Re[2]: [WSG] Why is deprecated?
Hello. Is underline really needed? What for? --- С уважением, Алексей Новиков. Электронная почта: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://blog.micromarketing.ru/ Действительно интересный блог об интернете, маркетинге, рекламе и PR своими руками *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [WSG] an accessible question: server-side vs client-side validation
Why client-side *VS* server side? Why *versus*? They must work together. 1. We cannot dismiss server-side validation for security reasons. So, server-side validaion should stay. 2. Client-side script is usable. It checks the form before submission, saves user's time and improves user experience. Example here: http://blog.micromarketing.ru/contacts/ (In Russian, but I hope you'll find the form :) ) And, I believe, client-side validation decreases server load. It decreases the quantity of invalid forms submitted by users. If the form is valid, server doesn't have to handle errors, send error-page, etc. --- Regards, Alexey Novikov http://studiomade.ru *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Styling forms
Chris Knowles wrote: CK> yes, but my point was that a lot of js libraries base drag and drop CK> re-ordering of elements around list elements and not other elements. And CK> I have noticed a lot of form building services use lists to markup forms CK> because they require drag and drop re-ordering of form elements. So I'm CK> suggesting they are only using list elements because they can add drag CK> and drop easily by using an external library that supports it, not CK> because they think lists are necessarily a good markup choice. So this is the problem of those JS libraries. Do we really need to break semantics because of this problem? I prefer fixing JS instead. Regards, Alexey Novikov http://studiomade.ru *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [WSG] Styling forms
Chris Knowles wrote: CK> from what I can see the reason lists have come into use in forms has a CK> lot to do with javascript libraries that have re-ordering of elements by CK> drag and drop that tend to work mainly on lists. Therefore lists are CK> useful to wrap form elements if you are creating form building software CK> so the form elements can be easily reordered by non-technical users. I suppose that form elements can be easily reordered even if form elements are not LI-wrapped. Can't they? Regards, Alexey Novikov http://studiomade.ru *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Styling forms
On Behalf Of Thierry Koblentz Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 10:29 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Styling forms TK> fwiw, I think BRs are the perfect fit. BRs? Are BRs semantically correct? I believe they aren't. -- Regards, Alexey Novikov http://studiomade.ru *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
