Would you like me to send the captures to you at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] We are not having problems with all users, all
domains. Inbound and outbound.
On 4/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Send Wireshark-users mailing list submissions to
wireshark-users@wireshark.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Wireshark-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. trouble w/ tshark static build on linux
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
2. Re: capturing msn web cam traffic with wireshark.
(Wonkyun*^^* Lee)
3. Re: capturing msn web cam traffic with wireshark. (Guy Harris)
4. Bizarre mail issue on network, Please someone,help. (S R)
5. Re: Bizarre mail issue on network, Please someone,help.
(Sake Blok)
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:54:09 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Wireshark-users] trouble w/ tshark static build on linux
To: wireshark-users@wireshark.org
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Hi,
I've successfully statically built tethereal before on linux, but
when I tried with tshark/wireshark 0.99.5, I keep getting errors like
this:
can't find -lgmodule
I've tried
--enable-static --disable-wireshark --enable-tshark --disable-gtk2
and lots of other options to configure, with no success.
(configure seems to work OK, but make fails.)
I just want to get a static build of tshark.
This is on Fedora Core 6; I also tried on RHEL4.
I do have glib and gtk and gmodule, etc.
Thanks!
Barry
--
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:43:12 +0900
From: "Wonkyun*^^* Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] capturing msn web cam traffic with
wireshark.
To: wireshark-users@wireshark.org
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
> > I am trying to capture traffic using Msn messenger, espec. with web
> > cam.
>
>You're trying to capture traffic with a webcam? You mean by, for
>example, pointing a webcam at the screen while Wireshark is doing a
>live traffic capture, to display what Wireshark is showing? :-)
>
>Or do you mean you're trying to capture network traffic being put onto
>the network by a webcam?
>
==>
What I meant was, I want to capture traffic during 'WebCam/Video
conversation', ie when i have video-convesation w/ my friend or someone.
using msn messnger webcam feature.
there is equipment that we are trying to release in public, which allows
to
have video conversation, it's something like video-telephone.
when i use this equipment, and wireshark, i can capture traffic with a
protocol ; H.263. and..G.722 , etc.
and it also tells me about their video type(qcif, cif ...), codec, and
bit-rate, picture type, etc
but i cannot capture any of these things with msn messenger video
conversation, is it b/c it's encrypted?
all i see was just 'udp' protocol saying nothing..
is there anyway that i can see and analyze these things?
I want to see their picture coding type(i-frame, p-frame), time for
receiving each frame so i can calculate their frame rates, and so on...
I also tryed with SKYPE, but i know that it uses their own codec, so there
is no way to capture video frames, and analyze them.
but as far as i know, msn messnger uses standard codec, so it can co-work
with other messngers like yahoo or AOL..
I don't know whether you understand what i am trying to say, but i hope
so..
cheers.. need help here..
plz tell me about other tools or some kind of dissectos that allow me to
do
these things..
> > Is there any way that i can capture video codec, or video traffic?
> >
> > some kind of frame rate or something..
> >
> > I also tried with Skype, but i cannot find the way to do it..
>
>You can capture *any* sort of network traffic with Wireshark.
>
>Whether Wireshark can *dissect* that traffic, and show it as anything
>other than raw hex data, is another matter.
>
>And, even if it can dissect it, it won't display it as video.
>Wireshark's a network analyzer, not a video player, although some
>dissectors might support saving the contents of a video stream within
>a capture in some video format, just as it can save some VoIP traffic
>in an audio format.
>
>What *exactly* is it you're trying to do here?
>___
>
