Re: [WSG] RE: [BULK] WSG Digest

2009-03-16 Thread Andrew Duck
Couldn't agree more. 

Regards, 
Andrew 


andrew duck 
executive director | asia-pacific | quiqcorp.com 
155 high street | po box 6363 | christchurch 8011 new zealand 
p +64 3 341 7692 | f +64 3 341 7693 | m +64 212 934 985 (nz) | e 
andrew.d...@quiqcorp.com 

- Original Message - 
From: kie...@humdingerdesigns.co.uk 
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org 
Sent: Monday, 16 March, 2009 5:14:27 PM GMT +07:00 Bangkok, Hanoi, Jakarta 
Subject: RE: [WSG] RE: [BULK] WSG Digest 

I agree with this bloke - it's starting to look like blatant advertising. 

www.humdingerdesigns.co.uk 


-Original Message- 
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On 
Behalf Of Glen Wallis 
Sent: 16 March 2009 08:10 
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org 
Subject: [WSG] RE: [BULK] WSG Digest 

Am I the only person on this list who is sick of the constant and blatant 
advertising for this Content Management System? Don't we have rules against 
this? If so, they are not being enforced. 

-Original Message- 
From: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:w...@webstandardsgroup.org] 
Sent: Monday, 16 March 2009 6:42 PM 
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org 
Subject: [BULK] WSG Digest 
Importance: Low 

* 
WEB STANDARDS GROUP MAIL LIST DIGEST 
* 


From: Sigurd Magnusson  
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:10:09 +1300 
Subject: Re: Browser Backwards Compatibility -- How far back? 

Most websites we build at SilverStripe have IE 6.0 as a minimum, and even 
then, we're unpatiently anticipating the time when we can drop IE 6. 

FireFox (2), Safari (3), Chrome (latest) users are more encouraged to keep 
up to the latest versions, and have more aggressive update mechanisms, so we 
just use the bracketed versions as minimum. 

We have not given thought to Netscape for years. 

The same applies to when we're working on the administration interface of 
our open source SilverStripe CMS (www.silverstripe.org.) 

Cheers, 
Sig. 


On 15/03/2009, at 8:32 PM,  wrote: 

> * 
> WEB STANDARDS GROUP MAIL LIST DIGEST 
> * 
> 
> 
> From: Brett Patterson  
> Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:19:00 -0400 
> Subject: Browser Backwards Compatibility -- How far back? 
> 
> Hi all, 
> 
> I was just reading from a book that talked about some code that would 
> not work in Internet Explorer 3.0, but would in Internet Explorer 4.0 
> and later, and Netscape Navigator 3.0 and later. This brought up a 
> question that I could not find direct and consistent answers while 
> searching the Internet...so, how far back would it be acceptable to 
> design for, when it comes to backwards browser compatibility? I have 
> been told from some sites, that Internet Explorer 5.0/later and 
> Netscape Navigator 4.0/later, as well as Firefox 1.5/later and Opera 
> 6.0/later. Is this correct? 
> 
> -- 

* 
From: James Jeffery  
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:44:56 + 
Subject: Blueprint & Grids 

After reading 'Transcending CSS' I have learnt that grids are not a 
replacement for table based layouts (as has been drummed into me by so 
called evangelists on IRC). I understand the importance of grids in print 
and non-web media and now want to start using them. 

I've started using Blueprint. I quickily scrolled through the CSS file and 
got a grasp for it. 

My problem is this. In the book I am seeing examples where they are using 4 
and 5 columns. I have developed a layout, which uses the divine proportion. 
So far I have the container, and 2 divs. Now, within these grids do I use 
more columns to go with the layout and structure of the design? And if so, 
how can I overlap? For example, in the "main-content" area I might have 5 
columns, now lets say using Blueprint and my own CSS I want to use 4 columns 
for the content and 1 for meta date per article. How do I use all 4 and 
leave the one? 

Sounds like a silly, vaugue, question ... I know. But I'm a little taken by 
this and am eager to learn because I feel this is going to greatly boost 
productivity. 

Thanks 

-- 
James Jeffery 
Web Developer and iPhone Applications Developer 
m: 07964722061 


** 
Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm 
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm 
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org 
** 






*** 
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.or

[WSG] An interesting take....

2008-09-11 Thread Andrew Duck
Jeff Croft posted an interesting comment on the state of the HTML WG/Web 
standards. 

http://jeffcroft.com/blog/2008/sep/11/two-thousand-twenty-two/ 

Regards, 
Andrew 


andrew duck 
executive director | asia-pacific | quiqcorp.com 
unit 4, 243 blenheim rd | riccarton, christchurch 8041 new zealand 
p +64 3 341 7692 | f +64 3 341 7693 | m +64 212 934 985 (nz) | e [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***