[Wireshark-dev] MacOSX snow leo integration
Hello, This is a patch to improve Wireshark integration with MacOSX 10.6.X It uses the new API from ige-mac-integration called GtkOSXApplication using cocoa. The patch brings -GtkOSXApplication detection -main menu integration -functional menu shortcut -dock menu (Start/Stop/Restart) -dock status picture (Wireshark blue logo : idle , green logo : capturing) Hsivank___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] MacOSX snow leo integration
gtkosxapplication.diff Description: Binary data Le 22 mai 2010 à 16:08, H.sivank a écrit :Hello,This is a patch to improve Wireshark integration with MacOSX 10.6.XIt uses the new API from ige-mac-integration calledGtkOSXApplicationusing cocoa.The patch brings -GtkOSXApplication detection -main menu integration -functional menu shortcut -dock menu (Start/Stop/Restart) -dock status picture (Wireshark blue logo : idle , green logo : capturing)Hsivank___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] MacOSX snow leo integration
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:08 PM, H.sivank hsiv...@gmail.com wrote: This is a patch to improve Wireshark integration with MacOSX 10.6.X It uses the new API from ige-mac-integration called GtkOSXApplication using cocoa. What do I need to install to test this patch? Can it be installed with mac ports? -- Stig Bjørlykke ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] MacOSX snow leo integration
Hello Sig, To test this patch you need ige-mac-integration version 0.9.2 Currently there are two port of ige-mac-integration in MacPort (0.8.2 and 0.8.6), but this version are too old :/ I can suggest a path to the macport team to update or create a new port ... Hsivank Le 22 mai 2010 à 18:06, Stig Bjørlykke a écrit : On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:08 PM, H.sivank hsiv...@gmail.com wrote: This is a patch to improve Wireshark integration with MacOSX 10.6.X It uses the new API from ige-mac-integration called GtkOSXApplication using cocoa. What do I need to install to test this patch? Can it be installed with mac ports? -- Stig Bjørlykke ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] MacOSX snow leo integration
I forgot, You must build Gtk2 port with no_x11 and quartz variants Hsivank Le 22 mai 2010 à 18:06, Stig Bjørlykke a écrit : On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:08 PM, H.sivank hsiv...@gmail.com wrote: This is a patch to improve Wireshark integration with MacOSX 10.6.X It uses the new API from ige-mac-integration called GtkOSXApplication using cocoa. What do I need to install to test this patch? Can it be installed with mac ports? -- Stig Bjørlykke ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Sub_dissectors assertion failed
On May 21, 2010, at 6:42 PM, Scott wrote: On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote: So what protocols does your custom protocol run on top of? For now the custom protocol is a dummy protocol that only contains a 32-bit int and rides on top of the IP protocol rider (*it*). So presumably the IP protocol rider protocol has fields of its own. Does the IP protocol rider have an IP protocol number assigned to it, so that you have: link-layer protocol IP, with the IP protocol number having the value for the IP protocol rider protocol IP protocol rider protocol custom protocol some protocol that normally runs directly atop IP or is this a non-standard encapsulation where you have: link-layer protocol IP, with the IP protocol number having the value for the protocol that's above the custom protocol IP protocol rider protocol custom protocol some protocol that normally runs directly atop IP The former can be done without modifying Wireshark, but not the way you're doing it. The latter *CANNOT* be done without Wireshark's IP dissector to directly call the dissector for the IP protocol rider protocol. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] MacOSX snow leo integration
On May 22, 2010, at 7:08 AM, H.sivank wrote: This is a patch to improve Wireshark integration with MacOSX 10.6.X What happens on Mac OS X 10.5.x? Is there anything Snow Leopard-specific about this? It uses the new API from ige-mac-integration called GtkOSXApplication using cocoa. Is this different from the code in gtk/main.c, gtk/menus.c, and gtk/prefs_gui.c inside #ifdef HAVE_IGE_MAC_INTEGRATION/#endif? ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] MacOSX snow leo integration
Le 22 mai 2010 à 22:41, Guy Harris a écrit : On May 22, 2010, at 7:08 AM, H.sivank wrote: This is a patch to improve Wireshark integration with MacOSX 10.6.X What happens on Mac OS X 10.5.x? Is there anything Snow Leopard-specific about this? I've not tested on 10.5.x but it should work too. It uses the new API from ige-mac-integration called GtkOSXApplication using cocoa. Is this different from the code in gtk/main.c, gtk/menus.c, and gtk/prefs_gui.c inside #ifdef HAVE_IGE_MAC_INTEGRATION/#endif? Yes, the API with ige-mac-integration 0.9.x have changed. This is why i use a dedicated define HAVE_GTKOSXAPPLICATION. Hsivank ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/356 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86 Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: 32914 Blamelist: etxrab BUILD FAILED: failed compile sincerely, -The Buildbot ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-PowerPC
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-PowerPC on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-PowerPC/builds/306 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: 32914 Blamelist: etxrab BUILD FAILED: failed compile sincerely, -The Buildbot ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Sub_dissectors assertion failed
-Original Message- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Scott Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 1:50 PM To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Sub_dissectors assertion failed Thanks for the reply Guy! I have some followup questions. [ snippy-snip] Quite a number of questions? Yes. I feel like README.developer is good but it doesn't explain all. Guidance from you and any other developers is much appreciated. -Scott I could not agree more. A few diagrams in the developer guide would be worth thousands of words. Just when I think I know what I am doing I realise that, indeed, I don't... ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] MacOSX snow leo integration
On May 22, 2010, at 1:59 PM, H.sivank wrote: It uses the new API from ige-mac-integration called GtkOSXApplication using cocoa. Is this different from the code in gtk/main.c, gtk/menus.c, and gtk/prefs_gui.c inside #ifdef HAVE_IGE_MAC_INTEGRATION/#endif? Yes, the API with ige-mac-integration 0.9.x have changed. This is why i use a dedicated define HAVE_GTKOSXAPPLICATION. Is there any reason to continue to support the old API? If not, we should probably just continue to use HAVE_IGE_MAC_INTEGRATION for this, and just change the code to use the new API. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Question regarding the reassembled_key
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:13:53PM -0400, Liu Chunfang-CCL083 wrote: Can this be added to wish list? Can you please open a bug marked as an enhancement request at https://bugs.wireshark.org with this request, so it isn't forgotten? My concern, though, is why are there fragments that are in the same frame? -- Steve ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
