Re: [Wireshark-dev] Bug 16294, in_progress?
HI, Yes, you are correct. That’s why I held off pushing a change myself. We’ll wait and see. Good luck, Jaap > On 28 Dec 2019, at 08:04, Uli Heilmeier wrote: > > Hi Jaap, > > I’ve set it to IN_PROGRESS as I’m working on a patch. I thought that's what > the status field was for. ;-) > Change will include support for draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-08 > and draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-15. > > Cheers > Uli > >> Am 27.12.2019 um 20:29 schrieb Jaap Keuter : >> >> Hi Uli, >> >> You’ve changed the bug to IN_PROGRESS, do you intend to push a change for >> this? >> I’ve got one ready, so if you can’t I can. >> >> Thanks, >> Jaap ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Bug 16294, in_progress?
Hi Jaap, I’ve set it to IN_PROGRESS as I’m working on a patch. I thought that's what the status field was for. ;-) Change will include support for draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-08 and draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-15. Cheers Uli > Am 27.12.2019 um 20:29 schrieb Jaap Keuter : > > Hi Uli, > > You’ve changed the bug to IN_PROGRESS, do you intend to push a change for > this? > I’ve got one ready, so if you can’t I can. > > Thanks, > Jaap > ___ > Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list > Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] PIM: Support for dissection of PIM Flooding Mechanisme (PFM)
Hi, I see that this might be of interest and will proceed to complete the needed testing and submit to review. -Anders Sendt fra min iPhone > 27. des. 2019 kl. 10:22 skrev Alexis La Goutte : > > > Hi Anders, > > It is always interressing to include new RFC on Wireshark > > Please push on upstream (you can look the wiki about help) > > Cheers > >> On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 9:52 PM Anders Reggestad >> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have as part of a study of the RFC8364, written a dissection of the PFM >> message from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8364 as part of the Protocol >> Independed Multicast (PIM) dissection. Not sure if this is of interest to >> include into the source base or not? >> >> Regards, >> Anders Reggestad >> >> ___ >> Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list >> Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev >> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev >> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe > ___ > Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list > Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] G729 Wiki page
Dear Graham and Jaap, >> On 17 Nov 2019, at 21:15, Jiří Novák wrote: >> >> Dear Graham, >> >>> Can you update the Wiki page when that occurs? >> >> I do my best. >> BTW what do you expect to read on page about G.729? >> I imagine (in points): >> - G.729 is now supported by Wireshark >> - RTP player allows to play it >> - Save as .au saves it too to describe all new features I updated pages: https://wiki.wireshark.org/HowToDecodeG729 https://wiki.wireshark.org/VoIP_calls https://wiki.wireshark.org/RTP_statistics can you check whether changes contain information you expected? Best regards, Jirka Novak ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-dev] Bug 16294, in_progress?
Hi Uli, You’ve changed the bug to IN_PROGRESS, do you intend to push a change for this? I’ve got one ready, so if you can’t I can. Thanks, Jaap ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] PIM: Support for dissection of PIM Flooding Mechanisme (PFM)
Hi Anders, It is always interressing to include new RFC on Wireshark Please push on upstream (you can look the wiki about help) Cheers On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 9:52 PM Anders Reggestad wrote: > Hi, > > I have as part of a study of the RFC8364, written a dissection of the PFM > message from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8364 as part of the Protocol > Independed Multicast (PIM) dissection. Not sure if this is of interest to > include into the source base or not? > > Regards, > Anders Reggestad > > ___ > Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list > Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > ?subject=unsubscribe ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
