,
you will likely need another adapter plate (or access to a drill press
if you want to roll your own).  The 1142 brackets no longer have the X-Y
holes that the 1131 brackets had, which made the 1131's so nice and easy
to mount up against the wall, with only the stuff supplied in the box.

We are finding that the current architectural trend on campus, is one
that is shying away from t-bar ceilings - hence our need for the
alternate brackets.  In many cases we are back to open and exposed
ceilings with cable tray and pipe.  Often an acoustic baffle, made from
what can only be described as pressed wood shavings is hung from the
ceiling as well, these don't like to be drilled or bolted into... 


Ian Procyk
UBC IT
604-827-4707



-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Linchuan Yang
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 10:31 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 1140 Cisco APs

Hi, Kristina

We did a test with Cisco 1142 AP. From the results (same location, 12
feet),
the coverage of vertical mounting (on the wall) and horizontal mounting
(under the ceiling) are almost the same. Please consult with Cisco about
the
mounting position of 1140 AP; I think both of them are suitable for
1140.

Linchuan Yang

Wireless Networking Analyst
Network Assessment and Integration,
IITS-Concordia University
Tel: (514)848-2424 ext. 7664

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Kristina Gasca
Kelly
Sent: November 9, 2009 1:14 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 1140 Cisco APs

We are a Cisco shop and have begun discussing the deployment of 802.11n 
APs in our environment. We currently have 22 WiSMs and approx 1100 APs 
(1240s and 1230s).

Currently there are two Cisco flavors of APs the 1252 and 1140. We are 
shying away for the 1250 series because of the power draw limitation 
with our current PoE switches. We don't want to start using injectors 
again or buy all new 3560e switches! However the 1140s were designed to 
be hung from the ceiling and we only hang wall mounted APs.

Has anyone else installed 1140s on the wall, and if so, did you have to 
change your design methodology?

Thanks, Kristina

-- 
~~
Kristina Gasca Kelly
Network Operations Manager
North Carolina State University
Communication Technologies
919.515.0107 (office)
919.515.1641 (fax)
krist...@ncstate.net
~~ 

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 1140 Cisco APs

2009-11-09 Thread Lee H Badman
If you recall, not too long ago Cisco did come out and say that ceiling mount 
is strongly recommended- to the point of dropping wall mounting from the text 
in their documentation.

I believe RRM assumes a ceiling mount for whatever it is worth to the enigmatic 
algorithm. 

-Lee
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Procyk, Ian
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 2:30 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 1140 Cisco APs

Kristina,

Also be aware of the fact that to mount on a single gang electrical box,
you will likely need another adapter plate (or access to a drill press
if you want to roll your own).  The 1142 brackets no longer have the X-Y
holes that the 1131 brackets had, which made the 1131's so nice and easy
to mount up against the wall, with only the stuff supplied in the box.

We are finding that the current architectural trend on campus, is one
that is shying away from t-bar ceilings - hence our need for the
alternate brackets.  In many cases we are back to open and exposed
ceilings with cable tray and pipe.  Often an acoustic baffle, made from
what can only be described as pressed wood shavings is hung from the
ceiling as well, these don't like to be drilled or bolted into... 


Ian Procyk
UBC IT
604-827-4707



-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Linchuan Yang
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 10:31 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 1140 Cisco APs

Hi, Kristina

We did a test with Cisco 1142 AP. From the results (same location, 12
feet),
the coverage of vertical mounting (on the wall) and horizontal mounting
(under the ceiling) are almost the same. Please consult with Cisco about
the
mounting position of 1140 AP; I think both of them are suitable for
1140.

Linchuan Yang

Wireless Networking Analyst
Network Assessment and Integration,
IITS-Concordia University
Tel: (514)848-2424 ext. 7664

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Kristina Gasca
Kelly
Sent: November 9, 2009 1:14 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 1140 Cisco APs

We are a Cisco shop and have begun discussing the deployment of 802.11n 
APs in our environment. We currently have 22 WiSMs and approx 1100 APs 
(1240s and 1230s).

Currently there are two Cisco flavors of APs the 1252 and 1140. We are 
shying away for the 1250 series because of the power draw limitation 
with our current PoE switches. We don't want to start using injectors 
again or buy all new 3560e switches! However the 1140s were designed to 
be hung from the ceiling and we only hang wall mounted APs.

Has anyone else installed 1140s on the wall, and if so, did you have to 
change your design methodology?

Thanks, Kristina

-- 
~~
Kristina Gasca Kelly
Network Operations Manager
North Carolina State University
Communication Technologies
919.515.0107 (office)
919.515.1641 (fax)
krist...@ncstate.net
~~ 

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 1140 Cisco APs

2009-11-09 Thread Rick Brown
For those of you that may not be totally familiar with antenna 
propagation patterns and wonder why the concern it's important to 
remember that propagation from an omni antenna isn't a perfect sphere.  
It's more like a donut.  If you took a perfectly round balloon and 
pushed in from the top and bottom you'll get a closer approximation to 
the signal radiating from an omni antenna.  This isn't that big a deal 
when you're closer to the source.  When you turn the donut on it's side 
(wall mount) the propagation fields are now larger on the floors above 
and below than horizontally.  Again, not a real big deal in new 
construction with steel pan floors.  But in older buildings where design 
may incorporate bleed through it can make a big difference when 
forklifting AP's for newer ones. 

My apologies to the design engineers on here, I don't want to insult 
your intelligence.  However I know that less technical folks also follow 
this listserv.


Rick



Lee H Badman wrote:

If you recall, not too long ago Cisco did come out and say that ceiling mount 
is strongly recommended- to the point of dropping wall mounting from the text 
in their documentation.

I believe RRM assumes a ceiling mount for whatever it is worth to the enigmatic algorithm. 


-Lee
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Procyk, Ian
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 2:30 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 1140 Cisco APs

Kristina,

Also be aware of the fact that to mount on a single gang electrical box,
you will likely need another adapter plate (or access to a drill press
if you want to roll your own).  The 1142 brackets no longer have the X-Y
holes that the 1131 brackets had, which made the 1131's so nice and easy
to mount up against the wall, with only the stuff supplied in the box.

We are finding that the current architectural trend on campus, is one
that is shying away from t-bar ceilings - hence our need for the
alternate brackets.  In many cases we are back to open and exposed
ceilings with cable tray and pipe.  Often an acoustic baffle, made from
what can only be described as pressed wood shavings is hung from the
ceiling as well, these don't like to be drilled or bolted into... 



Ian Procyk
UBC IT
604-827-4707



-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Linchuan Yang
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 10:31 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 1140 Cisco APs

Hi, Kristina

We did a test with Cisco 1142 AP. From the results (same location, 12
feet),
the coverage of vertical mounting (on the wall) and horizontal mounting
(under the ceiling) are almost the same. Please consult with Cisco about
the
mounting position of 1140 AP; I think both of them are suitable for
1140.

Linchuan Yang

Wireless Networking Analyst
Network Assessment and Integration,
IITS-Concordia University
Tel: (514)848-2424 ext. 7664

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Kristina Gasca
Kelly
Sent: November 9, 2009 1:14 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 1140 Cisco APs

We are a Cisco shop and have begun discussing the deployment of 802.11n 
APs in our environment. We currently have 22 WiSMs and approx 1100 APs 
(1240s and 1230s).


Currently there are two Cisco flavors of APs the 1252 and 1140. We are 
shying away for the 1250 series because of the power draw limitation 
with our current PoE switches. We don't want to start using injectors 
again or buy all new 3560e switches! However the 1140s were designed to 
be hung from the ceiling and we only hang wall mounted APs.


Has anyone else installed 1140s on the wall, and if so, did you have to 
change your design methodology?


Thanks, Kristina

  



--

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 1140 Cisco APs

2009-11-09 Thread Johnson, Bruce T
All,

It should be noted that since the 1140 uses standard PoE, it makes some
sacrifices in transmit power by data rate and MCS/ Beam-Forming support.  

The 1250 just has the standard FCC UNII-band EIRP transmit power restrictions
(with Cisco's implicit antenna gain for external antenna connectors), but
without transmit power changes by data rate.

This may be moot if you survey with an APs at 11dB transmit power anyway.

Here's a enlightening dialog I had with Fred Niehaus of Cisco on the NetPro
forum,

Replied by: bjohns...@partners.org - PARTNERS HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS - Oct 2, 2009,
8:15pm PST


Hi Fred, 

I'm looking at the power levels on the 1140 radios and amazed at the variations
in power by data rate. These are in addition to the UNII-band EIRP rules, with
some additional antenna gain assumptions on Cisco's part. 

Are these really FCC-regulated levels? Does MIMO/MRC/ClientLink overcome these
limitations to deliver higher sustained legacy rates at range? 

Active power levels by rate 
6.0 to 18.0 , 14 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
24.0 to 36.0 , 13 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
48.0 to 48.0 , 12 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
54.0 to 54.0 , 11 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
6.0-bf to 18.0-b, 14 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
24.0-b to 36.0-b, 13 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
48.0-b to 48.0-b, 12 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
54.0-b to m6. , 11 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
m7. to m7. , 10 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
m8. to m14. , 11 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
m15. to m15. , 10 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
m0.-4 to m3.-4 , 14 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
m4.-4 to m4.-4 , 13 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
m5.-4 to m5.-4 , 12 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
m6.-4 to m6.-4 , 11 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
m7.-4 to m7.-4 , 10 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
m8.-4 to m11.-4, 14 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
m12.-4 to m12.-4, 13 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
m13.-4 to m13.-4, 12 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
m14.-4 to m14.-4, 11 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 
m15.-4 to m15.-4, 10 dBm, changed due to regulatory maximum 


Replied by: fredn - CISCO SYSTEMS - Oct 8, 2009, 12:32pm PST


Yes this power levels are real (don't be amazed) it's pretty much the same
across the board with our competitors as well. What you are seeing here is not
an FCC regulated limitation but rather one of PoE. When we design products, such
as the 1140 we design to a power of approx 12.5 Watts (yes 802.3af is 15.4
Watts) but the device is designed less as there is loss in Ethernet cable etc.
As the data rates go lower the transmitter power goes up since the transmitter
EVM limit is relaxed. 

EVM is the linear or distortion factor, the higher the data rate the less
distortion is tolerated. Similar to receiver sensitivity gets better as the data
rates go down (since it can decode better through the distortion). 

If you have a need for higher transmitter power, take a look at the AP-1250
product which can accept a higher PoE rating (beyond that of 802.3af) using our
power injector. 

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 2:36 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 1140 Cisco APs

If you recall, not too long ago Cisco did come out and say that ceiling mount is
strongly recommended- to the point of dropping wall mounting from the text in
their documentation.

I believe RRM assumes a ceiling mount for whatever it is worth to the enigmatic
algorithm. 

-Lee
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Procyk, Ian
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 2:30 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 1140 Cisco APs

Kristina,

Also be aware of the fact that to mount on a single gang electrical box,
you will likely need another adapter plate (or access to a drill press
if you want to roll your own).  The 1142 brackets no longer have the X-Y
holes that the 1131 brackets had, which made the 1131's so nice and easy
to mount up against the wall, with only the stuff supplied in the box.

We are finding that the current architectural trend on campus, is one
that is shying away from t-bar ceilings - hence our need for the
alternate brackets.  In many cases we are back to open and exposed
ceilings with cable tray and pipe.  Often an acoustic baffle, made from
what can only be described as pressed wood shavings is hung from the
ceiling as well, these don't like to be drilled or bolted into... 


Ian Procyk
UBC IT
604-827-4707



-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless