[Wireshark-dev] "hundreds" of protocols?

2012-03-09 Thread Jeff Morriss

The About page on wireshark.org says, in part:

Deep inspection of hundreds of protocols, with more being added all the time 


epan/dissectors now has over a thousand .c files.  Should the web page 
be changed to say, maybe, "Deep inspection of over a thousand 
protocols[...]"? :-)

___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [Wireshark-dev] "hundreds" of protocols?

2012-03-09 Thread Graham Bloice


> -Original Message-
> From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-
> boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Morriss
> Sent: 09 March 2012 15:20
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] "hundreds" of protocols?
> 
> The About page on wireshark.org says, in part:
> 
> > Deep inspection of hundreds of protocols, with more being added all
> > the time
> 
> epan/dissectors now has over a thousand .c files.  Should the web page be
> changed to say, maybe, "Deep inspection of over a thousand
protocols[...]"?
> :-)

We should be aiming for 1 meellion!


___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [Wireshark-dev] "hundreds" of protocols?

2012-03-09 Thread Jeff Morriss

Graham Bloice wrote:



-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-
boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Morriss
Sent: 09 March 2012 15:20
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] "hundreds" of protocols?

The About page on wireshark.org says, in part:


Deep inspection of hundreds of protocols, with more being added all
the time

epan/dissectors now has over a thousand .c files.  Should the web page be
changed to say, maybe, "Deep inspection of over a thousand

protocols[...]"?

:-)


We should be aiming for 1 meellion!


:-)

We've got a couple meellion things, but so far it's just lines of code!


Total Physical Source Lines of Code (SLOC)= 2,204,247
Development Effort Estimate, Person-Years (Person-Months) = 647.82 (7,773.82)
 (Basic COCOMO model, Person-Months = 2.4 * (KSLOC**1.05))
Schedule Estimate, Years (Months) = 6.27 (75.23)
 (Basic COCOMO model, Months = 2.5 * (person-months**0.38))
Estimated Average Number of Developers (Effort/Schedule)  = 103.34
Total Estimated Cost to Develop   = $ 87,511,453
 (average salary = $56,286/year, overhead = 2.40).
SLOCCount, Copyright (C) 2001-2004 David A. Wheeler
SLOCCount is Open Source Software/Free Software, licensed under the GNU GPL.
SLOCCount comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, and you are welcome to
redistribute it under certain conditions as specified by the GNU GPL license;
see the documentation for details.
Please credit this data as "generated using David A. Wheeler's 'SLOCCount'."


(This was taken from a dist tarball from the current SVN.)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [Wireshark-dev] "hundreds" of protocols?

2012-03-09 Thread Anders Broman
 

-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org 
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Morriss
Sent: den 9 mars 2012 16:40
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] "hundreds" of protocols?

Graham Bloice wrote:
>> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev- 
>>> boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Morriss
>>> Sent: 09 March 2012 15:20
>>> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
>>> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] "hundreds" of protocols?
>>>
>>> The About page on wireshark.org says, in part:
>>>
>>>> Deep inspection of hundreds of protocols, with more being added all 
>>>> the time
>>> epan/dissectors now has over a thousand .c files.  Should the web 
>>> page be changed to say, maybe, "Deep inspection of over a thousand
>> protocols[...]"?
>>> :-)
>> 
>> We should be aiming for 1 meellion!
>
>:-)
>
>We've got a couple meellion things, but so far it's just lines of code!

A meelion things to do, more like it ;-)


>> Total Physical Source Lines of Code (SLOC)= 2,204,247
>> Development Effort Estimate, Person-Years (Person-Months) = 647.82 
>> (7,773.82)  (Basic COCOMO model, Person-Months = 2.4 * (KSLOC**1.05))
>> Schedule Estimate, Years (Months) = 6.27 (75.23)
>>  (Basic COCOMO model, Months = 2.5 * (person-months**0.38)) Estimated 
>> Average Number of Developers (Effort/Schedule)  = 103.34
>> Total Estimated Cost to Develop   = $ 87,511,453
>>  (average salary = $56,286/year, overhead = 2.40).
>> SLOCCount, Copyright (C) 2001-2004 David A. Wheeler SLOCCount is Open 
>> Source Software/Free Software, licensed under the GNU GPL.
>> SLOCCount comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, and you are welcome to 
>> redistribute it under certain conditions as specified by the GNU GPL 
>> license; see the documentation for details.
>> Please credit this data as "generated using David A. Wheeler's 'SLOCCount'."

(This was taken from a dist tarball from the current SVN.) 
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe