Re: [Wireshark-dev] Voip Graph: Port numbers too faint?

2010-05-04 Thread Anders Broman
Hi,
I think that you could experiment with the values at line 1212 in 
graph_analysis.c
/* gray and soft gray colors */
static GdkColor color_div_line[2] = {
{0, 0x64ff, 0x64ff, 0x64ff},
{0, 0x25ff, 0x25ff, 0x25ff}
/*{0, 0x7fff, 0x7fff, 0x7fff}*/
};
Regards
Anders 

-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org 
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** 
CTR **
Sent: den 3 maj 2010 17:20
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Voip Graph: Port numbers too faint?

Hi folks,

I really like the new pastel color tones of VoIP Graph, but honestly, the port 
numbers are barely visible now.
(see attached png)
Could they be made a little darker?

Regards,
Lars



wireshark 1.3.4 (SVN Rev 32342 from /trunk)

Copyright 1998-2010 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org and contributors.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO 
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled with GTK+ 2.16.6, with GLib 2.22.4, with WinPcap (version unknown), 
with libz 1.2.3, without POSIX capabilities, without libpcre, with SMI 0.4.8, 
with c-ares 1.7.1, with Lua 5.1, without Python, with GnuTLS 2.8.5, with Gcrypt 
1.4.5, with MIT Kerberos, with GeoIP, with PortAudio V19-devel (built Mar 31 
2010), with AirPcap, with new_packet_list.

Running on Windows XP Service Pack 3, build 2600, with WinPcap version 4.1.1 
(packet.dll version 4.1.0.1753), based on libpcap version 1.0 branch 1_0_rel0b 
(20091008), GnuTLS 2.8.5, Gcrypt 1.4.5, without AirPcap.

Built using Microsoft Visual C++ 9.0 build 30729
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [Wireshark-dev] Voip Graph: Port numbers too faint?

2010-05-04 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **
Thanks for pointing out, Anders.

I also realized that it depends on my WinXP Appearance settings (Display 
Properties  Appearance  Effects...  Use the following method to smooth edges 
and fonts). If i disable smoothing, it looks somewhat darker, but still not 
very readable.
(voip_graph_faint_port_numbers-no-smooth.png) - compare to the first I sent!

I tried to increase the font size by putting
at line 758 in graph_analysis.c:

pango_font_description_set_size(small_font_desc,(gint)(small_font_size*0.8));

instead of (*0.7) and i'd be happy with that.
(voip_graph_faint_port_numbers-no-smooth-font-size++.png)

But i guess this needs some more validation on other platforms?

Regards,
Lars


-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org 
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Anders Broman
Sent: mardi 4 mai 2010 10:06
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Voip Graph: Port numbers too faint?

Hi,
I think that you could experiment with the values at line 1212 in 
graph_analysis.c
/* gray and soft gray colors */
static GdkColor color_div_line[2] = {
{0, 0x64ff, 0x64ff, 0x64ff},
{0, 0x25ff, 0x25ff, 0x25ff}
/*{0, 0x7fff, 0x7fff, 0x7fff}*/
};
Regards
Anders 

-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org 
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** 
CTR **
Sent: den 3 maj 2010 17:20
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Voip Graph: Port numbers too faint?

Hi folks,

I really like the new pastel color tones of VoIP Graph, but honestly, the port 
numbers are barely visible now.
(see attached png)
Could they be made a little darker?

Regards,
Lars



wireshark 1.3.4 (SVN Rev 32342 from /trunk)

Copyright 1998-2010 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org and contributors.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO 
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled with GTK+ 2.16.6, with GLib 2.22.4, with WinPcap (version unknown), 
with libz 1.2.3, without POSIX capabilities, without libpcre, with SMI 0.4.8, 
with c-ares 1.7.1, with Lua 5.1, without Python, with GnuTLS 2.8.5, with Gcrypt 
1.4.5, with MIT Kerberos, with GeoIP, with PortAudio V19-devel (built Mar 31 
2010), with AirPcap, with new_packet_list.

Running on Windows XP Service Pack 3, build 2600, with WinPcap version 4.1.1 
(packet.dll version 4.1.0.1753), based on libpcap version 1.0 branch 1_0_rel0b 
(20091008), GnuTLS 2.8.5, Gcrypt 1.4.5, without AirPcap.

Built using Microsoft Visual C++ 9.0 build 30729
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
attachment: voip_graph_faint_port_numbers-no-smooth.pngattachment: voip_graph_faint_port_numbers-no-smooth-font-size++.png___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe