tretys of the Astrolabi3... and an introxution
http://anatorts.blogspot.com/ I want here to say how much I so love to look up and discover such as appear mistakenly in keyboarding contentXtually provident strings as solve the subject line of this post. Please also see how by mediacioun of this litel tretys, I purpose to teche the a certein nombre of conclusions aperteynyng to the instrument http://anatorts.blogspot.com/2006/12/tretys-of-astrolabie.html http://art-bin.com/art/oastro.html P!^VP
Fog storm Fodder
Fog storm bin d an bor n anteam an golden ! d rifting in eh ged the luffing ou sed outside the ps tung shoulder .f shotless b end the fork mine ,chewed the rotted l ip stick y an aage you bull undered og rind .k noc kloo smoke or cha t ah crispy sg lint an b ile an mut turd he dite pullers at the neck an crypt .shgrazed the plit ,corpsid loggorou spoilt the cow .so re mundled in the sh rugged día ,bussed an b led ,nodded p ants yhea dance le livre p lat turned aneat me und ulate .binder w hips ,mud vided all the c lack Fodder host isle langtused the soap he edge mot ileessence ,like a s ed gr ease not em ist meater you nest you kept the dimness g razing chopping b ags sot so t ,fors f lavored h eel contail the lapinlumpinesence ,drain moulder you conw edge chaffing oer t melted like aor rot or rub or rule .or booted :musin yr armpit gus e crystal sighedbled a head of tim ching c racked be side the frag runt .bull ho le clouding ,mum,no flag rant it e or need ledty shorts an ,tub h dance ,ran ksquirm in head John M. Bennett __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___
342/365, Micheal
Micheal still has the eyes of a mischievous eight year old who is whipsmart and knows he can get away with flaunting it because he's got an irresistibly winning smile to get him out of whatever trouble it might cause. 40 words, 40 years 365 days, 365 people http://www.logolalia.com/40x365
Re: Fog storm Fodder
flog form murder At 08:43 AM 12/19/2006, you wrote: Fog storm mudder -- BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS -- Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 170706153) is spam: Spam:https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=si=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e Not spam:https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=ni=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e Forget vote: https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=fi=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e -- END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___
Re: Fog storm Fodder
frog sturm blubber - Original Message - From: John M. Bennett To: WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:55 AM Subject: Re: Fog storm Fodder flog form murder At 08:43 AM 12/19/2006, you wrote: Fog storm mudder -- BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS -- Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 170706153) is spam: Spam:https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=si=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e Not spam:https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=ni=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e Forget vote: https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=fi=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e -- END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___
Re: Fog storm Fodder
knog loom laminate - Original Message - From: John M. Bennett To: WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 7:12 AM Subject: Re: Fog storm Fodder hog berm hummer At 10:05 AM 12/19/2006, you wrote: frog sturm blubber - Original Message - From: John M. Bennett To: WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:55 AM Subject: Re: Fog storm Fodder flog form murder At 08:43 AM 12/19/2006, you wrote: Fog storm mudder -- BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS -- Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 170706153) is spam: Spam: https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=si=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e Not spam: https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=ni=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e Forget vote: https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=fi=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e -- END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___ Spam Not spam Forget previous vote __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___
A Banner Year for Farm Animals Thanks to YOU
Title: Untitled Document Farm Sanctuary was a key sponsor of the ballot initiative campaign that PASSED a measure in Arizona outlawing gestation crates and veal crates We completed construction of a new Cattle Barn at our New York Shelter, providing a new home for our expanding cattle herd as a result of recent rescues We completed Phase One of construction on a new Duck Goose Habitat Project, to provide safe housing for our existing flock and new rescues Our Walk for Farm Animals events were held in 44 cities across the U.S. We provided loving daily care for 1,500 rescued animals at our Watkins Glen, NY and Orland, CA sanctuaries, including hundreds of survivors of Hurricane Katrina We continued to advance our lawsuit against the New Jersey Department of Agriculture We held our Farm Animal Forum: conference in San Francisco, CA We came to the rescue of over 100 broiler chickens from an abandonment case in NYC Farm Sanctuary led a No Foie Gras campaign in Chicago, where the city council voted to BAN the sale of this cruel delicacy in city limits We held our 20th Anniversary Gala for Farm Animals at Cipriani in NYC We continued our lawsuit against Corcpork, challenging the use of gestation crates under CA law We came to the rescue of piglets being used for practice hernia surgeries at a university veterinary hospital Farm Sanctuary released two new scientific reports: U.S. Highway Accidents Involving Farm Animals and The Welfare of Cattle in Beef Production Dear Alan, This year was a banner year for farm animals. In our 20th anniversary year, we built upon two decades of progress and advanced critical campaigns and programs to end farm animal abuse. Today, change comes in the form of laws and litigation for farm animals, rescues that alleviate untold suffering, and coverage in the major media that reaches into the mainstream and touches Americans with stories exposing cruelty and demonstrating compassion. We are fighting factory farming abuse head-on and we are winning. Few laws exist in the U.S. to protect farm animals, and the agribusiness lobby is extremely powerful, making legal change difficult. But, this year, we have seen unprecedented progress in a very short time. Not one, but two laws have passed! In Chicago, the sale of foie gras (translated in French as fatty liver) made through the cruel process of force-feeding ducks and geese was BANNED. And, in Arizona, citizens voted overwhelmingly in favor of Proposition 204, banning gestation crates for pregnant pigs and veal crates for calves! Our shelters saved hundreds of suffering farm animals in 2006, from Linda, a crippled cow injured during birth at a dairy farm, to the piglets rescued from practice surgeries at a university, over 100 chickens found sick and dying in an abandoned garage in Brooklyn, and so many more. In addition to these new faces on the farm, we continued providing ongoing care for over 1,500 farm animals here at our sanctuaries, including hundreds of brave survivors from Hurricane Katrina. Each of these animals is a beloved individual, who suffered the horror of mutilation, abuse and neglect ... and only survived to have her story told today because of the commitment of Farm Sanctuary members. We gave a voice to the millions of turkeys who suffer on factory farms each year with educational stories about turkey production, our Adopt-A-Turkey project, and compassionate holiday alternatives running on NPR, Fox News and the Food Network. The foie gras effort was covered by media outlets from USA Today, Chicago Tribune, Chicago Sun Times, Los Angeles Times, New York Times, The Christian Science Monitor, the Associated Press, and hundreds more. And, through our outreach programs, we sent a message of compassion across the U.S. as we hosted a Farm Animal Forum in San Francisco, our 20th Anniversary Gala in New York, shelter events throughout the year, and 44 Walk for Farm Animals events. All that we have accomplished for farm animals this year is thanks to you. These victories are yours and the animals. But, our work is far from completed. As we look forward to 2007, we must build on this momentum, and fight harder than ever. Farm animals are counting on us, and we are counting on you. Please, make a year-end, tax-deductible gift to Farm Sanctuary to make our work possible. We are grateful to know and work with such compassionate and committed individuals as you, and to count you as part of the Farm Sanctuary family. Warm wishes from all
PERFORATIONS 30: Hut / Tech and bare life CFM (fwd)
Public Domain, Inc. is pleased to announce the call for PERFORATIONS 30: Hut / Tech bare life As usual with perforations, deadlines are somewhat fluid but please notify Robert Cheatham or Fehta Murhana of your intent by February 15 2007 in order to be included in the release notification. Article length is at your discretion. Experimental hypertexts are especially welcome. Other forms of media, video, etc., may have length restrictions, please cc media editor Chea Prince or technical editor, Jim Demmers. If you have any questions please query one of the editors. - Hut Tech and bare life When the shack dweller lays in supplies, she is composing a politics. Lisa Robertson This issue of Perforations was generated because of papers found during a reconstruction of Fehta Murghana's hut. She had constructed it herself as a writer's retreat but was fond of calling it a 'witch hut', always fantasizing putting it on legs as the famous hut-on-chicken-legs of the Russian witch fable Baba Yaga, creating an image of inner mobility only seemingly at odds with the the apparent rooted nature of the hut. This issue/node of Perforations will concede the perimeter to the hut and hut dwellers everywhere, but also examines the oxymorons of thought which the hut generates at the center (potentially), such as the 'rooted nomadism' of the hut dweller and perhaps even the 'revolutionary conservativism' of such, including its modern anti-modernism. Murghana herself was well aware of the uncanny nature of the 'hut,' seeing it as enabling portents and revenants, neither of which are wanted in the modern world, yet both are continuously courted through the hypermodern technical networks which course through contemporary life, binding and separating at the same time. We begin with Murghana's musings on the hut, but several writers have lately taken to heart, (not forgetting Rykwert's history of the hut), the enigma of the hut, such as Anne Cline, Lisa Robertson, and most lately Adam Scharff in a recently released book on Heidegger's Hut. We have enabled the basic text along the way with quotes from the above. What is 'Hut / Tech', that such frabjous entities can be held together by a stroke, a dividing line between the nether poles of a magnet? Another oxymoron? Who are the dwellers of huts, either in thought or corporeally? Does the hut embody some sort of midway point between homeless and home? Between presence and absence? Is there any future for the hut or is it to be relegated to economic end-zones of emergency and to the camps of the coming era? Is there the 'hut of last resort' and then the freely chosen hut? Or is the very nature of the hut a last resort?and hence a resort to primal potentiality, both ending and beginning? (After all, the three most notable hut dwellers in recent memory are Henry Thoreau, Theodore Kacynski, and Martin Heidegger, all of which would seem to be problematic for the modern cultural inhabitant --besides being white, western males -- of the current wave of hyperdevelopment in re: to lofts, townhouses, tract Macmansions, all examples of a certain form of maximalism and neo-liberal justifications of a new economic order. And of course with the above dwellers, the hut is often seen as a breeding ground of primordial darkness in its willful, almost-Nietzschean separation from culture, civilization, and society.: What we crave is not Rosseau's solitude but the excellent series of origin dwindling on ahead into the future. Thus we love shacks. Each leads erotically to the next. One sojourns, or starts out, rather than settles, in a shack. Domestic duration, like childhood, is transient, serial. A shack is always timely. Typically an account of the history of architecture will begin with a shack. Lisa Robertson But the hut also seems oddly timeless in its aspect of catering to bare life, which exists as a possibility everywhere and everywhen. Is there any place left for the minimalisms of the hut? For its limitations, its 'insect politics,' its dark broodings, its centrality in a haunted, uncanny landscape? Or are the compacted maximalisms of favelas, the psychic densities and thickenings and potential new forms which they seem to prophesy, more exacting? In all cases the 'hut' avers between opacity and transparency, justifying both, on different occasions, preserving both as trans-temporal exigencies which advance, retreat (and sublime) into spiritualities, goblins, ghosts, ethers, and materializations at the drop of a hat. Please fell free to send us your hut life, even if it only resides as a dream, a whistle in the dark. Please feel free to send us the minimals that you are able to squeeze out of everyday, the disguised trans-temporalities that make up hut life in the middle of empire, that make up hope in the middle of loss and abandon, like lotus seeds found in the bottom of a three thousand year old pyramid. notes (1) Robertson quotes
....
brimstone appellation healthfully inhibited hump saint unrelenting muckrake July precisely enterprising master's degree soundness caliber stir-fry gambit inception rationalize disagreement rock bottom indoctrinate omen virtuoso tit for tat derangement dishpan recliner dramatics puff gaseous glamorize restore rush solid clothier lodging sadist regulatory workmanship saboteur heavyweight elitism enviously Xview y c%p criN3 ga(iG l?st undi veF e rstan w1 2y gon e und ewNW8 Wio;$ SNs!e GiO4 pL. isQ00 6to!l %pK d eESil 0nwSM rP$Tq pK do o5g8 Uentr t sit eH#po ra' b nwSMS stand ll?st :um6e criN3 aging tters ging %:um6 ibili Gus6t orwaA ventriloquism unworldly copy doze forward interview severe strumpet schlock ballast pooh-pooh understandable hooligan subscription biophysics electrocardiogram admissibility pp. tantalize tarragon engaging raven education equilateral beloved polyp treasonous sundial skirmish vellum trickiness sagacious
Re: Fog storm Fodder
bloom famine ululate - Original Message - From: John M. Bennett To: WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 11:28 AM Subject: Re: Fog storm Fodder soggy groom fulminate At 12:11 PM 12/19/2006, you wrote: knog loom laminate - Original Message - From: John M. Bennett To: WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 7:12 AM Subject: Re: Fog storm Fodder hog berm hummer At 10:05 AM 12/19/2006, you wrote: frog sturm blubber - Original Message - From: John M. Bennett To: WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:55 AM Subject: Re: Fog storm Fodder flog form murder At 08:43 AM 12/19/2006, you wrote: Fog storm mudder -- BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS -- Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 170706153) is spam: Spam: https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=si=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e Not spam: https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=ni=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e Forget vote: https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=fi=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e -- END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___ Spam Not spam Forget previous vote __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___ Spam Not spam Forget previous vote __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___
Re: Fog storm Fodder
spoon jammed ungulate At 02:58 PM 12/19/2006, you wrote: bloom famine ululate - Original Message - From: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]John M. Bennett To: mailto:WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDUWRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 11:28 AM Subject: Re: Fog storm Fodder soggy groom fulminate At 12:11 PM 12/19/2006, you wrote: knog loom laminate - Original Message - From: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]John M. Bennett To: mailto:WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDUWRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 7:12 AM Subject: Re: Fog storm Fodder hog berm hummer At 10:05 AM 12/19/2006, you wrote: frog sturm blubber - Original Message - From: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]John M. Bennett To: mailto:WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDUWRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:55 AM Subject: Re: Fog storm Fodder flog form murder At 08:43 AM 12/19/2006, you wrote: Fog storm mudder -- BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS -- Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 170706153) is spam: Spam:https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=si=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e Not spam:https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=ni=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e Forget vote: https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=fi=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e -- END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___ -- https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=si=170776008m=168f21f9432cSpam https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=ni=170776008m=168f21f9432cNot spam https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=fi=170776008m=168f21f9432cForget previous vote __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___ -- https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=si=170883018m=b65747a9bc63Spam https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=ni=170883018m=b65747a9bc63Not spam https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=fi=170883018m=b65747a9bc63Forget previous vote __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___ -- https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=si=171043871m=d4746e2dd026Spam https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=ni=171043871m=d4746e2dd026Not spam https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=fi=171043871m=d4746e2dd026Forget previous vote __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___
Re: Fog storm Fodder
fog storm mudder On Dec 19, 2006, at 5:53 PM, rzep wrote: fog storm fodder - Original Message - From: Halvard Johnson To: WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 12:23 PM Subject: Re: Fog storm Fodder flog groom doddererz On Dec 19, 2006, at 3:13 PM, John M. Bennett wrote: spoon jammed ungulate At 02:58 PM 12/19/2006, you wrote: bloom famine ululate - Original Message - From: John M. Bennett To: WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 11:28 AM Subject: Re: Fog storm Fodder soggy groom fulminate At 12:11 PM 12/19/2006, you wrote: knog loom laminate - Original Message - From: John M. Bennett To: WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 7:12 AM Subject: Re: Fog storm Fodder hog berm hummer At 10:05 AM 12/19/2006, you wrote: frog sturm blubber - Original Message - From: John M. Bennett To: WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:55 AM Subject: Re: Fog storm Fodder flog form murder At 08:43 AM 12/19/2006, you wrote: Fog storm mudder -- BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS -- Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 170706153) is spam: Spam:https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php? c=si=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e Not spam:https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php? c=ni=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e Forget vote: https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php? c=fi=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e -- END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___ Spam Not spam Forget previous vote __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___ Spam Not spam Forget previous vote __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___ Spam Not spam Forget previous vote __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___
Re: Fog storm Fodder
http://anamediations.blogspot.com/2006/12/re-fog-storm-fodder-after- jbennett.html P!^VP On 19-Dec-06, at 2:53 PM, rzep wrote: fog storm fodder - Original Message - From: Halvard Johnson To: WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 12:23 PM Subject: Re: Fog storm Fodder flog groom doddererz On Dec 19, 2006, at 3:13 PM, John M. Bennett wrote: spoon jammed ungulate At 02:58 PM 12/19/2006, you wrote: bloom famine ululate - Original Message - From: John M. Bennett To: WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 11:28 AM Subject: Re: Fog storm Fodder soggy groom fulminate At 12:11 PM 12/19/2006, you wrote: knog loom laminate - Original Message - From: John M. Bennett To: WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 7:12 AM Subject: Re: Fog storm Fodder hog berm hummer At 10:05 AM 12/19/2006, you wrote:frog sturm blubber - Original Message - From: John M. Bennett To: WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:55 AM Subject: Re: Fog storm Fodder flog form murder At 08:43 AM 12/19/2006, you wrote:Fog storm mudder -- BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS -- Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 170706153) is spam: Spam: https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=si=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e Not spam: https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=ni=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e Forget vote: https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?c=fi=170706153m=3297cb2c5f6e -- END-ANTISPAM-VOTING- LINKS__ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___ Spam Not spam Forget previous vote __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___ Spam Not spam Forget previous vote __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___ Spam Not spam Forget previous vote __ Dr. John M. Bennett Curator, Avant Writing Collection Rare Books Manuscripts Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Av Mall Columbus, OH 43210 USA (614) 292-3029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johnmbennett.net http://www.library.osu.edu/sites/rarebooks/avantwriting/ ___
harpy hoolidays...
arf116 http://www.phaneronoemikon.org/images/arf116.jpg
the colour of ivy, the colour of strain
we saw the colour in the door, the door was momentous. the door was sad as an arch over only frozen rivers. we stood with a wish but the night was scary. we tried our ever light way, chasing after the fear. we came to a fine draining moment that was like waking. would you like to live like a tree? would you need me in a second? will I live beyond the colour of last night or this morning? of course all colours are strong, and someday I will show it. someday we will live in terms of green stretches of land and the certain effort of the bluest sea. the sky too is blue, it is blue with me and you. the land is green and staring at us in our lives. our lives are considered earth. this is the poem that lasted thru the parts that stretch away. this is, then, a poem that sees its present.
What does logotomy mean?
Begin forwarded message: From: West Virginia University LISTSERV Server (14.5) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: December 19, 2006 9:34:27 PM CST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Rejected posting to WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU LISTSERV does not allow the distribution of empty messages to a mailing list, because some users are unable to see the Subject: field from the original message. From: mIEKAL aND [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: December 19, 2006 9:34:08 PM CST To: Theory and Writing WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU, UB Poetics discussion group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: What does logotomy mean?
Re: What does logotomy mean?
logotomy: the rejection of empty messages due to in-cuts - Original Message - From: mIEKAL aND To: WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 7:36 PM Subject: What does logotomy mean? Begin forwarded message: From: West Virginia University LISTSERV Server (14.5) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: December 19, 2006 9:34:27 PM CST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Rejected posting to WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU LISTSERV does not allow the distribution of empty messages to a mailing list, because some users are unable to see the Subject: field from the original message. From: mIEKAL aND [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: December 19, 2006 9:34:08 PM CST To: Theory and Writing WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU, UB Poetics discussion group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: What does logotomy mean?
Until you are adept enough
Until you are adept enough http://www.cgi7.com/peterimages/adept.htm -- Peter Ciccariello Image - http://invisiblenotes.blogspot.com/
Re: What does logotomy mean? AND... what about Jutert?
BESIDES the looping empty message meaning less ness of the unassailable... http://www.google.ca/search?hl=enq=logotomybtnG=Google+Searchmeta= What I want, similarly, to know is... What does Jutert mean? http://anatorts.blogspot.com/2006/12/tretys-of-astrolabie.html A Google search turn up a few such passages: Jeg har ein 1992 Passat turbo diesel som harker ved kaldstart.Den jukser og noe ved lavt turtall. Ellers går det ca10sek. etter start før turtallsheving. Jeg har hatt bilen påWW.verksted og der ble den jutert Bildet er: - Scannet med 300DPI - Klippet ut av et større bilde - Saturation og Hue er justert noe ned - Hvitt Lys er jutert noe ned NONE of which Babelfishes ...? TAK! On 19-Dec-06, at 7:36 PM, mIEKAL aND wrote: Begin forwarded message: From: West Virginia University LISTSERV Server (14.5) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: December 19, 2006 9:34:27 PM CST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Rejected posting to WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU LISTSERV does not allow the distribution of empty messages to a mailing list, because some users are unable to see the Subject: field from the original message. From: mIEKAL aND [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: December 19, 2006 9:34:08 PM CST To: Theory and Writing WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU, UB Poetics discussion group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: What does logotomy mean? P!^VP
Re: Until you are adept enough
brilliant peter! On 12/20/06, Peter Ciccariello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Until you are adept enough -- Peter Ciccariello Image - http://invisiblenotes.blogspot.com/ -- --LFG Curiosity, Play, or Xperimention PST-- -http://netwurker.livejournal.com/ -- sharding.ur.reality.purples
Joint Chiefs UNANIMOUSLY Oppose Adding Troops
Joint Chiefs UNANIMOUSLY Oppose Adding Troops White House, Joint Chiefs At Odds on Adding Troops By Robin Wright and Peter Baker Washington Post Staff Writers Tuesday, December 19, 2006; Page A01 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/18/AR2006121801477.html The Bush administration is split over the idea of a surge in troops to Iraq, with White House officials aggressively promoting the concept over the unanimous disagreement of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, according to U.S. officials familiar with the intense debate. Sending 15,000 to 30,000 more troops for a mission of possibly six to eight months is one of the central proposals on the table of the White House policy review to reverse the steady deterioration in Iraq. The option is being discussed as an element in a range of bigger packages, the officials said. But the Joint Chiefs think the White House, after a month of talks, still does not have a defined mission and is latching on to the surge idea in part because of limited alternatives, despite warnings about the potential disadvantages for the military, said the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the White House review is not public. The chiefs have taken a firm stand, the sources say, because they believe the strategy review will be the most important decision on Iraq to be made since the March 2003 invasion. At regular interagency meetings and in briefing President Bush last week, the Pentagon has warned that any short-term mission may only set up the United States for bigger problems when it ends. The service chiefs have warned that a short-term mission could give an enormous edge to virtually all the armed factions in Iraq -- including al-Qaeda's foreign fighters, Sunni insurgents and Shiite militias -- without giving an enduring boost to the U.S military mission or to the Iraqi army, the officials said. The Pentagon has cautioned that a modest surge could lead to more attacks by al-Qaeda, provide more targets for Sunni insurgents and fuel the jihadist appeal for more foreign fighters to flock to Iraq to attack U.S. troops, the officials said. The informal but well-armed Shiite militias, the Joint Chiefs have also warned, may simply melt back into society during a U.S. surge and wait until the troops are withdrawn -- then reemerge and retake the streets of Baghdad and other cities. Even the announcement of a time frame and mission -- such as for six months to try to secure volatile Baghdad -- could play to armed factions by allowing them to game out the new U.S. strategy, the chiefs have warned the White House. The idea of a much larger military deployment for a longer mission is virtually off the table, at least so far, mainly for logistics reasons, say officials familiar with the debate. Any deployment of 40,000 to 50,000 would force the Pentagon to redeploy troops who were scheduled to go home. A senior administration official said it is too simplistic to say the surge question has broken down into a fight between the White House and the Pentagon, but the official acknowledged that the military has questioned the option. Of course, military leadership is going to be focused on the mission -- what you're trying to accomplish, the ramifications it would have on broader issues in terms of manpower and strength and all that, the official said. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, said military officers have not directly opposed a surge option. I've never heard them be depicted that way to the president, the official said. Because they ask questions about what the mission would be doesn't mean they don't support it. Those are the kinds of questions the president wants his military planners to be asking. The concerns raised by the military are sometimes offset by concerns on the other side. For instance, those who warn that a short-term surge would harm longer-term deployments are met with the argument that the situation is urgent now, the official said. Advocates would say: 'Can you afford to wait? Can you afford to plan in the long term? What's the tipping point in that country? Do you have time to wait?' Which way Bush is leaning remains unclear. The president's keeping his cards pretty close to his vest, the official said, and I think people may be trying to interpret questions he's asking and information he's asking for as signs that he's made up his mind. Robert M. Gates, who was sworn in yesterday as defense secretary, is headed for Iraq this week and is expected to play a decisive role in resolving the debate, officials said. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's views are still open, according to State Department officials. The principals met again yesterday to continue discussions. The White House yesterday noted the growing number of reports about what is being discussed behind closed doors. It's also worth issuing a note of caution, because quite often people will try to
Re: Joint Chiefs UNANIMOUSLY Oppose Adding Troops
Odd... I just tried to respond to this at it went to a different email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] (what is this?) what I said was simple: crack. fissure. finally. On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:25:49 -0500 Alan Sondheim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joint Chiefs UNANIMOUSLY Oppose Adding Troops White House, Joint Chiefs At Odds on Adding Troops By Robin Wright and Peter Baker Washington Post Staff Writers Tuesday, December 19, 2006; Page A01 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/18/AR2006121801477.html The Bush administration is split over the idea of a surge in troops to Iraq, with White House officials aggressively promoting the concept over the unanimous disagreement of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, according to U.S. officials familiar with the intense debate. Sending 15,000 to 30,000 more troops for a mission of possibly six to eight months is one of the central proposals on the table of the White House policy review to reverse the steady deterioration in Iraq. The option is being discussed as an element in a range of bigger packages, the officials said. But the Joint Chiefs think the White House, after a month of talks, still does not have a defined mission and is latching on to the surge idea in part because of limited alternatives, despite warnings about the potential disadvantages for the military, said the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the White House review is not public. The chiefs have taken a firm stand, the sources say, because they believe the strategy review will be the most important decision on Iraq to be made since the March 2003 invasion. At regular interagency meetings and in briefing President Bush last week, the Pentagon has warned that any short-term mission may only set up the United States for bigger problems when it ends. The service chiefs have warned that a short-term mission could give an enormous edge to virtually all the armed factions in Iraq -- including al-Qaeda's foreign fighters, Sunni insurgents and Shiite militias -- without giving an enduring boost to the U.S military mission or to the Iraqi army, the officials said. The Pentagon has cautioned that a modest surge could lead to more attacks by al-Qaeda, provide more targets for Sunni insurgents and fuel the jihadist appeal for more foreign fighters to flock to Iraq to attack U.S. troops, the officials said. The informal but well-armed Shiite militias, the Joint Chiefs have also warned, may simply melt back into society during a U.S. surge and wait until the troops are withdrawn -- then reemerge and retake the streets of Baghdad and other cities. Even the announcement of a time frame and mission -- such as for six months to try to secure volatile Baghdad -- could play to armed factions by allowing them to game out the new U.S. strategy, the chiefs have warned the White House. The idea of a much larger military deployment for a longer mission is virtually off the table, at least so far, mainly for logistics reasons, say officials familiar with the debate. Any deployment of 40,000 to 50,000 would force the Pentagon to redeploy troops who were scheduled to go home. A senior administration official said it is too simplistic to say the surge question has broken down into a fight between the White House and the Pentagon, but the official acknowledged that the military has questioned the option. Of course, military leadership is going to be focused on the mission -- what you're trying to accomplish, the ramifications it would have on broader issues in terms of manpower and strength and all that, the official said. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, said military officers have not directly opposed a surge option. I've never heard them be depicted that way to the president, the official said. Because they ask questions about what the mission would be doesn't mean they don't support it. Those are the kinds of questions the president wants his military planners to be asking. The concerns raised by the military are sometimes offset by concerns on the other side. For instance, those who warn that a short-term surge would harm longer-term deployments are met with the argument that the situation is urgent now, the official said. Advocates would say: 'Can you afford to wait? Can you afford to plan in the long term? What's the tipping point in that country? Do you have time to wait?' Which way Bush is leaning remains unclear. The president's keeping his cards pretty close to his vest, the official said, and I think people may be trying to interpret questions he's asking and information he's asking for as signs that he's made up his mind. Robert M. Gates, who was sworn in yesterday as defense secretary, is headed for Iraq this week and is expected to play a decisive role in resolving the debate, officials said. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's views are still open, according to State Department officials. The
Re: Joint Chiefs UNANIMOUSLY Oppose Adding Troops
It's a really interesting email list that sends out opinion or news articles daily - Alan On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Talan Memmott wrote: Odd... I just tried to respond to this at it went to a different email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] (what is this?) what I said was simple: crack. fissure. finally. On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:25:49 -0500 Alan Sondheim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joint Chiefs UNANIMOUSLY Oppose Adding Troops White House, Joint Chiefs At Odds on Adding Troops By Robin Wright and Peter Baker Washington Post Staff Writers Tuesday, December 19, 2006; Page A01 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/18/AR2006121801477.html The Bush administration is split over the idea of a surge in troops to Iraq, with White House officials aggressively promoting the concept over the unanimous disagreement of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, according to U.S. officials familiar with the intense debate. Sending 15,000 to 30,000 more troops for a mission of possibly six to eight months is one of the central proposals on the table of the White House policy review to reverse the steady deterioration in Iraq. The option is being discussed as an element in a range of bigger packages, the officials said. But the Joint Chiefs think the White House, after a month of talks, still does not have a defined mission and is latching on to the surge idea in part because of limited alternatives, despite warnings about the potential disadvantages for the military, said the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the White House review is not public. The chiefs have taken a firm stand, the sources say, because they believe the strategy review will be the most important decision on Iraq to be made since the March 2003 invasion. At regular interagency meetings and in briefing President Bush last week, the Pentagon has warned that any short-term mission may only set up the United States for bigger problems when it ends. The service chiefs have warned that a short-term mission could give an enormous edge to virtually all the armed factions in Iraq -- including al-Qaeda's foreign fighters, Sunni insurgents and Shiite militias -- without giving an enduring boost to the U.S military mission or to the Iraqi army, the officials said. The Pentagon has cautioned that a modest surge could lead to more attacks by al-Qaeda, provide more targets for Sunni insurgents and fuel the jihadist appeal for more foreign fighters to flock to Iraq to attack U.S. troops, the officials said. The informal but well-armed Shiite militias, the Joint Chiefs have also warned, may simply melt back into society during a U.S. surge and wait until the troops are withdrawn -- then reemerge and retake the streets of Baghdad and other cities. Even the announcement of a time frame and mission -- such as for six months to try to secure volatile Baghdad -- could play to armed factions by allowing them to game out the new U.S. strategy, the chiefs have warned the White House. The idea of a much larger military deployment for a longer mission is virtually off the table, at least so far, mainly for logistics reasons, say officials familiar with the debate. Any deployment of 40,000 to 50,000 would force the Pentagon to redeploy troops who were scheduled to go home. A senior administration official said it is too simplistic to say the surge question has broken down into a fight between the White House and the Pentagon, but the official acknowledged that the military has questioned the option. Of course, military leadership is going to be focused on the mission -- what you're trying to accomplish, the ramifications it would have on broader issues in terms of manpower and strength and all that, the official said. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, said military officers have not directly opposed a surge option. I've never heard them be depicted that way to the president, the official said. Because they ask questions about what the mission would be doesn't mean they don't support it. Those are the kinds of questions the president wants his military planners to be asking. The concerns raised by the military are sometimes offset by concerns on the other side. For instance, those who warn that a short-term surge would harm longer-term deployments are met with the argument that the situation is urgent now, the official said. Advocates would say: 'Can you afford to wait? Can you afford to plan in the long term? What's the tipping point in that country? Do you have time to wait?' Which way Bush is leaning remains unclear. The president's keeping his cards pretty close to his vest, the official said, and I think people may be trying to interpret questions he's asking and information he's asking for as signs that he's made up his mind. Robert M. Gates, who was sworn in yesterday as defense secretary, is headed for Iraq this week and is expected to play a decisive role in
losing my way in the milky forests of confession
losing my way in the milky forests of confession http://www.asondheim.org/decipher.jpg [...] #9626;#6667;#56c0;#;#7406;#1630;#a206;#9202;#c706; #9687;#4207;#4206;#b6e0;#;#7600;#a206;#5686;#66f2; #0656;#9797;#2207;#4206;#76e0;#0001;#0007;#3206;#5686; #5697;#2656;#f632;#0737;#2746;#e750;#0001;#0207;#4692; #0797;#2702;#0736;#e657;#3656;#1772;#0740;#0001;#0402; #0726;#5746;#e697;#9727;#40a2;#0677;#3206;#5680;#0001; #0606;#5697;#2656;#f632;#0737;#2746;#e757;#4692;#0790; #0001;#1007;#2702;#0736;#e657;#3656;#1772;#0742;#0726; #5740;#0001;#1206;#9797;#20a7;#4206;#76e7;#3206;#5686; #5697;#2650;#0001;#1406;#f632;#0737;#2746;#e757;#4692; #0797;#2702;#0730;#0001;#1606;#e657;#3656;#1772;#0742; #0726;#5746;#e697;#9720;#0001;#2002;#06f2;#0676;#9797; #20a6;#f206;#76e7;#20a0;#a200;#0001;#2206;#76e6;#9790; #a206;#f206;#8736;#1777;#56f2;#02c0;#0001;#2400;#a697; #3743;#a746;#5757;#9722;#7206;#56c6;#32d0;#0001;#2606; #e696;#e616;#8742;#0676;#5702;#0657;#26f6;#6720;#0001; #3006;#36e6;#16d0;#a0a2;#0656;#32d7;#9726;#e616;#56c0; #0001;#3202;#0676;#e692;#0656;#8746;#6726;#5706;#16d7; #26f0;#0001;#3402;#0656;#36e7;#6612;#00a7;#2617;#4617; #0202;#c730;#0001;#3600;#a2d6;#5726;#5636;#e616;#9797; #2202;#0216;#76e0;#0001;#4006;#e697;#9720;#a202;#1676; #e697;#9726;#5202;#1670;#0001;#4202;#c687;#4706;#50a6; #f202;#c687;#4700;#a0a6;#f200;#0001;#4406;#8747;#0652; #06f2;#02c7;#4617;#6612;#1737;#2610;#0001;#4602;#0796; #d207;#4746;#96c6;#4206;#56c7;#9726;#4270;#0001;#5006; #56c6;#32d6;#e696;#e612;#7642;#0672;#d797;#2640;#0001; #5206;#1656;#c636;#76e6;#96e6;#c6f7;#0207;#0206;#16b0; #0001;#5406;#16b6;#c6f6;#d690;#a207;#66f7;#2707;#4617; #3690;#0001;#5602;#06e6;#f697;#2706;#d697;#3697;#66f6; #f697;#4610;#0001;#6006;#c662;#06e2;#0666;#6756;#6756; #c666;#c632;#0660;#0001;#6206;#56e6;#1656;#3207;#3726; #e616;#56c2;#0737;#2650;#0001;#6406;#5736;#96d2;#d6e6; #52d7;#3796;#2610;#a206;#16d0;#0001;#6606;#5736;#96d2; #d6e6;#52d7;#3796;#2616;#3206;#16d0;#0001;#7006;#3207; #0616;#2207;#0617;#9622;#0794;#6203;#3200;#0001;#7206; #9646;#c6f7;#4206;#76e2;#e706;#9722;#0696;#8200;#0001; #7406;#a627;#5733;#a746;#3657;#0616;#3203;#a657;#2200; #0001;#7606;#8202;#d206;#1632;#0692;#d0a2;#0707;#46f6; #2200;#0002;#0002;#d656;#c746;#e756;#e657;#4616;#9632; #06e6;#f690;#0002;#0207;#4746;#f626;#52d6;#56c6;#36e7; #56e6;#9746;#1690;#0002;#0407;#4206;#e6f2;#e706;#9726; #16e7;#5202;#0656;#c620;#0002;#0607;#5746;#5727;#02d6; #e723;#a687;#4612;#06f7;#4200;#0002;#1002;#0656;#8742; #03d7;#70a6;#1657;#4736;#4656;#9640;#0002;#1207;#4657; #2202;#d6e7;#2756;#8746;#1706;#8722;#03a0;#0002;#1406; #d687;#4796;#5687;#4202;#0666;#f206;#1657;#4730;#0002; #1606;#4656;#9647;#0616;#3207;#2207;#3276;#8747;#9680; #0002;#2006;#30a2;#06d6;#52d7;#0616;#36e7;#56e6;#9746; #1690;#0002;#2206;#f206;#e6f6;#66f2;#0667;#0616;#3207; #5207;#3270;#0002;#2406;#c626;#16e6;#1632;#0656;#e652; #d706;#9636;#e750;#0002;#2606;#f697;#4616;#f742;#06e2; #0726;#f202;#0706;#1630;#0002;#3007;#2706;#d697;#3697; #66f0;#a206;#4656;#5746;#1770;#0002;#3206;#1772;#0722; #0726;#5746;#5746;#1646;#1642;#03a0;#0002;#3402;#d656; #36e6;#7207;#3697;#6656;#e656;#4202;#e650;#0002;#3603; #a657;#4616;#4276;#4206;#32d7;#9726;#e616;#56c0;#0002; #4002;#0676;#e696;#56e6;#5672;#02e6;#5767;#7207;#26f0; #0002;#4207;#2657;#4616;#90a2;#02c6;#f727;#06d6;#5736; #9760;#0002;#4406;#f6c2;#0646;#9746;#1636;#9206;#e6f6; #2612;#0660;#0002;#4602;#0657;#66f2;#7706;#1636;#f762; #0732;#92e6;#4690;#0002;#5002;#0796;#2206;#4206;#6696; #e697;#9726;#9762;#0670;#0002;#5207;#46f6;#5646;#4657; #0617;#4697;#7206;#40a2;#0680;#0002;#5406;#e697;#9726; #f6c2;#0676;#9746;#1637;#2206;#e6f0;#0002;#5606;#e6f7; #3657;#3657;#4616;#f626;#1207;#7206;#5760;#0002;#6002; #0687;#4692;#0656;#8742;#0736;#1776;#4696;#f760;#0002; #6206;#2202;#92e7;#26f6;#6656;#8772;#0652;#e2e7;#7650; #0002;#6406;#30a2;#02e6;#5726;#f686;#1726;#76f6;#4656; #8700;#0002;#6602;#06f6;#4207;#4736;#f6d6;#c656;#8206; #f206;#f6c0;#0002;#7007;#4206;#56e6;#8772;#06f2;#e2e7; #7656;#1632;#02e0;#0002;#7206;#f642;#0707;#4617;#7207; #3207;#2656;#2207;#9610;#0002;#7407;#26f6;#6656;#5682; #0652;#06f6;#c6c6;#f686;#30a0;#0002;#7606;#76f6;#5726; #8706;#1726;#1206;#4657;#2657;#4660;#0003;#0006;#d697; #4206;#2612;#0652;#0747;#56f2;#02e2;#e2e0;#0003;#0207; #4206;#e616;#8206;#5682;#0727;#56f7;#0736;#e690;#0003; #0407;#4617;#2692;#06e6;#f696;#1656;#e756;#9207;#9730; #0003;#0606;#d697;#4207;#90a2;#0656;#c277;#56f2;#e2e2; #06c0;#0003;#1006;#5672;#02e6;#e692;#0747;#2697;#0736; #f697;#4610;#0003;#1206;#2612;#06e2;#0747;#56f2;#0646; #e616;#9206;#e610;#0003;#1407;#56f6;#8206;#f792;#0726; [...] http://www.asondheim.org/decipher.jpg o lord forgive me, such agony as done
Re: Joint Chiefs UNANIMOUSLY Oppose Adding Troops
Just got it... thanks... looks interesting. Just odd that the email went back to them... On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:38:30 -0500 Alan Sondheim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's a really interesting email list that sends out opinion or news articles daily - Alan On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Talan Memmott wrote: Odd... I just tried to respond to this at it went to a different email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] (what is this?) what I said was simple: crack. fissure. finally. On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:25:49 -0500 Alan Sondheim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joint Chiefs UNANIMOUSLY Oppose Adding Troops White House, Joint Chiefs At Odds on Adding Troops By Robin Wright and Peter Baker Washington Post Staff Writers Tuesday, December 19, 2006; Page A01 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/18/AR2006121801477.html The Bush administration is split over the idea of a surge in troops to Iraq, with White House officials aggressively promoting the concept over the unanimous disagreement of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, according to U.S. officials familiar with the intense debate. Sending 15,000 to 30,000 more troops for a mission of possibly six to eight months is one of the central proposals on the table of the White House policy review to reverse the steady deterioration in Iraq. The option is being discussed as an element in a range of bigger packages, the officials said. But the Joint Chiefs think the White House, after a month of talks, still does not have a defined mission and is latching on to the surge idea in part because of limited alternatives, despite warnings about the potential disadvantages for the military, said the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the White House review is not public. The chiefs have taken a firm stand, the sources say, because they believe the strategy review will be the most important decision on Iraq to be made since the March 2003 invasion. At regular interagency meetings and in briefing President Bush last week, the Pentagon has warned that any short-term mission may only set up the United States for bigger problems when it ends. The service chiefs have warned that a short-term mission could give an enormous edge to virtually all the armed factions in Iraq -- including al-Qaeda's foreign fighters, Sunni insurgents and Shiite militias -- without giving an enduring boost to the U.S military mission or to the Iraqi army, the officials said. The Pentagon has cautioned that a modest surge could lead to more attacks by al-Qaeda, provide more targets for Sunni insurgents and fuel the jihadist appeal for more foreign fighters to flock to Iraq to attack U.S. troops, the officials said. The informal but well-armed Shiite militias, the Joint Chiefs have also warned, may simply melt back into society during a U.S. surge and wait until the troops are withdrawn -- then reemerge and retake the streets of Baghdad and other cities. Even the announcement of a time frame and mission -- such as for six months to try to secure volatile Baghdad -- could play to armed factions by allowing them to game out the new U.S. strategy, the chiefs have warned the White House. The idea of a much larger military deployment for a longer mission is virtually off the table, at least so far, mainly for logistics reasons, say officials familiar with the debate. Any deployment of 40,000 to 50,000 would force the Pentagon to redeploy troops who were scheduled to go home. A senior administration official said it is too simplistic to say the surge question has broken down into a fight between the White House and the Pentagon, but the official acknowledged that the military has questioned the option. Of course, military leadership is going to be focused on the mission -- what you're trying to accomplish, the ramifications it would have on broader issues in terms of manpower and strength and all that, the official said. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, said military officers have not directly opposed a surge option. I've never heard them be depicted that way to the president, the official said. Because they ask questions about what the mission would be doesn't mean they don't support it. Those are the kinds of questions the president wants his military planners to be asking. The concerns raised by the military are sometimes offset by concerns on the other side. For instance, those who warn that a short-term surge would harm longer-term deployments are met with the argument that the situation is urgent now, the official said. Advocates would say: 'Can you afford to wait? Can you afford to plan in the long term? What's the tipping point in that country? Do you have time to wait?' Which way Bush is leaning remains unclear. The president's keeping his cards pretty close to his vest, the official said, and I think people may be trying to interpret questions he's asking and information he's asking for as signs that
