Re: [Wireshark-dev] setcap for CMake install under Linux

[Guy Harris]

On Jan 12, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Bálint Réczey  wrote:

> IMO it does not have to support Debian packages.
> The best practice (and Debian's policy) is calling CMake from
> debian/rules, not the other way around.

As long as switching from autotools to CMake doesn't cause a loss of 
functionality when it comes to building packages, that's good enough.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] setcap for CMake install under Linux

[Bálint Réczey]

2014/1/13 Guy Harris :
>
> On Jan 12, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Joerg Mayer  wrote:
>
>> It allows the compilation with capabilities (that's what I use), but right 
>> now
>> the installation process has neither suid nor setcap support.
>> Does it really make sense to add this? If so, I can do so tomorrow.
>
> I think it'd make sense to support them.
>
> (It should probably also support making Debian packages, RPMs, OS X dmgs, 
> etc. to at least the same extent that autotools does, as well as supporting 
> making Windows NSIS packages.)
IMO it does not have to support Debian packages.
The best practice (and Debian's policy) is calling CMake from
debian/rules, not the other way around.

Cheers,
Balint
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] setcap for CMake install under Linux

[Guy Harris]

On Jan 12, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Joerg Mayer  wrote:

> It allows the compilation with capabilities (that's what I use), but right now
> the installation process has neither suid nor setcap support.
> Does it really make sense to add this? If so, I can do so tomorrow.

I think it'd make sense to support them.

(It should probably also support making Debian packages, RPMs, OS X dmgs, etc. 
to at least the same extent that autotools does, as well as supporting making 
Windows NSIS packages.)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 BuildBot down?

[Gerald Combs]

They should be back up except for the Solaris builder. It apparently
needs a hug and I won't be in the office until tomorrow. Sorry for the
downtime.

On 1/12/14 11:37 AM, Tyson Key wrote:
> Hi Pascal,
>
> Thanks for confirming. I was just wondering, since I haven't gotten
> around to setting up a Wireshark build environment in a Linux VM on
> this new PC, and I tend to use the binary snapshots as a convenient
> way of testing the latest changes.
>
> Funnily enough, I did see that  the Mac OS X bots are still alive,
> just now. 
>
> No big deal, though.
>
> Tyson.
>
>
> 2014/1/12 Pascal Quantin  >
>
> Hi Tyson,
>
> numerous buildbots are down, as seen on
> http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/waterfall
> I can build locally without any problem for win64.
>
> Pascal.
>
>
> 2014/1/12 Tyson Key mailto:tyson@gmail.com>>
>
> Hi list,
>
> It seems that there haven't been any more Win64 CI builds
> since the 9th...
>
> Please forgive me for asking - but is this since someone
> accidentally broke the build, or due to infrastructure migration?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tyson.
> -- 
>   Fight Internet
> Censorship! http://www.eff.org
> http://vmlemon.wordpress.com | Twitter/FriendFeed/Skype:
> vmlemon | 00447934365844 
>
> 
> ___
> Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
> mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>>
> Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>  mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
>
> 
> ___
> Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
> mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>>
> Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>  mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
>
>
> -- 
>   Fight Internet Censorship!
> http://www.eff.org
> http://vmlemon.wordpress.com | Twitter/FriendFeed/Skype: vmlemon |
> 00447934365844
>
>
> ___
> Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
> Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>  mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] setcap for CMake install under Linux

[Joerg Mayer]

On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 09:28:13AM -0500, Ed Beroset wrote:
> I've recently been trying to get used to the new system (git,
> gerrit, CMake) and noticed that unlike the autotools installation,
> the CMake installation does not seem to have support for setcap.  Is
> that correct, or am I just overlooking something?

It allows the compilation with capabilities (that's what I use), but right now
the installation process has neither suid nor setcap support.
Does it really make sense to add this? If so, I can do so tomorrow.

Ciao
 Jörg
-- 
Joerg Mayer   
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 BuildBot down?

[Tyson Key]

Hi Pascal,

Thanks for confirming. I was just wondering, since I haven't gotten around
to setting up a Wireshark build environment in a Linux VM on this new PC,
and I tend to use the binary snapshots as a convenient way of testing the
latest changes.

Funnily enough, I did see that  the Mac OS X bots are still alive, just
now.

No big deal, though.

Tyson.


2014/1/12 Pascal Quantin 

> Hi Tyson,
>
> numerous buildbots are down, as seen on
> http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/waterfall
> I can build locally without any problem for win64.
>
> Pascal.
>
>
> 2014/1/12 Tyson Key 
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> It seems that there haven't been any more Win64 CI builds since the 9th...
>>
>> Please forgive me for asking - but is this since someone accidentally
>> broke the build, or due to infrastructure migration?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tyson.
>> --
>>   Fight Internet Censorship!
>> http://www.eff.org
>> http://vmlemon.wordpress.com | Twitter/FriendFeed/Skype: vmlemon |
>> 00447934365844
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
>> Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>  mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>>
>
>
> ___
> Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
> Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>  mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>



-- 
  Fight Internet Censorship!
http://www.eff.org
http://vmlemon.wordpress.com | Twitter/FriendFeed/Skype: vmlemon |
00447934365844
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 BuildBot down?

[Pascal Quantin]

Hi Tyson,

numerous buildbots are down, as seen on
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/waterfall
I can build locally without any problem for win64.

Pascal.


2014/1/12 Tyson Key 

> Hi list,
>
> It seems that there haven't been any more Win64 CI builds since the 9th...
>
> Please forgive me for asking - but is this since someone accidentally
> broke the build, or due to infrastructure migration?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tyson.
> --
>   Fight Internet Censorship!
> http://www.eff.org
> http://vmlemon.wordpress.com | Twitter/FriendFeed/Skype: vmlemon |
> 00447934365844
>
> ___
> Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
> Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>  mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-dev] Win64 BuildBot down?

[Tyson Key]

Hi list,

It seems that there haven't been any more Win64 CI builds since the 9th...

Please forgive me for asking - but is this since someone accidentally broke
the build, or due to infrastructure migration?

Thanks,

Tyson.
-- 
  Fight Internet Censorship!
http://www.eff.org
http://vmlemon.wordpress.com | Twitter/FriendFeed/Skype: vmlemon |
00447934365844
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-dev] setcap for CMake install under Linux

[Ed Beroset]

I've recently been trying to get used to the new system (git, gerrit, 
CMake) and noticed that unlike the autotools installation, the CMake 
installation does not seem to have support for setcap.  Is that correct, 
or am I just overlooking something?


Ed
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe