Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 52701: /trunk/epan/ /trunk/epan/: oids_test.c
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 02:18:19AM +, eapa...@wireshark.org wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=52701 User: eapache Date: 2013/10/20 02:18 AM Log: Don't use g_assert_cmpint, it isn't happy on Windows. g_assert is nearly as good except it doesn't produce as nice error messages. How about adding it to check api? Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 52701: /trunk/epan/ /trunk/epan/: oids_test.c
Joerg Mayer wrote: On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 02:18:19AM +, eapa...@wireshark.org wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=52701 User: eapache Date: 2013/10/20 02:18 AM Log: Don't use g_assert_cmpint, it isn't happy on Windows. g_assert is nearly as good except it doesn't produce as nice error messages. How about adding it to check api? That's a good idea, since it was certainly news to me. I also looked and couldn't find anything in the gnome bugzilla. The closest I could find was this: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=516916 So for those of us without handy access to Windows (at the moment) what's the issue, exactly? Are there other parts of gnome testing environment that won't work under Windows? Ed ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 52701: /trunk/epan/ /trunk/epan/: oids_test.c
On Oct 21, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Ed Beroset bero...@mindspring.com wrote: Joerg Mayer wrote: On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 02:18:19AM +, eapa...@wireshark.org wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=52701 User: eapache Date: 2013/10/20 02:18 AM Log: Don't use g_assert_cmpint, it isn't happy on Windows. g_assert is nearly as good except it doesn't produce as nice error messages. How about adding it to check api? That's a good idea, since it was certainly news to me. I also looked and couldn't find anything in the gnome bugzilla. The closest I could find was this: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=516916 So for those of us without handy access to Windows (at the moment) what's the issue, exactly? Are there other parts of gnome testing environment that won't work under Windows? It produces funny compile warnings about loss of data casting 64-bit types to 32 bits. These are currently turned into errors in our build system. I didn't really investigated further, as I also don't have easy access to a Windows builder. Evan ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
