[WSG] Web Standards Meetup London July Meeting
Morning Standardistas I'd like to announce the next instalment in the Web Standards Meetup London July Meeting For those of you living and working in London UK, please check out: http://webstandards.meetup.com/130/calendar/8110079/ and hopefully come along for an evening of web chat and beer (or wine or juice) This will be my penultimate event in London before I join the Sydney crew in September so it would be great to get as many of you as possible around. Thanks. Joe Ortenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.typingthevoid.com www.joiz.com *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] Centered List
Hi, This is my first post and I am fairly new to CSS. I'd like some help positioning a floated list. The image link is an example of that the design should look like (http://www.datadial.net/test/bb-example.gif ). The problem I am having is that I can float the list items to get them to sit side by side but the list needs to be centred in the column. Some products will have fewer size options (ie. I don't know the total width). ol id=sizeList lia href=xs/a/li lia href=s/a/li lia href=m/a/li lia href=l/a/li lia href=xl/a/li lia href=2xl/a/li lia href=3xl/a/li /ol Any idea on how I should approach this would be welcome. Thanks Tyrone *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Centered List
have a look at http://www.accessify.com/tools-and-wizards/developer-tools/list-o-matic/ I think your going to need to set the width of the ol (and the li inbetween) set the margin of your ol to someing like margin: 5px auto; get firefox+firebug as it will allow you to test styles in firebug which you can then move to the actual css hth - S 2008/7/14 Tyrone Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, This is my first post and I am fairly new to CSS. I'd like some help positioning a floated list. The image link is an example of that the design should look like ( http://www.datadial.net/test/bb-example.gif ). The problem I am having is that I can float the list items to get them to sit side by side but the list needs to be centred in the column. Some products will have fewer size options (ie. I don't know the total width). ol id=sizeList lia href=xs/a/li lia href=s/a/li lia href=m/a/li lia href=l/a/li lia href=xl/a/li lia href=2xl/a/li lia href=3xl/a/li /ol Any idea on how I should approach this would be welcome. Thanks Tyrone *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] [at]font-face confusion
Hello, I wonder if anyone knows of or can advise on the following: I have been asked by a client to embed a font on their website - this is a custom made truetype font, also something I have not been asked to do before. I have therefore took to my books/research to look it up but am coming across conflicting information. I am finding information on the internet and in the books that says [at]font-face has been deprecated in css2.1 but have found many references to web fonts for css3 using [at]font-face but with reference to little or no browser support! I wonder if anyone has come across this recently, has a working solution or can advise or clarify? Many thanks in advance, Sarah *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] [at]font-face confusion
Hi Sarah, Try using SIFR, it uses flash to render the font and then degrades nicely if end user does not have Flash plugin or javascript enabled. http://www.mikeindustries.com/blog/sifr/ Cheers Chris -- Chris Wharton www.cdwharton.com On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Love Web Design [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I wonder if anyone knows of or can advise on the following: I have been asked by a client to embed a font on their website - this is a custom made truetype font, also something I have not been asked to do before. I have therefore took to my books/research to look it up but am coming across conflicting information. I am finding information on the internet and in the books that says [at]font-face has been deprecated in css2.1 but have found many references to web fonts for css3 using [at]font-face but with reference to little or no browser support! I wonder if anyone has come across this recently, has a working solution or can advise or clarify? Many thanks in advance, Sarah *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] [at]font-face confusion
On 14 Jul 2008, at 13:33, Love Web Design wrote: I have been asked by a client to embed a font on their website - this is a custom made truetype font, also something I have not been asked to do before. I have therefore took to my books/research to look it up but am coming across conflicting information. I am finding information on the internet and in the books that says [at]font-face has been deprecated in css2.1 but have found many references to web fonts for css3 using [at]font-face but with reference to little or no browser support! Brief history: * Introduced in CSS 2 * Not well implemented * Removed in CSS 2.1 * Push for it to appear in CSS 3 I believe that some support is there in Opera and Safari. I wonder if anyone has come across this recently, has a working solution or can advise or clarify? If it is body text, forget about it. If it is for small bits of text (headings and the like) then you might consider sFIR (search engines will tell you more). -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk/ http://blog.dorward.me.uk/ *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] [at]font-face confusion
Maybe sIFR will help? See documentation: http://wiki.novemberborn.net/sifr/ Michal On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Love Web Design [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I wonder if anyone knows of or can advise on the following: I have been asked by a client to embed a font on their website - this is a custom made truetype font, also something I have not been asked to do before. I have therefore took to my books/research to look it up but am coming across conflicting information. I am finding information on the internet and in the books that says [at]font-face has been deprecated in css2.1 but have found many references to web fonts for css3 using [at]font-face but with reference to little or no browser support! I wonder if anyone has come across this recently, has a working solution or can advise or clarify? Many thanks in advance, Sarah *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] [at]font-face confusion
The @font-face rule does appear in CSS 2.0, but not in 2.1. CSS 2.1 is a revision of CSS 2.0 made in response to a lack of implementation of certain features in CSS 2.0, so 2.1 closer resembles what is implemented. (however still plenty in 2.1 that is not perfectly implemented) @font-face reappears in CSS3 as you point out. In terms of browser support, Internet explorer has supported @font-face since IE 5.5. However, only the proprietary .EOT font format is supported. There is a free tool available on microsoft's website for creating EOT files. More information about this tool is available here: http://www.microsoft.com/typography/web/embedding/weft3/default.htm Netscape version 6 (I think) supported @font-face, but support was removed from mozilla by the time firefox rolled around, and has not been added back to this day. Safari has supported @font-face for truetype fonts since version 3.1. This may encourage other browsers to follow suit, probably beginning with opera (if they have not already done so), and eventually firefox. On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Love Web Design [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I wonder if anyone knows of or can advise on the following: I have been asked by a client to embed a font on their website - this is a custom made truetype font, also something I have not been asked to do before. I have therefore took to my books/research to look it up but am coming across conflicting information. I am finding information on the internet and in the books that says [at]font-face has been deprecated in css2.1 but have found many references to web fonts for css3 using [at]font-face but with reference to little or no browser support! I wonder if anyone has come across this recently, has a working solution or can advise or clarify? Many thanks in advance, Sarah *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] [at]font-face confusion
Sorry I gave some bad version numbers here. (I was pulling numbers out my ass, memory is difficult) embedded font support actually began in IE4, and netscape 4. As I pointed out, it is not currently supported in firefox, (including firefox 3) However other typography solutions exist such as SIFR. (google it) On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The @font-face rule does appear in CSS 2.0, but not in 2.1. CSS 2.1 is a revision of CSS 2.0 made in response to a lack of implementation of certain features in CSS 2.0, so 2.1 closer resembles what is implemented. (however still plenty in 2.1 that is not perfectly implemented) @font-face reappears in CSS3 as you point out. In terms of browser support, Internet explorer has supported @font-face since IE 5.5. However, only the proprietary .EOT font format is supported. There is a free tool available on microsoft's website for creating EOT files. More information about this tool is available here: http://www.microsoft.com/typography/web/embedding/weft3/default.htm Netscape version 6 (I think) supported @font-face, but support was removed from mozilla by the time firefox rolled around, and has not been added back to this day. Safari has supported @font-face for truetype fonts since version 3.1. This may encourage other browsers to follow suit, probably beginning with opera (if they have not already done so), and eventually firefox. On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Love Web Design [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I wonder if anyone knows of or can advise on the following: I have been asked by a client to embed a font on their website - this is a custom made truetype font, also something I have not been asked to do before. I have therefore took to my books/research to look it up but am coming across conflicting information. I am finding information on the internet and in the books that says [at]font-face has been deprecated in css2.1 but have found many references to web fonts for css3 using [at]font-face but with reference to little or no browser support! I wonder if anyone has come across this recently, has a working solution or can advise or clarify? Many thanks in advance, Sarah *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] [at]font-face confusion
On Mon, July 14, 2008 10:56 pm, Breton Slivka wrote: Netscape version 6 (I think) supported @font-face, but support was removed from mozilla by the time firefox rolled around, and has not been added back to this day. From memory Netscape used Bitstream's proprietary TrueDoc technology. Other approaches from that period were server based solutions such as GlyphGate. -- Andrew Cunningham Research and Development Coordinator Vicnet State Library of Victoria Australia [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] visibility problem in ie...z-index maybe?
hi,
im using negative margins to put a png half over the edge of a wrapper
div.
Works good in ff, but breaks the layout in ie.
Is there anything i can do to get ie to display the
div like fire fox does or is this to tall an order for ie?
-best
kevin
http://pattersons.s34978.gridserver.com/indexnew1.html
heres the css of the div with the image:
#kitchenhead{ z-index:999;
width:200px;
height:100px;
margin-top:-35px;
padding-top:40px;
background-image:url(../images/kitchen.png);
background-position: 0 0;
overflow:visible;
background-repeat:no-repeat;
}
heres the css for the div that its going under at the moment:
#shellhead
{
background-image: url(../images/yellowtopshad.png);
background-repeat:repeat-x;
width:999px;
margin:0 auto;
padding-top:20px;
}
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
RE: [WSG] Centered List
Thanks for your reply but this doesn't solve my problem as the size list will be controlled by a CMS. This means that there may be times when there are 7 options and there may be times when are 3 options. I somehow need to center the li elements without affecting other textual content within the containing div. I am trying by best to keep the HTML clean and I don't want to add any unnecessary divs within the main div. div id=content p class=confirmKnee length Puff Ball has been added to your basket! a href=View Basket/a/p div id=productDetails h2Knee Length Puff Ball br / £320.00em Now £290.00/em/h2 pPraesent in odio. Curabitur quam turpis, placerat sit amet, elementum ut, molestie at, velit. Quisque ultrices odio pellentesque erat. Sed sit amet purus eu leo lacinia ultrices. Vivamus lectus magna, imperdiet non, interdum tempus, dapibus vel, quam. Aliquam ut massa. Fusce rhoncus iaculis metus. Donec sollicitudin justo pharetra ligula. /p h3Choose your size:/h3 ol id=sizeList lia href=xs/a/li lia href=s/a/li lia href=m/a/li lia href=l/a/li lia href=xl/a/li lia href=2xl/a/li lia href=3xl/a/li /ol p input type=submit class=button title=add to basket name=add to basket / /p p Has your size sold out? a href=Find out when it will be back in stock./a br / Not sure what to choose? a href=See our size chart./a br / Know someone who would love this? a href=Email to a friend./a br / Or are you after someone else? a href=See more Littel Black Dresses./a /p /div From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam Sherlock Sent: 14 July 2008 13:07 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Centered List have a look at http://www.accessify.com/tools-and-wizards/developer-tools/list-o-matic/ I think your going to need to set the width of the ol (and the li inbetween) set the margin of your ol to someing like margin: 5px auto; get firefox+firebug as it will allow you to test styles in firebug which you can then move to the actual css hth - S 2008/7/14 Tyrone Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, This is my first post and I am fairly new to CSS. I'd like some help positioning a floated list. The image link is an example of that the design should look like (http://www.datadial.net/test/bb-example.gif ). The problem I am having is that I can float the list items to get them to sit side by side but the list needs to be centred in the column. Some products will have fewer size options (ie. I don't know the total width). ol id=sizeList lia href=xs/a/li lia href=s/a/li lia href=m/a/li lia href=l/a/li lia href=xl/a/li lia href=2xl/a/li lia href=3xl/a/li /ol Any idea on how I should approach this would be welcome. Thanks Tyrone *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] visibility problem in ie...z-index maybe?
2008/7/14 kevin mcmonagle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hi,
im using negative margins to put a png half over the edge of a wrapper
div.
Works good in ff, but breaks the layout in ie.
Is there anything i can do to get ie to display the
div like fire fox does or is this to tall an order for ie?
-best
kevin
http://pattersons.s34978.gridserver.com/indexnew1.html
#kitchenhead{ z-index:999;
width:200px;
height:100px;
margin-top:-35px;
padding-top:40px;
background-image:url(../images/kitchen.png);
background-position: 0 0;
overflow:visible;
background-repeat:no-repeat;
}
heres the css for the div that its going under at the moment:
#shellhead
{
background-image: url(../images/yellowtopshad.png);
background-repeat:repeat-x;
width:999px;
margin:0 auto;
padding-top:20px;
}
Hi Kevin,
You might be better off using
position: relative;
top: -35px;
instead of the negative margin
I've only tested it in FF and IE7, but can see any reason why it
wouldn't work in older versions of IE as well..
David
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
[WSG] [at]font-face confusion
Thank you to everyone You have helped a lot, I have spent the afternoon finding a solution which I shall now implement - with luck :) Sarah *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] visibility problem in ie...z-index maybe?
Thanks David, That works well in ie 6 7. I only had to add a negative margin in a conditional comment to the div that was getting pushed up. -best kevin David Owens wrote: Hi Kevin, You might be better off using position: relative; top: -35px; instead of the negative margin *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Centered List
2008/7/14 Tyrone Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks for your reply but this doesn't solve my problem as the size list
will be controlled by a CMS. This means that there may be times when there
are 7 options and there may be times when are 3 options.
I somehow need to center the li elements without affecting other textual
content within the containing div. I am trying by best to keep the HTML
clean and I don't want to add any unnecessary divs within the main div.
Hi Tyrone,
I've been playing around for this, and have a pretty good looking
solution for you.
ul
lia href=#one/a/li
li
two
a href=#sold out/a
/li
lia href=#three/a/li
/ul
ul {
margin: 0;
text-align: center;
}
li {
display: inline-block;
border: 1px solid black;
padding: 5px;
margin: 5px;
vertical-align: top;
}
a {
display: block;
}
Plus you will need to send this to IE, preferably using conditional comments:
li {
zoom: 1;
display: inline;
}
Works in FF, IE 5.5, 6 and 7, Opera 9.5 and Safari 3 on PC. I haven't
looked at anything on a Mac yet.
Regards
David
http://fineartdavid.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
[WSG] input type image
I have a question in regards to styling a submit button.
I have the following HTML
input name=doSearch type=image id=btnGo value=GO
src=/certainedge/_resource/generic/image/btn_go.jpg alt=GO
Please note: I'm more than happy for the HTML markup to change, to
achieve the desired effect.
Following is the CSS I used, which I hoped would change the image, but
it doesn't.
input#btnGo {
background: url(/proximer/_resource/generic/image/btn_go.jpg)!important
top left no-repeat;
}
Would it be acceptable to just use a input of type submit and leave
the value empty?
input name=btnGo type=submit id=btnGo
--
Kind regards,
Taco Fleur
clickfind™ - The new Australian Online Marketing Platform (OMP)
http://www.clickfind.com.au
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Re: [WSG] input type image
Taco Fleur wrote: I have a question in regards to styling a submit button. I have the following HTML input name=doSearch type=image id=btnGo value=GO src=/certainedge/_resource/generic/image/btn_go.jpg alt=GO Would it be acceptable to just use a input of type submit and leave the value empty? you could use: button type='submitspanSubmit/span/button then shift the span off the page and style the button with a sprite - this gets around having an empty value -- Chris Knowles *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] input type image
Taco Fleur wrote:
I have a question in regards to styling a submit button.
I have the following HTML
input name=doSearch type=image id=btnGo value=GO
src=/certainedge/_resource/generic/image/btn_go.jpg alt=GO
Following is the CSS I used, which I hoped would change the image, but
it doesn't.
input#btnGo {
background: url(/proximer/_resource/generic/image/btn_go.jpg)!important
top left no-repeat;
}
It probably works, but the background image is neatly covered by the
actual image of the button itself.
Would it be acceptable to just use a input of type submit and leave
the value empty?
input name=btnGo type=submit id=btnGo
Not really, as the value in the case of these buttons is the actual
label (that would, for instance, be read out by screen readers).
What are you actually trying to achieve?
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
__
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Re: [WSG] input type image
That looks like it did the trick, had to pull the button up a bit with
position: relative;
top: -3px;
I'm not sure why.
Anyways, I ended up with
button#btnGo {
background: url(/proximer/_resource/generic/image/btn_go.jpg) top
left no-repeat;
border: none;
width: 26px;
height: 20px;
cursor: pointer;
position: relative;
top: -3px;
}
button#btnGo span {
position: relative;
left: -3000px;
}
Cheers
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Chris Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taco Fleur wrote:
I have a question in regards to styling a submit button.
I have the following HTML
input name=doSearch type=image id=btnGo value=GO
src=/certainedge/_resource/generic/image/btn_go.jpg alt=GO
Would it be acceptable to just use a input of type submit and leave
the value empty?
you could use:
button type='submitspanSubmit/span/button
then shift the span off the page and style the button with a sprite - this
gets around having an empty value
--
Chris Knowles
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
--
Kind regards,
Taco Fleur
clickfind™ - The new Australian Online Marketing Platform (OMP)
http://www.clickfind.com.au
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Re: [WSG] input type image
chris's suggestion looks simluar to particletree's rediscovered button
element
button type='submitspanSubmit/span/button
http://particletree.com/features/rediscovering-the-button-element/
2008/7/15 Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Taco Fleur wrote:
I have a question in regards to styling a submit button.
I have the following HTML
input name=doSearch type=image id=btnGo value=GO
src=/certainedge/_resource/generic/image/btn_go.jpg alt=GO
Following is the CSS I used, which I hoped would change the image, but
it doesn't.
input#btnGo {
background:
url(/proximer/_resource/generic/image/btn_go.jpg)!important
top left no-repeat;
}
It probably works, but the background image is neatly covered by the
actual image of the button itself.
Would it be acceptable to just use a input of type submit and leave
the value empty?
input name=btnGo type=submit id=btnGo
Not really, as the value in the case of these buttons is the actual label
(that would, for instance, be read out by screen readers).
What are you actually trying to achieve?
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
__
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Re: [WSG] [at]font-face confusion
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:27:18 +0100, Love Web Design wrote: Thank you to everyone You have helped a lot, I have spent the afternoon finding a solution which I shall now implement - with luck :) If it works out, can you please share? Cordially, David -- *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] Out of Office AutoReply: WSG Digest
Thanks for your email. I'm out of the office today and will get back to you on my return tomorrow. If your enquiry is urgent you can contact the main office: [EMAIL PROTECTED], tel: 0161 234 2955. _ Ben Le Jeune Marketing Services Manager Arts About Manchester T: 0161 234 2963 F: 0161 234 2966 W: www.aam.org.uk This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl - www.blackspider.com *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
RE: [WSG] [at]font-face confusion
Hi David, I most certainly will, but obviously would like to try it/test it first :) Best for now, Sarah -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Hucklesby Sent: 15 July 2008 02:14 To: Love Web Design Subject: Re: [WSG] [at]font-face confusion On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:27:18 +0100, Love Web Design wrote: Thank you to everyone You have helped a lot, I have spent the afternoon finding a solution which I shall now implement - with luck :) If it works out, can you please share? Cordially, David -- *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
