Re: [WSG] Lengthy form buttons

2005-12-07 Thread Tim Burgan

Hi Nick,

Does button type=submit still submit a form by default, or does it 
require javascript to do so?


If it doesn't require javascript.. why doesn't everyone use button 
type=submit?


Tim



Nick Cowie wrote:

One way around this is to use button type=submit instead of input 
type=submit


The button tag offers far more opportunity to style than input, and 
allows you to include an image inside a button tag.


The buttons look the same  in all modern browsers regadless of OS.

Did a little experimenting here: 
http://nickcowie.com/2005/stylish-accessible-buttons/ 
http://nickcowie.com/2005/stylish-accessible-buttons/





--
Nick Cowie
http://nickcowie.com 



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Lengthy form buttons

2005-12-07 Thread Tim Burgan

Thanks Nick,

   Nick Cowie wrote:


The button element is the new kid on the block it was only
introduced in 1997 with HTML 4.0
http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-html40-970708/interact/forms.html#edef-BUTTON 
input has be around a lot longer.

http://nickcowie.com


No kidding!
RIP: input type=submit /
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] news scroller and standards

2005-11-15 Thread Tim Burgan

As a nice looking example: Apple's news ticker www.apple.com.
Tim


The Visual Process wrote:

As pointed out already there are plenty of Javascript options which 
are standards compliant, try google.
However scrollers look horrible, you may want to go for something like 
they have one the bbc news website, http://news.bbc.co.uk/ (see 
LATEST:) not only is it easier to read than scrolling text it looks 
better overall.





**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] CSS and PHP

2005-11-14 Thread Tim Burgan

Just a quick note that'll help:

In the URL, the special characters (such as ampersands, question marks, 
etc) need to be converted to html character entities. You can find 
entity codes from:

http://www.ascii.cl/htmlcodes.htm

For example:
ampersand can be #38; or amp;
question mark is #63;

Therefore your code is:
$myurl = 'testdate.php#63;houseID={$housename}#38;changeID={$changeover}';

You can also do this automatically by using the PHP function 
htmlspecialchars() [1]

[1] http://php.net/manual/en/function.htmlspecialchars.php

Tim

designer wrote:


$myurl=testdate.php#63;houseID=$housename#38;changeID=$changeover;





**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



[WSG] Visited links

2005-11-11 Thread Tim Burgan




In CSS, if I style
my visited links so they are purple, as so...

 a:visited { color: purple; }

...once the user has visited a particular link, from then on the color
for that link will not be purple.

Once the content for that visited page is updated, does the browser
realise the linked page has changed and link color change back to it's
previous state?

No it does not, the browser still thinks that link is visited. Problem!


Do you have any suggestions as to how to overcome this?


Tim





[WSG] Bridging the gap in IE

2005-11-07 Thread Tim Burgan

Hi,

I'm using image replacement on a H1 element. The problem I'm having is
that the content under the H1 is fine in Firefox, but is pushed much
further down the page in IE6. An example shows it clearly:

HTML: http://timburgan.com/css-test/index.htm
CSS: http://timburgan.com/css-test/css/style.css

Is this a common issue, because I always seem to run into it?
Does anyone have any ideas as to what this is caused by and how to
overcome this?


Regards

Tim



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



[WSG] XHTML as text/html what Tantek said.

2005-10-26 Thread Tim Burgan




Hi,

Can someone please inform me about the disadvantages about the fact the
XHTML is served as text/html to IE?

(1) What does this mean?
(2) Is it only IE?
(3) Isn't HTML 4 or XHTML Transitional served as text/html?
(4) Why does it matter that XHTML Strict should be served as
application-xml-whatever?

Thanks for taking the time to help.

I remember Tantek saying at WE05 that if you're serious you should be
using XHTML Strict all the time. So why then does tantek.com use
HTML4.01 strict not XHTML?

Thanks

Tim





Re: [WSG] Checking in as many browsers as possible

2004-12-19 Thread Tim Burgan
Hi Wayne,
Wayne Godfrey wrote:
Am I having Firefox problems because the latest Netscape is also on my Mac
OSX (Panther) as well? The latest version of Firefox has been acting
strangely ever since I installed Netscape (or thereabouts). I can't seem to
quit Firefox without it remaining in the menu and is unusable without a
reboot (I also get no force quit option on the dock) . It also, quite
often, doesn't load any page on startup, though it is suppose to.
Create a new issue relating to your problem on Bugzilla [1]. Bugzilla is 
the official bug tracker for all Mozilla software.
You could also make a post on the Mozillazine [2] official Firefox 
forums. Someone may have a solution to this issue.

[1] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/
[2] http://forums.mozillazine.org/
Tim
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Checking in as many browsers as possible

2004-12-19 Thread Tim Burgan
I was going to make a post about browsers also, but it fits directly 
into your post also...

Is it necessary to test the same browser on different platforms (e.g. 
IE6 on Win2000 AND WinXP), or ok to just test all available windows 
browsers in XP?

Tim
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


[WSG] repositioning markup

2004-12-16 Thread Tim Burgan
Hello,
If I have an XHTML document containing tags in the order:
h1Heading One/h1
pParagraph/p
h2Heading Two/h2
pParagraph/p
How are these tags styled with CSS so that there are positioned in and 
out of order on the page with no relation to each other.. but when 
viewed in a text browser it viewed in it's original order.

Thanks
Tim
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


[WSG] Learning to design Accessibility

2004-11-25 Thread Tim Burgan
Hi,
I've done freelance work using standards for a few years, but now due to 
study I'm looking to get some casual web design work in Adelaide.

I know and use standards, and I understand the need for accessibility, 
but I don't know how or what need to be implemented to meet 
accessibility needs.

Is there a resource that's available that is able to fill the gaps in my 
knowledge regarding accessibility?

Thanks for your time.
Tim
--
Tim Burgan.
Website Development  Graphic Design
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W www.timburgan.com

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Learning to design Accessibility

2004-11-25 Thread Tim Burgan
This is brilliant!
Thanks for the kick-start everyone.
Tim
--
Tim Burgan.
Website Development  Graphic Design
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W www.timburgan.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Drop Shadow

2004-11-24 Thread Tim Burgan
Nick Gleitzman wrote:
Matt, create 3 bg images for your shadow - one for the header, which 
is the top (altho you don't really have a top) and a bit of the RHS, 
one for the main body (and this is the key) which is the RHS but only 
needs to be 5 or 10px high - and set it to repeat vertically - and one 
for the footer, which is a bit of the RHS, plus the bottom.

You'll need to use the imgs as bgs in the header, main and footer 
divs, as opposed to the container div...a little lateral thinking with 
padding and/or margins and you should be fine.

Hi Matt,
I've implemented what you're looking for in the same way that Nick 
describes, and have been very happy with the result.

Andy Budd's website [1] uses this technique if you want to see a 
real-word example in action.

[1] http://www.andybudd.com/
Tim
--
Tim Burgan.
Website Development  Graphic Design
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W www.timburgan.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**