[WSG] Is the W3C confused!? XHTML HTTP specs contradict each other

2004-08-30 Thread Jason Grunstra
When validating an XHTML strict page the form method attribute gives an
error back explaining that it is case sensitive and needs to be either
get or post

Example:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2F209.200.68.105%2Fform_method_UC.htmcharset=%28detect+automatically%29doctype=%28detect+automatically%29ss=1verbose=1

And here are results after fixing the case-sensitive verb:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2F209.200.68.105%2Fform_method_LC.htmcharset=%28detect+automatically%29doctype=%28detect+automatically%29ss=1verbose=1

But the W3's own specs say that the HTTP verbs ARE INDEED Case Sensitive
and need to be all caps!! Here:
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/Methods.html


What gives?!? Which Spec is right? XHTML or HTTP?


On IIS using method verbs of the wrong case can result in an error Bad
Request (Invalid Verb)

http://support.microsoft.com/?id=828726


-Jason
http://www.sixside.com/

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



[WSG] Your opinion and feedback requested

2004-04-28 Thread Jason Grunstra
I just completed my first fully web-standards compliant website and would
appreciate any feedback. Anything from usability, layout, colors,
readability, etc... all is fair game. I appreciate your time and feedback.

http://www.sentinare.com/


-Jason


*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
*