Re: [Wireshark-users] Exporting objects with invalid defaultfilenames

2007-10-24 Thread Mark G.

> -Original Message-
> From: Luis EG Ontanon
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:30 AM
> 
> BTW url-encoding filenames would be a solution for this kind of
> isues... guess what urlencoding was thought for exactly that!
> 
> filename%20with%20spaces.ext

True enough. 

But for those of us who are using Wireshark to leech large 
numbers of images from a commercial web site, the incremental 
naming feature would be very helpful.  ;-)

-Mark

___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


Re: [Wireshark-users] Exporting objects with invalid defaultfilenames

2007-10-24 Thread Guy Harris
Mark G. wrote:

> But for those of us who are using Wireshark to leech large 
> numbers of images from a commercial web site, the incremental 
> naming feature would be very helpful.  ;-)

Isn't that what programs such as curl and wget are for?  Using Wireshark 
seems a bit indirect, especially given that somebody has to be fetching 
the file *anyway* in order for Wireshark to see the traffic.
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users