[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12064] extcap/androiddump: Wireshark fails to start when Android device attached

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12064

--- Comment #2 from Roland Knall  ---
(In reply to Michal Labedzki from comment #1)
> I can see there is a problem with "-" (minus). Without minus - works. With
> "_" (let call that lower-case "-" :) ) also works.

Yeah, although I do not get why it does not work with androiddump, but worked
without an issue with sshdump. There are arguments like remote-count, ... and
they work fine.

I am still looking into that, but if you have an idea, feel free to submit a
patch.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12055] Bugs seem to be CONFIRMED automatically

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12055

Alexis La Goutte  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ger...@wireshark.org

--- Comment #2 from Alexis La Goutte  ---
Gerald, bug after update ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11668] extcap: capture filter should be validated by the extcap

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11668

Bugzilla administrator  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #5 from Bugzilla administrator  ---
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10722] Round-Trip Time Graph plots incorrect values

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10722

Bugzilla administrator  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Bugzilla administrator  ---
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10220] add ISO 8601 date format option to tshark -T fields (FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME type fields)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10220

Bugzilla administrator  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Bugzilla administrator  ---
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9284] Make Qtshark accessible?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9284

Bugzilla administrator  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Bugzilla administrator  ---
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10085] Synonymous "contains" operator for display filters

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10085

Bugzilla administrator  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Bugzilla administrator  ---
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 3046] "Closing File!" Dialog Hangs

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3046

Bugzilla administrator  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #45 from Bugzilla administrator  ---
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11125] RTP Player does not show progress in selected stream in Window 7

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11125

Bugzilla administrator  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #7 from Bugzilla administrator  ---
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11237] Wireshark crashes when launched from GNS3 and capturing from the standard input

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11237

Bugzilla administrator  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #8 from Bugzilla administrator  ---
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 8713] Add comments to multiple packets based on marked instead of current selection.

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8713

Bugzilla administrator  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #7 from Bugzilla administrator  ---
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11370] Need dumpcap to be able to capture pcap-ng from a pipe

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11370

Bugzilla administrator  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #4 from Bugzilla administrator  ---
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12064] extcap/androiddump: Wireshark fails to start when Android device attached

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12064

--- Comment #3 from Michal Labedzki  ---
The problem seems to be related to "interface name" rather then "argument
name". Try rename sshdump to "ssh-DUMP" or "ssh-dump".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12055] Bugs seem to be CONFIRMED automatically

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12055

--- Comment #3 from Gerald Combs  ---
Newer versions of Bugzilla *really* want to use CONFIRMED as the initial status
to the point of ignoring UNCONFIRMED if it's first in the list.

I ended up modifying the source code do default to the first status. The other
option was to disable every status except UNCONFIRMED, which would have kept
people from using CONFIRMED, IN_PROGRESS, or INCOMPLETE.

Note that older versions of Bugzilla tied the initial status value to the
"minimum votes to confirm" setting. As an experiment I changed its value which
triggered a bunch of UNCONFIRMED → CONFIRMED changes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12055] Bugs seem to be CONFIRMED automatically

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12055

Gerald Combs  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CONFIRMED   |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12068] New: Headings on the Telephony/Voip Calls Call Flow ladder diagram are missing

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12068

Bug ID: 12068
   Summary: Headings on the Telephony/Voip Calls Call Flow ladder
diagram are missing
   Product: Wireshark
   Version: 2.0.1
  Hardware: x86
OS: Windows 7
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: Normal
  Priority: Low
 Component: Common utilities (libwsutil)
  Assignee: bugzilla-ad...@wireshark.org
  Reporter: da...@zilknet.net

Created attachment 14298
  --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14298=edit
VoIP Call Flow Graph in Wireshark 2.0.1

Build Information:
Version 2.0.1 (v2.0.1-0-g59ea380 from master-2.0)
--
The column headers indicating the sending and receiving IP Address or Hostname
on the VoIP Calls/Flow Graph are missing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12066] New: Failure to decrypt on AWS server

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12066

Bug ID: 12066
   Summary: Failure to decrypt on AWS server
   Product: Wireshark
   Version: 2.1.x (Experimental)
  Hardware: x86
OS: Ubuntu
Status: CONFIRMED
  Severity: Major
  Priority: Low
 Component: TShark
  Assignee: bugzilla-ad...@wireshark.org
  Reporter: adamsh...@allionusa.com

Created attachment 14297
  --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14297=edit
Capture that can be decrypted on local machine but not AWS Instance

Build Information:
Wireshark 2.1.0 (v2.1.0rc0-1691-g0f5bed3 from master)

Copyright 1998-2016 Gerald Combs  and contributors.
License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later

This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled (64-bit) with Qt 5.2.1, with libpcap, without POSIX capabilities,
without libnl, with libz 1.2.8, with GLib 2.40.2, without SMI, without c-ares,
without ADNS, without Lua, without GnuTLS, with Gcrypt 1.5.3, without Kerberos,
without GeoIP, without QtMultimedia, without AirPcap.

Running on Linux 3.13.0-44-generic, with locale C, with libpcap version 1.5.3,
with libz 1.2.8, with Gcrypt 1.5.3.
  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz (with SSE4.2)

Built using gcc 4.8.4.









TShark (Wireshark) 2.1.0 (v2.1.0rc0-1689-g6bd7e92 from master)

Copyright 1998-2016 Gerald Combs  and contributors.
License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later

This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled (64-bit) with libpcap, without POSIX capabilities, without libnl, with
libz 1.2.8, with GLib 2.40.2, without SMI, without c-ares, without ADNS,
without
Lua, without GnuTLS, without Gcrypt, without Kerberos, without GeoIP.

Running on Linux 3.19.0-31-generic, with locale en_US.UTF-8, with libpcap
version 1.5.3, with libz 1.2.8.
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz (with SSE4.2)

Built using gcc 4.8.4.
--
Unable to decrypt specific captures using command line tshark on AWS instance.
Able to decrypt same capture on local machine. Verified using same version
(First build information is from AWS instance second from local machine). It is
also seemingly random. Happens on the same trace but in a group of seemingly 5
identical traces.


Had the same issue on 1.27. Upgraded to see if it would fix the issue

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] New: Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

Bug ID: 12067
   Summary: Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details
pane
   Product: Wireshark
   Version: 2.0.1
  Hardware: x86
OS: Mac OS X 10.11
Status: CONFIRMED
  Severity: Minor
  Priority: Low
 Component: GTK+ UI
  Assignee: bugzilla-ad...@wireshark.org
  Reporter: i.can...@gmail.com

Build Information:
Version 2.0.1 (v2.0.1-0-g59ea380 from master-2.0)

Copyright 1998-2015 Gerald Combs  and contributors.
License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later

This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled (32-bit) with Qt 4.8.6, with libpcap, without POSIX capabilities, with
libz 1.2.3, with GLib 2.16.3, with SMI 0.4.8, without c-ares, without ADNS,
with
Lua 5.2, with GnuTLS 2.12.19, with Gcrypt 1.4.3, with MIT Kerberos, with GeoIP,
with QtMultimedia, without AirPcap.

Running on Mac OS X 10.11.3, build 15D21 (Darwin 15.3.0), with locale C, with
libpcap version 1.5.3 - Apple version 54, with libz 1.2.5, with GnuTLS 2.12.19,
with Gcrypt 1.4.3.

Built using gcc 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot 3).

Wireshark is Open Source Software released under the GNU General Public
License.

Check the man page and http://www.wireshark.org for more information.
--
I recently installed Wireshark 2.0.1 in my Macbook Pro 15" Retina Display (Mid
2014 Model) running on Mac OS X El Capitan 10.11.3. The GUI is refreshingly
greater. But I see a subtle nuance. I am not able to re-size the panes...the
Packet List Pane, Packet Summary Pane and Packet Details Pane. I saw a similar
bug reported in Linux Flavours as well in Bugzilla.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12055] Bugs seem to be CONFIRMED automatically

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12055

--- Comment #4 from Gerald Combs  ---
(BTW, I'm subscribed to wireshark-bugs so there's no need to add me to the CC
list.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11933] smb2_info_t structure isn't always passed down

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11933

--- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review  ---
Change 13674 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Mann:
Pass smb2_info_t structure to heuristic subdissectors.

https://code.wireshark.org/review/13674

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11933] smb2_info_t structure isn't always passed down

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11933

--- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review  ---
Change 13674 merged by Michael Mann:
Pass smb2_info_t structure to heuristic subdissectors.

https://code.wireshark.org/review/13674

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11933] smb2_info_t structure isn't always passed down

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11933

Gerrit Code Review  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CONFIRMED   |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10220] add ISO 8601 date format option to tshark -T fields (FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME type fields)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10220

--- Comment #3 from Guy Harris  ---
(In reply to Craig Garrett from comment #0)
> I would also ask for an option to output datetime fields in the UTC timezone
> regardless of the local system timezone setting (e.g. "-E timezone=UTC"),
> but that could be a separate feature request.

It probably should be a separate request.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10220] add ISO 8601 date format option to tshark -T fields (FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME type fields)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10220

--- Comment #2 from Guy Harris  ---
Other than for compatibility reasons, a case could be made that, for "-T
fields" output, absolute times should *always* be written out in ISO 8601
format, as "-T fields" output is generally parsed by software, and it's easier
for them to parse ISO 8601 date/time values than to parse dates and times
formatted for humans (especially given that dates and times formatted for
humans might show it in the locale's format using the locale's month names).

I don't know how much disruption just changing it would have for existing
scripts.

Independently of this, a user might want to have the "human-readable" output
("-T text -V" output in TShark, packet details pane in Wireshark) in ISO 8601
format as well.

We already show the time stamp column in ISO 8601 format, which further argues
for it as at least an option, if not the default.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12069] New: I can't scroll horizontally in the packet list pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12069

Bug ID: 12069
   Summary: I can't scroll horizontally in the packet list pane
   Product: Wireshark
   Version: Git
  Hardware: x86
OS: Mac OS X 10.11
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: Major
  Priority: Low
 Component: Qt UI
  Assignee: bugzilla-ad...@wireshark.org
  Reporter: g...@alum.mit.edu

Build Information:
Version 2.1.0 (v2.1.0rc0-1798-g59b5609 from master)

Copyright 1998-2016 Gerald Combs  and contributors.
License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later

This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled (64-bit) with Qt 5.5.0, with libpcap, without POSIX capabilities, with
libz 1.2.5, with GLib 2.36.0, with SMI 0.4.8, with c-ares 1.10.0, with Lua 5.2,
with GnuTLS 2.12.19, with Gcrypt 1.5.0, with MIT Kerberos, with GeoIP, with
QtMultimedia, without AirPcap.

Running on Mac OS X 10.11.3, build 15D21 (Darwin 15.3.0), with locale C, with
libpcap version 1.5.3 - Apple version 54, with libz 1.2.5, with GnuTLS 2.12.19,
with Gcrypt 1.5.0.
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4980HQ CPU @ 2.80GHz (with SSE4.2)

Built using clang 4.2.1 Compatible Apple LLVM 7.0.2 (clang-700.1.81).
--
I've opened a capture with Info lines wide enough that they don't fit within
the packet list pane, and attempts to scroll horizontally result in vertical
scrolling - no horizontal scrolling.

(The lack of a horizontal scrollbar is, on OS X, not necessarily a bug by
itself; I tried my favorite reference example, Mail, and if I narrow the Mail
window, whilst it allows me to scroll the message list pane, it doesn't appear
to show a horizontal scrollbar for it, even when scrolling.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

Guy Harris  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|GTK+ UI |Qt UI
   Hardware|x86 |x86-64

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12069] I can't scroll horizontally in the packet list pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12069

--- Comment #1 from Guy Harris  ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #0)
> (The lack of a horizontal scrollbar is, on OS X, not necessarily a bug by
> itself; I tried my favorite reference example, Mail, and if I narrow the
> Mail window, whilst it allows me to scroll the message list pane, it doesn't
> appear to show a horizontal scrollbar for it, even when scrolling.)

Although Quicken for Mac 2016 *does* have a horizontal scrollbar that pops up. 
That's what I love about the Mac - enforced UI consistency!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12066] Failure to decrypt on AWS server

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12066

Alexis La Goutte  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||alexis.lagou...@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Alexis La Goutte  ---
It is no the same for the First you have gcrypt lib and no a the second
(without grypt)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12040] Print "Selected packets only" crashes application

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12040

Pierre Fortin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||p...@pfortin.com

--- Comment #4 from Pierre Fortin  ---
On Mageia 5 (wireshark 2.0.1), crash occurs immediately at File->Print...
If it helps, filed my crash logs at:
   https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17623

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11939] "wireshark -i usbmon2 -k" results in "No interfaces selected" when restarting a capture

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11939

Thomas W.  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
 CC||thomas.wel...@kaba.com
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #3 from Thomas W.  ---
I can confirm this for Wireshark 2.0.1

I am using command line -i \Device\NPF_{06B4DD94-39B2-4A29-8496-72F0589A03DC}



Version 2.0.1 (v2.0.1-0-g59ea380 from master-2.0)

Copyright 1998-2015 Gerald Combs  and contributors.
License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later

This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled (64-bit) with Qt 5.3.2, with WinPcap (4_1_3), with libz 1.2.8, with
GLib 2.42.0, with SMI 0.4.8, with c-ares 1.9.1, with Lua 5.2, with GnuTLS
3.2.15, with Gcrypt 1.6.2, with MIT Kerberos, with GeoIP, with QtMultimedia,
with AirPcap.

Running on 64-bit Windows 7 Service Pack 1, build 7601, with locale C, with
WinPcap version 4.1.3 (packet.dll version 4.1.0.2980), based on libpcap version
1.0 branch 1_0_rel0b (20091008), with GnuTLS 3.2.15, with Gcrypt 1.6.2, without
AirPcap.
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4702MQ CPU @ 2.20GHz (with SSE4.2), with 16265MB of
physical memory.


Built using Microsoft Visual C++ 12.0 build 31101

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12053] Bluetooth LL: dissection over DLT_USER misses additional informations

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12053

--- Comment #6 from nathan.p.ear...@gmail.com ---
While I understand that it is not incorrect, the issue is that it is not
displaying in the format it was before. Also,  I have tested some other ble
packet captures that have some syncing between devices and a lot of the data
during the sync operation are showing unknown direction between devices and
some erroneous data. When I get time later today I will attach another pcap
with some sync data. But in the mean time at least I can tell what handle
values are being written to and I can generally gather everything else I need.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11370] Need dumpcap to be able to capture pcap-ng from a pipe

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11370

alan.r.ford...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||alan.r.ford...@gmail.com

--- Comment #3 from alan.r.ford...@gmail.com ---
I would like to add my weight to this bug-report. We also need dumpcap to
handle pcap-ng via a pipe as we also need to send additional data with each
packet for dissection.

My only option now is to use the ts_usec header field of the standard libpcap
offering to add in my extra data which is a pretty horrible hack given that
wireshark and tshark both already support pcap-ng.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12064] extcap/androiddump: Wireshark fails to start when Android device attached

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12064

Michal Labedzki  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||michal.labed...@tieto.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12063] New: Wireshark is decoding wrongly for long header format of DRTReq version zero message over GTPP

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12063

Bug ID: 12063
   Summary: Wireshark is decoding wrongly for long header format
of DRTReq version zero message over GTPP
   Product: Wireshark
   Version: 2.1.x (Experimental)
  Hardware: x86
OS: Windows 7
Status: CONFIRMED
  Severity: Major
  Priority: Low
 Component: Capture file support (libwiretap)
  Assignee: bugzilla-ad...@wireshark.org
  Reporter: anila.agrawa...@gmail.com

Created attachment 14295
  --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14295=edit
attachement contains both trace and text log file

Build Information:
Version 2.1.0-91-g894c3c0 (v2.1.0rc0-91-g894c3c0 from master)

Copyright 1998-2015 Gerald Combs  and contributors.
License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later

This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled (64-bit) with Qt 5.3.2, with WinPcap (unknown), with libz 1.2.8, with
GLib 2.42.0, with SMI 0.4.8, with c-ares 1.9.1, with Lua 5.2, with GnuTLS
3.2.15, with Gcrypt 1.6.2, with MIT Kerberos, with GeoIP, with QtMultimedia,
with AirPcap.

Running on 64-bit Windows 7 Service Pack 1, build 7601, with locale C, with
WinPcap version 4.1.3 (packet.dll version 4.1.0.2980), based on libpcap version
1.0 branch 1_0_rel0b (20091008), with GnuTLS 3.2.15, with Gcrypt 1.6.2, without
AirPcap.
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4210M CPU @ 2.60GHz (with SSE4.2), with 8097MB of physical
memory.


Built using Microsoft Visual C++ 12.0 build 31101

Wireshark is Open Source Software released under the GNU General Public
License.

Check the man page and http://www.wireshark.org for more information.
--
Test Scenario: 

1. CDF sends Data Record Transfer Request message to CGF server over Ga
interface. 

2. Configure CDF server for version 0 and long header format (20 octet length)
message. 

As per spec 32295 6.1.1: 

Bit 1 of octet 1 is not used in GTP' (except in v0), and it is marked '0' in
the GTP' header. It is in use in GTP' v0 and
distinguishes the used header-length. In the case of GTP' v0, this bit being
marked one (1) indicates the usage of the 6
octets header. If the bit is set to '0' (usually the case) the 20-octet header
is used. For all other versions of GTP', this bit
is not used and is set to '0'. However, this does not suggest the use of the
20-octet header, rather a shorter 6-octet header. 


issue: 

CDF server is sending it correctly but wireshark is decoding wrongly. 

i.e: Till sequence number message is decoded properly (which contain 6 octet)
the rest 14 octet is decoded with some IE which is not part of GTPP DRTR
message. 

The wrong IEs are :

Flow Level
SNDCP N-PDU LLC Number
TID

Spec 32295 does not have some IE. 

Attached the trace and log file for further analysis.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12065] New: Flow Graph colored data arrows

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12065

Bug ID: 12065
   Summary: Flow Graph colored data arrows
   Product: Wireshark
   Version: 2.0.1
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: CONFIRMED
  Severity: Enhancement
  Priority: Low
 Component: Qt UI
  Assignee: bugzilla-ad...@wireshark.org
  Reporter: mustafabu...@gmail.com

Created attachment 14296
  --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14296=edit
Colored Flow Graph data arrows

Build Information:
Wireshark 2.0.0-HsyncDevelV200 (SVN Rev Unknown from unknown)

Copyright 1998-2015 Gerald Combs  and contributors.
License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later

This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled (64-bit) with Qt 5.4.0, with WinPcap (4_1_3), with libz 1.2.8, with
GLib 2.42.0, with SMI 0.4.8, with c-ares 1.9.1, with Lua 5.2, with GnuTLS
3.2.15, with Gcrypt 1.6.2, with MIT Kerberos, with GeoIP, with QtMultimedia,
with AirPcap.

Running on 64-bit Windows 7 Service Pack 1, build 7601, with locale C, with
WinPcap version 4.1.3 (packet.dll version 4.1.0.2980), based on libpcap version
1.0 branch 1_0_rel0b (20091008), with GnuTLS 3.2.15, with Gcrypt 1.6.2, with
AirPcap 4.1.0 build 1622.
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz (with SSE4.2), with 8132MB of
physical memory.


Built using Microsoft Visual C++ 12.0 build 21005
--
Flow Graph draws data arrows only in black color.
Instead it can use background color which is set by color filters.

SequenceDiagram::draw() method can read color value from "seq_analysis_item_t".

See the attached example.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12065] Flow Graph colored data arrows

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12065

Stig Bjørlykke  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||s...@bjorlykke.org

--- Comment #1 from Stig Bjørlykke  ---
It may be hard to read the text and see the line if the background color is a
light color, because it's drawn on white background.

But we may want to add an option to use the background color as a background
color in the graph, and the foreground color for text and arrow.  I haven't
tried this so I don't know if it's usable.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11312] Unable to Decrypt TDLS Direct link Packets: Does TPKSA decryption support exist?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11312

--- Comment #6 from Gerrit Code Review  ---
Change 13662 had a related patch set uploaded by cedric izoard:
Add function for SHA256 and HMAC-SHA256

https://code.wireshark.org/review/13662

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11312] Unable to Decrypt TDLS Direct link Packets: Does TPKSA decryption support exist?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11312

--- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review  ---
Change 13663 had a related patch set uploaded by cedric izoard:
Add AES-CMAC encryption support

https://code.wireshark.org/review/13663

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11312] Unable to Decrypt TDLS Direct link Packets: Does TPKSA decryption support exist?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11312

--- Comment #8 from Gerrit Code Review  ---
Change 13664 had a related patch set uploaded by cedric izoard:
[airpdcap] Add support to decrypt TDLS traffic

https://code.wireshark.org/review/13664

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12064] extcap/androiddump: Wireshark fails to start when Android device attached

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12064

Alexis La Goutte  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||alexis.lagou...@gmail.com,
   ||lom...@gmail.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12064] extcap/androiddump: Wireshark fails to start when Android device attached

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12064

--- Comment #1 from Michal Labedzki  ---
I can see there is a problem with "-" (minus). Without minus - works. With "_"
(let call that lower-case "-" :) ) also works.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12064] extcap/androiddump: Wireshark fails to start when Android device attached

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12064

Stig Bjørlykke  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rkn...@gmail.com,
   ||s...@bjorlykke.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12064] New: extcap/androiddump: Wireshark fails to start when Android device attached

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12064

Bug ID: 12064
   Summary: extcap/androiddump: Wireshark fails to start when
Android device attached
   Product: Wireshark
   Version: Git
  Hardware: x86
OS: Ubuntu
Status: CONFIRMED
  Severity: Normal
  Priority: Low
 Component: Extras
  Assignee: bugzilla-ad...@wireshark.org
  Reporter: mikael.kanst...@gmail.com

Build Information:
Version 2.1.0 (v2.1.0rc0-1768-gd575992 from unknown)

Copyright 1998-2016 Gerald Combs  and contributors.
License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later

This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled (64-bit) with Qt 5.2.1, with libpcap, with POSIX capabilities (Linux),
with libnl 3, with libz 1.2.8, with GLib 2.40.2, with SMI 0.4.8, with c-ares
1.10.0, with Lua 5.2, with GnuTLS 2.12.23, with Gcrypt 1.5.3, with MIT
Kerberos,
with GeoIP, with QtMultimedia, without AirPcap.

Running on Linux 3.19.0-47-generic, with locale C, with libpcap version 1.5.3,
with libz 1.2.8, with GnuTLS 2.12.23, with Gcrypt 1.5.3.
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU   W3680  @ 3.33GHz (with SSE4.2)

Built using gcc 4.8.4.
--
Wireshark fails to start when an Android device is connected via USB. Error
message is like this:
13:20:05  Err  Preference
extcap.android-logcat-text-events-CB5A1ZN4HN.adbserverip contains invalid
characters

Reverting these patches solves the problem:
71a21d7 extcap: Correct save for file arguments
927ffaa extcap: Add Save functionality to options dialog

The problem appears to be that some new preferences are named based on the
extcap interface name. androiddump tool generate interface names from the
device serial number with capital letters present. Preferences however have to
be lower case only.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12053] Bluetooth LL: dissection over DLT_USER misses additional informations

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12053

--- Comment #4 from nathan.p.ear...@gmail.com ---
Thank you for taking a look. I checked it, and it does display more data now
with the header at 17 but some of it is still off like the source is showing
the MAC address and the destination just says broadcast and not the typical
client/server (master/slave) relationship.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12053] Bluetooth LL: dissection over DLT_USER misses additional informations

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12053

--- Comment #5 from Michal Labedzki  ---
Advertising packet has only address of devices that doing advertising (aka
Source). So Destination "broadcast" is right here.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe