Re: [Wireshark-dev] MIH protocol dissector

2011-05-05 Thread Jeff Morriss
I've been trying to review some patches lately, but have not had much 
free time...  But don't worry, since it's in the database, it will not 
be forgotten.


Ankith Agarwal wrote:

Hi
  Thank you for the reply.. Can you also review the patch which I have
uploaded for inclusion in wireshark main source of dissectors.

Regards
Ankith

On Thu, May 5, 2011, Jeff Morriss  said:


Ankith Agarwal wrote:

Hi
  I have written a dissector for MIH protocol as specified by IEEE 802.21
standard, and have submitted it as a patch in bugzilla..

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5881

But I have some problem, what is the transport protocol and the port
number to be used to decode the packet as MIH protocol. I have gone
through the standard and I did not get any answer. For now I have directly
taken it as 4551(as specified by IANA), is it right?

Yes, using the IANA assignment certainly seems correct.

RFC 5677 lists this IANA assignment too:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5677#section-9

___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [Wireshark-dev] MIH protocol dissector

2011-05-05 Thread Ankith Agarwal
Hi
  Thank you for the reply.. Can you also review the patch which I have
uploaded for inclusion in wireshark main source of dissectors.

Regards
Ankith

On Thu, May 5, 2011, Jeff Morriss  said:

> Ankith Agarwal wrote:
>> Hi
>>   I have written a dissector for MIH protocol as specified by IEEE 802.21
>> standard, and have submitted it as a patch in bugzilla..
>> 
>> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5881
>> 
>> But I have some problem, what is the transport protocol and the port
>> number to be used to decode the packet as MIH protocol. I have gone
>> through the standard and I did not get any answer. For now I have directly
>> taken it as 4551(as specified by IANA), is it right?
> 
> Yes, using the IANA assignment certainly seems correct.
> 
> RFC 5677 lists this IANA assignment too:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5677#section-9
> ___
> Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
> Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>  mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 

-- 




-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [Wireshark-dev] MIH protocol dissector

2011-05-05 Thread Jeff Morriss

Ankith Agarwal wrote:

Hi
  I have written a dissector for MIH protocol as specified by IEEE 802.21
standard, and have submitted it as a patch in bugzilla..

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5881

But I have some problem, what is the transport protocol and the port
number to be used to decode the packet as MIH protocol. I have gone
through the standard and I did not get any answer. For now I have directly
taken it as 4551(as specified by IANA), is it right?


Yes, using the IANA assignment certainly seems correct.

RFC 5677 lists this IANA assignment too:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5677#section-9
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [Wireshark-dev] MIH protocol dissector

2011-04-29 Thread Jeff Morriss

Ankith Agarwal wrote:

Hi
  I have written a dissector for IEEE 802.21 MIH(Media Independent
Handover) protocol. Can this be put in the epan dissectors list in
wireshark, or as a plugin?
(I have tested this code for the coding style and the working of the
dissection also is tested.)


The preference is to build dissectors in to Wireshark (in epan/dissectors/).
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe