[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

Christopher Maynard  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
 Status|CONFIRMED   |RESOLVED

--- Comment #20 from Christopher Maynard  ---
(In reply to Christopher Maynard from comment #19)
> Is there any update on this bug?  Wireshark 2.0.x is end of life as of
> November 18, 2017 and Wireshark 2.2.x is end of life as of September 7,
> 2018.  Does the bug still exist even with the latest stable version of
> Wireshark?  If so, please provide updated build and other relevant
> information.

There hasn't been any additional feedback, so I'm going to close this bug.  If
the problem can be reproduced using the lates stable version of Wireshark, then
feel free to reopen the bug and update the relevant information.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

--- Comment #19 from Christopher Maynard  ---
Is there any update on this bug?  Wireshark 2.0.x is end of life as of November
18, 2017 and Wireshark 2.2.x is end of life as of September 7, 2018.  Does the
bug still exist even with the latest stable version of Wireshark?  If so,
please provide updated build and other relevant information.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

Christopher Maynard  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.wireshark.org/
   ||bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11
   ||951

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

--- Comment #18 from Eric Blanding  ---
I just found a workaround that may help point to the bug; the Packet Bytes pane
appears to be forcing the window wider to show a large number of individual
Bitstring tabs.

After I uncheck View --> Packet Bytes, I can manually drag the window to a
narrower size so it all fits on screen.  The checkmark returns after quit the
app and reopening the same file, which appears to be a separate bug.  The
window re-expands after applying the check under View --> Packet Bytes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

Eric Blanding  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ehb@icloud.com

--- Comment #17 from Eric Blanding  ---
I was looking for solutions and found this bug.  My observation is the same as
James Elliot describes: the main window opens twice as wide as my actual
screen.

I have seen this with various pcap files, and do not have the ability to debug,
but I can reproduce this every time with at least one pcap at this point.  The
window size expands beyond the screen size after applying a filter for x2ap.  I
tried exporting only one packet from the original pcap to a new file. 
Filtering for x2ap on the new file containing a single packet does not resize
the window, so pcap file size or specific packet contents appear to be a
factor.  Removing the filter does not allow me to manually shrink the window
narrower, but I can still stretch it wider - i.e. some minimum window size
appears to be applied.

File size: 6.7MB
Protocols in the pcap:
Frame
Ethernet
802.1Q Virtual LAN
Internet Protocol Version 4
Stream Control Transmission Protocol
S1 Application Protocol
Malformed Packet
EUTRAN X2 Application Protocol (X2AP)
Unreassembled Fragmented Packet
Malformed Packet

Here is my info from the about box - I downloaded the installer from
wireshark.org:

Version 2.2.1 (v2.2.1-0-ga6fbd27 from master-2.2)

Copyright 1998-2016 Gerald Combs  and contributors.
License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later

This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled (64-bit) with Qt 5.3.2, with libpcap, without POSIX capabilities, with
GLib 2.36.0, with zlib 1.2.5, with SMI 0.4.8, with c-ares 1.12.0, with Lua
5.2.4, with GnuTLS 2.12.19, with Gcrypt 1.5.0, with MIT Kerberos, with GeoIP,
with QtMultimedia, without AirPcap.

Running on Mac OS X 10.11.6, build 15G1004 (Darwin 15.6.0), with locale C, with
libpcap version 1.5.3 - Apple version 54, with GnuTLS 2.12.19, with Gcrypt
1.5.0, with zlib 1.2.5.
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU   M 620  @ 2.67GHz (with SSE4.2)

Built using llvm-gcc 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build
2336.9.00).

Wireshark is Open Source Software released under the GNU General Public
License.

Check the man page and http://www.wireshark.org for more information

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

--- Comment #16 from Gerald Combs  ---
(In reply to Matt Day from comment #15)
> (In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #12)

> > - It uses --with-qt and --with-qt4 instead of --with-qt5 and --with-qt to
> > install with Qt5 and Qt4 respectively.
> 
> Could you please clarify this point? Are you saying that it's necessary to
> specify BOTH --with-qt and --with-qt{4,5} when running Wireshark's configure?

I'm saying that the unversioned --with-qt option should build with Qt5. That
is, the options

  --with-qt  (builds with Qt4)
  --with-qt5 (builds with Qt5)

should be changed to

  --with-qt  (builds with Qt5)
  --with-qt4 (builds with Qt4)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

--- Comment #15 from Matt Day  ---
(In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #12)
> At the very least I think it'd be helpful if
> https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/blob/master/Formula/wireshark.rb
> were modified such that
> 
> - It installs Wireshark as Wireshark.app if it doesn't already do so. 

I'm far from a Homebrew expert, but here's what I have observed:

1) `brew install wireshark` does NOT install an application bundle.

2) `brew install --with-qt wireshark` DOES install an app bundle, built with
QT4.

3) `brew install --with-qt5 wireshark` DOES install an app bundle, built with
QT5.

`brew linkapps wireshark` is currently required to make the app bundle
available in /Applications.

And in case anyone else is unaware like I was, in all the above cases a
`/usr/local/bin/wireshark` executable is built, but running that executable
directly can result in bugs that do not occur when invoking Wireshark via app
bundle, for example:

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12582

> - It uses --with-qt and --with-qt4 instead of --with-qt5 and --with-qt to
> install with Qt5 and Qt4 respectively.

Could you please clarify this point? Are you saying that it's necessary to
specify BOTH --with-qt and --with-qt{4,5} when running Wireshark's configure?

Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

--- Comment #14 from Matt Day  ---
(In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #12)
> (In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Matt Day from comment #8)
> > > It seems nobody has tested Wireshark+Qt5 much beyond successful 
> > > compilation.
> > 
> > Are you referring to the official packages from wireshark.org or the
> > homebrew-compiled executables?
> 
> Note that I'm not trying to be snarky here. The official Wireshark packages
> for macOS are compiled with versions of Qt, GLib, and other libraries that
> don't change very often and are known to work reasonably well. The Wireshark
> application is installed as an application bundle and *not* as a bare
> executable. The further homebrew diverges from the wireshark.org installer
> the more opportunities for misadventure will arise.

That's an excellent point, and not snarky at all. Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

--- Comment #13 from Matt Day  ---
(In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #11)
> (In reply to Matt Day from comment #8)
> > It seems nobody has tested Wireshark+Qt5 much beyond successful compilation.
> 
> Are you referring to the official packages from wireshark.org or the
> homebrew-compiled executables?

I've only been testing homebrew-compiled executables.

Yeah, sorry about that... I wasn't aware of the importance of running Wireshark
via the application bundle. I've been under the assumption that running the
executable directly should work.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

--- Comment #12 from Gerald Combs  ---
(In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #11)
> (In reply to Matt Day from comment #8)
> > It seems nobody has tested Wireshark+Qt5 much beyond successful compilation.
> 
> Are you referring to the official packages from wireshark.org or the
> homebrew-compiled executables?

Note that I'm not trying to be snarky here. The official Wireshark packages for
macOS are compiled with versions of Qt, GLib, and other libraries that don't
change very often and are known to work reasonably well. The Wireshark
application is installed as an application bundle and *not* as a bare
executable. The further homebrew diverges from the wireshark.org installer the
more opportunities for misadventure will arise.

At the very least I think it'd be helpful if
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/blob/master/Formula/wireshark.rb were
modified such that

- It installs Wireshark as Wireshark.app if it doesn't already do so. 
- It uses --with-qt and --with-qt4 instead of --with-qt5 and --with-qt to
install with Qt5 and Qt4 respectively.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

--- Comment #11 from Gerald Combs  ---
(In reply to Matt Day from comment #8)
> It seems nobody has tested Wireshark+Qt5 much beyond successful compilation.

Are you referring to the official packages from wireshark.org or the
homebrew-compiled executables?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

Alexis La Goutte  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||alexis.lagou...@gmail.com

--- Comment #10 from Alexis La Goutte  ---
(In reply to Matt Day from comment #8)
> (In reply to James Elliott from comment #7)
> > I can report, however, that removing it and reinstalling it --with-qt-5 made
> > everything work fine, so I am going to remove my votes, and just use the
> > newer QT version!
> 
> I'm surprised to hear you say everything works fine with Qt 5, though I
> agree that at least the packet list panes are resizeable there.
> 
> When I built with Qt 5 to get resizeable packet list panes, I immediately
> ran into two new bugs:
> 
> bug 12580 - (Qt5) after obtaining a packet trace, crashes when quitting or
> starting new trace
> 
> bug 12582 - (Qt5) app menus won't pull down
> 
> It seems nobody has tested Wireshark+Qt5 much beyond successful compilation.

Hi Matt,
Do you have try with release from Wireshark.org ? May be a issue with Qt from
homebrew...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

--- Comment #9 from James Elliott  ---
(In reply to Matt Day from comment #8)
> (In reply to James Elliott from comment #7)
> > I can report, however, that removing it and reinstalling it --with-qt-5 made
> > everything work fine, so I am going to remove my votes, and just use the
> > newer QT version!
> 
> I'm surprised to hear you say everything works fine with Qt 5, though I
> agree that at least the packet list panes are resizeable there.
> 
> When I built with Qt 5 to get resizeable packet list panes, I immediately
> ran into two new bugs:
> 
> bug 12580 - (Qt5) after obtaining a packet trace, crashes when quitting or
> starting new trace
> 
> bug 12582 - (Qt5) app menus won't pull down
> 
> It seems nobody has tested Wireshark+Qt5 much beyond successful compilation.

Ow, how painful! I feel really lucky that it is working for me now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

--- Comment #8 from Matt Day  ---
(In reply to James Elliott from comment #7)
> I can report, however, that removing it and reinstalling it --with-qt-5 made
> everything work fine, so I am going to remove my votes, and just use the
> newer QT version!

I'm surprised to hear you say everything works fine with Qt 5, though I agree
that at least the packet list panes are resizeable there.

When I built with Qt 5 to get resizeable packet list panes, I immediately ran
into two new bugs:

bug 12580 - (Qt5) after obtaining a packet trace, crashes when quitting or
starting new trace

bug 12582 - (Qt5) app menus won't pull down

It seems nobody has tested Wireshark+Qt5 much beyond successful compilation.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

--- Comment #7 from James Elliott  ---
I feel your pain! Sadly I am buried in side-projects which are what are pulling
me into Wireshark in the first place, for reverse-engineering synchronization
protocols used by DJ equipment, so I very much don’t have time to try to learn
the Wireshark and QT internals and help with this.

I can report, however, that removing it and reinstalling it --with-qt-5 made
everything work fine, so I am going to remove my votes, and just use the newer
QT version!

Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

--- Comment #6 from Gerald Combs  ---
(In reply to James Elliott from comment #4)
> Sadly, I install via homebrew, so I am limited to what they give me. Is that
> a bad idea?

Can you try reinstalling it with "--with-qt5"?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

--- Comment #5 from Gerald Combs  ---
(In reply to James Elliott from comment #2)
> This deserves more attention than it seems to be getting from the
> description, because not only am I unable to resize the Wireshark windows,
> but they always open twice as wide as my actual screen, so I need to drag
> the window back and forth in multiple, tedious steps, in order to access
> elements on the left or right hand sides of the window.

It would help if someone with the means and time to debug the problem could
reproduce it. So far that hasn't been the case. I've been building the Qt UI
using different versions of Qt on different versions of OS X, Windows, and
Linux a while now and yet to run into this issue.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

--- Comment #4 from James Elliott  ---
Sadly, I install via homebrew, so I am limited to what they give me. Is that a
bad idea?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

--- Comment #3 from Gerald Combs  ---
(In reply to Cannan from comment #0)
> Build Information:
> Version 2.0.1 (v2.0.1-0-g59ea380 from master-2.0)
> 
> Copyright 1998-2015 Gerald Combs  and contributors.
> License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later
> 
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> 
> Compiled (32-bit) with Qt 4.8.6, with libpcap, without POSIX capabilities,
> with
> libz 1.2.3, with GLib 2.16.3, with SMI 0.4.8, without c-ares, without ADNS,
> with
> Lua 5.2, with GnuTLS 2.12.19, with Gcrypt 1.4.3, with MIT Kerberos, with
> GeoIP,
> with QtMultimedia, without AirPcap.

Did you install the OS X package from Wireshark.org (as opposed to Homebrew or
MacPorts or some other avenue)? If so, can you try the 64-bit installer instead
of the 32-bit installer?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

James Elliott  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|Low |Medium
 CC||ja...@brunchboy.com
   Severity|Minor   |Normal

--- Comment #2 from James Elliott  ---
This deserves more attention than it seems to be getting from the description,
because not only am I unable to resize the Wireshark windows, but they always
open twice as wide as my actual screen, so I need to drag the window back and
forth in multiple, tedious steps, in order to access elements on the left or
right hand sides of the window.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

Matt Day  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fja...@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Matt Day  ---
This might be a duplicate of bug 11951, reported on Mageia Linux.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

char  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||charh1...@gmail.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12067] Unable to resize the packet list pane, packet details pane

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

Guy Harris  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|GTK+ UI |Qt UI
   Hardware|x86 |x86-64

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe