Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment
Hi Graham, On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:12:10AM -, Graham Bloice wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev- > > boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Andriy Beregovenko > > Sent: 17 January 2012 20:38 > > To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment > > > > Hi Graham, > > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:39:19AM -, Graham Bloice wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev- > > > > boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Andriy Beregovenko > > > > Sent: 13 January 2012 23:14 > > > > To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > > > > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment > > > > > > > > Hi Graham, > > > > > > > > Oh, this is very actual issue. > > > > > > > > My personal "wishlist" consist of two things: > > > > 1. Generation of register.c must be completely reworked, cause most > > > > times > > > I > > > > must wait about 15-20 minutes when recompiling sources; 2. Make > > > > CMake default for win-platform building is really good idea. > > > > > > > > > > Are you using a platform native build of python or the Cygwin version? > > > A platform native build should faster. When I've been doing intensive > > > work on a single dissector I've commented out the bit of > > > Makefile.nmake that generates register.c when it wasn't required. > > > > How I can detect this? I'm use windows-msi-installer from python.org. > > Version 2.7.2. Btw at compile time I get error in python script > works(another > > script, not that script that generate register.c) > > > > Andriy, > > The output of nmake -f Makefile.nmake verify_tools will tell you which > python you are using. If you've installed Windows Python 2.7 into the > default directory it should be C:\Python27\python.exe. [BSo I all the time use native python build :) > config.nmake has some settings for which python to use, but if you leave > everything at the defaults it should pick up the Windows python > installation. > > > As the generation of register.c uses Python across all platforms > > > replacing it would require another cross platform solution, and as my > > > guess is that the generation is I/O bound moving to a compiled rather > > > than an interpreted solution may not improve things. > > Anyway, to compile wireshark you need to install many other "more > > traditional" tools, like bash and perl. Hence there are pocible much > faster > > replacement for python :) But, i think, this is more holywat theme then > > practical. > > > > I would be very surprised to find Cygwin bash or perl faster than a native > Python, or even a Cygwin Python. On my Win XP build VM, generating > register.c using windows Python 2.7 takes 6 seconds. Somewhy, when REbuild is in progress, generating register.c takes mre time. But, when I do clean build(I mean after distclean), register.c generates in a few seconds. > > > ___ > Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list > Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe -- Best regards, Andriy 0xBDDBDAE3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment
> -Original Message- > From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev- > boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Andriy Beregovenko > Sent: 17 January 2012 20:38 > To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment > > Hi Graham, > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:39:19AM -, Graham Bloice wrote: > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev- > > > boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Andriy Beregovenko > > > Sent: 13 January 2012 23:14 > > > To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > > > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment > > > > > > Hi Graham, > > > > > > Oh, this is very actual issue. > > > > > > My personal "wishlist" consist of two things: > > > 1. Generation of register.c must be completely reworked, cause most > > > times > > I > > > must wait about 15-20 minutes when recompiling sources; 2. Make > > > CMake default for win-platform building is really good idea. > > > > > > > Are you using a platform native build of python or the Cygwin version? > > A platform native build should faster. When I've been doing intensive > > work on a single dissector I've commented out the bit of > > Makefile.nmake that generates register.c when it wasn't required. > > How I can detect this? I'm use windows-msi-installer from python.org. > Version 2.7.2. Btw at compile time I get error in python script works(another > script, not that script that generate register.c) > Andriy, The output of nmake -f Makefile.nmake verify_tools will tell you which python you are using. If you've installed Windows Python 2.7 into the default directory it should be C:\Python27\python.exe. config.nmake has some settings for which python to use, but if you leave everything at the defaults it should pick up the Windows python installation. > > As the generation of register.c uses Python across all platforms > > replacing it would require another cross platform solution, and as my > > guess is that the generation is I/O bound moving to a compiled rather > > than an interpreted solution may not improve things. > Anyway, to compile wireshark you need to install many other "more > traditional" tools, like bash and perl. Hence there are pocible much faster > replacement for python :) But, i think, this is more holywat theme then > practical. > I would be very surprised to find Cygwin bash or perl faster than a native Python, or even a Cygwin Python. On my Win XP build VM, generating register.c using windows Python 2.7 takes 6 seconds. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment
Hi wireshark-dev, But this build fails on Win7 to work :) On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:29:22AM +0200, Andriy Beregovenko wrote: > Hi Graham, > > Greate news! > I found my old notebook with WinXP x86_32, install to it MSVC2008EE, Python, > Cygwin. Download 1.6.5 sources, add my own dissector+update Makefile.common. > Run build, and no python fails happened... Also I was suprised, after > wireshark build done, I run it with sample dump for my dissecter and it not > crash at all... Another words, if I build on WinXP 32bit - result is fine, > but if I try to do same things on my Win7 64bit, build fails and result is > unusable... > > "Developers, developers, developers..." (c) > > Time goes by, nothing has changed... > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:39:19AM -, Graham Bloice wrote: > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev- > > > boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Andriy Beregovenko > > > Sent: 13 January 2012 23:14 > > > To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > > > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment > > > > > > Hi Graham, > > > > > > Oh, this is very actual issue. > > > > > > My personal "wishlist" consist of two things: > > > 1. Generation of register.c must be completely reworked, cause most times > > I > > > must wait about 15-20 minutes when recompiling sources; 2. Make CMake > > > default for win-platform building is really good idea. > > > > > > > Are you using a platform native build of python or the Cygwin version? A > > platform native build should faster. When I've been doing intensive work on > > a single dissector I've commented out the bit of Makefile.nmake that > > generates register.c when it wasn't required. > > > > As the generation of register.c uses Python across all platforms replacing > > it would require another cross platform solution, and as my guess is that > > the generation is I/O bound moving to a compiled rather than an interpreted > > solution may not improve things. > > > > > > ___ > > Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list > > Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe > > -- > Best regards, > Andriy > 0xBDDBDAE3 > ___ > Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list > Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe -- Best regards, Andriy 0xBDDBDAE3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment
Hi Graham, Greate news! I found my old notebook with WinXP x86_32, install to it MSVC2008EE, Python, Cygwin. Download 1.6.5 sources, add my own dissector+update Makefile.common. Run build, and no python fails happened... Also I was suprised, after wireshark build done, I run it with sample dump for my dissecter and it not crash at all... Another words, if I build on WinXP 32bit - result is fine, but if I try to do same things on my Win7 64bit, build fails and result is unusable... "Developers, developers, developers..." (c) Time goes by, nothing has changed... On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:39:19AM -, Graham Bloice wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev- > > boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Andriy Beregovenko > > Sent: 13 January 2012 23:14 > > To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment > > > > Hi Graham, > > > > Oh, this is very actual issue. > > > > My personal "wishlist" consist of two things: > > 1. Generation of register.c must be completely reworked, cause most times > I > > must wait about 15-20 minutes when recompiling sources; 2. Make CMake > > default for win-platform building is really good idea. > > > > Are you using a platform native build of python or the Cygwin version? A > platform native build should faster. When I've been doing intensive work on > a single dissector I've commented out the bit of Makefile.nmake that > generates register.c when it wasn't required. > > As the generation of register.c uses Python across all platforms replacing > it would require another cross platform solution, and as my guess is that > the generation is I/O bound moving to a compiled rather than an interpreted > solution may not improve things. > > > ___ > Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list > Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe -- Best regards, Andriy 0xBDDBDAE3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment
Hi Graham, On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:39:19AM -, Graham Bloice wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev- > > boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Andriy Beregovenko > > Sent: 13 January 2012 23:14 > > To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment > > > > Hi Graham, > > > > Oh, this is very actual issue. > > > > My personal "wishlist" consist of two things: > > 1. Generation of register.c must be completely reworked, cause most times > I > > must wait about 15-20 minutes when recompiling sources; 2. Make CMake > > default for win-platform building is really good idea. > > > > Are you using a platform native build of python or the Cygwin version? A > platform native build should faster. When I've been doing intensive work on > a single dissector I've commented out the bit of Makefile.nmake that > generates register.c when it wasn't required. How I can detect this? I'm use windows-msi-installer from python.org. Version 2.7.2. Btw at compile time I get error in python script works(another script, not that script that generate register.c) > As the generation of register.c uses Python across all platforms replacing > it would require another cross platform solution, and as my guess is that > the generation is I/O bound moving to a compiled rather than an interpreted > solution may not improve things. Anyway, to compile wireshark you need to install many other "more traditional" tools, like bash and perl. Hence there are pocible much faster replacement for python :) But, i think, this is more holywat theme then practical. > > ___ > Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list > Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe -- Best regards, Andriy 0xBDDBDAE3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment
> -Original Message- > From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev- > boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Andriy Beregovenko > Sent: 13 January 2012 23:14 > To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment > > Hi Graham, > > Oh, this is very actual issue. > > My personal "wishlist" consist of two things: > 1. Generation of register.c must be completely reworked, cause most times I > must wait about 15-20 minutes when recompiling sources; 2. Make CMake > default for win-platform building is really good idea. > Are you using a platform native build of python or the Cygwin version? A platform native build should faster. When I've been doing intensive work on a single dissector I've commented out the bit of Makefile.nmake that generates register.c when it wasn't required. As the generation of register.c uses Python across all platforms replacing it would require another cross platform solution, and as my guess is that the generation is I/O bound moving to a compiled rather than an interpreted solution may not improve things. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment
Hi Graham, Oh, this is very actual issue. My personal "wishlist" consist of two things: 1. Generation of register.c must be completely reworked, cause most times I must wait about 15-20 minutes when recompiling sources; 2. Make CMake default for win-platform building is really good idea. On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 03:46:52PM -, Graham Bloice wrote: > Folks, > > > > This email was triggered by the recent win-setup.sh issue reported, but I?ve > been thinking about the issues for a while. > > > > FWIW over the Xmas break I looked into reworking the windows build to remove > as > many external dependencies (such as Cygwin) as possible. I was using > PowerShell to replace the bash bits. We would still need Python and probably > Perl as they are intrinsic to the build, and some gnuwin32 utilities such as > bison and flex but I thought that the rest could be handled by PowerShell > scripts. Any extra executable (apart from Python and Perl) not normally found > on a Windows machine could be bundled in a zip file similar to the way we > handle the libs required. > > > > Does anyone see any value in this? > > > > I've also wondered about moving on from nmake and converting to MSBuild. This > is only usable from VS2008 or later though. Any thoughts on that? > > > > And there is also CMake, does anyone use that for the windows build? > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Graham Bloice > > ___ > Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list > Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe -- Best regards, Andriy 0xBDDBDAE3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment
> -Original Message- > From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev- > boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Mayer > Sent: 12 January 2012 00:19 > To: Developer support list for Wireshark > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:23:21AM -, Graham Bloice wrote: > > > On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Graham Bloice wrote: > > > > > > > I've also wondered about moving on from nmake and converting to > > > MSBuild. This is only usable from VS2008 or later though. Any > > > thoughts > > on > > > that? > > > > > > If we do so, can we continue to have lists of source files in > > Makefile.common, > > > rather than, say, having to duplicate such a list in other files > > > (which developers might forget to do)? Or, at least, can we > > > automatically > > generate > > > the relevant MSBuild files from files such as Makefile.common? > > > > Although I haven't investigated I would expect MSBuild to be able to > > absorb such input and make it useable, either directly or by a task to > > generate the required file. > > As an alternative: How about making building with cmake work for Windows? > After that, maybe the following article has some clues: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1459482/how-to-use-cmake-for-non- > interactive-build-on-windows > > I'm willing to support anyone who is willing to tackle this, it's just that I don't > have a Windows system to do this on my own. > My initial motivation was more about reducing dependencies on stuff that Windows folks don't normally have installed, e.g. Cygwin, and also to move things forward a bit in terms of supported build technologies, although I don't suppose nmake is going away anytime soon. Last time I looked at CMake on Windows it didn't work for me, but I didn't look too hard. IIUC CMake is a "Makefile" generator, can it do all the stuff we currently do in nmake which is a fair bit more than just working out dependencies and compiling and linking the required modules? CMake's ability to generate Visual Studio project files could be attractive to some as well. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:23:21AM -, Graham Bloice wrote: > > On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Graham Bloice wrote: > > > > > I've also wondered about moving on from nmake and converting to > > MSBuild. This is only usable from VS2008 or later though. Any thoughts > on > > that? > > > > If we do so, can we continue to have lists of source files in > Makefile.common, > > rather than, say, having to duplicate such a list in other files (which > > developers might forget to do)? Or, at least, can we automatically > generate > > the relevant MSBuild files from files such as Makefile.common? > > Although I haven't investigated I would expect MSBuild to be able to absorb > such input and make it useable, either directly or by a task to generate the > required file. As an alternative: How about making building with cmake work for Windows? After that, maybe the following article has some clues: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1459482/how-to-use-cmake-for-non-interactive-build-on-windows I'm willing to support anyone who is willing to tackle this, it's just that I don't have a Windows system to do this on my own. Ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment
> -Original Message- > From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev- > boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris > Sent: 11 January 2012 10:59 > To: Developer support list for Wireshark > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment > > > On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Graham Bloice wrote: > > > I've also wondered about moving on from nmake and converting to > MSBuild. This is only usable from VS2008 or later though. Any thoughts on > that? > > If we do so, can we continue to have lists of source files in Makefile.common, > rather than, say, having to duplicate such a list in other files (which > developers might forget to do)? Or, at least, can we automatically generate > the relevant MSBuild files from files such as Makefile.common? Although I haven't investigated I would expect MSBuild to be able to absorb such input and make it useable, either directly or by a task to generate the required file. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment
On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Graham Bloice wrote: > I've also wondered about moving on from nmake and converting to MSBuild. > This is only usable from VS2008 or later though. Any thoughts on that? If we do so, can we continue to have lists of source files in Makefile.common, rather than, say, having to duplicate such a list in other files (which developers might forget to do)? Or, at least, can we automatically generate the relevant MSBuild files from files such as Makefile.common? ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment changes
Using VS 2008 Pro: I updated to svn 25939 and did nmake setup/distclean. I have config.nmake pulling in Wpd_Pack automatically for capturing (i.e. I'm not referencing my local winpcap copy). I'm getting farther than I was a week or so ago: I can now use the file open dialog, but when I try to open a capture file, I get the generic MS crash dialog with: AppName: wireshark.exe AppVer: 1.0.99.0 ModName: msvcr90.dll ModVer: 9.0.21022.8 Offset: 0002f9bb Any manual changes needed on my part to tweak the build for this to work? Thanks, -Nathan >> - Original Message - >> From: "Gerald Combs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: >> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 7:13 PM >> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment changes >> >> >>> I just set the default MSVC_VARIANT in config.nmake to MSVC2008 in >>> order to test that compiler on the Windows buildslave. If it works >>> we can start using Visual C++ 2008 for official builds in the trunk. >>> >>> Also, a new tag was created in wireshark-win32-libs yesterday. You'll >>> have to run "nmake -f makefile.nmake setup" next time you update SVN >>> (which you should now be warned about). >>> >>> ___ >>> Wireshark-dev mailing list >>> Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org >>> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev >>> >>> ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment changes
Question 32 in the Visual Studio Express FAQ (http://www.microsoft.com/express/support/faq/) hints that it's possible: Does Visual C++ 2008 Express include the "optimizing compiler"? Yes, Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition includes the same core optimizing compiler that will be included with all other Visual Studio 2008 editions. Some new expanded optimization features, including Profile Guided Optimizations, will be available only in the Standard and above editions of Visual Studio 2008. I don't know if anyone has actually tried it, however. On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:45:14 +0200, "Sake Blok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are plugins compiled with MSVC2008EE compatible with (official) wireshark > versions compiled with MSVC2008? > > > Sake > > - Original Message - > From: "Gerald Combs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 7:13 PM > Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment changes > > >>I just set the default MSVC_VARIANT in config.nmake to MSVC2008 in >> order to test that compiler on the Windows buildslave. If it works >> we can start using Visual C++ 2008 for official builds in the trunk. >> >> Also, a new tag was created in wireshark-win32-libs yesterday. You'll >> have to run "nmake -f makefile.nmake setup" next time you update SVN >> (which you should now be warned about). >> >> ___ >> Wireshark-dev mailing list >> Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org >> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev >> >> > > > ___ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment changes
You need to set up your environment with "c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\bin\vcvars32.bat" (assuming that's where Visual C++ is installed), but /trunk should now work out of the box for MSVC2008 instead of MSVC6. On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:17:32 +0200, "Luis EG Ontanon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does that mean that I just need to install the tools (MSVC2008+cygwin) > do a checkout, make setup, and make all with no need anymore to modify > any files? > > \Lego > > On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Gerald Combs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I just set the default MSVC_VARIANT in config.nmake to MSVC2008 in >> order to test that compiler on the Windows buildslave. If it works >> we can start using Visual C++ 2008 for official builds in the trunk. >> >> Also, a new tag was created in wireshark-win32-libs yesterday. You'll >> have to run "nmake -f makefile.nmake setup" next time you update SVN >> (which you should now be warned about). >> >> ___ >> Wireshark-dev mailing list >> Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org >> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev >> > > > > -- > This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself. > -- Marshall McLuhan > ___ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment changes
Are plugins compiled with MSVC2008EE compatible with (official) wireshark versions compiled with MSVC2008? Sake - Original Message - From: "Gerald Combs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 7:13 PM Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment changes >I just set the default MSVC_VARIANT in config.nmake to MSVC2008 in > order to test that compiler on the Windows buildslave. If it works > we can start using Visual C++ 2008 for official builds in the trunk. > > Also, a new tag was created in wireshark-win32-libs yesterday. You'll > have to run "nmake -f makefile.nmake setup" next time you update SVN > (which you should now be warned about). > > ___ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > > ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment changes
Does that mean that I just need to install the tools (MSVC2008+cygwin) do a checkout, make setup, and make all with no need anymore to modify any files? \Lego On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Gerald Combs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just set the default MSVC_VARIANT in config.nmake to MSVC2008 in > order to test that compiler on the Windows buildslave. If it works > we can start using Visual C++ 2008 for official builds in the trunk. > > Also, a new tag was created in wireshark-win32-libs yesterday. You'll > have to run "nmake -f makefile.nmake setup" next time you update SVN > (which you should now be warned about). > > ___ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > -- This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself. -- Marshall McLuhan ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
