RE: [WSG] critque

2004-06-19 Thread Alan Harrison
Hi Ryan,

Don't know if you've noticed it or not, but on the
http://www.moreofthesame.com/notes/notes.htm page, your link
http://http://www.freetranslation.com is broken !


-Alan.

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



RE: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders using Character Entity Evasion

2004-06-04 Thread Alan Harrison
I have been using the obfuscation method for some time now, and while it may
not totally eliminate spam harvesting, IMHO it certainly does slow the
harvesting down.

I have used the javascript method also, with the addition of a gif
displaying the e-mail address for folks that have javascript disabled. I
have found this to be effective also.

Mark is quite correct when he says that complex e-mail harvesters will
probably work around these methods, but it appears that most of the
harvesting is done by very basic programs that are looking only for e-mail
addresses stored in conventional format.

 Guys hate to rain on your parade but if your browser can 
 understand that obfuscation what makes you think that a email 
 address harvester is not going to be able to?
 
 These guys are writing complex viruses that harvest email 
 addresses directly from people's Outlook contact lists, 
 surely they can understand a little javascript and work with 
 character entities.

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
*