[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16245] Crash after closing the Edit Column widget

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16245

--- Comment #1 from Jim Young  ---
Created attachment 17497
  --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17497&action=edit
Proposed patch

Unploading patch here because unable to upload to gerrit at this time.

This patch that appears to resolve the crash but the cfield test may need to be
closer to the strcmp().  There were in fact two getters that could trigger this
bug.  The setters may need to have similar treatment.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16245] New: Crash after closing the Edit Column widget

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16245

Bug ID: 16245
   Summary: Crash after closing the Edit Column widget
   Product: Wireshark
   Version: Git
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: Major
  Priority: Low
 Component: Qt UI
  Assignee: bugzilla-ad...@wireshark.org
  Reporter: jyo...@gsu.edu
  Target Milestone: ---

Build Information:
Wireshark 3.3.0rc0-58-g890e2bea2ef2 (v3.3.0rc0-58-g890e2bea2ef2)

Copyright 1998-2019 Gerald Combs  and contributors.
License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later

This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled (64-bit) with Qt 5.12.5, with libpcap, without POSIX capabilities,
with
GLib 2.37.6, with zlib 1.2.11, with SMI 0.4.8, with c-ares 1.15.0, with Lua
5.2.4, with GnuTLS 3.4.17, with Gcrypt 1.7.7, with MIT Kerberos, with MaxMind
DB
resolver, with nghttp2 1.39.2, with brotli, with LZ4, with Zstandard, with
Snappy, with libxml2 2.9.9, with QtMultimedia, with SpeexDSP (using bundled
resampler), with SBC, with SpanDSP, with bcg729.

Running on Mac OS X 10.13.6, build 17G9016 (Darwin 17.7.0), with Intel(R)
Core(TM) i7-4870HQ CPU @ 2.50GHz (with SSE4.2), with 16384 MB of physical
memory, with locale en_US.UTF-8, with libpcap version 1.8.1 -- Apple version
79.20.1, with GnuTLS 3.4.17, with Gcrypt 1.7.7, with brotli 1.0.7, with zlib
1.2.11, binary plugins supported (0 loaded).

Built using clang 4.2.1 Compatible Apple LLVM 11.0.0 (clang-1100.0.33.8).

--
A crash can be triggered when closing the Packet List's header context menu's
Edit Column widget.  This appears to happen when there is already is at least
one custom column defined for the current profile.

Starting with a new default profile (no custom columns).

1 Right click on one of the standard (non-custom) column Header names (for
example "Source") to open the context menu and select the "Edit Column" item.

2 In the column editor click in the "Fields:" text entry and type some trivial
display filter such as "ip" or "frame" (any valid filter name will do).

3 Accept and close the Edit Column widget.

4 Click on another non-custom column Header (for example "Destination") to
again open the context menu and again select the "Edit Column" item.

5 As was done in step 2 click on the "Fields:" entry and again enter some
trivial display like "ip".

6 Accept and close the Edit column widget.

7 Crash.

Problem first seen when working with a recent buildbot generated Development
version on macOS.

> Exception Type:EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV)
> Exception Codes:   KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x
> Exception Note:EXC_CORPSE_NOTIFY
> 
> Termination Signal:Segmentation fault: 11
> Termination Reason:Namespace SIGNAL, Code 0xb
> Terminating Process:   exc handler [0]

Thread 0 Crashed:: Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread
> 0   libsystem_platform.dylib  0x7fff755a4750 _platform_strcmp + 
> 176
> 1   wireshark 0x00010ae4657b 
> recent_get_column_width + 107 (recent.c:1458)
> 2   wireshark 0x00010aad5396 
> ColumnEditorFrame::on_buttonBox_accepted() + 246
> 3   wireshark 0x00010aad56ab 
> ColumnEditorFrame::keyPressEvent(QKeyEvent*) + 107


Duplicated using recent buildbot generated Development version on Windows. 
With the appropriate PDB files and source it provided this:

> Wireshark.exe!recent_get_column_width(int col) Line 1458
> Wireshark.exe!ColumnEditorFrame::on_buttonBox_accepted() Line 145
> Wireshark.exe!ColumnEditorFrame::keyPressEvent(QKeyEvent * event) Line 169


Which pointed to this line of code in ui/recent.s's recent_get_column_width():

> if (cfmt != COL_CUSTOM || strcmp (cfield, col_w->cfield) == 0) {

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16242] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-11-30-27445.pcap

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16242

--- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review  ---
Change 35280 merged by Anders Broman:
kafka: don't use an empty tvb list.

https://code.wireshark.org/review/35280

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16242] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-11-30-27445.pcap

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16242

--- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review  ---
Change 35280 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Mann:
kafka: don't use an empty tvb list.

https://code.wireshark.org/review/35280

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16242] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-11-30-27445.pcap

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16242

Michael Mann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|CONFIRMED   |RESOLVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16242] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-11-30-27445.pcap

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16242

--- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review  ---
Change 35277 merged by Michael Mann:
kafka: don't use an empty tvb list.

https://code.wireshark.org/review/35277

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12997] wslua (gregex) test suite fails on Ubuntu 16.04

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12997

--- Comment #7 from João Valverde  ---
I don't have any plans to change the existing GRegex binding. We briefly talked
about removing it (+1) but someone else would have to drive that.

It can be replaced with any other flavor of lrexlib.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12997] wslua (gregex) test suite fails on Ubuntu 16.04

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12997

--- Comment #6 from Peter Wu  ---
The test will most likely still fail. Upstream glib recommends using PCRE2
directly, see https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/837

I think that João was trying to change the existing lrexlib backend to use
PCRE2 instead of GRegex. Alternatively, the regex binding could be dropped if
there are no users, but this would have to be carefully checked.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16241] [oss-fuzz] #19070: wireshark:fuzzshark_ip_proto-udp: Heap-buffer-overflow in bytestring_to_str

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16241

Peter Wu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pe...@lekensteyn.nl
URL||https://bugs.chromium.org/p
   ||/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=
   ||19070

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15870] [oss-fuzz] #15221 Heap-buffer-overflow in asn1_get_real

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15870

Peter Wu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

URL||https://bugs.chromium.org/p
   ||/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=
   ||15221
 CC||pe...@lekensteyn.nl

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16242] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-11-30-27445.pcap

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16242

--- Comment #1 from Gerrit Code Review  ---
Change 35277 had a related patch set uploaded by Dario Lombardo:
kafka: don't use an empty tvb list.

https://code.wireshark.org/review/35277

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16106] Restrict allowed characters in "short name" to avoid errors while parsing heuristic_protos

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16106

Michael Mann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mman...@netscape.net
 Status|CONFIRMED   |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16106] Restrict allowed characters in "short name" to avoid errors while parsing heuristic_protos

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16106

--- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review  ---
Change 35267 merged by Michael Mann:
Restrict allowed characters in "short name" of heuristic_protos

https://code.wireshark.org/review/35267

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16244] [Thrift] Dissector fails to reassemble PDU on nested structures

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16244

Triton Circonflexe  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Triton Circonflexe  ---
Already working on it, need to anonymize properly the example pcap or generate
a new one before submitting it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16244] New: [Thrift] Dissector fails to reassemble PDU on nested structures

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16244

Bug ID: 16244
   Summary: [Thrift] Dissector fails to reassemble PDU on nested
structures
   Product: Wireshark
   Version: 3.0.6
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: Major
  Priority: Low
 Component: Dissection engine (libwireshark)
  Assignee: bugzilla-ad...@wireshark.org
  Reporter: triton+enu...@kumal.info
  Target Milestone: ---

Build Information:
Version 3.0.6 (Git commit 908c8e357d0f) 
Copyright 1998-2019 Gerald Combs  and contributors.
License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later
 This is free software;
see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. 
Compiled (64-bit) with Qt 5.12.5, with libpcap, with POSIX capabilities
(Linux), with libnl 3, with GLib 2.60.6, with zlib 1.2.11, without SMI, without
c-ares, with Lua 5.1.5, with GnuTLS 3.6.7, with Gcrypt 1.8.5, without Kerberos,
without MaxMind DB resolver, without nghttp2, with LZ4, without Snappy, with
libxml2 2.9.9, with QtMultimedia, without SBC, without SpanDSP, without bcg729. 
Running on Linux 4.19.72-gentoo, with Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 860 @ 2.80GHz
(with SSE4.2), with 16011 MB of physical memory, with locale fr_FR.UTF-8, with
libpcap version 1.9.1 (with TPACKET_V3), with GnuTLS 3.6.7, with Gcrypt 1.8.5,
with zlib 1.2.11, binary plugins supported (14 loaded). Built using gcc 8.2.0.
--
Thrift PDU are not correctly reassembled when the packet break happens within
nested structures.

Apart from basic types (integers, booleans, strings, enums), Thrift allows
several kinds of structures (structs, maps, lists, sets) and the type of the
elements/fields of these structures can be any type whether it is some basic
type or other structures, resulting in nested structures.

Thrift dissector has some of the necessary bits to reassemble PDU across
several packets but when the split happen in some nested structure, the
dissection just stops with "Malformed Packet (Exception occurred)" and the end
of the PDU in subsequent packets is just considered as non-specific TCP payload
until the next Thrift header.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15445] Wireless toolbar is missing

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15445

--- Comment #3 from Hiro  ---
I pushed the changes to Gerrit.
Could you check whether my push is correct?
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/35274/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12636] Selecting an interface can clear the capture filter

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12636

--- Comment #10 from Michael Mann  ---
(In reply to Jaap Keuter from comment #9)
> What more needs to be done for this bug?

It looks like the original "bug" is still an issue (just tried it myself):

> This leads to a usability problem: The capture filter field is located above 
> the
> interface list, so the user (at least *this* user) tends to enter the capture
> filter before selecting any interfaces. However, as soon as I then select an
> interface, the filter string goes away tracelessly and cannot be recovered
> because no interface was selected when I entered it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16243] Big SMB2 Write requets do not supported very well.(Write Size bigger than 1MB)

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16243

--- Comment #2 from Jack <84051...@qq.com> ---
Created attachment 17496
  --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17496&action=edit
Screen capture of 3.0.6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16243] Big SMB2 Write requets do not supported very well.(Write Size bigger than 1MB)

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16243

--- Comment #1 from Jack <84051...@qq.com> ---
Version 3.0.6 (v3.0.6-0-g908c8e357d0f) 
Copyright 1998-2019 Gerald Combs  and contributors.
License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later
 This is free software;
see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. 
Compiled (64-bit) with Qt 5.12.5, with WinPcap SDK (WpdPack) 4.1.2, with GLib
2.52.2, with zlib 1.2.11, with SMI 0.4.8, with c-ares 1.14.0, with Lua 5.2.4,
with GnuTLS 3.6.3 and PKCS #11 support, with Gcrypt 1.8.3, with MIT Kerberos,
with MaxMind DB resolver, with nghttp2 1.39.2, with LZ4, with Snappy, with
libxml2 2.9.9, with QtMultimedia, with AirPcap, with SBC, with SpanDSP, with
bcg729. 
Running on 64-bit Windows 10 (1803), build 17134, with Intel(R) Core(TM)
i7-2760QM CPU @ 2.40GHz (with SSE4.2), with 12171 MB of physical memory, with
locale Chinese (Simplified)_China.936, with Npcap version 0.9983, based on
libpcap version 1.9.1-PRE-GIT, with GnuTLS 3.6.3, with Gcrypt 1.8.3, without
AirPcap, binary plugins supported (14 loaded). Built using Microsoft Visual
Studio 2017 (VC++ 14.16, build 27034). 
Wireshark is Open Source Software released under the GNU General Public
License. 
Check the man page and https://www.wireshark.org for more information.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16243] New: Big SMB2 Write requets do not supported very well.(Write Size bigger than 1MB)

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16243

Bug ID: 16243
   Summary: Big SMB2 Write requets do not supported very
well.(Write Size bigger than 1MB)
   Product: Wireshark
   Version: 3.0.6
  Hardware: x86
OS: Windows 10
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: Major
  Priority: Low
 Component: Dissection engine (libwireshark)
  Assignee: bugzilla-ad...@wireshark.org
  Reporter: 84051...@qq.com
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 17495
  --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17495&action=edit
SMBWriterequets

Build Information:
Paste the COMPLETE build information from "Help->About Wireshark", "wireshark
-v", or "tshark -v".
--

When I use Wireshark to analyze Smb2 protocol, I find that except the first and
second packages can be parsed normally, other write packages cannot be parsed
normally
The attachments are all Smb2's write packages, but only the first and the
second can be parsed, and others can't.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16242] New: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-11-30-27445.pcap

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16242

Bug ID: 16242
   Summary: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-11-30-27445.pcap
   Product: Wireshark
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: x86-64
OS: Ubuntu
Status: CONFIRMED
  Severity: Major
  Priority: High
 Component: Dissection engine (libwireshark)
  Assignee: bugzilla-ad...@wireshark.org
  Reporter: buildbot-do-not-re...@wireshark.org
  Target Milestone: ---

Problems have been found with the following capture file:

https://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/captures/fuzz-2019-11-30-27445.pcap

stderr:
Input file: /home/wireshark/menagerie/menagerie/produce.pcapng

Build host information:
Linux build6 4.15.0-70-generic #79-Ubuntu SMP Tue Nov 12 10:36:11 UTC 2019
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS
Release:18.04
Codename:   bionic

Buildbot information:
BUILDBOT_WORKERNAME=clang-code-analysis
BUILDBOT_BUILDNUMBER=5157
BUILDBOT_BUILDERNAME=Clang Code Analysis
BUILDBOT_URL=http://buildbot.wireshark.org/wireshark-master/
BUILDBOT_REPOSITORY=ssh://wireshark-build...@code.wireshark.org:29418/wireshark
BUILDBOT_GOT_REVISION=d4ca6cc550e98f4a4f2f879a3572ea56792caf45

Return value:  0

Dissector bug:  0

Valgrind error count:  1



Git commit
commit d4ca6cc550e98f4a4f2f879a3572ea56792caf45
Author: Jim Walker 
Date:   Thu Nov 28 13:39:26 2019 +

couchbase: Update dissector for latest 6.5.0 DCP snapshot marker

Decode the v1/v2.0 formats which are relevant for the upcoming
6.5.0 release.

Change-Id: Ie726f1ebd2457f6a36b096a0cd0bed9c94f713df
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/35251
Reviewed-by: Ben Huddleston 
Petri-Dish: Anders Broman 
Tested-by: Petri Dish Buildbot
Reviewed-by: Jaap Keuter 


Command and args: ./tools/valgrind-wireshark.sh -b
/home/wireshark/builders/wireshark-master-fuzz/clangcodeanalysis/install.plain/bin
 
==12809== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==12809== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==12809== Using Valgrind-3.13.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==12809== Command:
/home/wireshark/builders/wireshark-master-fuzz/clangcodeanalysis/install.plain/bin/tshark
-nr /fuzz/buildbot/clangcodeanalysis/valgrind-fuzz/fuzz-2019-11-30-27445.pcap
==12809== 

** (process:12809): WARNING **: 13:03:04.603: Dissector bug, protocol Kafka, in
packet 71: ../epan/tvbuff_composite.c:268: failed assertion "num_members"
==12809== 
==12809== HEAP SUMMARY:
==12809== in use at exit: 174,493 bytes in 205 blocks
==12809==   total heap usage: 324,181 allocs, 323,976 frees, 40,353,425 bytes
allocated
==12809== 
==12809== LEAK SUMMARY:
==12809==definitely lost: 288 bytes in 2 blocks
==12809==indirectly lost: 131,072 bytes in 2 blocks
==12809==  possibly lost: 304 bytes in 1 blocks
==12809==still reachable: 42,026 bytes in 167 blocks
==12809== suppressed: 803 bytes in 33 blocks
==12809== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==12809== 
==12809== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==12809== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Definitely + indirectly (288 + 131072) exceeds max (102400).

[ no debug trace ]

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16083] Missing include causes builds to fail on specific include orders

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16083

Michael Mann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
   Hardware|x86 |All
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 OS|Linux   |All
   Severity|Major   |Normal

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16139] IEEE 1609.2 dissector issue when HeaderInfo.generationLocation field is present

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16139

Michael Mann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|INCOMPLETE  |RESOLVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16139] IEEE 1609.2 dissector issue when HeaderInfo.generationLocation field is present

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16139

--- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review  ---
Change 35273 merged by Anders Broman:
IEEE 1609.2 dissector issue when HeaderInfo.generationLocation field is present

https://code.wireshark.org/review/35273

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16139] IEEE 1609.2 dissector issue when HeaderInfo.generationLocation field is present

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16139

--- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review  ---
Change 35273 had a related patch set uploaded by Anders Broman:
IEEE 1609.2 dissector issue when HeaderInfo.generationLocation field is present

https://code.wireshark.org/review/35273

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12997] wslua (gregex) test suite fails on Ubuntu 16.04

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12997

--- Comment #5 from Jaap Keuter  ---
What is the current status of this? Is the Glib bug still relevant, can the
test be re-enabled?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12787] Extcaps hang when launched from windows console

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12787

--- Comment #11 from Jaap Keuter  ---
Anything further on this bug?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12604] Proposal for dissection of BGP capability code 131

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12604

Alexis La Goutte  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED

--- Comment #5 from Alexis La Goutte  ---
(In reply to Jaap Keuter from comment #4)
> Is there anything more to be done for this bug?

We can close, reopen or recreate a issue if needed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12636] Selecting an interface can clear the capture filter

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12636

--- Comment #9 from Jaap Keuter  ---
What more needs to be done for this bug?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12604] Proposal for dissection of BGP capability code 131

2019-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12604

--- Comment #4 from Jaap Keuter  ---
Is there anything more to be done for this bug?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe