[Wireshark-dev] Reassembly problem with ipv6-in-ipv6 fragmented traffic (both ipv6 headers are fragmented).

2011-01-31 Thread vijay mohan
Hi,
wireshark is not properly reassembling the packets with ipv6-in-ipv6
header when both the ipv6 headers are fragmented.
I have attached the two capture files one with inner fragmented packets
(this is working fine) the other with both the headers fragmented(this is
not working).

Thanks,
Vijay


inner_ipv6_fragmented.pcap
Description: Binary data


both_ipv6_fragmented.pcap
Description: Binary data
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.6-x64

2011-01-31 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.6-x64 on Wireshark 
(development).
Full details are available at:
 http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.6-x64/builds/1778

Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/

Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.6-x64

Build Reason: 
Build Source Stamp: 35718
Blamelist: etxrab

BUILD FAILED: failed compile

sincerely,
 -The Buildbot

___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86

2011-01-31 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark 
(development).
Full details are available at:
 http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/2270

Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/

Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86

Build Reason: 
Build Source Stamp: 35718
Blamelist: etxrab

BUILD FAILED: failed compile

sincerely,
 -The Buildbot

___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-PowerPC

2011-01-31 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-PowerPC on Wireshark 
(development).
Full details are available at:
 http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-PowerPC/builds/1932

Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/

Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc

Build Reason: 
Build Source Stamp: 35718
Blamelist: etxrab

BUILD FAILED: failed compile

sincerely,
 -The Buildbot

___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [Wireshark-dev] Reassembly problem with ipv6-in-ipv6 fragmented traffic (both ipv6 headers are fragmented).

2011-01-31 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 02:27:46PM +0530, vijay mohan wrote:

 wireshark is not properly reassembling the packets with ipv6-in-ipv6
 header when both the ipv6 headers are fragmented.
 I have attached the two capture files one with inner fragmented packets
 (this is working fine) the other with both the headers fragmented(this is
 not working).

Thanks for your report.  Please open a bug report for this and attach 
the sample capture files you provided at https://bugs.wireshark.org so 
we don't forget about this issue.  Thanks!

___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [Wireshark-dev] Reassembly problem with ipv6-in-ipv6 fragmented traffic (both ipv6 headers are fragmented).

2011-01-31 Thread vijay mohan
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5638

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Stephen Fisher
st...@stephen-fisher.comwrote:

 On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 02:27:46PM +0530, vijay mohan wrote:

  wireshark is not properly reassembling the packets with ipv6-in-ipv6
  header when both the ipv6 headers are fragmented.
  I have attached the two capture files one with inner fragmented
 packets
  (this is working fine) the other with both the headers fragmented(this is
  not working).

 Thanks for your report.  Please open a bug report for this and attach
 the sample capture files you provided at https://bugs.wireshark.org so
 we don't forget about this issue.  Thanks!

 ___
 Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
 Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
 Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-dev] Prepartion for migration from GTK+ 2.x to GTK+ 3

2011-01-31 Thread Stephen Fisher
The GTK+ documentation now includes a list of things we can do to 
prepare for the future migration to GTK+ 3:

  http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/gtk-migrating-2-to-3.html

I'm once again trying to compile with -DGSEAL_ENABLE to catch places 
where we're directly accessing variables, so they can be replaced with 
accessor functions.  The last time I tried this (quite a while back), 
they didn't have accessor functions for everything yet.

___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-7-x64

2011-01-31 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark 
(development).
Full details are available at:
 http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/979

Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/

Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64

Build Reason: 
Build Source Stamp: 35724
Blamelist: etxrab,martinm

BUILD FAILED: failed checkapi

sincerely,
 -The Buildbot

___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [Wireshark-dev] Prepartion for migration from GTK+ 2.x to GTK+ 3

2011-01-31 Thread Jaap Keuter

Hi,

Interesting subject. I've put up a development project page on the Wiki[1] on 
this subject to be able to keep track of what's going on.


Thanks,
Jaap

[1] http://wiki.wireshark.org/GoingGTK3

On 01/31/2011 06:37 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote:

The GTK+ documentation now includes a list of things we can do to
prepare for the future migration to GTK+ 3:

   http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/gtk-migrating-2-to-3.html

I'm once again trying to compile with -DGSEAL_ENABLE to catch places
where we're directly accessing variables, so they can be replaced with
accessor functions.  The last time I tried this (quite a while back),
they didn't have accessor functions for everything yet.



___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.6-x64

2011-01-31 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.6-x64 on Wireshark 
(development).
Full details are available at:
 http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.6-x64/builds/1791

Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/

Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.6-x64

Build Reason: 
Build Source Stamp: 35736
Blamelist: etxrab

BUILD FAILED: failed compile

sincerely,
 -The Buildbot

___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86

2011-01-31 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark 
(development).
Full details are available at:
 http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/2282

Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/

Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86

Build Reason: 
Build Source Stamp: 35736
Blamelist: etxrab

BUILD FAILED: failed compile

sincerely,
 -The Buildbot

___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-PowerPC

2011-01-31 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-PowerPC on Wireshark 
(development).
Full details are available at:
 http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-PowerPC/builds/1941

Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/

Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc

Build Reason: 
Build Source Stamp: 35737
Blamelist: etxrab,jake

BUILD FAILED: failed compile

sincerely,
 -The Buildbot

___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe